The Gold Standard: Why Now?

gold standard main The Gold Standard: Why Now?

A topic that is increasingly being discussed since the 2008 financial crash is that of a return to the Gold Standard. The world’s currencies were backed by gold until 1971 at which time the current fiat system was adopted. The reason that a gold standard makes sense is that all money would be backed by intrinsic value, in this case gold, a precious metal that has been associated with wealth and a store of value for thousands of years.

The question might be, why go back to a gold standard now?

Fractional Reserve Banking

In the US, the reserve requirements for private banks are 10%, meaning they have to keep 10% of deposits on reserve and can lend out the other 90%. Since everyone should know that, they had to come up with a way to keep people from starting bank runs and demand their deposits back which last happened on the 26th of September 2008 and lasted for ten days when depositors of Washington Mutual demanded their deposits back. Only about 10% of bank deposits would need to be withdrawn in order for most banks to become insolvent. In order to prevent bank failures and maintain the confidence in the banking system, in the US the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and in Canada the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) guarantee bank deposits. The FDIC guarantees personal deposits up to $250,000 while the CDIC guarantees up to $100,000. Due to these organizations depositors feel secure that their savings are guaranteed and insured.

The problem with that logic is that, should there be another shock to the financial system and depositors start to demand their money, what will happen? The FDIC has since the Dodd-Frank Act raised the minimum designated reserve ratio (DRR) to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits, meaning that only 1.35% of all deposits are covered with funding by the FDIC. That amount may be sufficient for a few small banks to fail, but is far from an insurance or guarantee that anybody will see their savings again should the whole system fail as was the case in 2008.

Instead of deposit insurance corporations to enable the fractional reserve system to maintain itself, money should be backed by gold. Depositors would not have to worry about not getting any actual physical paper money back from the bank, which would stabilize the system. Something not mentioned in the North American mainstream media are bank runs that happened last week in South Korea, the China Post reported that Busan Savings Bank was suspended; Korea’s largest by assets (US$3.4 billion). Further it was reported that,

“South Korea suspended operations at four more savings banks on Saturday after runs developed as customers rushed to get their money despite official assurances the financial sector was secure”.

One of the only US central bankers who still has his head on straight is Kansas City Fed Chief, Thomas Hoenig who last week during a Q&A gave the following reply to the statement that people are pointing the finger at the Fed for commodity price increases,


Further to the question about the recent undercurrent of anti-fed sentiment Hoenig replied,

“I say I understand. I say gold is a very legitimate monetary system. However it will not end crisis. It will not end credit bubbles”.

Hoenig is correct in saying that a gold standard will not prevent from crisis, but a gold standard will keep crisis to short periods of time as was the case until 1971. The gold standard with a fractional reserve system will not stop credit bubbles since private banks will continue to increase the money supply through bank credit. That’s one of the difficulties in implementing a gold standard with the current fractional reserve system, since the amount of gold held by the central bank would have to constantly increase due to the money multiplier effect.

Even World Bank President Robert Zoellig called for a “Bretton Woods 2” like system in an article he wrote for the Financial Times in Nov 2010. He said the system would most likely involve the US dollar, Euro, Yen, Pound, and Chinese Renminbi. He added that,


These are significant statements from the President of the World Bank, considering that it is for the most part a US institution due to having veto power. What he called “Bretton Woods 2” would mean the end to the US dollar being the single world’s reserve currency. It would cause most central banks around the world to balance their treasury portfolios by buying treasuries and reserves in all other currencies than US dollars. This would make it extremely difficult for the US to refinance maturing debt as demand would drop off even more than it already has. This would leave the Fed to buy more treasuries, effectively monetizing even more debt which will further drive up the price of gold as risk of inflation increases.

Student Loan Bubble

The next crisis similar to the sub-prime crisis that caused the crash in 2008 is that of US student loans. Students are often handed empty promises that they can find employment after they are done with their degree so that they can sufficiently pay back their loans, but that is often a lie and students are loaded up with government student loans by many private for profit educational institutions. US student loan debt at $880 billion is almost the same as all US credit card debt, and since no jobs are being created these people won’t be able to pay back their student loans. Since they cannot default on government loans, these people’s wages (if any) will be garnished and they won’t be able to consume as much as before, which for a consumer driven economy is an unstable base for a sustainable recovery. The next crisis won’t be on Wall Street, but rather on Main Street.

A potential shock to the financial system in the near future could become a reality. Not just the bursting of a student loan bubble, but also that according to the recent Case-Shiller index US home prices have been continuously falling for the past five months. As long as unemployment, house price, and inflation are not kept at sustainable levels, the US economy will have a difficult time recovering as fast as most economists are predicting, but then again those same economists missed the sub-prime crisis all together in the first place.

A gold standard won’t fix all of the above, but it is a needed intervention for the world’s financial system and its addiction to credit and easy money. The current system is plagued with boom and bust cycles due to unsustainable credit expansion and speculation. The idea of “sound money” is gaining popularity, the US state of Utah might vote as early as today on adopting gold and silver coins as legal tender that can be used to pay taxes. The silver and gold coins would not replace paper money, but can be used as alternative legal currency within the state.

Thanks again for your time and continue to check back with the Capital Research Institute (CRI) as we continue to unravel The Web of International Finance!

onlinerel The Gold Standard: Why Now? facebook The Gold Standard: Why Now? twitter The Gold Standard: Why Now? myspace The Gold Standard: Why Now? friendfeed The Gold Standard: Why Now? technorati The Gold Standard: Why Now? delicious The Gold Standard: Why Now? digg The Gold Standard: Why Now? google The Gold Standard: Why Now? yahoobuzz The Gold Standard: Why Now? stumbleupon The Gold Standard: Why Now? elipets The Gold Standard: Why Now?

This entry was posted in Gold Standard and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

45 Responses to The Gold Standard: Why Now?

  1. Tracy Horn says:

    If Utah and other states do vote to accept gold and silver coins, will they be accepted at face value, or intrinsic value. (i.e. a $50 gold piece. Is it worth $50? Or $1440?)

  2. Cerchia says:

    you know blogs have become an integral part of the internet nowadays and this is partly because of good bloggers like you who care to keep there blog in good shape.

  3. Ulysses says:

    The current monetary system is based upon two factors: smoke (fiat currency) and mirrors (fractional reserve system).

    In 1970, before Nixon trashed Bretton Woods, a gallon of gas cost around $0.30, a car around $4,000 and a middle-class house around $30,000. Today all of them cost roughly 10 times more. It is interesting to note that they have maintained their relative exchange rates while their prices have gone up tenfold in nominal dollars. In other words the fiat dollar has lost around 90% of its purchasing power, impoverishing unsuspecting savers.

    Unless these two corrupt practices are stopped there will be no real economic growth, only transfer of wealth from the savers to the borrowers. However, since they are backed by the powers-that-be who are the primary beneficiaries of the scam, things are not likely to change without a catastrophic crisis as has happened countless times in the past from Germany to Zimbabwe and is guaranteed to happen here too in the future.

  4. therooster of Christ says:

    The article mentions that banks would have to increase gold holdings on the basis of issuing more currency (they use the confusing term of “money”) into circulation. This is only true on the basis of a fixed dollar-gold relationship as we saw during Bretton Woods.

    Gold made for a poor form of money, not because of bullion, however, but because of the poor liquidity of bullion due to the underlying logistical system. It was undervalued and cumbersome.

    Two things had to happen for gold to take on a responsible role of money that displayed store of value properties and tremendous liquidity. Past systems have lacked liquidity because of fixed gold values.

    1) Gold had to be set free in regards to allowing the market to establish a trade value. In this way, it could rise in trade value as a debt free asset to cover debts.

    2) The enhanced value of gold, as a result of being set free to float, had to be integrated with a way of “splitting the weight” of the enhanced value in such a way that it was fast, efficient and user friendly. That has occurred with the advent of fully gold backed digital currency where the fully backed currency is actually the digitised ownership title to the stored bullion. The currency is a weighted currency.

    You can now (right now) buy a stick of Juicy Fruit gum (or a yacht) from a merchant in Timbuktu and make fully backed debt free payment with the click of a mouse. Instant liquidity has married debt-free store of value.

    There is no monetary crisis as per a design problem. There is only a marketing challenge that must be conquered from the bottom-up, as per the market.

    The elite’s prescribed role as the “necessary evil” in “the script” is to simply “carry the stick” …. inflation. They must guard against a collapse in the legacy system of the USD during the market migration. Rate of change is critical.

    Here’s the part you’ve all been waiting for –> The ultimate purpose of the USD is/was not that of a currency. It’s ultimate role is as the real-time measure for gold payment on the basis that some measuring tool had to act in the “bridging” of things priced in currency but that are traded for by payment in gold weight. The real-time paradigm is like a “new wineskin” that contains “new wine”. Without the real-time development of the free floating fiat dollar, the real-time gold payment system could not have evolved in any practical fashion.

    Some evils are necessary. Follow “the script”.

  5. Dilly says:

    Wonderful explanation of facts available here.

  6. Maurice Zobell says:

    I appreciate you for the really useful write-up, we all could take advantage of a lot more blogs of this nature on the web. Would you expand more about the second paragraph please? I am a tiny bit puzzled as well as uncertain whether or not I realize your position totally. Thank you.

    • Henrik says:


      Thank you for your interest and comment. To answer your question in regards to the second paragraph, currently most banks around the world are only required to keep between 5-10% of your deposits are reserves. Meaning if you deposit $100 into your bank account the bank is allowed to lend out 90-95% of that money for mortgages, car loans, and other credit people and businesses may need. This is the reason why private banks rather than central banks create most of the “money” which in reality is bank credit in our economies. So the bank says they have your $100 in deposits on their books, but in reality have only $5-$10 in actual cash of that deposit since the rest has been lend out. When people lose confidence in the system they may chose to demand their deposits back, but if you now want to withdraw the $100 you deposited the bank will only have $10 to give you which means the bank is insolvent. In order to protect banks from bank runs governments created deposit insurance so that depositors like you and me know that our deposits are guaranteed up to a certain amount so that we do not have to worry about it and so that private banks can continue to create “money” out of thin air and charge us interest on it.

      I hope this answers your question. Please continue to visit the Capital Research Institute as we unravel the web of international finance.

      Thank you.

  7. Catinella says:

    Excellent subject I could not of thought off that !

  8. Electro Bass says:

    Nice subject great execution on your site

  9. Anstead says:


  10. Wooton says:

    i had to go through it again since i could not grab the entire essence of the post in one go.That was a very articulate and logical point you make there.I appreciate you letting me know your thinking on this.

  11. Maccaffery says:


  12. Rogge says:

    the way you connect with your readers through your posts is amazing,be it a video,image or a post, you seem to exactly know what fits in the criteria.believe me i read 10′s of blogs every week, but your posts are quite engrossing than the rest. I just hope you continue writing and updating this blog!

  13. Wallschlaeger says:


  14. Lisius says:


  15. Bohlinger says:

    Actually after reading this article, i am against you on this. I do not blame you,and am actually thankful for bringing this up on your blog. I am just conjuring up a dialogue here,no hard feelings.

  16. Dejoseph says:

    This is a different sort of opinion that many people don’t usually talk about. Sometimes I fav stuff like this on Redit. Although this time I’m not sure if this would be best for the users. I’ll look around and find another article that may work.

  17. Sautner says:

    your blog sure does rank high in bing for some key-phrases,that’s how i got here and i must say it deserves the rankings. really liked this post.

  18. Succar says:


  19. Vandegriff says:


  20. Ebenstein says:

    A Quite easy to follow post . Every time i check your blog i see a unique view. In addition , as a noob developer, i have to say that the structure of your blog rocks . Could you reply with the name of the template? .Thank you.

  21. Tara says:

    Great post, I believe people should learn a lot from this website, its rattling user genial.

  22. Rex Ryan says:


  23. Rody says:


  24. Pawn says:

    I have bookmarked your great blog.

  25. Neal Bandel says:

    I have learned a lot from your article and i will come back and will check more comments on your blog and i have bookmarked your site.

  26. HosseWatson says:

    Helpful post, thank you for sharing.

  27. ElfstromSeabrook says:


  28. Walkowski says:

    Thanks a lot for sharing – just wished to mention wonderful blog!

  29. Varma says:

    Properly put together! We are in agreement over here.

  30. Aegerter says:

    Good post, we do concur totally here and think this is going to be occurring more and more from this stage onwards.

  31. Blenker says:

    Properly rounded up! We are in agreement over here.

  32. Voisin says:

    Thanks for sharing – just wished to say terrific blog!

  33. Dehaven says:

    I concur wholly, keep on posting I liked the read.

  34. Schwoerer says:

    how do i apply for bankruptcy or insolvency?

  35. Morasca says:

    Very Interesting what you have going on .

  36. Zarring says:

    This web website is seriously a walk-through for all the information you needed about this and did not know who to consult. Glimpse here, and you’ll undoubtedly discover it.

  37. Maxton says:

    what is the best investment opportunity amongst Gold, Property or Equity shares?

  38. Doro says:

    Wonderful blog!

  39. Selkuom says:

    I simply wanted to say thanks yet again. I am not sure the things I would have handled in the absence of these ideas discussed by you about such question. Certainly was a real scary matter in my view, however , taking a look at your specialized way you resolved it made me to jump with fulfillment. Now i am happier for this service as well as trust you know what a great job you’re getting into training most people with the aid of your webblog. I am sure you have never encountered any of us.

  40. Pingback: Google

Comments are closed.