Open Access

Role of neutrophils in systemic autoimmune diseases

Arthritis Research & Therapy201315:219

DOI: 10.1186/ar4325

Published: 2 October 2013


Neutrophils have emerged as important regulators of innate and adaptive immune responses. Recent evidence indicates that neutrophils display marked abnormalities in phenotype and function in various systemic autoimmune diseases, and may play a central role in initiation and perpetuation of aberrant immune responses and organ damage in these conditions. This review discusses the putative roles that neutrophils and aberrant neutrophil cell death play in the pathogenesis of various systemic autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, small vessel vasculitis and rheumatoid arthritis.


Neutrophils, terminally differentiated cells with a short lifespan in circulation, are the most abundant leukocytes in the human body, with homeostasis maintained by their continuous release from the bone marrow. More than 50% of the bone marrow is devoted to neutrophil production. As a first line of defense against invading microorganisms, neutrophils are characterized by their ability to act as phagocytic cells, release lytic enzymes from their granules and produce reactive oxygen species. In addition to microbial products, other stimuli (for example, tissue deposition of immune complexes) can induce the respiratory burst, leading to enhanced inflammation and the recruitment of inflammatory cells [1].

The neutrophil-mediated inflammatory response is a multistep process, initially characterized by adhesion of granulocytes to the activated vasculature, followed by their extravasation and migration towards inflamed tissues, then leading to in situ destruction of microorganisms [24]. Upon homing to inflamed tissues, neutrophils engage in complex bidirectional interactions with macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), natural killer cells, lymphocytes and mesenchymal stem cells, thereby influencing innate and adaptive immune responses [5, 6]. Indeed, neutrophils can modulate DC maturation and, in turn, the proliferation and polarization of T cells [7]. Further, they can directly prime antigen-specific T-helper type 1 and T-helper type 17 cells [8]. Recent evidence also implicates splenic neutrophils in the development and establishing of specific phenotypes in marginal-zone B cells through cytokine effects, including immunoglobulin class switching, somatic hypermutation and antibody production [9]. In addition, several innate and adaptive immune cells can modulate neutrophil function [10, 11].

Neutrophils may also display immunoregulatory roles in vivo at both peripheral sites and lymph nodes by synthesizing soluble mediators, decoy receptors and scavengers that promote downregulation of deleterious responses [12, 13]. The disposal of apoptotic neutrophils is an important step in the resolution of inflammation and is regulated by the expression of eat-me signals, which shape the phenotype of engulfing macrophages [14].

Neutrophils are characterized by two distinctive morphological characteristics: the shape of their nucleus and their granules, which provide sequential release of bactericidal proteins into the extracellular space. Granules are classified into four groups: primary or azurophilic, secondary or specific, tertiary or gelatinase, and secretory vesicles. A wide variety of stimuli induce neutrophil degranulation, including C5a, formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine, lipopolysaccharide, platelet-activating factor, and TNF. Neutrophils also express Toll-like receptors TLR1 to TLR10, with the exception of TLR3, enabling them to initiate various potentially important immune responses upon recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns [2, 4, 15].

Among some of the molecules present in the primary granules is a group called the alarmins, endowed with the capacity to rapidly engage antigen-presenting cells and activate innate and adaptive immune responses [16]. Neutrophil-derived alarmins include a number of human antimicrobial peptides such as α-defensins, cathelicidin and lactoferrin. Further, neutrophil injury results in the release of nuclear binding proteins with alarmin activity, such as high-mobility group box-1 protein. The cathelicidin peptide LL-37, produced by proteolytic cleavage of the C-terminal antimicrobial domain of hCAP18, is chemotactic to various leukocytes. Other molecules released by neutrophils, including myeloperoxidase (MPO), neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G, also have important roles in triggering aberrant inflammatory responses [16]. Additionally, neutrophils synthesize eicosanoids and various inflammatory cytokines. Pertinent to autoimmune responses, although not usually considered classic IFNα-producing cells, neutrophils are capable of synthesizing this cytokine and other type I interferons in response to certain stimuli, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or via double-stranded RNA helicase signaling pathways [17, 18]. However, these observations relate to mRNA levels and there is some evidence that this may not translate into protein synthesis [19]. Future studies are needed to further address this controversy, particularly when related to lupus-specific stimuli.

In addition to granule release, neutrophils are efficient phagocytes and engulf microbes into phagosomes that rapidly fuse with the granules, exposing microorganisms to proteases, phospholipases and cationic peptides [20]. Neutrophils can also immobilize pathogens extracellularly by releasing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) (Figure 1) [21]. These traps are networks of extracellular fibers, primarily composed of DNA and various bactericidal proteins (neutrophil elastase, histones, and so forth), which bind and disarm pathogens [2124]. During NET formation, neutrophils may die through a distinct cell death program termed NETosis [21]. NET formation appears to require NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity [25] as well as histone citrullination. The latter appears relevant for chromatin decondensation required for NET formation [2628]. Indeed, neutrophils express high levels of nuclear peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD)-4, which catalyzes histone hypercitrullination, and mice lacking PAD-4 have decreased NET formation upon stimulation [25, 2729].
Figure 1

Representative images of neutrophil extracellular traps induced in vitro by lipopolysaccharide in human control neutrophils. Neutrophil extracellular traps are visualized by costaining of neutrophil elastase (green) and nuclear material (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, blue). Original magnification 40×. Microphotograph obtained by Dr Ritika Khandpur.

Various cytokines and chemokines play prominent roles in the recruitment, activation and survival of neutrophils at inflammatory sites, including IL-17, IL-8, IFNγ, TNF and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor [30]. Conversely, human neutrophils are a source of cytokines that are important for the survival, maturation and differentiation of B cells, including BAFF and APRIL [9, 31].

While neutrophil responses eventually result in the successful resolution of inflammatory lesions, their recruitment and activation can become aberrant and lead to the development of disease states associated with tissue damage. To limit potentially excessive inflammatory responses, neutrophils are characteristically short-lived and die in circulation within 4 to 10 hours. However, the neutrophil lifespan can increase in response to cytokines or other proinflammatory agents [32]. Furthermore, recent data from in vivo labeling of human neutrophils with deuterium suggests a considerably longer half-life, averaging around 5 days in circulation, while murine neutrophils have a significantly shorter half-life [33].

Over the last several years, a renewed interest in the role that neutrophils play in various systemic autoimmune diseases has emerged. This review highlights the putative roles that neutrophils and aberrant neutrophil cell death play in several of these diseases, including systemic vasculitides, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated systemic vasculitis

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated systemic vasculitis (AASV) comprises a group of systemic inflammatory vasculitides associated with circulating autoantibodies (anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs)) directed against the neutrophil granule components proteinase-3 (PR3) and MPO. AASV is characterized by leukocytoclasis and accumulation of unscavenged apoptotic and necrotic neutrophils in perivascular tissues. Indeed, injury in these conditions is largely driven by myeloid cells, including neutrophils. ANCAs interact with their target antigens on cytokine-primed neutrophils, causing neutrophil activation via several signaling pathways that lead to interaction with the endothelium, degranulation, cytokine production, and tissue damage. Given the presence of autoantibodies, the assistance of autoreactive T-helper cells and B cells appears to be required for disease to develop [34, 35].

There are various proposed mechanisms by which ANCAs are pathogenic in this group of diseases. Priming of neutrophils with TNF induces PR3 and MPO translocation to the cell membrane, where they are accessible to autoantibody binding [36]. Anti-MPO and anti-PR3 antibodies cause neutrophil-dependent endothelial injury [37]. ANCAs bind to membrane-expressed target antigens and initiate intracellular signaling events. Fcgamma receptor (FcγR) interactions (including FcγRIIa and FcγRIIIb) are involved in neutrophil activation by ANCAs, but additional putative pathways have also been described [3840]. Anti-MPO IgG can cause pauci-immune glomerular necrosis and crescent formation in the absence of functional T lymphocytes or B lymphocytes in Rag2-/- mice and in the presence of an intact immune system [41]. Chimeric MPO-/- mice with circulating MPO-positive neutrophils develop pauci-immune necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis, while chimeric MPO+/+ mice with circulating MPO-negative neutrophils do not, suggesting that bone marrow-derived cells are necessary for induction of anti-MPO disease [42]. In contrast, it has not been possible to induce similar phenotypes by passive transfer of anti-mouse-PR3 antibodies [43].

Human lysosome-associated membrane protein-2 (LAMP-2) has been identified as an additional target antigen in AASV. LAMP-2 is a heavily glycosylated type 1 membrane protein that is integrated into the membranes of neutrophil intracellular vesicles that contain MPO and PR3. Antibodies to human LAMP-2 have been reported to be highly prevalent in AASV and correlate with disease activity [44]. A passive model of anti-LAMP2-mediated pauci-immune glomerular necrosis and crescent formation has been developed. The LAMP-2 epitope recognized by human autoantibodies has 100% homology to the bacterial adhesin FimH, with which it cross-reacts. Indeed, rats immunized with FimH develop a similar clinical phenotype and antibodies to rat and human LAMP-2 [45].

Dysregulation of neutrophil cell death has been proposed to contribute directly to the pathogenesis of AASV. Membrane PR3 expressed on apoptotic neutrophils has been proposed to amplify inflammation and promote autoimmunity by affecting the anti-inflammatory reprogramming of macrophages [46].

Polyclonal ANCAs isolated from patients and chimeric PR3-ANCA can trigger release of neutrophil microparticles that express PR3 and MPO and bind and activate endothelial cells. Neutrophil microparticles can also induce generation of thrombin, thereby promoting clot formation [47]. ANCA-activated neutrophils also release BLyS, which could contribute to the amplification of ANCA responses by inducing B-cell survival and plasma cell differentiation [48].

NETs are produced by ANCA-stimulated neutrophils and have been reported in glomeruli and in the interstitium of kidney biopsies from patients with AASV. NETosis results in elevated levels of PR3 and MPO that are contained in the NETs. Further, circulating MPO–DNA complexes have been detected in patients with AASV, suggesting that NET formation triggers vascular inflammation and promotes autoimmune responses against neutrophil components in these diseases [49].

Propylthiouracil, a drug used to treat hyperthyroidism, has been associated with the development of vasculitis. A recent study found that NETs formed in neutrophils exposed to propylthiouracil change their conformation and are less prone to be degraded by nucleases. Further, when these propylthiouracil-exposed netting neutrophils are transferred to rodent models, they elicit a AASV phenotype [50]. Finally, DCs cocultured with netting neutrophils internalize NET material and, when transferred to rodent models, induce a vasculitis-like syndrome [51]. These observations suggest that aberrant NETosis may be implicated in the pathogenesis of AASV.

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Several qualitative abnormalities in various neutrophil functions have been reported in SLE. Lupus neutrophils display impaired phagocytic capacity [52]. SLE serum induces increased neutrophil aggregation and interferes with phagocytosis and lysosomal enzyme release by control neutrophils [53]. Lupus neutrophils are activated intravascularly by autoantibodies and nucleosomes and display a tendency to form aggregates [54]. Differences in oxidative metabolism of neutrophils mediated by FcγR/complement receptor have been suggested as acquired characteristics of the disease that are associated with distinct clinical manifestations. However, this observation requires further confirmation [55]. Levels of various bactericidal proteins synthesized and released by activated neutrophils and/or their precursors are increased in lupus sera [56].

Increased numbers of apoptotic neutrophils are found in SLE, related to disease activity and levels of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody. Anti-dsDNA and anti-SS/B antibodies can modulate neutrophil cell death and function, respectively [57]. Neutrophils from SLE patients have a reduced ability to be recognized and removed by the C1q/calreticulin/CD91-mediated apoptotic pathway, despite the presence of main apoptotic recognition partners [58]. Interestingly, there is recent evidence that various scavenger molecules show reduced binding to NETs [59]. ANCAs develop in SLE and are directed toward a number of neutrophil proteins, although their role in disease pathogenesis remains unclear (reviewed in [60]).

Neutropenia is a common feature in SLE and may be multifactorial, including neutrophil-reactive autoantibody-driven cell removal, neutralizing autoantibodies against neutrophil growth factors and myeloid precursors, bone marrow suppression, enhanced neutrophil apoptosis, secondary necrosis and NETosis. For a more comprehensive review on this specific complication, please refer to [61].

Significant upregulation of granulocyte-specific transcripts (granulocyte signatures) have been identified in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell fractions from SLE patients [62]. This is due to a subset of low-density granulocytes (LDGs) that are present in peripheral blood mononuclear cell fractions from adult and pediatric lupus patients. LDGs express similar cell-surface markers to mature autologous or healthy control neutrophils but differ from these cells in their nuclear morphology, which is consistent with an immature phenotype. LDGs appear to be proinflammatory; they synthesize higher levels of type I and type II interferons and TNF, and they display enhanced capacity to kill endothelial cells [63, 64].

Gene array studies have demonstrated higher mRNA levels of various immunostimulatory bactericidal proteins and alarmins present in azurophilic granules in the LDGs, relative to normal density SLE-derived and control neutrophils [65]. Given that levels of mRNAs that encode neutrophil serine proteases are highest at the promyelocytic stage in the bone marrow and decrease as these cells mature, it has been suggested that LDGs possess a more immature phenotype than normal-density neutrophils. This is supported by gene expression studies of SLE bone marrow, where a granulopoiesis-related signature is associated with disease activity [66]. As such, it is possible that LDGs represent an aberrant immature subset originating from the bone marrow that might persist or expand in the blood and/or other tissues in patients with SLE [64].

Recent evidence implicates aberrant NET formation, as well as impaired clearance of NET material, in lupus pathogenesis [65, 6769]. Increased NET formation has been reported in lupus neutrophils in the absence of infection. In particular, LDGs appear to be primed to form NETs ex vivo without needing additional stimuli [65]. These NETs externalize dsDNA and inflammatory cytokines, and levels of NETosis in the periphery and in tissues correlate with circulating anti-dsDNA titers. Indeed, affected skin and kidneys from patients with SLE are infiltrated by neutrophils that are undergoing NETosis, thereby exposing autoantigens and proinflammatory molecules at the tissue level [65]. Lupus serum contains immune complexes composed of autoantibodies to antimicrobial peptides such as LL37 and human neutrophil peptides and anti-dsDNA, in association with NETs. These immune complexes block the degradation of self-DNA by nucleases, thereby promoting its uptake by plasmacytoid DCs [69]. Indeed, self-DNA triggers TLR9 activation in plasmacytoid DCs and promotes the synthesis of IFNα, a cytokine that may prime further NET production [69]. Upon priming with IFNα, anti-RNP antibodies induce NET formation in lupus neutrophils [67]. The degradation of NETs by DNase I, normally found in healthy human serum, is impaired in about one-third of SLE patients [68]. This finding correlates with high levels of antinuclear and anti-NET antibodies and with higher prevalence of lupus nephritis and complement activation [70]. Indeed, NETs activate complement and the deposition of C1q in these structures impairs their degradation [70]. NETs, and LL37 associated with the NETs, also stimulate the NLRP3 inflammasome machinery in lupus macrophages, which may further promote proinflammatory responses in various organs, including kidneys and vasculature, through IL-18 and IL-1β effects [71].

A role for aberrant NET formation in animal models of lupus has been the focus of recent investigations. Injection of netting neutrophil cell lines to nonlupus prone mice led to moderate anti-IgG and anti-IgM responses but did not trigger a clinical phenotype [72]. However, it is unclear whether second signals or specific priming factors would be needed for this phenomenon to occur and whether this approach truly mimics in vivo NET formation with regards to TLR signaling and other putative mechanisms implicated in immunogenicity [72]. In the MRL/lpr mouse, knocking out NOX2 resulted in worsening lupus phenotype [73]. However, the role of NOX in immune responses is complex. For example, patients with chronic granulomatous disease and lack of functional NOX display a proinflammatory phenotype even if they are immunodeficient [74]. This may be related to the observation that NOX is important in preventing inflammasome activation in monocytes in addition to other anti-inflammatory roles [74, 75]. Finally, whether all processes of NET formation require NOX has been challenged recently [76, 77]. Nevertheless, these observations may support pleiotropic functions of NOX2, with potential immunoregulatory roles.

In the rat pristane model of autoimmunity, cathelicidin expression was also found in other organs (spleen, joints) and in association with low-density granulocytes in the blood. After pristane injection, the increased expression of rCRAMP (the mouse ortholog of LL37) coincided with higher levels of apoptosis, type I interferons and autoantibodies [78].

The NZM2328 lupus prone model displays evidence of enhanced NET formation in bone marrow neutrophils. Furthermore, factors present in NZM2328 sera induce NET formation in control neutrophils, and anti-NET and anti-CRAMP antibodies have been detected in the sera of these mice [79]. Similarly to human biopsies, netting neutrophils infiltrate kidneys from NZM2328 mice and NETs directly impair endothelial function. When these mice were administered Cl-amidine, an irreversible inhibitor of PAD enzymes (including PAD-4), they displayed decreased NET formation and significantly less deposition of immune complexes in the kidney and complement activation, while serum autoantibody levels increased, possibly due to lack of immune complex deposition in tissues. Furthermore, endothelial function, vascular repair and prethrombotic phenotype all improved when NETosis was inhibited in these mice [79]. These observations implicate PAD-4-dependent pathways for NET formation as functionally relevant in lupus pathogenesis as well as in its associated vascular risk [79]. Future studies need to further address in additional models, using additional inhibitors and knockout systems, the specific role that NETs play in lupus pathogenesis.

Another important issue that requires future experimentation is better understanding the interplay of neutrophils in both susceptibility for infections and autoimmunity in the context of SLE, as suggested in specific murine models [80].

Rheumatoid arthritis

The identification of increased neutrophils in RA synovial fluid, particularly in early disease stages, supports a role for these cells in the pathogenesis of joint destruction [8185]. Activated neutrophils have been found in RA synovial fluid, synovial tissue and RA-associated skin disease [8689]. Anti-granulocyte antibodies and ANCAs have also been described in RA [9092]. Further, there is a prominence of neutrophil recruitment in RA animal models [9395], with critical roles for these cells in initiating and maintaining joint inflammatory processes described in collagen-induced arthritis [96]. Cathelicidins are strongly upregulated in RA synovial membranes and in joints from rats with arthritis, particularly in myeloid cells including neutrophils [78].

Various chemoattractants stimulate neutrophil migration from the peripheral blood to the joint in RA [81, 97]. Neutrophils have been demonstrated to participate in their own recruitment in murine arthritis through C5aR and FcγR signaling [98]. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor promotes neutrophil trafficking into inflamed joints and induces neutrophil production [99]. Granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor has been found to be a key player in arthritis models, participating in interactions between hematopoietic cells through control of myeloid cell numbers and activation [100]. Dysregulation of T-helper type 17 responses in RA may play a role in increasing neutrophil recruitment to the joint [101]. In the K/BxN transgenic mouse model of inflammatory arthritis, neutrophil recruitment into the joints is promoted by leukotriene B4 through its receptor BLT1, both of which are expressed by neutrophils [102]. Neutrophil activation by immune complexes in the joints promotes IL-1β production, which in turn stimulates synovial cells to produce chemokines, and this amplifies neutrophil recruitment into the joints [98]. PAD-4 mRNA, absent from healthy synovium, is transcribed and translated by neutrophils infiltrating synovial tissue during inflammation. As a consequence, several synovial proteins are citrullinated in this compartment, which may play a pathogenic role [103].

Various neutrophil function abnormalities have been reported in RA [104, 105]. Exposure to immune complexes, rheumatoid factor and cytokines in synovial fluid results in neutrophil activation and granular content release that contributes to cartilage destruction [106108]. The rheumatoid synovial joint contains a complex mixture of proapoptotic and antiapoptotic factors, and local oxygen tensions that exist within these joints can exert profound effects on neutrophil survival [109]. Neutrophil-derived cytokines are also involved in bone resorption. Indeed, neutrophils can upregulate expression of functionally active, membrane-bound receptor activator of NF-κB ligand [110] and this is increased in synovial fluid from active RA patients [111]. Remission of RA has been linked with changes in neutrophil adhesion and chemotaxis that may potentially decrease neutrophil migration to the synovial fluid, with subsequent improvements in the clinical manifestations of RA [112].

Circulating and synovial fluid RA neutrophils are more prone to form NETs when compared with neutrophils from healthy controls and from patients with osteoarthritis. Levels of NETosis correlate with the presence and levels of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies and with markers of systemic inflammation [113]. Similar to what has been described above for anti-RNP [67] and ANCA antibodies [49], RA sera, synovial fluid, rheumatoid factor and IgG fractions purified from RA patients with high levels of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies significantly enhance NET formation and lead to distinct protein content in the NETs [113]. NETs externalize citrullinated autoantigens implicated in RA pathogenesis, including citrullinated vimentin. In turn, purified anti-citrullinated vimentin antibodies potently induce NET formation. As additional triggers for enhanced NETosis in RA, IL-17A and TNFα were identified as putative factors (Figure 2) [113]. The implications for enhanced NETosis in RA pathogenesis were also suggested by identifying RA NETs as strong activators of synovial fibroblasts, leading to enhanced synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules and chemokines by these cells [113]. As such, accelerated NETosis may play a pathogenic role in RA through externalization of citrullinated autoantigens and immunostimulatory molecules. This could lead to the promotion of immune responses in the joint, blood and other tissues and could perpetuate pathogenic mechanisms in this disease. Recent evidence indicates that inflammatory loops initiated by molecules described to be externalized in NETs may be key in arthritis development [114]. Interestingly, antibodies to modified citrullinated vimentin are associated with severity of RA [115]. Confirmation of the impact of NETs in RA pathogenesis is required in animal models and using specific inhibitors. Of interest, a PAD inhibitor mitigates collagen-induced arthritis [116]. However, no abrogation of disease severity was observed in PAD-4 knockout mice in the K/BxN serum transfer model of arthritis [117].
Figure 2

Neutrophil extracellular traps in neutrophils from a rheumatoid arthritis patient, following in vitro stimulation. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) visualized in neutrophils isolated from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis, following stimulation with recombinant IL-17A in vitro. Prominent NET formation is displayed, with DNA visualized in blue (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and neutrophil elastase in red. Original magnification 40×. Microphotograph obtained by Dr Carmelo Carmona-Rivera.

In Felty’s syndrome, a severe form of RA characterized by neutropenia and splenomegaly, circulating autoantibodies are preferentially directed against PAD-4-deiminated histones and bind to activated neutrophils and NETs. These observations suggest a direct contribution of neutrophil activation and the production of NET-associated nuclear autoantigens in the initiation or progression of Felty’s syndrome [118].

Summary and conclusions

Neutrophils have emerged as important regulators of innate and adaptive immune responses, display marked abnormalities in phenotype and function in various systemic autoimmune diseases, and may play a central role in initiation and perpetuation of aberrant immune responses and organ damage in these conditions. In addition to the use of ANCAs in AASV, there is a need to examine the role of neutrophils, anti-neutrophil antibodies, NETs and associated proteins as potential biomarkers that may predict development of tissue damage, autoantibody responses, vascular complications, and so forth. Important questions remain with regards to neutrophil diversity and plasticity that may be quite important to address with regards to induction of inflammatory responses and tolerogenic roles. In addition, better tools are needed to dissect the phenotype and function of neutrophils in vivo with respect to their role in autoimmunity. Future studies should also examine whether inhibition of aberrant NETosis will lead to amelioration of symptoms and prevent organ damage in patients with autoimmune disorders.



Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated systemic vasculitis


Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody


Dendritic cell


Double-stranded DNA


Fcgamma receptor








Lysosome-associated membrane protein 2


Low-density granulocyte




Neutrophil extracellular trap


Nuclear factor


NADPH oxidase


Peptidyl arginine deiminase




Rheumatoid arthritis


Systemic lupus erythematosus


Toll-like receptor


Tumor necrosis factor.



This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health through PHS grant HL088419, the Alliance for Lupus Research and the Rheumatology Research Foundation. The author thanks Dr Ritika Khandpur and Dr Carmelo Carmona-Rivera for obtaining and providing pictures of netting neutrophils.

Authors’ Affiliations



  2. Borregaard N, Sorensen OE, Theilgaard-Monch K: Neutrophil granules: a library of innate immunity proteins. Trends Immunol. 2007, 28: 340-345. 10.1016/ Scholar
  3. Huber AR, Kunkel SL, Todd RF, Weiss SJ: Regulation of transendothelial neutrophil migration by endogenous interleukin-8. Science. 1991, 254: 99-102. 10.1126/science.1718038.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Borregaard N: Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity. 2010, 33: 657-670. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.11.011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jaeger BN, Donadieu J, Cognet C, Bernat C, Ordonez-Rueda D, Barlogis V, Mahlaoui N, Fenis A, Narni-Mancinelli E, Beaupain B, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Bajénoff M, Malissen B, Malissen M, Vivier E, Uqolini S: Neutrophil depletion impairs natural killer cell maturation, function, and homeostasis. J Exp Med. 2012, 209: 565-580. 10.1084/jem.20111908.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Micheletti A, Costantini C, Calzetti F, Camuesco D, Costa S, Tamassia N, Cassatella MA: Neutrophils promote 6-sulfo LacNAc+ dendritic cell (slanDC) survival. J Leukoc Biol. 2013, [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  7. Park SJ, Burdick MD, Mehrad B: Neutrophils mediate maturation and efflux of lung dendritic cells in response to Aspergillus fumigatus germ tubes. Infect Immun. 2012, 80: 1759-1765. 10.1128/IAI.00097-12.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Puga I, Cols M, Barra CM, He B, Cassis L, Gentile M, Comerma L, Chorny A, Shan M, Xu W, Magri G, Knowles DM, Tam W, Chiu A, Bussel JB, Serrano S, Lorente JA, Bellosillo B, Lloreta J, Juanpere N, Alameda F, Baró T, de Heredia CD, Torán N, Català A, Torrebadell M, Fortuny C, Cusí V, Carreras C, Diaz GA: B cell-helper neutrophils stimulate the diversification and production of immunoglobulin in the marginal zone of the spleen. Nat Immunol. 2012, 13: 170-180.Google Scholar
  10. Derycke L, Zhang N, Holtappels G, Dutre T, Bachert C: IL-17A as a regulator of neutrophil survival in nasal polyp disease of patients with and without cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2012, 11: 193-200. 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.11.007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinsey GR, Sharma R, Huang L, Li L, Vergis AL, Ye H, Ju ST, Okusa MD: Regulatory T cells suppress innate immunity in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009, 20: 1744-1753. 10.1681/ASN.2008111160.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schuster S, Hurrell B, Tacchini-Cottier F: Crosstalk between neutrophils and dendritic cells: a context-dependent process. J Leukoc Biol. 2012, [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  13. Kasten KR, Muenzer JT, Caldwell CC: Neutrophils are significant producers of IL-10 during sepsis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 393: 28-31. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.01.066.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ren Y, Savill J: Proinflammatory cytokines potentiate thrombospondin-mediated phagocytosis of neutrophils undergoing apoptosis. J Immunol. 1995, 154: 2366-2374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Prince LR, Whyte MK, Sabroe I, Parker LC: The role of TLRs in neutrophil activation. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011, 11: 397-403. 10.1016/j.coph.2011.06.007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang D, de la Rosa G, Tewary P, Oppenheim JJ: Alarmins link neutrophils and dendritic cells. Trends Immunol. 2009, 30: 531-537. 10.1016/ CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tamassia N, Le Moigne V, Rossato M, Donini M, McCartney S, Calzetti F, Colonna M, Bazzoni F, Cassatella MA: Activation of an immunoregulatory and antiviral gene expression program in poly(I:C)-transfected human neutrophils. J Immunol. 2008, 181: 6563-6573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tamassia N, Cassatella MA: Cytoplasmic receptors recognizing nucleic acids and mediating immune functions in neutrophils. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013, 13: 547-554. 10.1016/j.coph.2013.05.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nordenfelt P, Tapper H: Phagosome dynamics during phagocytosis by neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol. 2011, 90: 271-284. 10.1189/jlb.0810457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A: Neutrophil extracellular traps: is immunity the second function of chromatin?. J Cell Biol. 2012, 198: 773-783. 10.1083/jcb.201203170.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Remijsen Q, Kuijpers TW, Wirawan E, Lippens S, Vandenabeele P, Vanden Berghe T: Dying for a cause: NETosis, mechanisms behind an antimicrobial cell death modality. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18: 581-588. 10.1038/cdd.2011.1.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaplan MJ, Radic M: Neutrophil extracellular traps: double-edged swords of innate immunity. J Immunol. 2012, 189: 2689-2695. 10.4049/jimmunol.1201719.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hemmers S, Teijaro JR, Arandjelovic S, Mowen KA: PAD4-mediated neutrophil extracellular trap formation is not required for immunity against influenza infection. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e22043-10.1371/journal.pone.0022043.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li P, Li M, Lindberg MR, Kennett MJ, Xiong N, Wang Y: PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med. 2010, 207: 1853-1862. 10.1084/jem.20100239.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Y, Li M, Stadler S, Correll S, Li P, Wang D, Hayama R, Leonelli L, Han H, Grigoryev SA, Allis CD, Coonrod SA: Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Cell Biol. 2009, 184: 205-213. 10.1083/jcb.200806072.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Neeli I, Khan SN, Radic M: Histone deimination as a response to inflammatory stimuli in neutrophils. J Immunol. 2008, 180: 1895-1902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Scapini P, Bazzoni F, Cassatella MA: Regulation of B-cell-activating factor (BAFF)/B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) expression in human neutrophils. Immunol Lett. 2008, 116: 1-6. 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.11.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. El Kebir D, Filep JG: Modulation of neutrophil apoptosis and the resolution of inflammation through beta2 integrins. Front Immunol. 2013, 4: 60-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pillay J, den Braber I, Vrisekoop N, Kwast LM, de Boer RJ, Borghans JA, Tesselaar K, Koenderman L: In vivo labeling with 2H2O reveals a human neutrophil lifespan of 5.4 days. Blood. 2010, 116: 625-627. 10.1182/blood-2010-01-259028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Franssen CF, Huitema MG, Muller Kobold AC, Oost-Kort WW, Limburg PC, Tiebosch A, Stegeman CA, Kallenberg CG, Tervaert JW: In vitro neutrophil activation by antibodies to proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase from patients with crescentic glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999, 10: 1506-1515.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Witko-Sarsat V, Lesavre P, Lopez S, Bessou G, Hieblot C, Prum B, Noel LH, Guillevin L, Ravaud P, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Timsit J, Grünfeld JP, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L: A large subset of neutrophils expressing membrane proteinase 3 is a risk factor for vasculitis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999, 10: 1224-1233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Charles LA, Caldas ML, Falk RJ, Terrell RS, Jennette JC: Antibodies against granule proteins activate neutrophils in vitro. J Leukoc Biol. 1991, 50: 539-546.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang JJ, Preston GA, Pendergraft WF, Segelmark M, Heeringa P, Hogan SL, Jennette JC, Falk RJ: Internalization of proteinase 3 is concomitant with endothelial cell apoptosis and internalization of myeloperoxidase with generation of intracellular oxidants. Am J Pathol. 2001, 158: 581-592. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64000-X.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Porges AJ, Redecha PB, Kimberly WT, Csernok E, Gross WL, Kimberly RP: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies engage and activate human neutrophils via Fc gamma RIIa. J Immunol. 1994, 153: 1271-1280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kocher M, Edberg JC, Fleit HB, Kimberly RP: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies preferentially engage Fc gammaRIIIb on human neutrophils. J Immunol. 1998, 161: 6909-6914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams JM, Ben-Smith A, Hewins P, Dove SK, Hughes P, McEwan R, Wakelam MJ, Savage CO: Activation of the G(i) heterotrimeric G protein by ANCA IgG F(ab’)2 fragments is necessary but not sufficient to stimulate the recruitment of those downstream mediators used by intact ANCA IgG. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003, 14: 661-669. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000050223.34749.F4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Xiao H, Heeringa P, Hu P, Liu Z, Zhao M, Aratani Y, Maeda N, Falk RJ, Jennette JC: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies specific for myeloperoxidase cause glomerulonephritis and vasculitis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 955-963.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schreiber A, Xiao H, Falk RJ, Jennette JC: Bone marrow-derived cells are sufficient and necessary targets to mediate glomerulonephritis and vasculitis induced by anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006, 17: 3355-3364. 10.1681/ASN.2006070718.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pfister H, Ollert M, Frohlich LF, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Colby TV, Specks U, Jenne DE: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies against the murine homolog of proteinase 3 (Wegener autoantigen) are pathogenic in vivo. Blood. 2004, 104: 1411-1418. 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kain R, Matsui K, Exner M, Binder S, Schaffner G, Sommer EM, Kerjaschki D: A novel class of autoantigens of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis: the lysosomal membrane glycoprotein h-lamp-2 in neutrophil granulocytes and a related membrane protein in glomerular endothelial cells. J Exp Med. 1995, 181: 585-597. 10.1084/jem.181.2.585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kain R, Exner M, Brandes R, Ziebermayr R, Cunningham D, Alderson CA, Davidovits A, Raab I, Jahn R, Ashour O, Spitzauer S, Sunder-Plassmann G, Fukuda M, Klemm P, Rees AJ, Kerjaschki D: Molecular mimicry in pauci-immune focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis. Nat Med. 2008, 14: 1088-1096. 10.1038/nm.1874.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gabillet J, Millet A, Pederzoli-Ribeil M, Tacnet-Delorme P, Guillevin L, Mouthon L, Frachet P, Witko-Sarsat V: Proteinase 3, the autoantigen in granulomatosis with polyangiitis, associates with calreticulin on apoptotic neutrophils, impairs macrophage phagocytosis, and promotes inflammation. J Immunol. 2012, 189: 2574-2583. 10.4049/jimmunol.1200600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hong Y, Eleftheriou D, Hussain AA, Price-Kuehne FE, Savage CO, Jayne D, Little MA, Salama AD, Klein NJ, Brogan PA: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies stimulate release of neutrophil microparticles. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012, 23: 49-62. 10.1681/ASN.2011030298.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Holden NJ, Williams JM, Morgan MD, Challa A, Gordon J, Pepper RJ, Salama AD, Harper L, Savage CO: ANCA-stimulated neutrophils release BLyS and promote B cell survival: a clinically relevant cellular process. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011, 70: 2229-2233. 10.1136/ard.2011.153890.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kessenbrock K, Krumbholz M, Schonermarck U, Back W, Gross WL, Werb Z, Grone HJ, Brinkmann V, Jenne DE: Netting neutrophils in autoimmune small-vessel vasculitis. Nat Med. 2009, 15: 623-625. 10.1038/nm.1959.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nakazawa D, Tomaru U, Suzuki A, Masuda S, Hasegawa R, Kobayashi T, Nishio S, Kasahara M, Ishizu A: Abnormal conformation and impaired degradation of propylthiouracil-induced neutrophil extracellular traps: implications of disordered neutrophil extracellular traps in a rat model of myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64: 3779-3787. 10.1002/art.34619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sangaletti S, Tripodo C, Chiodoni C, Guarnotta C, Cappetti B, Casalini P, Piconese S, Parenza M, Guiducci C, Vitali C, Colombo MP: Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate transfer of cytoplasmic neutrophil antigens to myeloid dendritic cells toward ANCA induction and associated autoimmunity. Blood. 2012, 120: 3007-3018. 10.1182/blood-2012-03-416156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Brandt L, Hedberg H: Impaired phagocytosis by peripheral blood granulocytes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Haematol. 1969, 6: 348-353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Abramson SB, Given WP, Edelson HS, Weissmann G: Neutrophil aggregation induced by sera from patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1983, 26: 630-636. 10.1002/art.1780260509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Alves CM, Marzocchi-Machado CM, Louzada-Junior P, Azzolini AE, Polizello AC, de Carvalho IF, Lucisano-Valim YM: Superoxide anion production by neutrophils is associated with prevalent clinical manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2008, 27: 701-708. 10.1007/s10067-007-0768-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Vordenbaumen S, Fischer-Betz R, Timm D, Sander O, Chehab G, Richter J, Bleck E, Schneider M: Elevated levels of human beta-defensin 2 and human neutrophil peptides in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2010, 19: 1648-1653. 10.1177/0961203310377089.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Armstrong DJ, Crockard AD, Wisdom BG, Whitehead EM, Bell AL: Accelerated apoptosis in SLE neutrophils cultured with anti-dsDNA antibody isolated from SLE patient serum: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int. 2006, 27: 153-156. 10.1007/s00296-006-0219-z.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Donnelly S, Roake W, Brown S, Young P, Naik H, Wordsworth P, Isenberg DA, Reid KB, Eggleton P: Impaired recognition of apoptotic neutrophils by the C1q/calreticulin and CD91 pathway in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54: 1543-1556. 10.1002/art.21783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Schorn C, Janko C, Krenn V, Zhao Y, Munoz LE, Schett G, Herrmann M: Bonding the foe – NETting neutrophils immobilize the pro-inflammatory monosodium urate crystals. Front Immunol. 2012, 3: 376-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Knight JS, Kaplan MJ: Lupus neutrophils: 'NET’ gain in understanding lupus pathogenesis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2012, 24: 441-450. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283546703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Kaplan MJ: Neutrophils in the pathogenesis and manifestations of SLE. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011, 7: 691-699. 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.132.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Carmona-Rivera C, Kaplan MJ: Low-density granulocytes: a distinct class of neutrophils in systemic autoimmunity. Semin Immunopathol. 2013, 35: 455-463. 10.1007/s00281-013-0375-7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Villanueva E, Yalavarthi S, Berthier CC, Hodgin JB, Khandpur R, Lin AM, Rubin CJ, Zhao W, Olsen SH, Klinker M, Shealy D, Denny MF, Plumas J, Chaperot L, Kretzler M, Bruce AT, Kaplan MJ: Netting neutrophils induce endothelial damage, infiltrate tissues, and expose immunostimulatory molecules in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2011, 187: 538-552. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100450.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Nakou M, Bertsias G, Stagakis I, Centola M, Tassiulas I, Hatziapostolou M, Kritikos I, Goulielmos G, Boumpas DT, Iliopoulos D: Gene network analysis of bone marrow mononuclear cells reveals activation of multiple kinase pathways in human systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e13351-10.1371/journal.pone.0013351.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Hakkim A, Furnrohr BG, Amann K, Laube B, Abed UA, Brinkmann V, Herrmann M, Voll RE, Zychlinsky A: Impairment of neutrophil extracellular trap degradation is associated with lupus nephritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 9813-9818. 10.1073/pnas.0909927107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Leffler J, Martin M, Gullstrand B, Tyden H, Lood C, Truedsson L, Bengtsson AA, Blom AM: Neutrophil extracellular traps that are not degraded in systemic lupus erythematosus activate complement exacerbating the disease. J Immunol. 2012, 188: 3522-3531. 10.4049/jimmunol.1102404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Kahlenberg JM, Carmona-Rivera C, Smith CK, Kaplan MJ: Neutrophil extracellular trap-associated protein activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is enhanced in lupus macrophages. J Immunol. 2013, 190: 1217-1226. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202388.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Liu CL, Tangsombatvisit S, Rosenberg JM, Mandelbaum G, Gillespie EC, Gozani OP, Alizadeh AA, Utz PJ: Specific post-translational histone modifications of neutrophil extracellular traps as immunogens and potential targets of lupus autoantibodies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012, 14: R25-10.1186/ar3707.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Campbell AM, Kashgarian M, Shlomchik MJ: NADPH oxidase inhibits the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Transl Med. 2012, 4: 157ra141-10.1126/scitranslmed.3004801.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Grimm MJ, Vethanayagam RR, Almyroudis NG, Dennis CG, Khan AN, D’Auria AC, Singel KL, Davidson BA, Knight PR, Blackwell TS, Hohl TM, Mansour MK, Vyas JM, Röhm M, Urban CF, Kelkka T, Holmdahl R, Segal BH: Monocyte- and macrophage-targeted NADPH oxidase mediates antifungal host defense and regulation of acute inflammation in mice. J Immunol. 2013, 190: 4175-4184. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202800.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Meissner F, Seger RA, Moshous D, Fischer A, Reichenbach J, Zychlinsky A: Inflammasome activation in NADPH oxidase defective mononuclear phagocytes from patients with chronic granulomatous disease. Blood. 2010, 116: 1570-1573. 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264218.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Pilsczek FH, Salina D, Poon KK, Fahey C, Yipp BG, Sibley CD, Robbins SM, Green FH, Surette MG, Sugai M, Bowden MG, Hussain M, Zhang K, Kubes P: A novel mechanism of rapid nuclear neutrophil extracellular trap formation in response to Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 7413-7425. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Chow OA, von Kockritz-Blickwede M, Bright AT, Hensler ME, Zinkernagel AS, Cogen AL, Gallo RL, Monestier M, Wang Y, Glass CK, Nizet V: Statins enhance formation of phagocyte extracellular traps. Cell Host Microbe. 2010, 8: 445-454. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.10.005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Hoffmann MH, Bruns H, Backdahl L, Neregard P, Niederreiter B, Herrmann M, Catrina AI, Agerberth B, Holmdahl R: The cathelicidins LL-37 and rCRAMP are associated with pathogenic events of arthritis in humans and rats. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013, 72: 1239-1248. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Knight JS, Zhao W, Luo W, Subramanian V, O’Dell AA, Yalavarthi S, Hodgin JB, Eitzman DT, Thompson PR, Kaplan MJ: Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition is immunomodulatory and vasculoprotective in murine lupus. J Clin Invest. 2013, 123: 2981-2993. 10.1172/JCI67390.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Mehrad B, Park SJ, Akangire G, Standiford TJ, Wu T, Zhu J, Mohan C: The lupus-susceptibility locus, Sle3, mediates enhanced resistance to bacterial infections. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 3233-3239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. den Broeder AA, Wanten GJ, Oyen WJ, Naber T, van Riel PL, Barrera P: Neutrophil migration and production of reactive oxygen species during treatment with a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003, 30: 232-237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Dularay B, Badesha JS, Dieppe PA, Elson CJ: Oxidative response of polymorphonuclear leucocytes to synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990, 49: 661-664. 10.1136/ard.49.9.661.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Dularay B, Elson CJ, Dieppe PA: Enhanced oxidative response of polymorphonuclear leukocytes from synovial fluids of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmunity. 1988, 1: 159-169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Kitsis E, Weissmann G: The role of the neutrophil in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991, 265: 63-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Pillinger MH, Abramson SB: The neutrophil in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1995, 21: 691-714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Barnhart MI, Riddle JM, Bluhm GB: Immunocytology in arthritic joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 1967, 26: 281-296. 10.1136/ard.26.4.281.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Belcher C, Doherty M, Crouch SP: Synovial fluid neutrophil function in RA: the effect of pregnancy associated proteins. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002, 61: 379-380. 10.1136/ard.61.4.379.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Hughes JR, Erhardt CC, Clement M: Neutrophilic dermatosis in association with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995, 20: 168-170. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1995.tb02676.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Ichikawa MM, Murata Y, Higaki Y, Kawashima M, Furuya T, Saito T: Rheumatoid neutrophilic dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 1998, 8: 347-349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Cines DB, Passero F, Guerry D, Bina M, Dusak B, Schreiber AD: Granulocyte-associated IgG in neutropenic disorders. Blood. 1982, 59: 124-132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Coremans IE, Hagen EC, van der Voort EA, van der Woude FJ, Daha MR, Breedveld FC: Autoantibodies to neutrophil cytoplasmic enzymes in Felty’s syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1993, 11: 255-262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Lassoued S, Sixou L, Oksman F, Pages M, Fournie A: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and antibodies to myeloperoxidase in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1991, 34: 1069-1070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Wipke BT, Allen PM: Essential role of neutrophils in the initiation and progression of a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol. 2001, 167: 1601-1608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Gal I, Bajnok E, Szanto S, Sarraj B, Glant TT, Mikecz K: Visualization and in situ analysis of leukocyte trafficking into the ankle joint in a systemic murine model of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52: 3269-3278. 10.1002/art.21532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Griffiths RJ, Pettipher ER, Koch K, Farrell CA, Breslow R, Conklyn MJ, Smith MA, Hackman BC, Wimberly DJ, Milici AJ, Scampoli DN, Cheng JB, Pillar JS, Pazoles CJ, Doherty NS, Melvin LS, Reiter LA, Biggars MS, Falkner FC, Mitchell DY, Liston TE, Showell HJ: Leukotriene B4 plays a critical role in the progression of collagen-induced arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92: 517-521. 10.1073/pnas.92.2.517.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Matsubara S, Yamamoto T, Tsuruta T, Takagi K, Kambara T: Complement C4-derived monocyte-directed chemotaxis-inhibitory factor. A molecular mechanism to cause polymorphonuclear leukocyte-predominant infiltration in rheumatoid arthritis synovial cavities. Am J Pathol. 1991, 138: 1279-1291.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Brennan FM, Zachariae CO, Chantry D, Larsen CG, Turner M, Maini RN, Matsushima K, Feldmann M: Detection of interleukin 8 biological activity in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and production of interleukin 8 mRNA by isolated synovial cells. Eur J Immunol. 1990, 20: 2141-2144. 10.1002/eji.1830200938.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Sadik CD, Kim ND, Iwakura Y, Luster AD: Neutrophils orchestrate their own recruitment in murine arthritis through C5aR and FcgammaR signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012, 109: E3177-E3185. 10.1073/pnas.1213797109.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Eyles JL, Hickey MJ, Norman MU, Croker BA, Roberts AW, Drake SF, James WG, Metcalf D, Campbell IK, Wicks IP: A key role for G-CSF-induced neutrophil production and trafficking during inflammatory arthritis. Blood. 2008, 112: 5193-5201. 10.1182/blood-2008-02-139535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Cook AD, Turner AL, Braine EL, Pobjoy J, Lenzo JC, Hamilton JA: Regulation of systemic and local myeloid cell subpopulations by bone marrow cell-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in experimental inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63: 2340-2351. 10.1002/art.30354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Cascão R, Moura RA, Perpétuo I, Canhão H, Vieira-Sousa E, Mourão AF, Rodrigues AM, Polido-Pereira J, Queiroz MV, Rosário HS, Souto-Carneiro MM, Graca L, Fonseca JE: Identification of a cytokine network sustaining neutrophil and Th17 activation in untreated early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010, 12: R196-10.1186/ar3168.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Chen M, Lam BK, Luster AD, Zarini S, Murphy RC, Bair AM, Soberman RJ, Lee DM: Joint tissues amplify inflammation and alter their invasive behavior via leukotriene B4 in experimental inflammatory arthritis. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 5503-5511. 10.4049/jimmunol.1001258.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Vossenaar ER, Nijenhuis S, Helsen MM, van der Heijden A, Senshu T, van den Berg WB, van Venrooij WJ, Joosten LA: Citrullination of synovial proteins in murine models of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48: 2489-2500. 10.1002/art.11229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Caccavo D, Garzia P, Sebastiani GD, Ferri GM, Galluzzo S, Vadacca M, Rigon A, Afeltra A, Amoroso A: Expression of lactoferrin on neutrophil granulocytes from synovial fluid and peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003, 30: 220-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Corberand J, Amigues H, de Larrard B, Pradere J: Neutrophil function in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1977, 6: 49-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Chatham WW, Heck LW, Blackburn WD: Lysis of fibrillar collagen by neutrophils in synovial fluid. A role for surface-bound immunoglobulins. Arthritis Rheum. 1990, 33: 1333-1339. 10.1002/art.1780330905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Emery P, Lopez AF, Burns GF, Vadas MA: Synovial fluid neutrophils of patients with rheumatoid arthritis have membrane antigen changes that reflect activation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1988, 47: 34-39. 10.1136/ard.47.1.34.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Mohr W, Wessinghage D: The relationship between polymorphonuclear granulocytes and cartilage destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Z Rheumatol. 1978, 37: 81-86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Cross A, Barnes T, Bucknall RC, Edwards SW, Moots RJ: Neutrophil apoptosis in rheumatoid arthritis is regulated by local oxygen tensions within joints. J Leukoc Biol. 2006, 80: 521-528. 10.1189/jlb.0306178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Poubelle PE, Chakravarti A, Fernandes MJ, Doiron K, Marceau AA: Differential expression of RANK, RANK-L, and osteoprotegerin by synovial fluid neutrophils from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and by healthy human blood neutrophils. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007, 9: R25-10.1186/ar2137.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Dominical VM, Bertolo MB, Almeida CB, Garrido VT, Miguel LI, Costa FF, Conran N: Neutrophils of rheumatoid arthritis patients on anti-TNF-alpha therapy and in disease remission present reduced adhesive functions in association with decreased circulating neutrophil-attractant chemokine levels. Scand J Immunol. 2011, 73: 309-318. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2011.02503.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Khandpur R, Carmona-Rivera C, Vivekanandan-Giri A, Gizinski A, Yalavarthi S, Knight JS, Friday S, Li S, Patel RM, Subramanian V, Thompson P, Chen P, Fox DA, Pennathur S, Kaplan MJ: NETs are a source of citrullinated autoantigens and stimulate inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Transl Med. 2013, 5: 178ra140-Google Scholar
  114. Cesaro A, Anceriz N, Plante A, Page N, Tardif MR, Tessier PA: An inflammation loop orchestrated by S100A9 and calprotectin is critical for development of arthritis. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e45478-10.1371/journal.pone.0045478.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Turesson C, Mathsson L, Jacobsson LT, Sturfelt G, Ronnelid J: Antibodies to modified citrullinated vimentin are associated with severe extra-articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013, [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  116. Willis VC, Gizinski AM, Banda NK, Causey CP, Knuckley B, Cordova KN, Luo Y, Levitt B, Glogowska M, Chandra P, Kulik L, Robinson WH, Arend WP, Thompson PR, Holers VM: N-alpha-benzoyl-N5-(2-chloro-1-iminoethyl)-L-ornithine amide, a protein arginine deiminase inhibitor, reduces the severity of murine collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol. 2011, 186: 4396-4404. 10.4049/jimmunol.1001620.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Rohrbach AS, Hemmers S, Arandjelovic S, Corr M, Mowen KA: PAD4 is not essential for disease in the K/BxN murine autoantibody-mediated model of arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012, 14: R104-10.1186/ar3829.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Dwivedi N, Upadhyay J, Neeli I, Khan S, Pattanaik D, Myers L, Kirou KA, Hellmich B, Knuckley B, Thompson PR, Crow MK, Mikuls TR, Csernok E, Radic M: Felty’s syndrome autoantibodies bind to deiminated histones and neutrophil extracellular chromatin traps. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64: 982-992. 10.1002/art.33432.PubMedGoogle Scholar


© BioMed Central Ltd. 2013