Doctor and patient relationship mangalam

A doctor–patient relationship (DPR) is considered to be the core element in the ethical principles of medicine. DPR is usually developed when a physician tends . Two examples include the measurement and use of patient satisfaction, and the Taken at its most basic level, the doctor-patient relationship embodies the. Trust is a non-excludable good because we cannot restrict the benefits of trust, such as social capital, to any particular people. The doctor-patient relationship: a .

Informed consent The default medical practice for showing respect to patients and their families is for the doctor to be truthful in informing the patient of their health and to be direct in asking for the patient's consent before giving treatment.

Historically in many cultures there has been a shift from paternalismthe view that the "doctor always knows best," to the idea that patients must have a choice in the provision of their care and be given the right to provide informed consent to medical procedures.

Dr Mangalam Sridhar

Furthermore, there are ethical concerns regarding the use of placebo. Does giving a sugar pill lead to an undermining of trust between doctor and patient? Is deceiving a patient for his or her own good compatible with a respectful and consent-based doctor—patient relationship?

Shared decision making[ edit ] Health advocacy messages such as this one encourage patients to talk with their doctors about their healthcare.

Shared decision making Shared decision making is the idea that as a patient gives informed consent to treatment, that patient also is given an opportunity to choose among the treatment options provided by the physician that is responsible for their healthcare. This means the doctor does not recommend what the patient should do, rather the patient's autonomy is respected and they choose what medical treatment they want to have done.

  • Doctor–patient relationship

A practice which is an alternative to this is for the doctor to make a person's health decisions without considering that person's treatment goals or having that person's input into the decision-making process is grossly unethical and against the idea of personal autonomy and freedom. A majority of physicians employ a variation of this communication model to some degree, as it is only with this technique that a doctor can maintain the open cooperation of his or her patient.

doctor and patient relationship mangalam

This communication model places the physician in a position of omniscience and omnipotence over the patient and leaves little room for patient contribution to a treatment plan. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

Doctor–patient relationship - Wikipedia

June Learn how and when to remove this template message The physician may be viewed as superior to the patient simply because physicians tend to use big words and concepts to put him or herself in a position above the patient.

The physician—patient relationship is also complicated by the patient's suffering patient derives from the Latin patior, "suffer" and limited ability to relieve it on his or her own, potentially resulting in a state of desperation and dependency on the physician. A physician should be aware of these disparities in order to establish a good rapport and optimize communication with the patient.

Additionally, having a clear perception of these disparities can go a long way to helping the patient in the future treatment. It may be further beneficial for the doctor—patient relationship to have a form of shared care with patient empowerment to take a major degree of responsibility for her or his care.

Those who go to a doctor typically do not know exact medical reasons of why they are there, which is why they go to a doctor in the first place. An in depth discussion of lab results and the certainty that the patient can understand them may lead to the patient feeling reassured, and with that may bring positive outcomes in the physician-patient relationship.


Benefiting or pleasing[ edit ] A dilemma may arise in situations where determining the most efficient treatment, or encountering avoidance of treatment, creates a disagreement between the physician and the patient, for any number of reasons. In such cases, the physician needs strategies for presenting unfavorable treatment options or unwelcome information in a way that minimizes strain on the doctor—patient relationship while benefiting the patient's overall physical health and best interests.

When the patient either can not or will not do what the physician knows is the correct course of treatment, the patient becomes non-adherent. Adherence management coaching becomes necessary to provide positive reinforcement of unpleasant options.


Mangalam Diagnostic


doctor and patient relationship mangalam

This can go a long way into impacting the future of the relationship throughout the patient's care. All speech acts between individuals seek to accomplish the same goal, sharing and exchanging information and meeting each participants conversational goals.

Mangalam Hospitals



Family members, in addition to the patient needing treatment may disagree on the treatment needing to be done. He applied for and was appointed to his first consultant appointment in while technically being a senior house officer under new UK regulations, a feat virtually unheard of.

That was no coincidence, however: He was appointed consultant physician in thoracic and general medicine at Staffordshire General Hospital in April There he was very active with the work of the British Lung Foundation. He moved to Charing Cross Hospital, London, as consultant general and respiratory physician inand honorary senior lecturer to Imperial College London. Sri was always principally a clinician and a compassionate and knowledgeable clinician for whom nothing was too much trouble.

He advanced medicine by his research and by his teaching, and he was published widely on the relationship between nutrition and lung function, on tuberculosis and respiratory complications of neurological disease and on many aspects of care for those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. More recently he was a principal investigator on a number of major studies and received grants from major charitable funders, such as The Health Foundation, to further his research work in these fields.

At Charing Cross Hospital in London he played a major role in the teaching of students and had written several chapters in a recent respiratory textbook.

He ran the chest clinics caring for those with tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and general respiratory illness. He also had a major role in the complete and successful reconfiguration of acute medical services in that area. Sri's caring manner and incisive mind made for an excellent doctor and superb colleague.

First and foremost, he was a loving husband to Geetha and proud father to Sandhya.