Sunday, January 2, 2011

[By Vic Rosenthal, crossposted from FresnoZionism.]


Details here.

I am always surprised at the lack of understanding of the idea of Zionism. It's really simple: it's the movement for national self-determination of the Jewish people in the land of Israel. Unlike some national movements, it does not declare that the Jewish people is superior to other peoples.

The concept of a 'people' carries a lot of baggage. Some think that there should be no such artificial separations. "We're all human beings," they say. But I think part of the evolutionary construct that embodies the human species is the need to divide ourselves into families, clans and peoples. It's not going to go away, and attempts to ignore it make it impossible to understand our behavior.

Others think that the concept is unacceptably vague because there's no list of characteristics that clearly include or exclude a person from membership in a people. But there are lots of perfectly meaningful concepts that are like this: Wittgenstein discussed the idea of a 'game', which could include everything from football or chess to children running around in circles. There will be borderline cases for which it is hard to determine whether or not they belong, but that doesn't make the concept meaningless.

In my view, membership in a people is determined by a list of characteristics. To be a member, someone does not have to have all of the characteristics, but he/she must have some of them. The more that apply, the more certain it is that the person is a member. Here is a list of what I have in mind, in no particular order:

  1. Common ancestry
  2. Language
  3. Religion
  4. Self-identification
  5. Identification by others
  6. Acceptance of a particular ideology or ideologies
  7. Common history, especially of trauma
  8. Geographical location
  9. Historical persistence

No deep thought went into the above, but you get the idea. Fill in the blanks for any particular people.

Arabs and Iranians are fond of saying "there isn't a Jewish people, just a religion" (of course they insist that there is a 'Palestinian people'). Shlomo Zand claims that there isn't a Jewish people because he believes that it can't be proven that present-day Jews are descended from the inhabitants of 1st-century Judea. Both of these arguments show a lack of understanding of what a people is.

There is no doubt that there has been a Jewish people for millennia, and there is probably a 'Palestinian' people by now, although it has not been in existence as a people for more than a few years.

By the way, there is nothing illegitimate about consciously trying to create peoplehood, as the Palestinian Arabs are doing -- what I object to is their invention of a false historical narrative that purports to give them exclusive possession of the land, and their embrace of a culture of murder and death. But that's another article.

One of the ideologies of the Jewish people is Zionism. No magic, no devils -- and no racism. Just self-determination.

1 Comment

Personally, I think the idea of a 'people' has more to do (regrettably) with what divides us, not with what unites us. This is where, for example, Canadians are united in declaring that they're not Americans, the Belgians insist that they're not French, and so on. This extends, in my humble opinion, to the Palestinians, who don't have a specific history or culture going back more than 100 years at most (but who nonetheless insist that they're not Jordanians, not Egyptians, not Syrians, and so on).

One might even argue that this is how a people defines itself, with a large number of people saying (a) "we're all a single people together", and (b) "we don't belong to any of those other groups".

As such, the Palestinians can certainly call themselves a people if they want to. On the other hand, for them to do so, while denying that the Jews are a people, is ludicrous. The Jewish people have more claim to such a title than most; we had a common language, a common history, a common cultural heritage, common customs and traditions -- and, yes, a common religion -- going back to the Babylonian dispersion, circa 586 BCE. We could have lost that connection and faded away into history, as many now-forgotten peoples did; the point is that we didn't.

On that subject, by the way: my wife has an interesting response to the claim that the modern Jews might not be the descendants of the biblical Jews.

Her father is a Cohen, meaning that he's entitled to be called first during a synagogue's Torah service. This is a title that is passed from father to son; it cannot be acquired any other way. This has been true since the days when priesthood in Jerusalem's High Temple was passed from a priest (cohen) to his son, all the way back to Aaron and his sons.

In other words, when asked if the modern-day Jews are descended from the Jews of biblical times, my wife can respond: don't know about you, but I am.

Daniel in Brookline



Blogroll Me!

Adam Holland
Agam's Gecko
Amy Ridenour
Armies of Liberation
Astute Blogger
Backseat Blogger
Barry Rubin
Blazing Cat Fur
Boker tov, Boulder
Bosch Fawstin
Breath of the Beast
Challah Hu Akbar
CiF Watch
Cinnamon Stillwell
Classical Values
Combs Spouts Off
Conservative Grapevine
Conservative Oasis Contentions
Contentious Centrist
Cox & Forkum
Creeping Sharia
Dancing with Dogs
Dave Bender
Davids Medienkritik
Dean Esmay
Defending Crusader
Democracy Project
Dreams Into Lightning
Dutchblog Israel
Exit Zero
Ghost of a Flea
GM's Place
The God Blog
Huff-Po Monitor
In Context
Insignificant Thoughts
Iraq the Model
Israel Matzav
Israel Seen
J Street Jive
Jerusalem Diaries
Jerusalem Posts
Jewish State
Kesher Talk
Legal Insurrection
Liberty's Spirit
Marathon Pundit
The Marmot's Hole
Martin Kramer
Matthew K. Tabor
Mere Rhetoric
Michelle Malkin
Mick Hartley
Mind of Mog
My Machberet
My Wide Blue Seas
Never Yet Melted
One Jerusalem
Paula Says
Point of no Return
Political inSecurity
Random Thoughts
Ranting Sandmonkey
Red Planet Cartoons
Right Wing News
Roger L. Simon
Seraphic Secret
Shawarma Mayor
Shining City
Simply Jews
Soccer Dad
A Soldier's Mother
Solomon's House
Something Something
Somewhere on A1A
Stand for Israel
Survival Tips: The Survivalist Blog
Tasty Infidelicacies
Tel Chai Nation
Texican Tattler
Themistocles' Shade
This Ain't Hell
Tikkun Olam
Tom Glennon
Tools of Renewal
Tundra Tabloids
UCC Truths
Vicious Babushka
The View From Here
View From Iran
The World
Yaacov Lozowick
Yid With Lid

:New England Blogs:
Augean Stables
Bloodthirsty Liberal
Boston Maggie
Boston's Patriots
Boulevard Girl
Business of Life
Daniel in Brookline
Hub Blog
Hub Politics
Jules Crittenden
Libertarian Leanings
Maggie's Farm
Miss Kelly
N.E. Republican
People's Republicans
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Sippican Cottage
Squaring the Globe
Universal Hub
Weekend Pundit
Who Knew?

Blogroll Policy

If You Enjoy This Site
Paypal Donate

Amazon Purchase

My Amazon Wish List

Worth a Click





Solomonia Button

Smaller Button

Smallest Button

Note on Permissions:

Site (C)2003-2009


Solomonia Store




Martin Solomon

Mary Madigan

Hillel Stavis


Jon Haber
Jon Haber



Enter your Email for a Daily Digest of New Posts

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
(Be sure to whitelist if you aren't receiving updates.)


Follow me on Twitter



 Subscribe in a reader


EN 160x600 B

Quality Diamond Crosses