Sunday, August 24, 2014
Friday, August 15, 2014
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Welcome to Matt Ridley's Blog


You can also follow me on twitter.

More on whether the weather is climate

The Economist turns to astrology

Here's a letter I sent to the editor of The Economist:



Matt Ridley


The article contains the following paragraph:

Europe's cold winters and the warmth of the planet as a whole might even be linked. There is some evidence that the summer heat stored in the newly ice-free seas north of Siberia may induce shifts in the atmosphere's circulation, when the heat is given up to the air in subsequent autumns and winters. Those shifts might in turn encourage seasonal patterns in which the Arctic is warm and the continents below it cold, as in early 2010. Since the sea-ice area looks likely to go on shrinking, such a link, if indeed it exists, would probably mean more cold winters in Britain and much of Europe.

There is a more serious point at issue here. Without man-made global warming Britain experienced terrible winters like that of 1947 and 1963. If the Economist is right and it can still experience such winters despite (or even because of) global warming, then where exactly is the problem? How are we to distinguish the effect of climate from weather?

Observe the following chart, from Willis Eschenbach, showing the temperature record in Armagh, Northern Ireland. The dark blue line is climate change (with a healthy helping urban heat island effect). The pale blue fuzz is weather.