Are new neurons really more excitable? (yes)

ResearchBlogging.orgSome facts on neuronal excitability:

  1. Excitable: the ability to fire action potentials.
  2. More excitable: fires action potentials, but more.
  3. More LTP: not the same as more excitable.



Young neurons are spikier
Young neurons are spikier

In the introduction the authors note that for new neurons to have a function, they must be able to generate action potentials (aka fire action potentials, aka spike), the basic unit of activity and communication between neurons. The degree of excitability of a neuron – it’s ability to fire action potentials – is influenced by its shape, ion channels and the number of synapses that are stimulating it. Coincident activation of distinct inputs onto the same neuron can boost the chances of action potential firing and lead to the integration of different pieces of information. And the same neuron can represent different information depending on the frequency of its firing. So, a good characterization of excitability will be necessary to understand how adult-born neurons process information.

To do this the authors recorded from individual GFP+ granule neurons of various ages. The key findings:

  1. Smaller current injections were able to elicit comparable spiking in 24-29 day old neurons and mature neurons (see figure). 19 day old neurons were not very good at firing action potentials.
  2. Synaptic stimulation evoked action potentials similarly in young and mature neurons. What is significant though is that young neurons had fewer synapses, yet were equally capable of responding to a given stimulus. The amount of synaptic current required to depolarize young neurons, and bring them closer to firing an action potential, was about half that of mature neurons.
    • young neuronal spiking was delayed and variable in response to synaptic stimulation, consistent with the possibility that their spikes could code information differently than mature neurons
  3. Relative to mature neurons, young neurons had almost normal voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents, which are the primary currents involved in action potential generation. In contrast, they had much weaker inward-rectifying K+ currents (Kir), which are generated by K+ channels that are always open and therefore always steer the cell towards a hyperpolarized state where it will not fire action potentials. As the authors put it, there is an “ongoing homeostatic regulation that maintains a high degree of excitability in immature DGCs by boosting currents involved in spike generation while limiting the development of Kir currents.”
    • When these Kir channels were blocked pharmacologically, mature neurons became like excitable young neurons. Furthermore, overexpressing Kir channels in young neurons made them less excitable, like mature neurons.

The take-home message to me seems to be that 3 to 4-week-old neurons, despite being rather immature, are fully capable of firing action potentials. They aren’t necessarily more active, but they are more excitable because they are more efficient at converting synaptic stimulation into firing behavior. Importantly, GABAergic inhibition was blocked for all of these experiments. Given that immature neurons have reduced inhibition they may be more likely to fire action potentials in the behaving animal or inhibited electrophysiology preparation. The other take-home message is that this group is great at consistently addressing physiological questions that are necessary for generating theories about how new neurons might contribute to circuit-level function and behavior.

Mongiat LA, Espósito MS, Lombardi G, & Schinder AF (2009). Reliable activation of immature neurons in the adult hippocampus. PloS one, 4 (4) PMID: 19399173

4 thoughts on “Are new neurons really more excitable? (yes)”

  1. Love the blog.
    If you haven’t seen it yet… recently came out in PNAS:

    “Compensatory network changes in the dentate gyrus
    restore long-term potentiation following ablation of
    neurogenesis in young-adult mice”

    Check out when you have more “infant-free” moments. Not earth-shattering but has some interesting implications for previous studies that base their learning results upon DG plasticity.

Leave a Reply