2.28 Avyaktadini etc. Whether beings are permanent or impermanent, this much is certain :  The person, who laments over a given object - as far as that person is concerned, that object is at the beginning unmanifest and at the end also it is unmanifest.  Its manifestation in between is therefore a deviation from its natural state, Rather, there may be need to lament over the deviation from natural state and nor over the natural state [itself].  Further, whatever has been approved as its root cause, that itself  permanently exhibits, within itself, a variety of  different and endless creation, sustenance and absorption as its own manifold nature, in a set pattern.  Hence what is the necessity for lamenting over the same nature of this (its effect) ?	
 And enowed with the above mentioned nature-