Stunning Video of Evolution in Action: Disingenuous and Untruthful


For many years, evolutionists have been putting forth their assertion that evolution is a matter that is closed. They say that science has proven the evolution is true and the whole world should accept their findings. When we investigate what scientists claim is proof for evolution, we find that it is far from conclusive and only proves that cells, animals, and plants, may adapt to their environments. There is no scientific proof, anywhere, that proves that one species has evolved from another species. Scientists state that because we can observe evolutionary adaptability, this means that special evolutions is also possible. Although the two are diametrically opposed to each other, the two are linked together: asserting the one proves the others. Adaptability cannot validate that a singular species may mutate into a completely different species.

This kind of evolution, is after all, what we all want to see proof for, not whether it is possible for adaptability to environment can occur. The entire premise of evolution is to prove that God is not necessary; that man evolved from a lower life form. In this effort, science has never, and will never succeed. Many notable scientists today with stellar credentials, who have categorically stated that evolution by species, is not possible.

In this video by “The Atlantic,” the viewer can see the adaptability of bacteria, right before their eyes. The Atlantic did not provide a video of any species evolving into a human being, nor show any fossilized remains that exist in the entire history of earth, that displays one species, evolving into another species.

 There Are Two Types of Evolution:

Most people are not aware that there are two types of Evolution. The first is called “Micro Evolution” and is defined as changes within the species based on adaptability to environnement, lack or abundance of food supply, predators or availability of suitable mating partners. “Micro Evolution” is observable today in many different species as they adapt to their environments and other factors.

The second type of Evolution is called “Macro Evolution” which is defined as one particular kind of species that evolves over a long period of time, say millions of years, into a completely different species. Macro Evolution has never been observed anywhere, at any time. There are no fossils in the geologic record that have ever shown one kind of species evolving into a different kind of species, say a Dinosaur evolving into a bird, or an ape into a man.

I found an interesting article on the MSNBC website written by John Roach which is a classic example of the problem that Evolution has in being able to become viable and true. The following article goes to great lengths to show us “Seven signs of Evolution in Action”.

The problem is that all seven of these examples are of Micro Evolution, evolving within a particular species for adaptability purposes. Not one of the following seven examples show any proof of Macro evolution where a species is seen evolving into a completely different species. This is important because the entire point of Evolution is to show that apes evolved into man.

I present the following seven examples of evolution in action to make the prevailing point that Evolution from one species into another does not happen, has not happen, not will it ever be found to have happened. Case in point, seven examples given here, not one of which is of any species evolving into another species. Notice as each of the seven examples are given that each one is only of a particular species adapting to environment by making changes to itself to fit that environment.

“Seven Signs of Evolution in Action”

MSNBC, by John Roach


Darwin’s finches evolve


Notice, no evolution into another species, just evolution within the species.

Humans influence natural selection



Human evolution speeding up?



Butterflies rapidly evolve resistance to killer bacteria

A population of tropical butterflies on a South Pacific island evolved resistance to a killer bacteria in the span of a single year â€” a blink of the eye in evolutionary time. The bacteria infects females and selectively kills males before they hatch. The strategy reduced male Blue Moon butterflies to just 1 percent of the population. But just 10 generations later â€” a year’s time â€” males made up nearly 40 percent of the population. Scientists said the rebound is due to the evolution of a so-called suppressor gene that keeps the killer bacteria in check.


Toxic toad evolves longer legs



Intermediate form supports flatfish evolution



Lizards lose limbs



I think you get the idea. Do you see what kind of nonsense evolutionist have been feeding us for decades? Their contention is that since we can see the above evolution within the species, that this is proof that evolution from one species into another species is also possible. This is a pretty big stretch by any sense of the imagination to go from growing longer legs so a frog can hop faster, to growing an entirely different body all together which is not the same species that it was before.

This is the foolishness that evolutionists would have us believe. Carried to the extreme, the evolutionists teach that because we do see the kinds of evolution within a species that helps them adapt to their environment, then an ape could evolve into a man. The problem is that an ape is classified as a completely different species than a man. None of the seven examples given above are any species evolving into another species. This is what they are teaching our kids in school and this is the lie that has been sold to unsuspecting Americans for several decades now. Evolution from one species into another species has never been observed to occur anywhere.

The Lack of Evidence from Evolution

The empirical evidence against the evolution of one species to another, is staggering. When we examine the fossil record, we find that paleontology does not support Macroevolution. It is in the area of transitional forms of the fossil record that the greatest evidence is missing. For many decades, those who have insisted that one species can evolve into a completely new species, as a matter of fact, have demanded that the history of life through evolutionary processes has taken place through gradual adaptive changes. Today, paleontologists understand that the fossil record does not support this theory.

The fossil record reveals that there are two features, which demand the conclusion that macroevolution—where one species evolves into a different species—is not possible, given the current data.

Stasis: Most of the species of the known world display no directional changes during their record of life here on earth. The animals which are observed in the fossil record remain the same, with little to no change or movement in a direction towards a new species.[1]

Sudden Appearance: The fossil record indicates that in any given local area, no species arose gradually by any process of steady transformation from its previous ancestors. All species appear in the fossil record suddenly and fully formed.[2]

Charles Darwin wrote in “The Origin of the Species,” that the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed on the earth, should be truly enormous. In fact, the fossil record reveals exactly the opposite. There are no graduated chains of species to be found in the geologic record, which are valid.

Zoologist Mark Ridley commented on the stunning void that exists in the fossil record to support evolutionary intermediate species:

The fossil record of evolutionary change within single evolutionary lineages is very poor. If evolution is true, species originate through changes of ancestral species: one might expect to be able to see this in the fossil record. In fact it can rarely be seen. In 1859 Darwin could not cite a single example.”[3]

After 150 years of Darwin’s theory of evolution, we have a rather large collection of fossils throughout the world. Instead of confirming the theory that any particular species can evolve into new species, the facts reveal the opposite. As more discoveries are made and increasing numbers of fossils are added, Darwin’s theory fails time and time again to provide any evidence to prove that evolution of a species, is possible.

￼The informed reader will watch these videos, read these articles, and look for proof that scientists have proven that a new species has evolved from an existing species. Until this time, why do we permit evolutionists to permeate our schools and universities with unfounded scientific facts, and discredit those who say that God is the source of all life; who made man in His own image and likeness?

I will leave you with a second interview between former Atheist leader, Dr. Antony Flew and Dr. Benjamin Wiker that took place on August 30, 2001. The following are a few of the excerpts from this very interesting exchange.[4]

Wiker: You say in “There is a God” that “it may well be that no one is as surprised as I am that my exploration of the Divine has after all these years turned from denial…to discovery.” Everyone else was certainly very surprised as well, perhaps all the more so since on our end, it seemed so sudden. But in There is a God, we find that it was actually a very gradual process—a “two decade migration,” as you call it. God was the conclusion of a rather long argument, then. But wasn’t there a point in the “argument” where you found yourself suddenly surprised by the realization that “There is a God” after all? So that, in some sense, you really did “hear a Voice that says” in the evidence itself ” ‘Can you hear me now?'”


For more information, read the book: “A Universe From God,”by Robert Clifton Robinson, available at Amazon

[1] Stephen Jay Gould, “Wonderful Life,” New York, 1989
[2] Ibid.
[3] Mark Ridley, “The Problems of Evolution”, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1985, page 11.
[4 Read the entire interview with Dr. Benjamin Wilker at:


Leave a Reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Google+ photo


Connecting to %s