ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Entertainment and Media»
  • Music

Understand Chords: Tensions--"Sus" and "Add" Chords (Part Five Of A Series)

Updated on September 15, 2013

In our last installment of “Understanding Chords,” we examined extended chords—that is, chords in which thirds are stacked higher and higher, forming chords of the ninth, eleventh and thirteenth. (The last-named chord contains all seven tones of the diatonic scale—conceptually, if not usually in practice.)

So, if extended chords can already contain any possible scale tone, why do musicians complicate things by speaking of “suspended chords,” or “add chords” (which include added tones?)

A definitive answer may not exist, since it must be admitted that in the youth-centered and generally anti-authoritarian world of popular music terminology tends not to be very consistent. People may use terms slightly differently, and disagree about definitions of terms such as “tension” and “extension.” But there are distinct and different contexts which give rise to the terms “suspended chords” and “add chords”—and even specific musical ‘moves’ that accompany them.

Keith Richards, founding member of a (formerly) youth-centered and generally anti-authoritarian band, has played his share of 'sus' chords.

Let’s consider examples, beginning with suspended (or “sus”) chords. The whole idea of a “suspension” actually goes back farther into music history than does our modern idea of the chord itself—back, in fact, at least to the fifteenth century.

In those days, harmonies were thought of in terms of the combination of two or more (vocal) lines. Loosely speaking, a harmony was what happened when melodies were sung simultaneously.

Josquin Des Prez, a 15th century master composer.
Josquin Des Prez, a 15th century master composer.

But that sounds as if the resulting harmonies were somehow accidental. In truth, the master composers of the day were anything but slipshod in designing their melodies to fit together harmoniously. The art of “counterpoint,” as it came to be called, today fills many books and whole semesters of music school.

Yet the basic idea is simple. The possible harmonic intervals were divided into two basic categories: 1) intervals in which the tones ‘sound together,’ making a stable (“consonant”) sonority, and 2) intervals with “dissonant,” clashing tones which refuse to blend together into a smooth composite.

Here’s a sequence of harmonic intervals—that is, tone pairs sounding simultaneously. Which ones seem smooth and consonant to you? Which clash in bold—or even grating—dissonance?

Your answers may or may not be the same as those of the fifteenth-century masters—your musical ear, after all, has been molded by an additional five centuries of musical experimentation.

But to a fifteenth-century musician, at least, the dissonant intervals were the 2nd, the 4th, and the 7th, shown separately here:

If you agree with those choices, it is very possible that you would also be tempted to call them “ugly” intervals. But part of the genius of the art of counterpoint was the discovery that there were (and are) ways to use these dissonances to create beauties deeper and more satisfying than simple consonances could afford.

One of these was the musical ‘move’ known as the suspension. At the heart of each suspension was a dissonant interval—a 2nd, 4th or 7th. Framing the dissonance in time were a set-up—the “preparation”—and a release, called the “resolution.” Each of these phases of the suspension had to meet certain criteria in order to sound right, but we needn’t concern ourselves here with the details.

Here are examples of three different types of suspensions:

Other variants of the suspension exist, but these are enough to show the origins of the “sus4” and “sus2” chords. Compare the suspended chords below to the suspensions above which gave rise to them.

"Sus chords" and suspensions.  Compare "sus2" to the first suspension above, noticing the clashing "A" and "B" in each.  "Sus4" relates similarly to the second suspension above, sharing a dissonant "F#" and "B."

The ‘sus’ suffix can attach to any chord root. It indicates that the third of the triad is replaced by the suspended tone—either a fourth or a second.

Here is an example showing how a suspended chord works in an actual progression. This is essentially a Classical suspension: notice how the “C” (top note of the chord) is prepared as a note of the F major triad, how it continues as the dissonant fourth in the Gsus4, and then resolves to the “B," the third of the G chord:

Suspended chords can be used in other ways, too. This figure, similar to a well-known riff by Tom Petty, uses both sus2 and sus4 chords to decorate a D major triad. The "F#" (top note of the D major chord) moves stepwise up to "G" and back, then similarly down to "E" before its resolution back to "F#." Listen to the 'crunchy' sus4 and sus2 harmonies that result:

In fact, it’s not necessary today even to resolve a suspended chord at all; you can find many examples of suspended chords used completely independently, with no resolution.

Yet the possibility of a resolution remains the hallmark of a suspended chord. That means obedience to one of the oldest ‘rules’ about suspensions: the tone of resolution should not be present in the dissonant part of the suspension.

(For instance, in Example 4 the “B”--which is the tone to which the dissonant “C” resolves—is not heard until the actual resolution itself. Likewise, the F# which forms the third in the Tom Petty-style lick of Example 5 alternates with the suspended “E” and “G”, but is never heard simultaneously with them.)

But does that mean that you can never create a chord which combines a triad with a 2nd or a 4th? No. In fact, the Indigo Girls’ hit, “Closer To Fine,” does just that in an unusual chord heard at the beginning of the chorus:

Here a “D” triad is heard simultaneously with both a 2nd (E) and a 4th (G) added to it. The fifth of the triad--"A"--is left out, but the resulting sound is still dense and strongly dissonant. In the song, the chord arrives with no preparation—although it does resolve to an ordinary C major triad. Since the "E" and "G" don't act as suspensions, they are termed "added tones", and the chord becomes "Dadd2add4."

The harmonic idea here is distinctly modern: dissonances don’t need justification; you can insert them wherever you please, and you needn’t bother with resolutions, either, if you prefer not to. The "recipe" for such sonorities is modern, and simple to boot: just begin with a triad and add any tone you like.

In reality, our choices are more limited than the "recipe" makes them sound. Assuming that we stay within the scale, there are only four additional tones available: the 2nd, 4th, 6th and 7th above the root of the triad. But 7th chords existed long before the idea of ‘add chords,’ so the 7th isn't really a new choice here—one could already ‘add’ a 7th at will anyway. We’ve just seen the addition of 2nd and 4th, but the 6th is a very common ‘add tone’ as well:

Frequently added along with the 6th is the 9th. (In this example, the 9th is the "A"--the lowest note in the treble staff. It's called the 9th because "A" is nine notes above the "G" bass.)

You may need to listen pretty carefully to notice the difference between this example and the previous one! It's just a bit more dissonant.

This was a jazz cliché for some time—but like seventh chords, it's not really a new choice, since the 9th is in effect the same tone as the 2nd.

(Presumably, the practice off calling it a 9th, not a 2nd, arose from the theory of "extended chords"--discussed in Part Four of this series. Extended chords--ninths, elevenths and thirteenths--were being pursued at about the same time in music history.)

Interestingly, the “add 6, add 9” chord can easily result in chord voicings containing stacked fourths, much like some extended chord voicings (also discussed in Part Four of this series.) But perhaps that's a topic for another Hub!

And that’s it! A dollop of music history, a couple of examples, a survey of the available tones (figuring from the root of the chord), and we have a fairly substantial picture of ‘sus’ and ‘add’ chords. (Admittedly, we didn’t consider these chords in minor mode, since doing so would involve a long, detailed case-by-case discussion—and one unlikely to change the big picture much.)

Pretty darn close to fine--the Indigo Girls in Chicago, 5/9/11.
Pretty darn close to fine--the Indigo Girls in Chicago, 5/9/11. | Source

I hope this Hub has given you a few ideas to experiment with in your own music-making. 'Sus' and 'add' chords can definitely increase the harmonic interest and color in your own tunes, or in arrangements. There's an old music adage: “If it sounds good, it IS good!” In that spirit, if using this or that ‘sus chord’ or ‘add chord’ in your music sounds good to you, why then, it probably IS good, too. In other words, don't sweat the theory too much--your ear is your best guide, and the proper spirit to experiment with these chords--as with all musical exploration!--is the spirit of play.

(And if this Hub is a bit shorter than the last couple of “Chords” Hubs, that’s probably all to the good likewise.)

So, happy 'sus' and 'add' chords to you!


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Doc Snow profile image


      Appreciate it!

    • Nurfninja profile image

      Nurfninja 5 years ago from Earth

      wow, that's a lot of work man. Way to go!!!!

    • Doc Snow profile image


      Thanks for coming back to expand a little bit--I really appreciate the feedback.

      I had actually already done a bit of rewriting in order to make the logical links between ideas more explicit, and I hope that will be helpful for future readers. I suspect you may have a point, too, about the "prerequisite knowledge." In the first part of this series of Hubs, I was able to structure things in such a way that actually reading the music wasn't so important. But for these later Hubs, I couldn't really do that and still have enough concrete information to cover the topic.

      I'm so glad to read your comment about the videos, because that's exactly what I hoped for--the ability to hear the musical examples with a single mouse click is just too good, and really sets this medium apart from traditional print essays.

      But I must admit that I also liked that comment a lot just because the videos take a *lot* of time and effort to put together--each one requires me to use 2 different programs for the audio, 3 for the visual image (due to format conversions, mostly), and a sixth program to integrate the notation and the audio into a video. Then of course you have to actually upload it.

      So it's really good to feel as if the effort does make a positive impact. Thanks again!

    • Nurfninja profile image

      Nurfninja 5 years ago from Earth

      For example, the idea of ugly intervals, makes sense.

      Like you said about your own ear being your best guide, some of the notes in the videos were ugly in my opinion.

      You might have had too quick of a jump, but at the same time that might have been just the right time to jump for somebody with a little prerequisite knowledge. It probably all just depends on what kind of audience you're trying to write to, if it's to noobs, then once you start showing a lot of images of chords and stuff that can be overwhelming, but once again it might be just fine for someone with a little knowledge, but the videos make a lot of sense because i can hear the music, and that's sooo easy and fun.

    • Doc Snow profile image


      Ah! Such mixed feelings from your comment!

      I'm so glad you liked it--but so sad I lost you.

      By the way, I hope you're joking when you call yourself dense! The fault, if any, is more likely mine. . .

      One of the tough things about presenting music theory (or any similarly technical discipline) in a Hub is the need to balance concision with including all the really necessary information. Possibly for you, at least, I didn't include enough of the 'necessary information'--or, to say it another way, there was a too-sudden 'jump' in complexity at halfway through.

      If you're following the comments here, Nurfninja, can I ask more precisely where I lost you? Was it by any chance where I started going into the details of the examples from songs? Maybe I can ease that transition a bit, with a little re-writing. . .

      Also--and as a 'user's guide' sort of comment--it's probably more helpful to listen to the examples and associate the sounds of the different chord types to their names than to follow every tiny fancy detail about the "resolutions" and "decorations." (Maybe I can convey that idea, better, too.)

      Anyway, thanks so much for coming by, and taking the time to comment. Much appreciated!

    • Nurfninja profile image

      Nurfninja 5 years ago from Earth

      that was incredible! you lost me about half way through. It was beyond me.

      But hey! just because someone like me is a little dense it doesn't mean we can't learn!

      That was a great hub sir, at least the first half of it that I read.