Loading the player...

Comparative advantage is an economic law, dating back to the early 1800s, that demonstrates the ways in which protectionism (or mercantilism as it was called at the time) is unnecessary in free trade. Popularized by David Ricardo, comparative advantage argues that free trade works even if one partner in a deal holds absolute advantage in all areas of production – that is, one partner makes products cheaper, better and faster than its trading partner.

The primary fear for nations entering free trade is that they will be out-produced by a country with an absolute advantage in several areas, which would lead to imports but no exports. Comparative advantage stipulates that countries should specialize in a certain class of products for export, but import the rest – even if the country holds an absolute advantage in all products. (To learn more, read What Is International Trade?)



Comparative Advantage and Free Trade

Economists have been uncommonly uniform in advocating free trade policies for centuries, and comparative advantage is the reason why. The theory suggests that total economic welfare in all countries is improved when countries focus on those industries where they have have the highest expertise and success, and the lowest opportunity costs.

To explain opportunity cost, we'll answer this question: Why don't NBA players mow their own lawns? Ostensibly, NBA players are stronger and faster than their landscapers and could do it more effectively. However, NBA players can maximize their value and productivity by focusing on basketball rather than wasting energy with a lawnmower; the opportunity cost is too high. Instead, the basketball player and landscaper each specialize and trade, using money as an intermediary representation of their respective productivity.

Comparative advantage says that countries should behave similarly. Laborers in the United States have relatively high levels of education and relatively advanced capital goods; this makes them very productive. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that American workers should produce everything that American consumers need. Instead, maximum efficiency and output can be achieved by specializing in those areas with the lowest opportunity costs and trading with other countries.

Free Trade Policies

Free-trade policies, in their truest form, advocate for a complete absence of import restrictions (such as tariffs and quotas) and for no subsidization of export industries. The proponents of free trade argue that restrictions on trade make all consumers, even Americans, poorer than they otherwise would have been.

The crux of the argument centers on the benefits of comparative advantage. When the laborers of one country specialize where they have the lowest opportunity costs, those industries achieve economies of scale and innovate. The increase in production causes prices to decline. American consumers see their real costs of living decline when cheap foreign goods are combined with cheaper domestic goods. Standards of living improve as a result.

Abbreviated as this explanation is, it highlights the academic arguments in favor of open international markets. During the 19th century Industrial Revolution, for example, Britain provided support for comparative advantage by essentially outsourcing its food growth (importing grains, meat, cheese, wine, etc.) and focusing on manufacturing goods for export, thus becoming the workshop of the world for decades. And in today's increasingly international economy, the theory is even more relevant (see How does globalization impact comparative advantage?).

Why Isn't There Complete Free Trade?

If economists – who rarely agree – are almost uniformly in favor of free trade, why doesn't the world have open trading between countries? There are many reasons, but the most influential is something that economists call rent-seeking. Rent-seeking occurs when one group organizes and lobbies the government to protect its interests.

Say, for example, the producers of American shoes understand and agree with the free-trade argument – but they also know that their narrow interests would be negatively impacted by cheaper foreign shoes. Even if laborers would be most productive by switching from making shoes to making computers, nobody in the shoe industry wants to lose his or her job or see profits decrease in the short run. This desire leads the shoemakers to lobby for, say, special tax breaks for their products and/or extra duties (or even outright bans) on foreign footwear. Appeals to save American jobs and preserve a time-honored American craft abound – even though, in the long run, American laborers would be made relatively less productive and American consumers relatively poorer by such protectionist tactics.

The Bottom Line

Comparative advantage urges nations to engage in true free trade and to specialize in areas where they have the highest expertise and most success – instead of looking to bolster weak industries from foreign competition by imposing protective tariffs that otherwise stifle the production that leads to overall gains in wealth. The benefits of comparative advantage are reduced when domestic industries are subsidized or when foreign industries are subjected to import tariffs.


  1. What are some real life examples of absolute advantage?

    Learn about absolute advantage, comparative advantage and their impact on trade through a real-world example involving call ... Read Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between absolute and comparative advantage?

    Learn about the difference between absolute and comparative advantage and how these two key economic concepts help shape ... Read Answer >>
  3. What determines labor productivity?

    Examine the two primary components of labor productivity, applied technical efficiency and available capital goods, and learn ... Read Answer >>

    Discover the problems caused by international trade protectionism and why economists support free trade, and review the infamous ... Read Answer >>
  5. What are the economic impacts of specialization?

    Read about the economic impacts of specialization and the division of labor, and see why individuals, firms and even countries ... Read Answer >>
Related Articles
  1. Insights

    Explaining Comparative Advantage

  2. Insights

    Do Cheap Imported Goods Cost Americans Jobs?

  3. Insights

    The Basics Of Tariffs And Trade Barriers

    Everything you need to know about trade barriers and tariffs, why they are used and their effects on the local economy. There are also different types of tariffs and trade barriers that could ...
  4. Tech

    How Does Neighborly Work and Make Money?

  5. Investing

    What Is The Difference Between Comparative Advantage And Absolute Advantage?

    When a nation can make a product at a higher quality and faster rate than another, it has an absolute advantage.
  6. Investing

    How Globalization Affects Developed Countries

  7. Insights

    The NBA’s Business Model

  8. Insurance

    How Americans Spend Their Money

  9. Insights

    Globalization: Progress Or Profiteering?

  10. Insights

    IMF Says Trade Barriers Will Hamper Global Growth

    Rising support for protectionist policies in countries around the world will hamper global economic growth, IMF officials say
  1. Absolute Advantage

    Absolute Advantage is the ability of a country, individual, company ...
  2. Free Trade

    Free trade is the unrestricted purchase and sale of goods and ...
  3. Competitive Advantage

  4. Free Trade Area

  5. Import

    An import is a good or service brought into one country from ...
  6. Closed Economy

Hot Definitions
  1. Return On Equity - ROE

  2. Working Capital

  3. Bond

  4. Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR

  5. Net Present Value - NPV

  6. Price-Earnings Ratio - P/E Ratio

Trading Center