Extracted Content: Anita Hicks: Okay. Je croix que c'est dommage de le it will be sad to destroy this prototype. It really looks like a banana.
  Margaret Tavis: It is a banana.
  Anita Hicks: It is a
  Margaret Tavis: It
  Anita Hicks: banana.
  Margaret Tavis: is of bananas. I would be confused with this thing.
  Anita Hicks: Mm.
  Margaret Tavis: S
  Fannie Freudenstein: Mm-hmm.
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Margaret Tavis: How is everyone?
  Anita Hicks: Hi.
  Marjorie Swanger: Hi.
  Anita Hicks: So we are here for the detailed design meeting.
  Margaret Tavis: Mm-hmm.
  Anita Hicks: So we will uh I will first present what we are going to do in this meeting. Then uh I've I will also take notes during this meeting and I will send you uh a summary then as usual. We will then look the our two colleagues that make good work. And uh then we will see the financial aspects and the cost of the product. Then we will uh evaluate the product. And uh end with the conclusion of this project and see whether it fits with it fulf if it fulfil the requirement or not.
  Marjorie Swanger: Mm-hmm.
  Anita Hicks: So d let's start with the cost aspect so so I look at the aspect discussed last time, that is to say uh to have a standard battery, to have a yellow banana shaped uh case with uh a rubber material around it to be uh
  Margaret Tavis: Like
  Anita Hicks: to
  Margaret Tavis: a banana.
  Anita Hicks: feel spongy, and uh also at the different aspect like having a wheel
  Marjorie Swanger: Mm-hmm.
  Anita Hicks: etcetera. And the cost ended to be ten point seven Euros. So which is uh good, because we had a price gap of twelve point five Euros.
  Marjorie Swanger: Mm-hmm.
  Anita Hicks: So for the financial aspect it's okay, we can uh we can continue with this product uh as if, and we are now going to see the project evaluation with uh our marketing expert.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Okay. So uh you can have my
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Fannie Freudenstein: project in
  Anita Hicks: You have a presentation?
  Fannie Freudenstein: Uh yeah just a
  Anita Hicks: Participant
  Fannie Freudenstein: Four.
  Anita Hicks: four, yes.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Evaluation.
  Anita Hicks: Okay. Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Okay. So you can go. We can go through.
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: So I made an evaluation and the the evaluation criteria is made according to the users' requirements and the market trends we talked about uh during the previous uh meetings. So you can go through and
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: okay so uh we have uh six points. We we talked about before.
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: So want to have a product fancy look and feel, technologically innovative, easy to use, fashion, easy to find in a room, and robust,
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Marjorie Swanger: Mm-hmm.
  Fannie Freudenstein: uh and uh uh I have a scale of uh seven points.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Okay. So I go through all the uh all the points here,
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Fannie Freudenstein: and uh according to what you think about the this project you can uh mm make a one point, two point or seven point. Okay?
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: And after we ha we have an an average, and uh we see.
  Marjorie Swanger: Mm-hmm.
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: The okay? Uh so uh fancy look and feel, what do
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: you think?
  Anita Hicks: Maybe you can
  Fannie Freudenstein: F between
  Anita Hicks: presen
  Fannie Freudenstein: o one and seven.
  Anita Hicks: okay. Maybe hold it. So I think it's uh very uh very nice.
  Margaret Tavis: I
  Anita Hicks: What
  Margaret Tavis: give
  Anita Hicks: do
  Margaret Tavis: it
  Anita Hicks: you think?
  Margaret Tavis: a I give it a five.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah. So it's between one and seven?
  Fannie Freudenstein: Yeah.
  Anita Hicks: Seven is the highest uh?
  Fannie Freudenstein: Seven
  Anita Hicks: I will
  Fannie Freudenstein: is the
  Anita Hicks: give a six.
  Marjorie Swanger: I will give a a five.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Mm-hmm.
  Margaret Tavis: And
  Fannie Freudenstein: sorry.
  Margaret Tavis: you? Do you vote uh Christine?
  Fannie Freudenstein: eh?
  Margaret Tavis: Do you also vote?
  Fannie Freudenstein: No, I just want to see something
  Anita Hicks: Maybe we all have to agree on a common
  Margaret Tavis: Well, we can very easily.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Mm-hmm. Uh I think uh and need to as well.
  Anita Hicks: No problem.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Need to
  Anita Hicks: So
  Fannie Freudenstein: uh I
  Anita Hicks: this
  Fannie Freudenstein: don't know if
  Anita Hicks: is
  Fannie Freudenstein: you
  Anita Hicks: your
  Fannie Freudenstein: we ha we have to put uh one uh f If it's better or
  Anita Hicks: One
  Margaret Tavis: I
  Anita Hicks: is most.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Uh-uh. Um.
  Anita Hicks: Well, we can choose what we want.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Yeah.
  Anita Hicks: Okay,
  Fannie Freudenstein: Or maybe
  Anita Hicks: let's
  Fannie Freudenstein: we
  Anita Hicks: say
  Fannie Freudenstein: can
  Anita Hicks: that
  Fannie Freudenstein: say
  Anita Hicks: seven is the best.
  Fannie Freudenstein: s seven is the best
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: mm.
  Anita Hicks: So so do note the grade we have five, six for Fannie Freudenstein,
  Marjorie Swanger: Five.
  Anita Hicks: five. And
  Fannie Freudenstein: Oh sorry.
  Anita Hicks: what what's your choice?
  Fannie Freudenstein: Six
  Anita Hicks: How much would you give on the fancy aspect, on
  Fannie Freudenstein: Uh
  Anita Hicks: the fashionable aspect?
  Fannie Freudenstein: s you can how much what?
  Anita Hicks: How much would you you don't answer to this uh
  Fannie Freudenstein: Oh yes
  Anita Hicks: questionnaire?
  Fannie Freudenstein: I mm I dunno mm, I think six, it's a good uh
  Margaret Tavis: So it will have five point five average.
  Anita Hicks: Five point five average.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Yeah. Wa
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Margaret Tavis: Mm.
  Fannie Freudenstein: can. Okay.
  Anita Hicks: Well, does it
  Fannie Freudenstein: I sorry. Okay. So after, the technological aspect?
  Anita Hicks: Okay, techne technological aspect.
  Fannie Freudenstein: So we we said uh we have uh a new technological uh thing with a wheel.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah, we have the wheel.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Uh.
  Anita Hicks: We also have the rubber material, which make it uh like new also. I think I would give a five.
  Margaret Tavis: It's four.
  Anita Hicks: Four?
  Marjorie Swanger: A four also,
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah.
  Marjorie Swanger: because, except for the wheel, we don't have so much innovation. The rubber is
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Margaret Tavis: D are we including
  Marjorie Swanger: Uh a four.
  Margaret Tavis: the
  Marjorie Swanger: I
  Margaret Tavis: voice
  Marjorie Swanger: I
  Margaret Tavis: are you glu we including the voice in the end or
  Anita Hicks: No.
  Margaret Tavis: not? Huh? No. Okay.
  Anita Hicks: So
  Fannie Freudenstein: No.
  Anita Hicks: what's your uh grade?
  Fannie Freudenstein: Four.
  Anita Hicks: Four? So we have four, four f and five?
  Fannie Freudenstein: We can put four?
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah. For
  Anita Hicks: Yeah,
  Margaret Tavis: twenty
  Anita Hicks: four.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Everyone
  Margaret Tavis: five.
  Fannie Freudenstein: is okay or
  Anita Hicks: Four,
  Fannie Freudenstein: four poin
  Anita Hicks: yeah, let's put four.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Four.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Okay.
  Anita Hicks: Doesn't it
  Fannie Freudenstein: Very easy to use. Do you think it's easy to use?
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah, I think
  Margaret Tavis: I give a
  Anita Hicks: so.
  Margaret Tavis: seven, I think.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Marjorie Swanger: Six.
  Anita Hicks: I would give a I would give a seven as well. It's very easy to use.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Mm,
  Marjorie Swanger: Six.
  Fannie Freudenstein: six for Fannie Freudenstein also.
  Anita Hicks: So
  Fannie Freudenstein: Six
  Margaret Tavis: 'Kay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: point five.
  Anita Hicks: six point
  Marjorie Swanger: Six
  Anita Hicks: five.
  Marjorie Swanger: six six point five.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Okay.
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Is it fashion?
  Anita Hicks: Oh yeah, its its f its fruit
  Fannie Freudenstein: Seven?
  Anita Hicks: fruit shape. I would say seven. And is very
  Fannie Freudenstein: Yeah
  Anita Hicks: very
  Fannie Freudenstein: it's
  Anita Hicks: nice
  Fannie Freudenstein: fashion,
  Anita Hicks: design.
  Fannie Freudenstein: because it's a fruit, and
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah,
  Fannie Freudenstein: we say
  Margaret Tavis: we can we
  Fannie Freudenstein: that
  Margaret Tavis: can put
  Fannie Freudenstein: the
  Margaret Tavis: a seven here. Yeah.
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah,
  Fannie Freudenstein: yeah, seven.
  Marjorie Swanger: seven.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah.
  Anita Hicks: Seven, okay.
  Margaret Tavis: Well, we hope.
  Marjorie Swanger: Easy
  Fannie Freudenstein: Uh
  Marjorie Swanger: to find.
  Fannie Freudenstein: easy to find in a room?
  Marjorie Swanger: I lost my banana.
  Anita Hicks: I think you can't miss it.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Yeah?
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Marjorie Swanger: Uh.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah, I think it's cool. I think we can put a six here.
  Fannie Freudenstein: We have the lightning, or
  Anita Hicks: Yeah,
  Fannie Freudenstein: The lighting.
  Anita Hicks: we have the we don't sesh especially
  Margaret Tavis: So you'll
  Anita Hicks: have
  Margaret Tavis: make
  Anita Hicks: the
  Margaret Tavis: the
  Anita Hicks: lightning
  Margaret Tavis: material
  Anita Hicks: but
  Margaret Tavis: transparent so that it uh lights up completely, or
  Anita Hicks: So it's yellow. It's okay. I think
  Fannie Freudenstein: Yeah.
  Anita Hicks: it's very easy to
  Fannie Freudenstein: Seven?
  Anita Hicks: I would say seven. It's hard to
  Marjorie Swanger: Six.
  Anita Hicks: miss it.
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah,
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Is it
  Marjorie Swanger: okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: is it robust?
  Anita Hicks: Yeah, it's
  Marjorie Swanger: Uh f
  Anita Hicks: rubber,
  Marjorie Swanger: yeah,
  Anita Hicks: made of rubber, I think it's m it's uh more rubber than uh
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah.
  Anita Hicks: other remote
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah
  Anita Hicks: control.
  Margaret Tavis: the only problem there might be which know, i if it's very sensitive,
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: they will,
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: I don't know
  Anita Hicks: But it is uh it is surrounded by rubber material.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah,
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: okay.
  Anita Hicks: So maybe we can put a six.
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: Mm.
  Marjorie Swanger: Six
  Fannie Freudenstein: Everybody is
  Marjorie Swanger: or five.
  Fannie Freudenstein: okay, six.
  Marjorie Swanger: Five.
  Anita Hicks: Six
  Margaret Tavis: Six,
  Anita Hicks: is okay?
  Margaret Tavis: yeah, for
  Marjorie Swanger: Six.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: Fannie Freudenstein.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Okay.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah.
  Fannie Freudenstein: S now
  Anita Hicks: Tadada.
  Fannie Freudenstein: um so.
  Anita Hicks: We have to
  Margaret Tavis: Twenty.
  Anita Hicks: sum up
  Fannie Freudenstein: Thirteen
  Anita Hicks: everything.
  Fannie Freudenstein: uh, twenty, twenty six point five, uh seven,
  Margaret Tavis: Thirty.
  Fannie Freudenstein: thirty two, thirty
  Margaret Tavis: Thir
  Fannie Freudenstein: six. That's that's okay? Six.
  Margaret Tavis: Okay.
  Anita Hicks: Six is a
  Fannie Freudenstein: Good.
  Anita Hicks: good
  Fannie Freudenstein: Uh if we say that seven it's uh
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah,
  Anita Hicks: Yeah,
  Fannie Freudenstein: it's
  Margaret Tavis: the
  Anita Hicks: the
  Fannie Freudenstein: the
  Anita Hicks: be.
  Margaret Tavis: top
  Fannie Freudenstein: better, and when uh s
  Anita Hicks: Okay,
  Margaret Tavis: Mm.
  Anita Hicks: so
  Fannie Freudenstein: six
  Anita Hicks: six
  Fannie Freudenstein: sit
  Anita Hicks: is
  Fannie Freudenstein: six
  Anita Hicks: a
  Fannie Freudenstein: are good it's a good uh p product,
  Margaret Tavis: So will
  Fannie Freudenstein: I think.
  Margaret Tavis: become eight soon?
  Anita Hicks: So it's a good evaluation, I think. It's very promising.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah, well it's a bit biased.
  Fannie Freudenstein: We have a good
  Anita Hicks: Huh.
  Fannie Freudenstein: price and uh.
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: Okay.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Good.
  Anita Hicks: So this prototype is quite nice.
  Margaret Tavis: Because I saw uh some phones that were banana shaped,
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: uh wireless phones not mobile ones, wireless
  Anita Hicks: Okay.
  Margaret Tavis: for the house, uh quite big also, and they were selling something like a hundred Euros, two hundred Euros. Just a just a phone, wireless.
  Marjorie Swanger: Mm-hmm.
  Anita Hicks: So having this at twenty five Euros is uh quite attractive, I think.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah.
  Anita Hicks: I think
  Marjorie Swanger: But
  Anita Hicks: the
  Marjorie Swanger: almo also the complexity between a phone and a remote control is not
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah.
  Marjorie Swanger: cannot compare.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah,
  Anita Hicks: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: it's much more complex, but
  Anita Hicks: So, I think, we can summarise. So we have seen the prototype. It's very nice according to the work of our two designer. The the the financial aspect were okay. We we have the cost below uh our threshold and so we could sell at twenty five Euros and make i make profit. The the evaluation give satisfying result as well. So I think we can move to the last part of the meeting. So the cost is in the budget, the evaluation is okay, so I th I think we can now uh open champagne and make a huge party.
  Marjorie Swanger: Start
  Anita Hicks: I
  Marjorie Swanger: to
  Anita Hicks: don't know if
  Marjorie Swanger: eat banana.
  Anita Hicks: it's provided by uh by the meeting staff.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Mm-hmm.
  Margaret Tavis: Okay.
  Anita Hicks: Okay so congratulation.
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah.
  Margaret Tavis: Congratulations
  Anita Hicks: Nice product.
  Margaret Tavis: to the team. Uh very well, we worked together fantastically.
  Anita Hicks: Yeah. I think it was a good collaboration uh. Aspect.
  Margaret Tavis: So what does the management say?
  Anita Hicks: Sorry?
  Margaret Tavis: What does the management say?
  Anita Hicks: I think we will have um much bigger project next time and a much bigger salary as well.
  Margaret Tavis: Ah.
  Anita Hicks: All it depends on who watch this meeting.
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah.
  Anita Hicks: We don't know.
  Margaret Tavis: Yeah. Okay.
  Anita Hicks: good guys,
  Marjorie Swanger: Okay.
  Anita Hicks: so see you for next uh successful project.
  Marjorie Swanger: Yeah. Fruits.
  Fannie Freudenstein: Mm 'kay.
  Margaret Tavis: Mm.
Updated Content: Anita Hicks presented the final cost of the remote with the finalized list of components. The final cost was under the alotted budget; Anita Hicks announced that the project could then continue with the current prototype. Fannie Freudenstein presented an evaluation of the prototype to the group. The group evaluated the prototype based on the requirements of users presented in the first meetings. The group decided that the prototype met enough of these goals to be able to market the product. The prototype was presented and the group discussed the look of the prototype. Anita Hicks summarized the accomplishments of the meeting.