Threesology Research Journal
Artificial Intelligence and 3sology (56K)
Page 22


AI and 3sology pages:

Artificial Intelligence and 3sology Introduction
pg1 pg2 pg3 pg4 pg5 pg6 pg7 pg8
pg9 pg10 pg11 pg12 pg13 pg14 pg15 pg16
pg17 pg18 pg19 pg20 pg21 pg22 pg23 pg24
pg25 pg26 pg27 pg28 pg29 pg30 pg31 pg32
pg33 pg34 pg35 pg36 pg37 pg38 pg39 pg40
pg41 pg42 pg43 pg44        

The definition of Artificial Intelligence, as taken from its description in the Britannica, is narrowly defined narrative purposely derived into a naive definition, in order to facilitate some hoped-for obtainable goal... but is not set in stone. Once a working model... described by the definition— is reached, a new... or second generation definition can come to the fore. The definition provides for a plausible goal to be obtained:

(Artificial Intelligence is) the ability of a digital computer or computer-controlled robot to perform tasks commonly associated with intelligent beings...

Source: "Artificial Intelligence (AI)." Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, 2013.

Those working in one or another area involving the design of computer software/hardware, like to put a reachable carrot out in front of them, while at the same time using an operable telescopic stick in order to challenge themselves to go the extra mile in attempting to make some new discovery or improvement. The present definition is therefore rather fluidic in that it can be altered to serve the purpose and philosophical position of those in their particular efforts. Unfortunately, examples of artificial intelligence have fallen short of expectations... expectations that have been influenced by science fiction portrayals of highly intelligent robotic entities. However, this is coupled with the introduction of ideas about Artificial Intelligence from influential thinkers who are not directly involved with those attempting to create a "walking-talking" robot whose mannerisms and overall mobility can be mistaken for "humanness"... or some other intelligent and animate life form.

Nonetheless, in an attempted analysis of what is meant by "Intelligence", "Artificial" and "Artificial Intelligence"... all three of which can have separate definitions; our examination of humanity and its presumed "intelligence", appears to be a specific behavioral capacity like the behavioral specificities recognized in other life forms... which appear to be the actions of intelligence— such as the building of dams by beavers, the design of intricate webs by spiders, the geometric architecture of bee hives, flight navigation over long distances by migrating birds, etc... And even though some might want to argue with terms such as "instinct" and behavior modification based on environmental pressures... like rats learning how to run a maze... so too can human intelligence be defined. Social and planetary/galactic environmental influences over long stretches of time have an ability to shape behavior by providing punishments and rewards... even if Historians and Sociologists do not have the breadth of perception to recognize, much less record the events... even if the whole of the public could appreciate such an expanse of knowledge.

In terms of behavior modification due to environmental pressures, human intelligence is an artificiality. Whether a person is viewed as the village idiot or talented, gifted, or as a genius... the intelligence of most people goes unrecognized... either privately or publicly. Humans are a poor judge of intelligence... typically describing one or another quality based on a presumed standard that has not been subjected to any real scrutiny. In other words, thoughts about thinking are not extensively thought out beyond an analogic (one to one pairing by way of analogy). Human intelligence has not really been scrutinized by the current binary digital paradigm, much less a trinary (ternary) model without resorting to some religious-based interpretation (such as the trinity or "intelligent design" presumption), or some type of esoteric application whose development is stifled by an association with superstition or approximated derivations that can not be tested. Humans very often use definitions in describing some validity without having taken the time to make a comparison with reality. They get swept up in fanciful notions of social application that are quite often foolish or just plain wrong... and promote the perpetuation of disadvantages. For example, take a look at the two charts comparing social benefits received by military personnel, to those benefits available to the public. Please note that both situations are described as expressions of Democracy:

These two practices are erroneously called a Democracy.
The Military Reality
(sponsored by the public)

  1. A worry-free Health care system.
  2. A free Housing system (Billet, Barrack).
  3. A free Basic income program (Everybody has an income).
  4. A free Recruitment, Education/training system.
  5. A free Legal system.
  6. A free public Feeding system (Cafeterias/Mess-halls).
  7. A free Laundry system (in many instances of training).
  8. A free Merit, Promotion, Reward system.
  9. A freely standardized wage scale.
  10. A uniform code of Military Justice.
  11. A free paid-Vacation allotments for everyone.
  12. A free clothing requirement and uniform allotment.
  13. A free (subsidized) retail outlets (Post Exchange).
  14. A free Commune-ity... large Communes without competition.
The Public Reality
(sponsored by inadequate legislation)

  1. A worry-filled high cost Health care system.
  2. A high cost Housing system.
  3. No Basic income or employment guarantees program.
  4. No free universal Education/training system.
  5. A substandard free Legal system.
  6. No free public Feeding system (Cafeterias/Mess-halls).
  7. No free Laundry system of any kind.
  8. No citizen Merit, Promotion, Reward system.
  9. An unequalized wage system.
  10. An arbitrarily practiced Criminal Justice service.
  11. No free paid-Vacation allotments for everyone.
  12. No free clothing allotment.
  13. No free (subsidized) retail outlets.
  14. No free Community... towns, cities, or States run as large Communes.

The people are forced to provide (through taxes), the means by which military personnel can have a much less difficult time in pursuing a livelihood... thus presenting us with an exercised dichotomy (binary formula). Incredulously, both situations are (erroneously) described as expressions of Democracy... even though there is no Actual Democracy being practiced and many in the public are all too aware that the type of government is variously described as a plutocracy, Coporatocracy, Aristocracy, etc... though I am inclined to agree with the notion of a "Plutocratic Aristocracy"... with the word "Aristocracy" being applied to interchanging Oligarchies whose aristocratic lineage may be derived from different people in different sectors of society, and not necessarily be the result of blood relations or marital arrangements. The Aristocracy is quite fluid and adaptable, but certain people remain in the association even if their role runs the scale of inactivity, mild activity, to full-dominant activity.

"Democracy", like "Artificial Intelligence" is being arbitrarily defined to fit within the practiced purview who hold the social reins in which the practices are taking place. If we attempt to alter the definition of Democracy by using a fairer description and practice by providing the public with the same benefits package they pay for military personnel, we are confronted with a situation in which an attempted fairness becomes redefined as a disparagement. In other words, what was called an expression of Democracy when practiced by the military, becomes defined as a Socialism and/or Communism when practiced by the public:

Now let us look at the so-called Democracy definition if the military benefits were given as a Public entitlement:
Hypothetical Public Entitlement to Military Benefits

  1. A worry-free Health care system.
  2. A free Housing system (Billet, Barrack).
  4. A free Recruitment, Education/training system.
  5. A free Legal system.
  8. A free Merit, Promotion, Reward system.
  9. A freely standardized wage scale.
  10. A uniform code of Military Justice.
  11. A free paid-Vacation allotments.
  12. A free clothing requirement and uniform allotment.

Military entitlements given to the Public as a benefit are called an act of Socialism.
(And in some instances would be referred to as a Communism.)

This is the rationalized hypocrisy the public is expected to put up with as a patriotically driven insanity.

"Insanity", or the expression of one or more opinions not aligned with a given majority that expects compliance to its rationale, is very much a part of that which is described as intelligence. In such a definition, Albert Einstein was clearly insane when he presented his ideas in several 1905 papers. If it hadn't been for the interest of Max Planc, history might have turned out a bit different, since the rest of the physic's community ignored Einstein. And if Einstein had exhibited the personality of a theatrics prone artist or musician, he might have ended up in an asylum or would have had to seek asylum amongst bohemians, anarchists or revolutionists.

Insanity, like intelligence, are artificialities dependent on context and content. In fact, so are the constructs called knowledge, dreams and wishes. They are all artificialities... but they are artificialities which have persisted over time. Despite the outward labeling, the definition of such words is differentially applied to person and place of occurrence. The same goes for the use of a two-patterned cognitive orientation... leaving us with different models of binary operation. In other words, if we look upon the human species as a "walking talking" robot, the present usage of a binary computer system is a sub-routine that is advancing towards the usage of a trinary system... though it already exists on the scaffolding of biological and physiological substrates. However, the maturational development along a 1- 2- 3 (and then 3 to 1) path is persistently overlooked.

The early substrate of computers was the integrated circuit fashioned from a semi-conductive crystalline material such as silicon. Transistors are made from one or more semi-conductors and an integrated circuit is an assemblage of electronic components such as resistors, diodes, capacitors, etc...


Solid-state materials are commonly grouped into three classes: insulators, semiconductors, and conductors. (At low temperatures some conductors, semiconductors, and insulators may become superconductors.) Insulators, such as fused quartz and glass, have very low conductivities, on the order of 10-18 to 10-10 siemens per centimetre; and conductors, such as aluminum, have high conductivities, typically from 104 to 106 siemens per centimetre. The conductivities of semiconductors are between these extremes and are generally sensitive to temperature, illumination, magnetic fields, and minute amounts of impurity atoms. For example, the addition of about 10 atoms of boron (known as a dopant) per million atoms of silicon can increase its electrical conductivity a thousandfold.

conductivity (26K)



Source: "Semiconductor." Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, 2013.

The comments about binary and ternary compounds, as well as bipolar and two-terminal, are lost on those as examples of the 1, 2, 3 and 3-to-1 (environmentally influenced) cognitive development placed in the present discussion about artificial intelligence. Likewise, without a knowledge of the development of the Periodic table, the patterns are likewise overlooked.

elements table (59K)

A triadic structure of elements for the periodic table was proposed by J.W. Dobereiner in 1817. The triad is the earliest atomic weight classification of the elements.


Source: "Döbereiner, Johann Wolfgang." Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, 2013.

The point to be made is that this reference represents another example of the "three" as a cognitive orientation to be catalogued with others, and to make note of the absence of other enumerated organizations. In other words, there isn't, for example, a recurrence of a "17", "80", or "6,000" pattern. However, the "three" does not seem to be a reference generated in the same manner as a "two"... in terms of what some might otherwise describe as a prejudice or bias, if race, gender, or dietary preference were thus being considered.

With the question of prejudice on hand, we must ask whether the binary focus is based and sustained because of an engrained bias towards this pattern? In other words, do we focus on... in fact, search for and expect a "two" existence, and will alter our behavior... in order to justify this orientation? This is particularly important because we are thus "reading into" reality what we are socially/environmentally influenced to apprehend. If we seek out a "two" explanation with respect to the properties of an electron, we will necessarily determine to create those conditions which will produce a two... such that we have "experimental evidence" which concludes that the electron exhibits both wave and particle properties.

The electron: wave or particle?


2 slit experiment (51K)





Source: "Quantum Mechanics." Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, 2013.

The importance of discussing "artificial intelligence" by including the topic of Quantum Mechanics rests on the application of the "electron" and other atomic particles in the construction of materials used in the development of computers. Hence, at some point of "core" reference, we find that "intelligence" is linked to atomic behavior. However, though there already exists the notion of hidden, unknown, misunderstood or mistaken variables, the "two" as given in the present context of discussion has not been included. Even though the usage of "two" as in the basic minimum particle arrangement is taken as a logical standard, this very standard needs to be questioned because it suggests that there is an existing prejudice, bias and seduction for this pattern.

Updated Posting: Saturday, 31-March-2018... 2:54 PM

Your Questions, Comments or Additional Information are welcomed:
Herb O. Buckland