« Turn back to God? | Main | Stephen Hawking joins anti-theological gnosis »

September 02, 2010

Stephen Hawking's answer to God question tiresome


The Rev. Robert Barron, priest and theology professor, University of St. Mary of the Lake in Mundelein and author of Word on Fire

So another prominent British academic has weighed in on the God question. Stephen Hawking, probably the best-known scientist in the world, has said, in a book to be published a week before the Pope’s visit to Britain, that the universe required no Creator.

I confess that something in me tightens whenever I hear a scientist pontificating on issues that belong to the arena of philosophy or metaphysics. I will gladly listen to Stephen Hawking when he holds forth on matters of theoretical physics, but he’s as qualified to talk about philosophical and religious issues as any college freshman.

There is a qualitative difference between the sciences, which speak of objects, forces, and phenomena within the observable universe, and philosophy or religion which speak of ultimate origins and final purposes. Science, as such, simply cannot adjudicate questions that lie outside of its proper purview—and this is precisely why scientists tend to make lots of silly statements when they attempt to philosophize.

Here’s an example from Hawking’s latest book: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing.”

Well, first of all, which is it: nothing or the law of gravity? There’s quite a substantial difference between the two. If Hawking is saying that the universe, which is marked in every nook and cranny by stunning and mathematically describable intellegibility, simply came forth from Nothing, then I just throw up my hands.

The classical philosophical tradition gives us an adage that is still hard to improve upon: ex nihilo nihil fit (from nothing comes nothing). Any teacher worth his salt would take a student to task if, in trying to explain why and how a given phenomenon occurred, the student were to say, “well, it just spontaneously happened.” Yet we are expected to be satisfied with precisely that explanation when it comes to the most pressing and fascinating question of all: why is there something rather than nothing?

In my dialogues with atheists, I often come up against this total non-explanation, and I can only smile ruefully. Apparently, the affirmation of God involves far too great a leap of faith, yet the assertion that the universe just popped into being is rationally compelling!

So suppose we say (to return to Hawking’s rather incoherent statement) that gravity is the ultimate cause of the universe. This would mean that a force within nature is the source of the being of the world.

To be sure, this sort of claim has a long pedigree, stretching back at least to the pre-Socratics, but it remains highly problematic. The question “why is there something rather than nothing?”is not searching after a thing within the universe, but rather the being of the universe. It is wondering why (to use the technical term) contingent things exist, that is to say, things that do not contain within themselves the reason for their own being.

You and I are contingent in the measure that we had parents, that we eat and drink, and that we breathe. In a word, we don’t explain ourselves. Now if we want to understand why we exist, we cannot go on endlessly appealing to other contingent things. We must come finally to some reality which exists through the power of its own essence, some power whose very nature it is to be.

But that whose very nature it is to be cannot, in any sense, be limited or imperfect in being, and this is precisely why Catholic philosophy has identified this non-contingent ground of contingency, this ultimate explanation of the being of the universe, as “God.”

To claim that something as finite and variable as the force of gravity is this ultimate explaining value is simply ludicrous. However all-embracing or powerful it is, gravity is still a worldly nature, something within the contingent cosmos.

There is a line from one of the articles describing Hawking’s book that I found, actually, quite helpful and illuminating. The author said, “in his new book, The Grand Design…Hawking sets out a comprehensive thesis that the scientific framework leaves no room for a deity.”

Quite right. Since the true God is not a being alongside other beings, not one thing in the universe among many, he is not circumscribable within a scientific frame of understanding. He should not, therefore, even in principle, be either affirmed or denied from a purely scientific perspective.

There is, of course, rampant today a “scientism” which would reduce all legitimate knowing to the scientific mode of knowing. You can find this form of dogmatism in the writings of all of the prominent “new” atheists: Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, etc.

I must confess that I’m disappointed that Stephen Hawking appears to have joined their company.


"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of ALL creation. For by Him ALL things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—ALL things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before ALL things, and in Him ALL things hold together." Colossians 1:15-17

The comments to this entry are closed.

• RssfeedThe Seeker RSS

 •  Special contributors bios
>> About Manya Brachear •  Latest stories by Brachear
>> Latest Tribune religion coverage

The Seeker 
All Things Catholic • Belief Beat • Blithe Spirit, the Blog
chicagomuslim  •  Christianity Today  •  Digital Dharma
Faithfully Liberal  • Get Religion  •  God, Faith and a Pen
God’s Politics •  J-Walking  •  Jewlicious  •  Street Prophets
The Buddhist Blog  •  The Jewish Atheist  •  Theolog
• Cardinal Francis George
• Church & state
• Dalai Lama
• Episcopalians
• Etiquette
• Evangelicals
• Evolution vs. Creation
• Hindus
• Holidays
• In the name of God
• Islam
• Judaism
• Lutherans
• Mormons
• Nonbelievers
• Pop culture
• Pope Benedict XVI
• Quiz
• Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.
• Scientology
• Sermons
• Sikhs

Search here for ways YOU can make a difference.

Give: Furniture & clothing needed
Help: Y family night
Go: Golf for a child event
•  The Seeker moves on
•  Changes to the Mass are not American, but universal
•  Generosity is essence of Thanksgiving
•  Religion encourages restraint, not revenge
•  How should Christians pray for Muslims?
•  Can God or Roosevelt save us from Wall Street?
•  Religion's treatment of women key to understanding progress
•  Quran says pastor must go free
•  Iran shows no religious mercy
•  'No religion request' offers opportunity for reflection

January 2012 posts
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

Chicago Tribune Media Group