Correlations: Nibiru - NASA & Modern Science (Part Two)

Everything about Nibiru (Planet X) in correlation to NASA and our Modern Science. Part Two.    ...

Part Two.
                                          (If you haven't read "Part One", I suggest you to do so by clicking here). 

Sumerian - NASA correlations
Ancient Sumerian and Babylonian texts indicate that the Earth (" Tiamat ") was struck by a large planet, which moved it into its present orbit, and created the Asteroid Belt.

Nibiru entered our solar system on its clockwise elliptical course, struck Tiamat (Earth), which was moving in its ordained counterclockwise orbit. One of Nibiru's satellites struck Tiamat first, followed by two more of Nibiru's moons. Then Nibiru itself, an enormous planetary body, struck Tiamat, smashing one half of the planet into pieces, which became the "Great Band" (Asteroid Belt). The other half of the planet, which was struck by a smaller moon of Nibiru, was moved into a new orbit, along with a chunk of material which became its moon (or Nibiru "gave" us one of its Moons). The new planet was then called "KI," meaning "cleaved one." The Earth's original moons were dispersed, many changing the direction of their orbits. 
The reference to killing off the dinosaurs (from Part One) seems to indicate that something more is known about this planet than NASA is letting on. Is this in fact a reference to the planet Nibiru of ancient infamy, the planet which, according to ancient sources, did in fact strike the Earth (Tiamat) in ancient times, and gave us a moon for a thank you? Regardless of what NASA really knows, silence is golden, and, for the most part, mum was the word on the issue of Planet X during the 1990s. Instead, scientific journals began to debunk the issue of a tenth solar system planet. In the 1990s, news stories began to dwell on "runaway planets" and "rebel planets" discovered in other solar systems. The issue of Planet X has now become entirely befuddled with recent discoveries of 18 nearby stars with Jupiter-class planets orbiting them (last count as of October, 1999). (see astron.berkeley.edu) Locating any new developments regarding a tenth solar system planet is akin to finding a needle in a haystack, since it's difficult to know which "new planet" they are talking about. For instance, an October 23, 1996 AP article entitled "New rebel planet found outside the solar system," disclosed the following:


Important scientific facts that you must know:

-The March 16, 1999 announcement by NASA at the 30th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston of the theory of the origin of Earth's Moon as a catastrophic collision with a "Mars-size planet." 




-There is a strange gravitational "pull" on Uranus, Neptune and Pluto, which indicates there is another body of significant size beyond it. 


Tom van Flandern of the U.S. Naval Observatory, who was quoted in the 1982 Newsweek article, admits that a tenth planet is possible, but argues that it would have to be so huge that it should have been observed by now. We must admit that there is a serious possibility that more details regarding Planet X are in fact known, but we are not being informed. Is there a major cover-up of Planet X ? This possibility was actually discussed in an article in the CCNet Digest on May 18, 1998 entitled "The Secrets of Asteroid Peril, British Media Smells a Rat." This article claimed that a report in the London Daily Mail accused US astronomers of trying to cover up scientific data until NASA has a chance to look at the information. The report indicated that "earth-shattering" information, such as the discovery of incoming comets or asteroids, has been ordered to go through NASA first. The Daily Mail report of May 15, 1998 entitled "Delayed Impact, or the Secrets of Asteroid Peril," stated the following:


A Los Angeles AP article on May 19, 1998 also reported on this 72 hour delay rule imposed by NASA on announcements to the public of asteroids or comets by astronomers. The report indicated that these measures were undertaken to avoid the "doomsday alert" which occurred in March of 1998 with regard to an asteroid which was due to collide with Earth in 2028, and which was "soon found to be a mistake." These new procedures, the article stated, are "not an attempt to hide anything but to make sure the information is accurate." How can we be sure that if the information is found to be accurate, NASA will not (a) find it to be a "mistake," or (b) withhold the message for a longer period of time? 

Article entitle: "X Marks the Spot" 

In February, 1999, J.B. Murray presented a paper to the Royal Astronomical Society entitled "Arguments for the Presence of a Distant Large Undiscovered Solar System Planet."

Murray's paper explored various explanations for what he called a "non-random clustering of long-period comets," which his research concluded are "aligned along a great circle inclined to both the elliptic and the Galactic plane." His paper examined the possibility that this non-random clustering was due to "orbital perturbations by an undiscovered object orbiting within the distances of 30,000 to 50,000 au from the Sun." Murray's mathematical modeling predicted that the object would have a retrograde orbit inclined at 120 degrees.
In an October 16, 1999 Economist article entitled "X Marks the Spot," Drs. Murray and Matese, after looking at the orbits of approximately 300 long-period comets, have separately concluded that too many of them are coming from the same regions of space. They suggest that the galaxy's "tidal wobble" is "being modulated by the gravity of something big within the Oort Cloud itself."

  The new object must be very faint, these astronomers suggest, or it would have been spotted. This means it's not a star. They predict that the object is three times the size of Jupiter. They also suggest that the object is not a "proper planet," because, take note: "its orbit appears to run in the opposite direction from those of the nine known planets." This is another factoid we can add to the above "anomalous" findings regarding the existence of Nibiru (or Marduk after the Babylonian texts). As the Enuma elish tells us, the planet Marduk entered the solar system on its "clockwise, elliptical orbit," and struck the Earth, which was moving in its "ordained counterclockwise orbit." So the planet we are looking for will have an orbit which runs in the opposite direction from those of the nine known planets in our solar system. (Chalk another one up for Sitchin!)

According to the above Economist article, the orbit of this object also appears to be so unstable that it is unlikely that it could have maintained this orbit for the 4.5 billion year history of the solar system. Therefore, these astronomers suggest, it is more likely that the object is an extra-solar body that was captured by our sun's gravity only "recently," in astronomical terms. (Otherwise, it would have wreaked virtual havoc throughout the history of the solar system. Of course, we are presuming that our neck of the galactic woods is serene because we've been left here in peace to "evolve" for so long that Planet X would have to be a relative newcomer to fit into this preconceived scenario.) In any case, these astronomers predict we should be detecting Planet X soon, even if we have to wait for the next generation of infra-red space telescopes.

It's interesting to note that many of the newly discovered extra-solar planets recently discovered have extremely "eccentric" orbits. It is suggested in "New Discoveries, A Planetary Mystery" (astron.berkeley.edu) that circular orbits may actually not be the rule in nearby solar systems. Nine of the extra-solar objects recently discovered travel in unusually elliptical orbits, "several of them plunging in relatively close to their stars and then swinging far out again." Several of these planets may be three times as massive as Jupiter, and one is estimated at eleven times the mass of Jupiter. What these new discoveries are teaching us is that our own solar system may be very unlike others. Even considering our catastrophic past, we may inhabit a relatively peaceful end of the cosmos, as far as galaxies go. As Dr. Geoffrey Marcy explains, powerful gravitational forces exerted over smaller planets by huge planets or passing stars are capable of upsetting their orbits. Likewise, two or more huge planets orbiting in close proximity can generate a "gravitational slingshot" effect, which could fling one of the objects off on an elongated orbit into the inner planetary system, while the other could at the same time fly off in the other direction, perhaps escaping into interstellar space. In another possible scenario, the planet's own star (sun) could be part of a binary star system, locked in a gravitational embrace.

"Jupiter sized bodies plunging toward and away from their stars are likely to sweep aside smaller worlds, sending them crashing into their star or flying out of orbit into interstellar space. Current technology is incapable of detecting Earth-size planets around other stars, but they almost certainly could not exist near their star's warmth in a system so unsettled by large planets in wrecking orbits."
A huge planet on an elliptical orbit would probably scatter or destroy smaller planets as it crosses their paths time and again. As Dr. Marcy writes, "if our Jupiter were in an eccentric orbit, the Earth and Mars would likely be gravitationally scattered out of the solar system. Therefore, our very existence, he writes, is dependent upon both Jupiter and Earth being in mutually stable and circular orbits." Lucky for us, we have no big bullies, no freewheeling wrecking balls, in our solar system. Or do we?


In assimilating this information into our world view, we have to realize that our science is missing large areas of information with regard to geometric interplanetary relationships in our solar system's cosmic dance, and the peculiar physics of a shared outer solar system planet or twin sun scenario, and the connection this might have on both Earth's climate and rotation, and also, as strange as it may sound, on space-time reality and human consciousness.

We are being spoken to in a forgotten ancient language, and we've got to wake up fast to the meaning of the message.

Before we can go further, please watch this short video:



Well, see for yourself!
Nibiru will pass between Mars and Jupiter and we will be here to see this astonishing event. The elites hide the planet from us because if the planet is real then the Sumerian texts are real. If the texts are real, then...THE REPTILIAN ANUNNAKI ARE REAL! And they are!

Dear Friends,

Stay updated via Email Newsletter:


The Anunnaki 7008826142113248834

Post a Comment

  1. Hi! I saw this video and find another one with other location. Plus one another that I search for myself.
    check this:
    6h 29m 34.84s 26 33 59.20
    6h 53m 55.88s 42 57 23.65
    plus the yours... put placemark and see this! its like a orbit? please let me know what do you think.
    thx. peace and good luck.

  2. Thank you for sharing, friend. Those rectangles hide something else, but we can only guess.
    Maybe huge "motherships", or...who knows?!

    Love and light! <3

  3. HI, ,Good morning,i am Rahul,26,from INDIA;
    Note:There are 9 planets,100 moons in our solar system,There are 10,000crores above solar systems in our Galaxy,There are above 10,000crores Galaxies in our Universe; There are Lot of universes in space;
    please Read science fiction Novels(Arther c.clarke Novels&short list of Arther c.clarke Award Novels(from 20 years));please send your Response to me; THANK U!; .

  4. Hello,

    Is there any way to validate Nibiru's coordinates?

    What source can we trust to validate this location?

  5. A lot of good information in here, but you should revisit the 12th Planet. Some of your recounting of Sitchin's hypothesis is incorrect.

  6. well...i´ve been following all the info i could get my hands on since i first heard about nibiru in 2008...anyways i´ve been looking at that picture (the one with the brown dwarf in the middle and the other moons or whatever around it forming a cross...and then i tried to find it and i found it...i wanted to paste it on the missing square on google sky to see if it fits on the google sky coordinates...well strange enough i found it onnasa website...the original pictures differs a little bit from the one posted in here cuz it has some other stuffa around it missing...but is the same..the red dwarf in the middle and the moons forming a cross...i found it here:


    look at the second picture of the article from the right hand...and you´ll see is the same picture

    the article is about the WISE mission and there are alot and interesting questions about "Tyche" here:


    nasa says that its existency is yet to be proven.. the name that some scientist
    gave to the brown dwarf "Tyche" would be what we know as nibiru i think

  7. Hi
    I have just checked the Nibiru black out on google earth/sky and I am wondering if anyone other than google earth could black out this area, can anyone answer this? because I am amazed at what I am seeing. If this is no hoax I am amazed at what I am seeing, what are they hiding and why.


  9. I first heard of planet x in 2008 and was unable to find any nasa info.i was very unaware back then of how corrupt nasa was.the history channels 2012 doomsday thing completely threw me off course as to what was happening.then came the earthquakes.and the strange loud booms and trumpet sounds.the real wakeup call came when asteroids and comets increased.i believe 99%now that nibiru is real.but when I tried to inform my family about this they shut me down completely.even to the point of having me commited to the luny bin.so I don't talk about it anymore.let them do their own research.






Like & Follow


What's hot?


Thanks for the coffee!







Tag cloud
