Photo/Wiki Commons
Photo/Wiki Commons

Religion played role in sowing seeds of future conflict in World War I, says researcher

On the 100th anniversary of the “war to end all wars,” historian traces elements of a religious crusade in the global conflict.

By Terry Goodrich

World War I — the “war to end all wars” — sowed seeds for future international conflicts in a way that has been largely overlooked through religion, says a Baylor University historian.

As the 100th anniversary of the war approaches this summer, Philip Jenkins says that attitudes prevalent then have influenced how global powers see each other today, often viewing themselves as favored by God.

During World War I, which began on July 28, 1914, Germany saw itself as a religious force on a “messianic mission,” while Russia saw itself not just as “a” Christian state, but as “the” Christian state, Jenkins said in a recent interview with Interfaith Voices, a public radio religion news magazine. Jenkins, professor of history at Baylor, is author of The Great and Holy War: How World War I Became a Religious Crusade.

WWIThose seeing the war as a religious crusade were “not just elite thinkers or a few crazy bishops and pastors. … Religion dominated propaganda messages and the way people thought about the war, wrote about the war, made films about the war,” Jenkins said. “Religion was part of the air they breathed. … The enemy was an evil satanic foe.”

He noted that angels and the Virgin Mary were reported as appearing regularly on battlefields, and the apocalypse was on the minds of many during the war, in which more than 9 million soldiers and about 7 million civilians were killed.




The notion of being part of a holy war “cast a very long shadow” into the 1920s, the 1930s and even into the 1940s, when popular secular movements such as Nazism, fascism and communism used similar rhetoric, he said.

But if Germany viewed itself as fighting a holy war in World War I, they had to ask themselves why they lost, Jenkins said.
