

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer

As the title suggests, I've noticed that my fingernail grow much faster than my toenails. For instance, I usually trim my fingernails every two week or so, but for toenails the number would be about 6 to 8 weeks.

A bit of research revealed this wikipedia article:



But correlation does not imply causation, so why should the growth rate of nails depend on the length of the terminal phalanges? Then why do babies grow nail much faster? I wasn't satisfied by its answer, so I looked a bit more where I found this other article. They had two possible candidates:

  • because hands are physically closer to the heart than are feet, fingers get better blood circulation and consequently better access to oxygen and nutrients.

  • Fingernails experience almost constant trauma through tapping, typing, bumping, and other seemingly insignificant actions. These persistent minor traumas stimulate fingernail growth. Toes, on the other hand, are not exposed to nearly as much trauma as they are usually bundled up safely inside socks and shoes. Similarly, fingernails on a person's right hand grow faster in right-handed people than on their left hand and vice-versa.

However they don't give actual experimental results. So my question is which of the above is the real cause of this difference in the growth rate of nails; or simply why toenails grow much slower than fingernails?

P.S. The season dependence and the lefthand-righthand asymmetry were news to me; it would be really nice if the answer explains them as well.

share|improve this question
Interesting! We could test "These persistent minor traumas stimulate fingernail growth. " by doing a study of people who primarily walk barefoot (beaches, temperate climate, etc). Mark the toenail, measure actual growth (since they will wear faster, being exposed), and compare it. – Adam Davis Nov 13 '14 at 16:04

Going on the abstract of a study by J.P. Pessan, et al., fluoride intake, as well as "the fact that toenails are less prone to environmental contamination," constitutes a lesser need for growth in toenails than that in fingernails. Also, fluorine being a crucial component in maintaining the solidity of bones, the body may redirect more fluorine that is ingested by various means, to the hands than to the feet, due to the arguably more necessary functions of the hands (in that they are used them for agile and precise motions that tend to influence our survival), meaning less growth in toenails as evidenced in the first citation.

share|improve this answer

protected by Chris Aug 11 '15 at 8:00


Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
