The National Catholic Review

If Roe v. Wade—the 1973 Supreme Court decision that made abortion legal nationwide at virtually any point in a womans pregnancy—were overturned, it is likely that the matter would then be referred to the legislatures of the 50 states and would require campaigns to restrict or outlaw abortion to be waged on a state-by-state basis. In assessing what that effort might look like, it is useful to examine progress on another life issue that has been the subject of state-by-state campaigns for 30-plus years: abolition of the death penalty.   

After the Supreme Court in 1976 allowed states to reinstate the death penalty, 37 states had laws on the books permitting the use of capital punishment, and nearly all of those states have executed a prisoner. Through March 5, 2009, 1,163 prisoners have been put to death, and another 3,308 are on death row. Efforts to repeal the death penalty have been slow-moving. New Jersey abolished capital punishment in 2007, but a bid by Maryland Gov. Martin OMalley, a Catholic, to repeal the death penalty in his state failed March 5, with the state Legislature instead passing a bill requiring stronger evidentiary rules before applying the ultimate sentence.




A Different Analogy. Tom McCluskey, vice president of FRC Action, the legislative arm of the Washington-based Family Research Council, said the effort to ratify amendments to the U.S. Constitution may provide a better analogy for state-by-state campaigns to restrict abortion than efforts to abolish the death penalty. But McCluskey admitted even that analogy isnt perfect, since the language of any constitutional amendment would remain the same when considered by each state, while legislation on abortion would likely vary in each state—as would the degree to which abortion could be successfully restricted. "The lower-hanging fruit is trying to pass more pro-life legislation in the states," McCluskey said. He added that, in the 36 years since Roe v. Wade became law, pro-life networks are "already working in the states" to restrict abortion.

"Each state is different," agreed Mary Spaulding Balch, director of the department of state legislation for the National Right to Life Committee. "Some states have laws on the books that would already say that abortion is illegal, and those are on the books still. There are other states that would have to enact that kind of law."

Uncertain future. What would happen in a Roe v. Wade reversal is far from certain, Balch added. "Theres a lot of scholarly writing in the event of what would happen," she said, like how to enforce a law outlawing abortion that is still on the books but that has been dormant for close to four decades. "Even if there are cases that are wending their way to the court, there will not be a successful challenge to Roe until we can count to five," Balch said, referring to the number of Supreme Court votes needed to overturn Roe v. Wade.

While many imagine a gulf between those who want to overturn current abortion law and those who want to overturn current death penalty law, there is much common ground between the two groups, according to Celeste Fitzgerald, who headed up the eight-year campaign to abolish capital punishment in New Jersey. "New Jerseys effort," Fitzgerald said, "was led by a pro-life Catholic."

Recently by

Letters (December 24, 2012)
Letters (December 17, 2012)
Letters (December 10, 2012)
Letters (November 26, 2012)
Letters (November 12, 2012)

Recently in Signs Of the Times