Regarding the letter to the editor "Teach young riders hand signals" (July 11), I agree that cyclists should use turn signals when it's practical. Knowing your intent can be very helpful for someone else - for instance, if they're waiting for you and they don't need to be. I also agree that children should be taught hand signals, and responsible bike riding in general.

Setting the record straight, right turn signals can be indicated in two ways: a.) by pointing your left arm out and up (as the letter describes), or b.) pointing your right arm straight to the right - basically pointing at what you're about to do. Both are acceptable. I prefer the latter, because it is more intuitive, looks more intentional and is less likely to be mistaken for a friendly (or unfriendly) gesture. (Technique A, by the way, dates back to when people used their left arms to signal turns from automobiles, before electronic turn signals were developed. It's also one which almost no drivers recognize or understand.)


Take note, for any hand signal, including "stopping" (which you're also supposed to signal using your left arm), you are exempt if you need both hands on your handlebars to control the bike - as is not uncommon when you're turning or stopping (

I myself am not a stickler for this stuff. If no one else is around, turn signals are still required, but perhaps a little less consequential if omitted. However, like many things, there can be other reasons to do it besides that you're legally required. Maybe you're making someone else's life a little easier. Car drivers, that goes for you too!

Todd Root