Outline and Evaluate Research Into the Effects of Age on the Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony. (12marks)

283 Words2 Pages
Outline and Evaluate research into the effects of age on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. (12marks) A study done by Christianson and Hubinette (1993) found that 58 witnesses who had been threatened during bank robberies has more detailed and accurate recall of events that those not threatened, even after 15 month. However this survey has an ecological validity as it is conducted in a real life sistutaion. This shows that people are likely to remember more if they are threatened because it will increase the anxiety. Also the study of Goodman and Reed (1986) they did a study on children ages between 3-6 years and they played Simon say’s and then 5 days later they were questioned about this event. They found that the 3 year olds recalled less detail. Loftus (1974) reported a lab study which demonstrated the huge role that anxiety can play. Participants were exposed to two situations, one, a low key discussion which results in a person emerging from a room with a pen in his hand, and the other, a heated argument resulting in breaking of glass, smashing of chairs and man emerging holding a bloodstained knife. Participants were then given 50 photos and asked to identify the person. The findings were that witnessed who had seen the man holding the knife emerge accurately identified him, 44% of the time, whereas the participants who saw the man carrying the bloodstained knife only identified him 33%. However, this study can be criticized. This is because the study was a lab experiment and was done in a lab. The variables can be manipulated so it could therefore be bias. The study could also be accused of lacking
Open Document