Scientists discover how common vaccine booster works

May 21, 2008

In an online paper in the journal Nature, Yale University researchers funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health, explain how a common ingredient in many vaccines stimulates and interacts with the immune system to help provide protection against infectious diseases.

Vaccines must possess not only the bacterial or viral components that serve as targets of protective immune responses, but also ingredients to kick start those immune responses. In many vaccines, the bacterial or viral components themselves have this capability. For other vaccines, the immune system requires an added boost. Adjuvants are those substances added to a vaccine to help stimulate the immune system and make the vaccine more effective.


In this paper, the Yale team, led by Richard Flavell, M.D., Ph.D., and Stephanie Eisenbarth, M.D., Ph.D., examined the immune system pathway and cell receptors used by alum. Many microbial compounds function as adjuvants by stimulating Toll-like receptors. These receptors identify microbial invaders and alert the body to the presence of a disease-causing agent, or pathogen. Alum, however, does not stimulate Toll-like receptors.

The Yale team found that alum stimulates clusters of proteins called inflammasomes, found inside certain cells. Inflammasomes respond to stresses such as infection or injury by releasing immune cell signaling proteins called cytokines. Inflammasomes are a component of the innate immune system that operates in parallel with, but separate from, Toll-like receptors, also part of the innate immune system.

To make this determination, Dr. Eisenbarth and her coworkers used mice that had been genetically engineered to be deficient in various components of a specific type of inflammasome, characterized by the presence of the protein termed Nalp3. The team demonstrated that an immune response did not occur in those animals with the deficient Nalp3 inflammasomes, despite the inclusion of alum, while it did occur in normal mice. The team’s findings provide the first convincing evidence that the Nalp3 inflammasome forms the basis for alum’s adjuvant action.

According to the study authors, several unanswered questions remain regarding how activation of this pathway controls a highly specific and long-lasting immune response generated by a vaccine. But this new information on the molecules that alum uses to activate the innate immune system should provide the keys to better understanding adjuvant function and should facilitate the design of new vaccine adjuvants.

Source: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Explore further: New 'adjuvant' could hold future of vaccine development

Related Stories

New 'adjuvant' could hold future of vaccine development

September 14, 2009


Research may lead to new and improved vaccines

March 14, 2011


Nano vaccine for hepatitis B shows promise for third world

August 13, 2008


Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015


Machine Translates Thoughts into Speech in Real Time

December 21, 2009



Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.5 / 5 (2) May 21, 2008
I think it's great that we inject our infants and toddlers (and adults) with things when we have no idea how they work. That's just awesome.

What about drugs that supress cytokines (like Cingulair?) Do they make vaccines less effective?
2 / 5 (1) May 23, 2008

I suppose we shouldn't use gravity to our advantage since we don't really understand how it works just yet.


Great question! I suppose a dozen or more studies like this one either have or will answer it.

Sorry if you're not a troll, but your first comment really struck a nerve with me. While we all know we can't be 100% certain about everything we do all the time, it's never right to use logical fallacies.
not rated yet May 28, 2008
The effects of gravity are not a choice we make. What was that about logical fallacies?

Injecting a toddler with unknowns should be a choice, but instead it is a legal requirement.

I object to the state violating my right to control what I ingest (or inject), and for making me a criminal (or outcast) if I protect that right for my 2-year old son.

And, if it's in the best interest of the population, then the state should be required to guarantee and prove that the injection is safe, which they can only do if they know exactly how everything in the vaccine (including additives) affects us.

But they don't.

Violating the rights of the individual to protect the masses is UNACCEPTABLE.


Click here to reset your password.