Jumat, 14 Desember 2012

Debate Material (theme : future war and piece)

di 14.24

sorry, i lost a lot of my data about this materisl, so, i'll just share, some that i can still found and i searches. it's not complete yet. i know there'll be so many arguments beside of this one. so i just share what can i share.!

THBT Peace is out of reach

Peace : the normal, nonwarring condition of a nation, group of nations, or the world. 
Out of reach : inaccessibly located or situated


from war. It has also been noted that history has recorded over 14,600 wars.
And this figure was derived in the mid-1960s. Men seem to invariably go to war
in search of peace. But, the outcome of war usually involves a truce, but always
fails to yield permanent peace. This is because men cannot, and never will, find
the way to peace on their own without outside help. In reality, they have no
chance to achieve world peace. Here is why.

The sheer number of wars down through history suggests there have been precious few years of peace. In a 1935 speech Gen. MacArthur stated: "In the last 3,400 years only 268—less than 1 in 13—have been free from wars. No wonder that Plato, the wisest of all men, once exclaimed, 'Only the dead have seen the end of war'! Where are Babylon, Persia, Carthage, Rome, and Byzantium? They all fell, never to rise again, annihilated at the hands of a more warlike and aggressive people: their cultures memories, their cities ruins."

Because basically one of human’s nature charachteristic is greedy, and never feel satisfied for something
People always want to improve the quality of theirselfs and theirlifes too, so that theycan deserve better.

Based on the development of science, selfishness is from there that we were toddlers egocentrism. Egocentrism is the behavior of children who can not put himself in the position of others. For example: Want to be kept in mind, his opinion should be accepted, expect others to understand him when he did not ever want to understand others.

   Based on the science of anthropology, every human being is to be anthropocentric, which is doing something that is based on self-interest. For example: People do things because they want to meet their needs and satisfy yourself with what is preferred. He was in touch with other people to realize what is wanted. Humans are social creatures called because the same can not meet its own needs, but the needs of others.

     According to Sigmund Freud human personality structure is divided into three (3), the id, ego, and superego.
         Id is the wildest desires of every person (eating, drinking, sex).
         The superego is the norms outside ourselves.
         The ego is our self that is decided, whether we prefer the id or the ego and how id be satisfied with considering the superego.
     When a person is too concerned with his id, then that person is a person who justifies any means to fulfill their needs. Freud called such people as idish (emphasis his id), and we used to call it selfish.

Because of the human’s selfishness, so that, it imapacted to the others, because  the human never satisfied with everythingthat they have, so that they disturb the others, and it’s the start of a conflict, and conflict means it’s not in a peace condition,

And because a that’s a natural characteristic, so that it’ll not dissapear, and it will always be like that., so that’s why we can’t reach the peace.


Rules Needed for World Peace:
1. Nonviolence - No one has the right to kill anyone else.  Groups of people have no more right to kill than individuals have.  Governments have no right to kill anyone.
2. No Aggression - Lives and land are sacred.  Nations have no right to invade another, kill the people or take their land.
3. Defense - A nation that has a non-repressive government has a right to defend itself from an invasion or revolution.
4. Guilt - The nation that initiates or supports an invasion, revolution or terrorism is the guilty party.  If their army is on another nation's land they are the guilty party.
  The best system for defense is collective defense.
  ... the United Nations ...

In order for the United Nations to be effective, it must give a permanent warning to all nations that the U.N. will come to the aid of any victim of an invasion. ... As of now, the U.N. is not structured to do this.
  Peace Defense basic tenets:
1. No one has the right to kill for any reason except as immediately and unavoidably required to protect human life or national borders.
2 & 3. Adequate defensive forces, in combination with rule number 3, are necessary to prevent aggression and repel the invaders.  A world mutual defense pact (as expressed in the U.N. Charter) and a firm resolve by all members to join together to repel aggression (against any nation that complies with rule number 1) are essential.
4. Citizens must withdraw support for any leader that violates rule number 1.
5. Capital punishment is to be replaced with permanent life imprisonments.
  These are five fundamental moral rules from which other rules can be derived in order to implement them.  Not only do we need the right rules, but we need enough people who understand them and who are concerned enough that they will speak up and demand that the government implement them.

This house would give special treatment to their workers working in conflict area

Treatment : The act, manner, or method of handling or dealing with someone or something
Worker :  One who works at a particular occupation or activity
Conflict :  a struggle or clash between opposing forces or battle
Area : a geographical region; tract


The state must take the responsibility of it’s civil


it’s expensive

that’s their choice to studied there, to worked there, so that they have to take the responsibility of theirself by theirself s\too

the one that have conflict is the local’s civil in that conflict zone, and the conflict that happen is directed to their government, not us.
So that our civil will not fighted by them. And it’s make them ( the locals) will feel treated like someone that will kidnap or kill us.
They’re not in a good emprament and it can make a new conflict between us and the local’s.

THBT One world government will create world peace

Government  :  The act or process of governing, especially the control and administration of public policy in a political unit.


As far as I believe, this divide and conquer method through multiple superpowers is the most effective way for world control. Because this way, the people of the world willingly support the control systems. It’s Us against Them, Democracy vs. Communism, Freedom vs. Terrorism or Christianity vs. Islam. But if you had a One World Government, there could be no longstanding abuse of authority as we see today, because a One World Government could provide no enemy for the people other than the One World Government. If a One World Government tried to operate as a dictatorship, it couldn’t last long. So I ask myself, who has the most to lose if a One World Government came into existence? And I answer myself, the very ones who control our current system of multiple superpowers. I personally have no fear over the creation of a One World Government, for these reasons.
I don’t mind if you disagree with any or all of this. But I will ask you, regarding the Faction 2 Templar charter that you spoke of… how could they possibly put this charter into place, for everyone, without a One World Government?


Therefore, world peace remains as elusive as ever. Seemingly everyone
yearns for it, but no one knows how to obtain it. Why? Why cannot the experienced
leaders and intelligent thinkers of our time find the way to peace? Why
do people understand that the only solution that could bring peace is one world
government yet, at the same time, acknowledge that this is utterly impossible
if left in the hands of men? If men are not capable of governing their own individual
lives, how could they govern the entire world?

Second, the entry will explore debates in contemporary theory. One set of debates is located within international relations theory, between realist and neorealist, ‘international society’, liberal internationalist, republican, and constructivist schools. A second set of discussions about world government is located within contemporary liberal theory, involving the foremost liberal political philosopher of the twentieth century, John Rawls, and his cosmopolitan liberal critics. A third set of debates has emerged among contemporary republican, democratic and critical theorists. There is lively debate within and between these sets of discussions about the feasibility, desirability and necessity of the political project of establishing a world sovereign state with some measure of coercive, centralized global authority. While the idea of world government has experienced an intellectual resurgence in the past five years, it coexists with the concept of “global governance,” which highlights the increasing agency of global civil society and nonstate actors, and deliberately eschews the coercive and centralized components of domestic models of government for looser, decentralized modes of achieving similar functions of government. The conclusion to the entry questions whether global governance without world government in contemporary world conditions can really deliver the goods of global security, universal human rights, social justice, and environmental protection that have made the ideal of world government a persistent if elusive human aspiration.
This house believe that there should be a universal standard of military quality and quantity

Unversal : Of, relating to, extending to, or affecting the entire world or all within the world; worldwide
Standard : something considered by an authority or by general consent as a basis of comparison; an approved model.
Military : Of, relating to, or characteristic of members of the armed forces
Quantity : a particular or indefinite amount of anything


Sll of the country will be in a same class, the same power, and it can prevent war.

No war = peace of the world


Not all state will accepted it,and it is possible if there are some that did’nt do it.
Because not all of yhe country is discipline

The total of people in a country is different in the others.

China : 1.332.451.196 person
Greenland : 56.916 person

America has the strongest navy and air force the world (quantitative), which is as much as 1.559
169 Navy and air force war machine. America has 1.3 million active military personnel, other than that America is the greatest country in the world arms production.

And how can we make a universal standard in every country in that different total local’s there.
And it’s possible too if we fired millions people to follow the standard, because it’ll make a new problem.

0 komentar:

Poskan Komentar


It Girl Template by Ipietoon Blogger Template | Gift Idea