Bryn Mawr Classical Review

Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2012.01.33


Reviewed by Mattia De Poli, Università degli Studi di Padova (



Antonio Martina (“Il mito di Elettra e l’ideazione drammatica nell’Elettra di Euripide”) traces step by step the development of Electra’s mythical figure from archaic epos (Homeric poems and the epic cycle) to Euripides’ Electra and Orestes, going through earlier lyric and tragic poetry (Xanthus, Stesichorus, Aeschylus, Sophocles). He mainly focuses on Euripides and his innovative approach to the mythical subject in comparison with Stesichorus and Aeschylus.

Giuseppina Basta Donzelli (“La parodo dello Ione di Euripide”) offers an analysis of the parodos in Euripides’ Ion and investigates its relationship with the sculptural decoration of the pediment on the temple of Apollo at Delphi . Tales about Heracles, Bellerophon and the Gigantomachy are quickly evoked by the chorus, probably because spectators knew them well. Basta Donzelli notes some inaccuracies in the description of the actual Delphi pediment and deals with the dramaturgical meaning of such a parodos within this tragedy. She supports her text with an iconographical appendix of 11 figures.

Paolo Cipolla (“Due testimonia relative a Pratina di Fliunte (Dioscoride, AP 7.707; Pap. Petrie 2.49.B.20-24)”) gives a detailed reading of a fictional epigram for Sositheus in order to derive information about the works of Pratinas and the development of satyric drama, from Sophocles to the Hellenistic Age. Cipolla then suggests that the lacuna in Pap. Petrie 2.49.B.20 could be filled simply by an allusion to the genre of Pratinas’ works (satyric plays) instead of a single title. Finally he adds additional arguments (“post scriptum”) against the famous Pratinas’ hyporchema as a part of a satyric drama:1 lyric poetry was at least an influence on this choral song.

Patrizia Mureddu (“Il processo a Socrate nell’Apologia di Platone”) deals with Plato’s skilful way of presenting Socrates’ character within his Apology: Mureddu argues that this dialogue gives the appearance of artlessness , while in fact nothing was said by chance and Plato looks like a wise playwright who mixed tragic and comic tones. Finally, she marks important differences between Apology of Socrates by Plato and Apology of Palamedes by Gorgias regarding the choices of the speaking character and their effects on the hearers.

Gian Franco Nieddu (“Un medico per commensale: il discorso di Erissimaco nel Simposio di Platone”) focuses on Eryximachus’ speech in Plato’s Symposium. This character was portrayed by the ancient philosopher as a young, self-confident iatrosophistes, who promoted medicine as the most important science but misunderstood both Heraclitus’ theory about the opposite elements and Aristophanes’ tragicomic asking for help against hiccup. As a result, Plato presented his well-read and well-defined speech as at the same time emphatic and forced.


Luigi Leurini (“Βοῦς Κύπριος εἶ. Gli animali nei proverbi delle commedie di Menandro”) collects a wide range of proverbs taken from Menander’s comedy, gathered by animal. Leurini also tries both to examine their range and the evolution in their meaning and to suggest the contexts in which they were inserted and their dramaturgical function.

Adele Teresa Cozzoli (“L’Ecale di Callimaco e la poesia ‘di nuovo stile’”) considers the narrative technique in Callimachus’ Ecale, finds some theatrical reminiscences and investigates their functions in epic poetry. She mainly focuses on the two speaking birds and points out the features of Hellenistic epic poetry in comparison with archaic epic, such as realism and contamination among different traditional genres. Cozzoli analyses this ‘new style’ looking at both content and language.

Maria Pia Pattoni (“Riusi epico-tragici e distanziazioni parodiche nei Pastoralia di Longo”) deals with the influence of tragedy on Longus’ Pastoralia: such a contamination between tragic and bucolic tones usually produced comic effects. The novelist also took the Homeric epos as a model for his work: in any case , the different context and genre implied a shift in pathos.

Tristano Gargiulo (“Un caso di intertestualità nel Romanzo di Alessandro: i fraintendimenti di β e γ rispetto ad A”) focuses on both the textual discrepancies between the several versions of the Alexander Romance and the differences in meaning they implied: the main character, for example, is not presented everywhere in the same way. So Gargiulo argues that one version is not more correct than the others and that editors of the Alexander Romance should keep this matter in mind.

Finally, Vittorio Citti (“Conclusioni”) sums up the content of each paper and underlines the wide range of topics on Attic drama and its later echoes that this book offers to its readers.



1.   Cipolla contests the arguments supported by Giovan Battista D’Alessio, Ἢν ἰδού: Ecce Satyri (Pratina, PMG 708 = TrGF 4 F 3). Alcune considerazioni sull’uso della deissi nei testi lirici e teatrali, in Franca Perusino, Maria Colantonio (eds.), Dalla lirica corale alla poesia drammatica: forme e funzioni del canto corale nella tragedia e nella commedia greca, Edizioni ETS, Pisa, 2007, pp. 95-128.

Comment on this review in the BMCR blog
Read Latest
Index for 2012
Change Greek Display
Books Available for Review
Bryn Mawr Classical Commentaries

HTML generated at 20:40:31, Sunday, 22 January 2012