How blood group A might be a risk and blood group O be protected from coronavirus (COVID-19) infections

Peter Arend
2020 Figshare  
When according to the numbers of Wikipedia (although they might be disputed) in countries like Chile, Ecuador, Colombia, Simbabwe and Mexico 59 to 85 percent of the people have blood group O, and these countries officially publish extremely low COVID-19 cases and death rates per 1 million inhabitants, this may not alone result from insufficient investigations but might suggest a lower susceptibility of blood group O to the disease. In the case that O-glycosylation plays a key role in the
more » ... role in the pathogenesis of coronavirus infections, as was discussed already 14 years ago and is currently again predicted, this would involve the formation of hybrid, serologically A-like, O-GalNAcα1-Ser/Thr-R, Tn ("T nouvelle") antigenic structures; the virus hypothetically hijacks the metabolism of the host's amino sugar N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc) by serine-rich peptides. The resulting intermediate, evolutionary/developmental A-like/Tn structure, which is common to all metazoan growth processes and apparently acts as a host-pathogen functional bridge in different, unrelated infectious diseases, would perform the adhesion of the virus to host cells primarily independent of the ABO blood group. However, while susceptibility to an infection and its severity depend on many factors, individuals with blood group A could not respond with either acquired or innate antibodies to the synthesis of A-like hybrid structures due to clonal selection and phenotypic accommodation of plasma proteins; blood group A individuals would become a preferred target for the virus, which utilizes the ACE receptor-mediated, blood group A-phenotype-determining enzyme activity and performs a further (blood group-A-specific) hybrid binding. In fact, a first statistical study suggests that people with blood group A have a significantly higher risk for acquiring COVID-19, whereas people with blood group O have a significantly lower risk for the infection compared with non-O blood groups (Zhao, J. et al., 2020). While these findings await confir [...]
doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12019035.v76 fatcat:7ghqbedwsfhpzeulogrsxqdu3i