Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Migrations in motion

Screenshot of animated map (Dan Majka/The Nature Conservancy)
As Earth warms and climate patterns adapt in response, animals will be forced to move to survive. That usually means hightailing it to higher latitudes as equatorial areas become too hot and dry. Many species moved great distances as climates changed. Historically, this movement pattern has happened fluidly and naturally as climates have shifted, but now with human developments such as cities, highways and agriculture, critical animal migrations will be limited in surprising and troubling ways.

Based on a 2013 study in Ecology Letters that considered the likely movement patterns of nearly 3,000 species under climate change the University of Washington and the Nature Conservancy have created an animated map showing where mammals, birds and amphibians are projected to move in the Western Hemisphere in response to climate change. The visualization draws upon flow models from electronic circuit theory, taking inspiration from existing visualizations of wind flow across the U.S.

The map is color-coded to depict separate movement patterns for mammals, birds and amphibians. The animations show a mass exodus toward northern regions, with empty black zones showing where large cities or landscape features like the Great Lakes block migration. Each dot and subsequent streaking line show the accumulation of species' movement, not just one animal's future migration. 

The researchers were surprised to see how clearly migration routes appeared once the data were visualized. They knew from the data that the Appalachians and the Rocky Mountains were important movement areas, but once the data were animated on a map, those routes were clearly visible. In South America the most striking pattern is a projected movement of species west and south out of the Amazon.

This is the best visualization of any of these studies we've done. It's much more compelling than our static maps. The flow diagram really makes the data much more accessible.

Monday, August 29, 2016

Imbalance of nutrients threatens biodiversity

Niche dimensionality provides a general theoretical explanation for biodiversity—more niches, defined by more limiting factors, allow for more ways that species can coexist. Because plant species compete for the same set of limiting resources, theory predicts that addition of a limiting resource eliminates potential trade-offs, reducing the number of species that can coexist. Multiple nutrient limitation of plant production is common and therefore fertilization may reduce diversity by reducing the number or dimensionality of belowground limiting factors. At the same time, nutrient addition, by increasing biomass, should ultimately shift competition from belowground nutrients towards a one-dimensional competitive trade-off for light.

In his description of an entangled bank of species, Charles Darwin illustrated the principle that species must manage complex interdependencies to successfully coexist in natural communities. His theory explains the mechanism of how a number of species should be competing for resources when they are actually coexisting because of the subtle differences in their resource needs.

The Nutrient Network, a global network of researchers now tested the impact increased nutrient levels are having on grasslands across six continents. The experiment was conducted across 45 grassland sites.

What the colleagues found, was that if you change the limiting resources and add an abundance of resources such as nutrients like phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium, it will lead to a favouring of some species over others because competition is then shifted above ground for light. This will in turn evoke competition between species, leading to one species dominating the land area.

Undoubtedly, the human influence on the nutrient cycle through greater globalisation, has a damaging effect on ecosystem biodiversity. Unfortunately, many of the ecosystem functions that humans need to survive, such as oxygen production, water filtration, nutrient cycling, pollination, and carbon sequestration, are provided by richly diverse ecosystems.

The loss of diversity was not driven by the addition of any single added resource for example nitrogen or potassium, we found greatest diversity loss occurred with the addition of a combination of two or more resources.Simply put, the more nutrients, the less biodiversity. What this research does is provide tangible evidence that global change is driving environmental conditions beyond our planetary boundaries.

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Invasive species in developing countries

Invasive alien species (IAS) are a primary threat to global biodiversity, economies and human health1. The threat of invasion at any given location has been shown to increase with the rate at which IAS propagules are introduced and the degree of disturbances that promote IAS establishment. Currently, the highest numbers of IAS in the world, the strongest IAS management efforts and the greatest knowledge about the extent of invasions are found in economically developed countries, that is, those with a high Human Development Index (HDI). However, the geographical patterns of future invasions is likely to be substantially different from that of today.

As a consequence IAS are often perceived as a "first world" problem. Increasing globalization, especially imports of pets and plants, has have caused much of the biological invasions in the past. However, in the future air travel will be responsible for biological invasions of Africa and Asia. This will be exacerbated by climate change, and intensifying agriculture, which make it easier for invasive species to become established. 

A group of researchers from the UK and the US have now shown that these invasions are also threatening the last remaining biodiversity strongholds in the world's most fragile economies. They conducted a global, spatial analysis of the terrestrial threat from IAS in light of twenty-first century globalization and environmental change, and evaluated national capacities to prevent and manage species invasions.

As it turns out one sixth of the global land surface is highly vulnerable to invasion, including substantial areas in developing nations and areas with diverse species of birds and plants. The study shows that rich nations become accustomed to the nuisance of invasive alien species, and are increasingly taking protective action but poorer economies have little power to regulate imports but at the same time are crucially reliant on international trade. 

In the coming years, the negative impacts associated with the introduction of harmful species will likely be exacerbated by other global stressors, such as climate change, landscape degradation and pollution. Developed and developing countries -- especially the latter -- may lack the operational infrastructure to prevent and deal with harmful introductions.

The researchers hope that their findings will lead to governments and NGOs improving schemes to warn communities of the threats of biological invasion and provide solutions.

Uniting data on the causes of introduction and establishment can improve early-warning and eradication schemes. Most countries have limited capacity to act against invasions. In particular, we reveal a clear need for proactive invasion strategies in areas with high poverty levels, high biodiversity and low historical levels of invasion.

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Regulatory and Forensic Applications of DNA Barcoding course

As promised earlier yet another announcement for a new online course. The third course developed by us and the Open Education group on the University of Guelph campus revolves around the use of DNA barcoding in regulatory and forensic science:



This 6-week program will provide an overview of the state of current technology and the various platforms used. It consists of a series of online lectures and research exercises introducing different aspects of regulatory and forensic DNA barcoding research. There will be a strong emphasis on case studies and support for protocol/standard operating procedure adaptation and development. 

We are also collaborating with researchers of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) in order to design a course that is as close to the needs of the regulatory and forensic communities as possible.

Registration for the first offering (October 31 to December 9, 2016) is already open

Thursday, August 18, 2016

How old is the Isthmus of Panama?


Long ago, one great ocean flowed between North and South America. When the Isthmus of Panama joined the continents, it also separated the Atlantic from the Pacific Ocean. If this took place much earlier than the accepted date of 3 million years ago as recently asserted by some, the implications for both land and sea life would be revolutionary. Estimates of rates of evolutionary change, models of global oceans, the origin of modern-day animals and plants of the Americas and why Caribbean reefs became established all depend upon knowing how and when the isthmus formed.

An international team of researchers from 23 institutions now reevaluated all of the available lines of evidence, such as geologic, oceanographic, genetic and ecological data to come up with a firm estimate of when the Isthmus formed. Their work provided three key pieces of evidence that define when the land bridge was finally in place:


Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Endangered species? Get in line.

The U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) was signed on December 28, 1973, and provides for the conservation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or a significant portion of their range, and the conservation of the ecosystems on which they depend. Approximately 2,270 species are listed as endangered or threatened under the ESA but species must first be listed as threatened or endangered before receiving protection under the Act. In an attempt to accelerate the latter process, Congress passed an amendment in 1982 declaring a two-year timeline for the process, which starts with submission of a petition and ends with a final rule in the Federal Register.

But how close is this timeline to the reality? A group of U.S. researchers now evaluated factors affecting the number of species listed annually under the Endangered Species Act between 1983 and 2014. They used an information theoretic approach to assess whether listing budget, policy phase, or both factors were associated with the number of species listed and they calculated processing times for those.

While the law lays out a process time of two years for a species to be listed, what we found is that, in practice, it takes, on average, 12.1 years. Some species moved through the process in 6 months but some species, including many flowering plants, took 38 years to be listed - almost the entire history of the ESA.

It comes to no surprise that annual listing rates were positively affected by budget increase. However, the listing process for any species spans multiple years. Therefore, the colleagues also evaluated how taxonomy, the initiating organization, and lawsuits affected the duration of the listing process. They found that vertebrates had a significantly shorter wait time than did invertebrates and flowering plants. For example, the island night lizard (Xantusia riversiana) was listed in 1.19 years, whereas the prairie fringed orchid (Platanthera leucophaea) took 14.7 years to be listed. The lizard has since recovered and been removed from endangered status; the orchid is still considered threatened.

While the [US Fish and Wildlife] Service can account for species groups in its prioritization system, it’s not supposed to be mammals versus insects versus ferns but, rather, how unique is this species within all of the ecological system. However, our findings suggest some bias that skews the process toward vertebrates...Our results show that the process time from petition to listing would need to increase in speed 6-fold to meet statutory limits under the ESA. An increase in number of species listed annually, which currently stands at roughly 50 species per year, would be needed to provide protection to the hundreds of species not currently recognized as candidates, but that are in fact imperiled.

Thursday, August 11, 2016

DNA barcoding of consumer-relevant mushrooms

The dietary supplement industry has grown from $4 billion in 1994 to an estimated value of $35 billion in 2015 in the United States, and many “mushroom” containing dietary supplements are formulated with one to several fungal species. The world production of mushrooms for this industry has been estimated to be around $18 billion, and their trade has been compared to the value of coffee sales worldwide. In 2002, the global market value of mushrooms in dietary supplement was approximated to range from $5-6 billion.

However, the industry is facing the challenge of ensuring reliable species identifications for process material. A multitude of modifications along a multilevel supply chain makes it particilar difficult for samples containing fungal mycelia. Processes such as milling, drying, and extraction usually destroy important morphological characters and as a consequence species identification based on such methods is out of the question.

A group of US researchers has now successfully demonstrated the utility of the DNA barcode standard marker ITS to provide reliable species IDs for all sorts of fungi found in the food and dietary supplement products. Their results confirm - not unexpected - that barcoding works quite well and, if properly executed, could enrich the tool set available to regulators and researchers.

Barcoding methods highlighted here could ensure the industry of product reliability, thereby ensuring both consumer safety and product integrity. Even when morphology can be discerned, for example in culinary mushrooms, we have revealed that a sample labeled as B. edulis and sold in a U.S. grocery store was actually a new species that was recently reported from grocery stores in the UK. We have also demonstrated that some fungal containing products sold commercially as dietary supplement are not entirely accurate in terms of the scientific names that were displayed on the product label.

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

eDNA to detect largetooth sawfish

Sawfishes (Family Pristidae) are the most threatened family of elasmobranch (sharks and rays), with all 5 species listed on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species as either Critically Endangered or Endangered. Limited observational data and expert opinion suggest that sawfish species are now extinct in at least 20 countries within their former distribution, and are possibly extinct in many more.

A lack of understanding the remaining extant range of sawfish due to their rarity and scattered occurence in remote regions has hampered our ability to implement recovery strategies. Researchers from James Cook University and Charles Darwin University have tested the utility of DNA barcodes obtained from environmental DNA (eDNA) to find the freshwater largetooth sawfish (Pristis microdon) in remote northern Australia.

Before trying the technique in the wild some initial tests were done on water samples from different aquaria and the colleagues were able to correctly tell which contained largetooth sawfish. Traditional methods to search for sawfish, such as fishing surveys, can be expensive and time-consuming. To test the approach in the wild, the research team sampled known largetooth sawfish habitats in the Daly River, Northern Territory. They partnered with indigenous owners and rangers. 

The method was mostly accurate in waterholes but not as good in flowing rivers likely the result of the high water flow and the associated turnover rates . This is not a big problem, this is very much a trial phase and it will be solved quite easily given some more timeWithin five to ten years it's hoped that all eDNA analysis will be able to be completed in the field, with no need to take samples back to the lab.

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

What snow leopards really eat

Declining prey populations are widely recognized as a primary threat to snow leopard (Panthera uncia) populations throughout their range. Effective snow leopard conservation will depend upon reliable knowledge of food habits. Unfortunately, past food-habit studies may be biased by inclusion of nontarget species in fecal analysis, potentially misinforming managers about snow leopard prey requirements.

It was estimated that there are only 4,500–7,500 snow leopards left in the wild and consequently the species is listed in CITES Appendix I. Knowledge of their dietary habits is a life-history parameter needed for effective conservation but it seems that as a result of the inclusion of non-target species samples in past studies, our understanding of the snow leopard has been biased to say the least. The issue with collecting and identifying scat in the field is that researchers mostly rely on morphological characteristics such as shape, size or associated signs of snow leopards, and since scat from different species can look similar, this can lead to misrepresented population estimates and errors in reporting what the snow leopards are actually eating.

It has been thought that they consume great numbers of small mammals such as marmots, hares and pika, as well as wild ungulates, such as ibex. Older estimates of the amount of small mammals snow leopards consume may have been overstated, and the importance of large ungulate populations to the snow leopard's diets may have been understated, as a new study suggests. Stable snow leopard populations are possibly more reliant upon large ungulate prey than previously understood.

This can affect conservation plans because if snow leopards are eating more large ungulates, we need to make sure we're maintaining those large ungulate populations. Otherwise, a population of snow leopards might not survive because there's not enough prey, or they may start eating more domestic livestock, which can cause problems with local human populations. That could result in people going out and killing snow leopards in retribution.

The colleagues analyzed 199 suspected snow leopard scat samples collected from two study sites in Tajikistan and from two study sites in Kyrgyzstan utilizing mitochondrial genetic markers. Overall, only about a third of collected scats thought to be from snow leopards were confirmed as snow leopard, many turned out to be from red fox . The snow leopard samples were most often confused with red fox (Vulpes vulpes) scat, which comprised almost 40% of collected samples.

We don't want to overstate our results because this was just one study, but we did notice that if we were using the blind approach, we definitely had a lot more small mammal occurrence in those scats. When we used genetics to pre-screen the scat and find out which ones were actually snow leopard, there were many fewer small mammals in those scats. It's a little bit of conjecture, but our thought is that a lot of food habit studies that have not been able to verify that their scat is actually from the species that they're studying probably do have this bias soaking in from other species.

Monday, August 8, 2016

The microbiome of wine

Source: cupegraf
Culture-independent methods of microbial identification have been developed, which allow for DNA extraction directly from environmental samples without subjecting microbes to growth on nutrient media. These methods often involve next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) for identifying microbes and qPCR for quantifying them. Despite the benefits of extracting all DNA from the sample, results may be compromised by amplifying DNA from dead cells. 

In a recent study, researchers of the University of British Columbia developed a technique that combines a process to identify the full spectrum of DNA in yeast and bacteria samples with a technique that distinguishes between live and dead micro-organisms. Key in the development of their method was the use of a light-sensitive dye, propidium monoazide, which deactivates DNA in non-viable cells and thereby prevents it from being detected. The colleagues tried to identifying the yeast and bacterial diversity of wines.

Since only live micro-organisms are relevant in the various stages of fermentation as they relate to the senses, this study provides some of the important tools that will be necessary to determine why different types of wine taste and smell as they do. While more research needs to be conducted, these findings could also lead to the identification and elimination of micro-organisms that are responsible for spoilage.

The new technique allows for a much faster and more accurate assessment. What previously could have taken multiple experiments and months of trial and error, can now be done in a single experiment. 

The next stages of research will focus this technique on different types of wine making methods to see how they change micro-organisms that affect the final wine product.

Thursday, August 4, 2016

DNA barcoding of frugivorous bird diets

Eurasian Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla)
Frugivores are critical components of restoration programs because they are seed dispersers. Thus, knowledge about bird–plant trophic relationships is essential in the evaluation of the efficacy of restoration processes. 

The traditional approach to the analysis of the diet of frugivore birds is the morphological identification of plant residues in droppings. Unfortunately, this is time-consuming, requires expert botanical knowledge, and cannot be used for fragments lacking any visible morphological characteristics. It seems obvious that molecular approaches such as DNA barcoding could instead be used as a universal tool to rapidly characterize the diet of a frugivorous bird or any other bird for that matter.

A group of Italian researchers was interested in using frugivorous birds as bioindicators of the efficacy of restoration at a site of community importance in Italy (Pusiano Lake in the North of the country). Over 3 years the team collected 642 Eurasian Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) droppings at the site during the autumn migration. Intact seeds and fragmented plant material were analyzed at two plastid loci (the barcode region rbcL and trnH-psbA), and the resulting plant identifications were validated by comparison with a reference molecular data set of the local flora.

The colleagues were able to find at least 17 plant species, including 7 of 11 newly transplanted taxa. Remarkably, 188 samples contained exclusively fragmented plant material unidentifiable with morphological methods. On the other hand it wasn't difficult to find sufficient DNA in all of their samples which shows the superiority of the method. Identification success was also exceptionally high which led to the summary:

Our results demonstrate the potential for DNA barcoding to be used to monitor the effectiveness of restoration plantings and to obtain information about fruit consumption and dispersal of invasive or unexpected plant species. Such an approach provides valuable information that could be used to study local plant biodiversity and to survey its evolution over time.

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Plant species diversity for soil health

Plant diversity loss impairs ecosystem functioning, including important effects on soil. Most studies that have explored plant diversity effects belowground, however, have largely focused on biological processes. As such, our understanding of how plant diversity impacts the soil physical environment remains limited, despite the fundamental role soil physical structure plays in ensuring soil function and ecosystem service provision.

As a result of changing land use to feed a growing population, climate change, and contamination of land with toxic chemicals, our soil resources are deteriorating, posing a serious threat to food security.

Plant roots play a key part in keeping soil together, making it resistant to erosion and helping water flow through the soil, which can help to prevent floods. But until now little was understood about how roots of different plant communities affect the physical condition of the soil. A team of researchers from the UK, Netherlands and Germany presented new evidence that an increase in plant species diversity can protect soil in grasslands by improving soil structure.

In a series of experiments in field sites in the UK (plant manipulation experiment conducted at the Lancaster University Field Station) and Germany (large scale plot experiment in Jena), the researchers tested the soil's structural stability when planted with a variety of different grasses, herbs and legumes. They found that soil structure improved with higher plant diversity and that the diverse properties of different plant roots were the key factor in keeping soil healthy.

For example legumes are better at getting water into the soil more quickly and maintaining root-soil strength. Grasses, however, have fine rooting systems that enhance the stability of soil making it more resistant to erosion. Combining these effects enhances the benefits for the soil. 

We only need to look at historical examples such the American Dust Bowl of the 1930s to see that globally, the physical degradation of our soil presents a serious threat to human well-being. This study offers clear evidence that by increasing species richness we can not only increase ecological value, but also provide a degree of protection to our soil which is good news for the future.

Soils are severely degraded in many parts of the world and these findings suggest that enhancing plant diversity could be an important way of speeding up their restoration to bring back fertility. It is almost like different combinations of roots can be used to engineer the soil, working to enhance its physical structure which is key to soil health.

Monday, August 1, 2016

From DNA barcodes to biomes

Today is a public holiday in Canada, so I'll keep posting to a minimum. However, I don't want to miss the opportunity to announce a special them issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. The issue comprises of contributions derived from presentations at the 6th International Barcode of Life conference. There is even one with me as co-author. All of them are Open Access. Enjoy reading:

Paul D. N. Hebert, Peter M. Hollingsworth, and Mehrdad Hajibabaei

Roderic D. M. Page

Scott E. Miller, Axel Hausmann, Winnie Hallwachs, and Daniel H. Janzen

John La Salle, Kristen J. Williams, and Craig Moritz

Paul D. N. Hebert, Sujeevan Ratnasingham, Evgeny V. Zakharov, Angela C. Telfer, Valerie Levesque-Beaudin, Megan A. Milton, Stephanie Pedersen, Paul Jannetta, and Jeremy R. deWaard

Peter M. Hollingsworth, De-Zhu Li, Michelle van der Bank, and Alex D. Twyford

Rebecca Yahr, Conrad L. Schoch, and Bryn T. M. Dentinger

Matthieu Leray and Nancy Knowlton

Camilla Speller, Youri van den Hurk, Anne Charpentier, Ana Rodrigues, Armelle Gardeisen, Barbara Wilkens, Krista McGrath, Keri Rowsell, Luke Spindler, Matthew Collins, and Michael Hofreiter

Heather J. Henter, Ralph Imondi, Karen James, Diana Spencer, and Dirk Steinke

Xin Zhou, Paul B. Frandsen, Ralph W. Holzenthal, Clare R. Beet, Kristi R. Bennett, Roger J. Blahnik, Núria Bonada, David Cartwright, Suvdtsetseg Chuluunbat, Graeme V. Cocks, Gemma E. Collins, Jeremy deWaard, John Dean, Oliver S. Flint, Jr, Axel Hausmann, Lars Hendrich, Monika Hess, Ian D. Hogg, Boris C. Kondratieff, Hans Malicky, Megan A. Milton, Jérôme Morinière, John C. Morse, François Ngera Mwangi, Steffen U. Pauls, María Razo Gonzalez, Aki Rinne, Jason L. Robinson, Juha Salokannel, Michael Shackleton, Brian Smith, Alexandros Stamatakis, Ros StClair, Jessica A. Thomas, Carmen Zamora-Muñoz, Tanja Ziesmann, and Karl M. Kjer

Christopher C. M. Baker, Leonora S. Bittleston, Jon G. Sanders, and Naomi E. Pierce

Ailsa H. C. McLean, Benjamin J. Parker, Jan Hrček, Lee M. Henry, and H. Charles J. Godfray

Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Donald J. Baird, Nicole A. Fahner, Robert Beiko, and G. Brian Golding

Diego Mallo and David Posada