Canada is the best jobs creator in the G7? Not so fast

Mike Moffatt busts the myth that Canada’s job-creation record is better than America’s

Chris Bolin

Chris Bolin

This item first appeared in Canadian Business.

For the first time since 1997, today saw the release of the sixth consecutive U.S. jobs market report with a net monthly employment gain of over 200,000 persons. But are they doing better than Canada, and if so, by how much?

The difficulty with direct U.S. to Canadian employment comparisons is the differences in size of the two countries. We can account for this difference by measuring employment growth relatively to the overall level of employment in each country. Here is year-over-year employment growth for Canada and the U.S. as a percentage of the overall level of employment since January 2010.


The U.S. employment market was dreadful in 2010, but has improved steadily since then. The scale required to show the 2010 numbers makes it difficult to see the relative differences in the last few years, so here is the same data starting at January 2011:


By this metric, U.S. employment growth outpaced Canadian growth in 2012 and 2014. The two countries were relatively even in 2013 outside of two bad months (February and October) for the United States.

The above charts treat full-time and part-time jobs equivalently. If we instead limit the discussion to full-time employment, the U.S. record is even stronger.


The United States has outperformed Canada by this metric in 23 of the 30 months from January 2012 to June 2014 (the Canadian July 2014 data has yet to be released), with the U.S. averaging 1.34 per cent growth relative to Canada’s 0.97 per cent. Full-time employment has grown by 2.3 million in the last year—64 times Canada’s paltry 35,600 net gain. Given Canada’s performance gap over the past two-and-a-half years, it is getting more and more difficult to claim that Canada “strongest job-creation record in the G7.”



  1. Another of Harp’s little fantasies disappear.

  2. The US Fed was on a money printing binge, around $2 trillion since 2010 and $1 trillion since 2012. i.e. The US Fed has doubled its balance sheet. The Bank of Canada has not. The Fed Funds rate in the US is 0% vs. the BOC rate of 1%.

    The Canadian government has also been reducing our deficit faster than the US government.

    So Canadian job growth is occurring with more government fiscal drag and far less monetary stimulus than the US.

    i.e. US job growth has been “steroid-assisted”. Canada’s has not.

    • To be fair, the current occupant of the White House inherited a trillion dollar deficit, two wars and collapsing financial, housing and auto sectors.

      Meanwhile, the current occupant of 24 Sussex inherited a healthy budget surplus and The World’s Most Stable Financial System (TM). Maybe Canada should have considered some steroids, considering its relatively poor performance (in spite of Paul Martin’s legacy).

      • Canada’s “relatively poor performance”, in relative to who/what? All I saw above was an author who picked an arbitrary time-period to compare two countries job creation records. Why choose January 2011 as the starting point? The only reason I can see for that arbitrary time-frame is because it makes Canada’s job-creation record look worse in comparison than it actually is.

Sign in to comment.