The intent of this paper is to find the relationship between the rate ofA unemploymentA and the rate ofA inflationA in the US economic system. It has been chiefly examined in the yesteryear that the rate ofA unemploymentA is reciprocally relative to the rate ofA rising prices. The relation is stable in the short tally but in the long tally it is different. Many plants have been done on this relation in the yesteryear and it has been listed in the literature reappraisal. Data has been collected for 40 old ages from 1970 to 2009 and analysis has been done to happen if there is correlativity between these two variables. The information has been collected from 1970 because during that period the rising prices and unemployment degrees were raising at the same rate in many states including US. This was called as ‘Stagflation ‘ as rising prices and unemployment were meeting rise in their degrees which in theory opposed Phillips curve. Edmund Phelps went on to explicate that in long tally, there is no trade off between unemployment and rising prices which got him a Nobel Prize. It was subsequently proved that an addition in rising prices can take down the unemployment in a short tally temporarily but in the long tally rising prices has no function in commanding unemployment. This behavior has been noted for the long tally ( 1970-2009 ) and it has been proved through correlativities and arrested development theoretical accounts that there is a weak correlativity between unemployment and correlativity.

Literature Reappraisal:

The relationship between the unemployment and the rate of rising prices was examined by a New Zealand born economic expert A.W. Phillips. The economic expert described the statistical relationship between pay rising prices and unemployment in the UK. It was found that there is an reverse relation between unemployment and rising prices when the graph was plotted with rising prices on Y-axis and unemployment on X-axis. Same theoretical account has been applied to other states by different economic experts and the consequence was same when rising prices was low, the unemployment was high and vice-versa. This curve obtained by the spread of points on the graph was popularly known as Phillips curve.

In his research, Phillip found that unemployment at 5.5 % , the pay rising prices is zero and when unemployment at 2.5 % , the monetary value rising prices is zero as the addition in pay will counterbalance the productiveness growing.

Paul A. Samuelson and Robert M. Solow through their research on “ Phillips-Curve ” found that a “ negative correlativity between the rate of rising prices and the rate of unemployment ” . “ The opposite relationship between rising prices and unemployment was explained in footings of unemployment being a step for the grade to which the capacity of the economic system to bring forth end product ( factor employment ) was utilised. When unemployment is high the extra supply of labor holds rewards and monetary values down. When unemployment is low, extra demand will force up rewards and monetary values more rapidly. Expansionary financial or pecuniary policy would take to an enlargement of aggregative demand and more employment, but merely at the monetary value of increasing rising prices ” ( Stratling, 2009 ) .

Several economic experts assumed that the Phillips curve inferred that in the long tally, at a changeless rate of rising prices there will be increase in the rate of unemployment. Surveies in 1960 witnessed the relationship between unemployment and rising prices is non what the Phillips curve recommended. Labour and companies were concerned of “ existent rewards and existent monetary values and non nominal 1s ” . “ Monetarists argue that one time rising prices outlooks are taken into history, any inflation-unemployment tradeoff is merely a short-run possibility ” ( Stratling, 2009 ) . The rising prices will be predictable and the labor and organisations will react to increase in demand owing to a rise in money supply with monetary value addition and supply staying the same. High degrees of rising prices loads the economic system with greater operation costs and which consequences in distortion of the industries in the part making unemployment. Other economic experts believed that it is the duty of the authorities to keep unemployment and rising prices with “ Keynesian policy ” . “ Monetary policy ” should be used to pump in money into the economic system which increases the GDP and cut down the unemployment rate. The unemployment factors depends on many things such as the side effects of the Vietnam War for US in 1970 ‘s and aware economic policies for other states.

The gradient of the long -run Phillips curve is correlated to rising prices finding and unemployment finding as a effect of fiscal blow. “ The standard New Phillips curve ( declivitous in the short tally and perpendicular in the long tally ) has recognized troubles in accounting for rising prices continuity and frequently implies implausible impulse-response maps ( IRFs ) for unemployment ; our Phillips curve ( declivitous in the short, medium and long tally ) can bring forth rising prices continuity and plausible unemployment IRFs ” ( Karanassoua et al. 2005 ) .

The Phillips curve plays a polar function in the country of macroeconomics and in the formation of pecuniary policies framed by the several authoritiess. Economists look upon the negative correlativity between the rate of rising prices and the rate of unemployment in Phillips curve as precise and consistent relation to monetary value rise. Research by economic experts such as Lipsey suggested that “ theA rate of changeA of unemployment besides has an consequence upon rising prices in add-on to the consequence of theA levelA of unemployment ” and Gordon highlighted the map of demand addition in finding rising prices ( Guha and Visviki, 2001 ) . By and large all the old research dressed ores on the “ flat effects ” instead than “ rate of alteration of effects ” . In the research conducts by Guha and Visviki ( 2001 ) , the consequence from the survey states that “ US occupation growing isA more importantA than the unemployment rate in finding rising prices ” . The relation between the variables occupation growing and rising prices is found to hold greater impact than the current variables. After the post-war epoch in US, employment growing has a greater digesting authorization on monetary value rise following the consequence of occupation loss and the control of unemployment on monetary value rise is small. In the past 10 old ages, it has been observed that rising prices being at its lowest degrees, the rate of unemployment has remained low every bit good.

The Phillips curve is a simple equation that interprets “ the impulse-response map of rising prices to a pecuniary daze into the impulse-response map of unemployment to that daze ; therefore the pecuniary daze is substituted out in deducing the relation between rising prices and unemployment. This curve can non portray the interplay between money growing and nominal clashs, which is the focal point of our analysis ” ( Karanassou et al. , 2008 ) .

Data Description and Data Collection:

The United States has been selected to happen the correlativity of unemployment and rising prices. As US is the universe ‘s largest economic system with more than $ 14 trillion in 2009 which is 3 times larger than Japan.

The two variables considered for this survey are unemployment and rising prices.

Inflation is computed by Consumer Price Index ( CPI ) method. It is a step measuring the mean cost of goods bought by consumers. It is a monetary value alteration for steady batch of goods from one clip to another in the same part.

Unemployment is the figure of people who are unemployed at a given period of clip. The figure is determined every month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics ( BLS ) of the U.S. Department of Labor.

The information for unemployment has been collected from United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The information has been considered for 40 old ages from 1970 to 2009 can be found in the Appendix. The unemployment in 1970 was around 4 million which was the lower limit in the sample size of 40. The highest figure of unemployment was recorded in the twelvemonth 2009 with more than 14 million.

The information for rising prices has been collected from the US Inflation Calculator web site. The information has been considered for 40 old ages from 1970 to 2009. The rate of rising prices in 1970 was 5.7 % . The rate of rising prices was recorded negative in 2009 with -0.4 % and the maximal rising prices was recorded in the twelvemonth 1980 with 13.5 % .

The mean, average, manner and standard divergence can be found in the tabular array.

Correlation Analysis:

Hypothesis: There is a weak relation between unemployment and rising prices ( reciprocally relative ) .

Dependent variable ( DV ) : Inflation

Independent variable ( IV ) : Unemployment

Datas of the two variables ( unemployment and rising prices ) are plotted as points on a graph. The graph obtained is called as spread gm. To find whether there is an grounds of the relation between the two variables, we calculate the correlativity coefficient. “ The correlativity coefficient is a figure which describes the extent to which the form of points is additive ” ( Jessop, 2010 ) . By utilizing the excel sheet and using the map CORREL, we get CORREL = -0.2901

“ A correlativity coefficient is a “ ratio ” non a per centum ” ( Higgins, 2005 ) .

When CORREL is negative, it implies that it is a downward sloping consecutive line form.

As we can see from the graph, a downward sloping form has been observed which means a negative correlativity has been determined. As the rate of rising prices additions, the unemployment decreases. “ The grade to which any form of points corresponds to the ideal of a perfect additive relation is described by the mean value of the merchandise. This is called correlativity coefficient ” ( Jessop, 2010 ) .

With the aid of correlativity, we can find whether the variables are correlated or non i.e. we can state that the greater the figure of unemployment the less will be the rate of rising prices. But we can non reason that unemployment causes rising prices or vice-versa. This correlativity helps us to acknowledge that a paradigm exists but non why the form exists. We will look into this issue in the latter subdivisions.

Therefore we have found correlativity coefficient ( R ) = 0.290

When considered hypothesis trial for CORREL, we find that the absolute value of sample CORREL ( r = 0.290 ) is smaller than 0.312. As the sample size of population is 40 and 95 % assurance interval is considered we get value of 0.312 from the tabular array.

The absolute value of R is non greater than the tabulated value ; this implies that there is a weak correlativity.

To happen the assurance intervals for R, we use FISHER map to happen the mean ( tungsten ) for the normal distribution.

W = FISHER ( 0.290 ) = 0.299

This is the mean for the normal distribution.

The standard divergence is 1/sqrt ( 40-3 ) = 0.164

The 95 % assurance interval for tungsten is

0.299 + ( 1.96*0.164 ) = 0.620

0.299 – ( 1.96*0.164 ) = -0.022

Now utilizing FISHERINV to acquire the corresponding values of R:

W = -0.022 = & gt ; r = FISHERINV ( -0.022 ) = -0.022

W = 0.620 = & gt ; r = FISHERINV ( 0.620 ) = 0.551

Therefore the 95 % assurance interval for the population correlativity is from -0.022 to 0.551.

Arrested development Analysis:

The Regression analysis is a “ Statistical tool for the probe of relationships between variables and to find the causal consequence of one variable upon another. It assesses the statistical significance of the estimated relationships ” ( Sykes, 2000 ) .

The consecutive line obtained from the graph is expressed by equation:

The equation obtained from the consecutive line is y = -0.0005x + 7.9857

Which implies incline = – 0.0005

And stop = 7.9857

Overall Model Performance:

Multiple Roentgen:

Multiple R is the correlativity coefficient ( CORREL ) = 0.2901.

From the tabular array for the hypothesis trial for CORREL, with a hazard of mistake of 5 % , a value less than 0.312, we can non formalize that population CORREL is non nothing, instead seting in other words, we can reject the hypothesis trial for CORREL.

The CORREL tells us “ whether two variables are related to one another, whether the relationship is positive or negative and how big the relationship is. It besides gives us inside informations about how accurately the fluctuation in one variable is relative to the alteration in the other variable ” ( Higgins, 2005 ) .

R Square:

To change over the correlativity coefficient into per centum we have to square the correlativity coefficient i.e multiply it by R and the obtained value is called “ Coefficient of Determination ” .

“ The coefficient of finding Tells you the per centum of variableness in one variable that is straight related to variableness in the other variable ” ( Higgins, 2005 ) .

In our instance: we have R Square = 0.0842 = & gt ; 8.42 %

In other words, big correlativity coefficient means strong relationship which in bend consequences in high R Square value. High R Square signifies “ more discrepancy accounted for and allows better, more accurate, anticipations about one variable based on cognition of the other ” .

This implies 8.42 % of discrepancy in rising prices is explained by unemployment.

Adjusted R Square:

Adjusted R square considers the entire sample size of the population and an improved appraisal of R Square. As we can see that the Adjusted R Square has farther been reduced to 6.01 % . This means that 6.01 % of discrepancy in rising prices is explained by unemployment. This might non be considered important.

Parameter estimations:

We obtained the equation: Y = -0.0005x + 7.9857

Slope: -0.0005

Intercept: 7.9857

t Stat:

T Stat is “ estimated coefficient divided by its ain criterion mistake ”

It is used to analyze whether the hypothesis that the value of the incline is non-zero. If the incline is non nothing there exists a relation between the variables. Sing 5 % hazard of mistake, we get the tabulated value 2.776 from the t distribution. From what we get the T Stat value -1.868, it is less than 2.776 which deduces that the relation is non important. In other words “ the variable is NOT a important forecaster of the dependant variable BEYOND the sample. However, as the theoretical account is a good tantrum with the sample – it does non take away from its value within the sample, it merely affects generalisability outside the sample ” ( talkstats website ) .


If 5 % hazard of mistake is non considered so the P-value Tells us that there is hazard of 6.9 % if we reject the hypothesis that incline of population is zero.

“ The p-value is the chance of detecting a t-stat that big or larger in magnitude given the void hypothesis that the true coefficient value is zero. If the p-value is greater than 0.05 ; which occurs approximately when the t-stat is less than 2 in absolute value, it means that the coefficient may be merely “ by chance ” important ” ( ) .

Assurance Time interval:

The 95 % assurance interval for the variable in the sample population is between -0.0010 and 0.0000. The interval consists of value zero therefore the incline of the equation can besides be a nothing.


From the analysis, we can see that 95 % assurance interval for the population correlativity is from -0.022 to 0.551. This implies that R could be positive or negative. As all the correlativity coefficients have to be in the scope from +1 to -1, the analysis is right.

The CORREL value of +1 gives us positive relationship between the two variables and -1 gives us negative correlativity between the two variables.

The behavior of CORREL value fluctuating between positive and negative is explained in item as there are many factors other than rising prices which causes unemployment.

The dependent variable rising prices has a positive relationship between the rates of money growing. “ In the theoretical account of aggregative demand and aggregative supply, additions in the money supply switch the aggregative demand curve to the right and therefore coerce the monetary value degree upward. Money growing therefore produces rising prices ” ( web-books ) . There are other factors which influence the rising prices other than the growing of the money but this may impact rising prices on a short term footing.

Datas for more than 150 states have been collected for a period of 30 old ages which shows a positive relationship between the rising prices and rate of money supply.

The fluctuation in unemployment can pull strings rising prices in 2 distinguishable ways. The difference of the existent sum of unemployment from its normal bounds can give rise to “ inflationary force per unit areas ” . On the other manus “ the fluctuation of the growing rate of the variable from its long tally equilibrium growing rate can besides impact rising prices ” ( Guha and Visviki, 2001 ) .

The Phillips curve recommends that more the employment in the state the more will be the rate of rising prices. At any point of clip, there will be unemployment which is non because of rising prices but of the other factors such as structural and frictional unemployment. “ When the rate of unemployment is below the non-accelerating-inflation rate of unemployment ( NAIRU ) , so the demand puts force per unit area on rewards to lift faster than productiveness. When the unemployment rate is above the NAIRU, the deficiency of demand leads to engage lifting more easy than productiveness ( or even falling ) . At the NAIRU, any pay additions are off-set by additions in productiveness ” ( Stratling, 2009 ) .

The experiment with the Phillips curve for US was stable for the twelvemonth in 1980s and get downing of 1990s to calculate the rising prices. The same was non true for the last decennary. The unemployment degrees began to fall in late 1990s without alteration in rising prices. NAIRU is variable for US and the grounds for it could be less possible salary degree, trade brotherhoods and the mechanization of industries driven by computing machines. It has been observed that during the period when there was high economic growing, there were promotions in the wellness attention industries which contributed to the US imports being low. “ The ground that most rising prices theoretical accounts have non managed to accurately predict inflationary motions in the 1990s is that they have non taken into history a really of import determiner of monetary value alterations: the rate of occupation growing ” ( Guha and Visviki, 2001 ) .

The rate of rising prices was high in 1970s in US because of the Vietnam war and oil monetary value addition in OPEC member states. After this there was deflation known as “ Volker deflation ” followed by recession. Harmonizing to Russell and Banerjee ( 2008 ) “ positive supply daze will ab initio increase both rising prices and the unemployment rate taking to a positive short-run relationship. A supply daze to unemployment is likely to take a really long clip to disperse due to dealing costs, retraining, and the rigidness of human and physical capital ” . But in the long tally this relation is different.

The practical survey by Abraham and Shimer ( 2002 ) and Valletta ( 1999 ) says that for the addition in unemployment is the consequence of ‘changes in adult females ‘s labour force fond regard ‘ and ‘changes in the incidence and continuance of lasting occupation loss that relate to worsening occupation security ‘ ( Valletta, 2005 ) .

Unemployment is ever at that place in any state because of ‘structural and frictional unemployment ‘ . Structural unemployment is disparity of the properties of a demand and properties of the supply for occupation. Frictional unemployment occurs when a individual displacement from one business to another for his ain precedences.

Other factors for unemployment in US are addition in population, competition that US houses face from other states, technological promotion doing occupation losingss, recession, seasonal occupations, lower limit pay programme, outsourcing to other states, multitasking of occupations carried by individual individual.

Supply of money dramas an of import function in the cause of rising prices. Keynesian suggests that the rising prices is because of three chief grounds – Demand-Pull rising prices ( addition in demand for goods is greater than the supply of goods, Cost-Push rising prices ( bead in supply because of external factors ) and Built-in rising prices. The rate of economic growing besides influences rising prices.


The analysis of correlativity and arrested development theoretical accounts between the two variables helped in understanding the statistical significance associated with the variables. The analysis of the 40 old ages data assisted in supplying grounds based on theories by celebrated economic experts. Initially there was a great trade of trouble in measuring the truth of the informations collected. Other factors impacting unemployment and rising prices were considered as the correlativity of the two variables was found to be weak. A batch of attempt was put on garnering information about the causes of rising prices and unemployment between the clip intervals. The analysis of Phillips curve is different for short term and long term. This added a batch of complexness in giving an account about the alteration in behavior of the Phillips curve. The direct correlativity would hold been an easy one to work out and to show an analysis. But I thought unemployment and rising prices would give me a disputing undertaking, I chose these variables. The positive correlativity between the rising prices and the money supply could hold better explained the cause and consequence on the economic system. The illustration provided a elaborate statistical analysis for the controversial variables. The Phillips curve has to be explained in two parts i.e. the long tally Phillips curve and the short tally Phillips curve. This is my personal acquisition after mentioning to batch of literature and making research about Phillips curve.