Under investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions found in trade and investment agreements, many laws for the protection of workers’ rights can be threatened, if a foreign investor argues they have a discriminatory effect on their interests.

Corporations could deem unfair any change of policy that improves workers’ rights and conditions, if they see it as a violation of their “legitimate expectations”, - their expected profits. Foreign companies consider they have a right to a stable regulatory context, and governments should not alter laws or regulations, even if public interest objectives such as fundamental labour rights are at stake.

If a state did enact new social and labour rights such as collective agreements, equal pay or decent minimum wage, companies could use the ISDS mechanism to challenge them.

Likewise, any reform favouring local companies or workers could potentially be the target of ISDS disputes.

The most well-known cases include:

• Piero Foresti & others vs. South Africa: in 2007, Italian and Luxembourg investors lodged an investor-state arbitral claim against South Africa for US$350 million because a new mining law contained anti-discrimination rules from the country’s Black Economic Empowerment Act, which aims to redress some of the injustices of the apartheid regime. The law required mining companies to transfer a portion of their shares into the hands of black investors. The dispute was discontinued in 2010, after the investors received new licenses requiring a much lower divestment of shares (Italy-South Africa and Belgium-Luxembourg-South Africa BITs invoked).

• Véolia (France) vs. Egypt: in 2012, the multinational utility corporation launched a dispute against Egypt, demanding US$110 million following changes to Egypt’s labour laws leading to an increase in minimum wage. Case pending (Egypt-France BIT invoked).

• Abitibi-Bowater (US) vs. Canada: the US paper corporation challenged the decision of Newfoundland and Labrador, a Canadian province, to confiscate various timber, water rights and equipment held by Abitibi-Bowater after the corporation closed a paper mill in Newfoundland, putting 800 employees out of work. Case was settled in 2010 for US$122 to the investor (NAFTA invoked).

(November 2015)

EconoMex | 26-Feb-2018
El pasado 24 de enero, 11 países de la Cuenca del Pacífico alcanzaron un acuerdo para firmar un resucitado Tratado Transpacífico (TPP), pero ahora con el nombre de Acuerdo Global y Progresivo para la Asociación Transpacífico (CPTPP por sus siglas en inglés).
Focus on the Global South | 1-Jun-2017
Jeune Afrique | 10-Mar-2017
L’année 2017 devrait solder l’épisode de conflit avec l’Égypte, qui confère à Veolia l’image négative d’une entreprise procédurière.
Open Canada | 3-Mar-2017
NAFTA has its fair share of critics who want to see it updated. But if Trump has his way, a re-negotiated agreement may prove disappointing.
Local Futures Blog | 16-Feb-2017
Nueva Tribuna | 13-Feb-2017
El Parlamento Europeo podría estar en vías de ratificar un acuerdo que es ilegal, además de faltar a su deber de asegurar que los tratados europeos respetan los principios fundamentales y leyes de la UE.
No al TTIP | 17-Jan-2017
La campaña No al TTIP convoca movilizaciones en más de 20 ciudades para frenar al CETA
AFL-CIO | 21-Dec-2016
El País | 30-Sep-2016
El grupo arbitral que dirime la controversia entre EE.UU. y Guatemala por supuestas violaciones de los derechos laborales en el país centroamericano, entregó el informe inicial a las partes, informó hoy una fuente oficial.
Global Labour Column | 28-Sep-2016
For decades, labour has been fighting purely defensive battles against the neo-liberal trade and investment agenda; we lack an agenda of our own. Lost ground will not be reclaimed on what is fundamentally hostile territory, argues Peter Rossmann of the IUF.

0 | 10 | 20