{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/2279","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/2279/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/2279/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/2279/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/2279","id":103520947,"number":2279,"title":"Cockroach Transaction Implementation vs Warp Transactions","user":{"login":"atrniv","id":1157654,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1157654?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv","html_url":"https://github.com/atrniv","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atrniv/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-08-27T14:17:50Z","updated_at":"2015-08-27T14:17:50Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I'm interested in knowing how the transaction approach taken by Cockroachdb would compare to [Warp](http://dl1.frz.ir/FREE/papers-we-love/distributed_systems/warp-multi-key-transactions-for-key-value-stores.pdf) transactions in terms of performance. I've taken a look at the Calvin paper which I believe is the source of inspiration for cockroach. How would Warp compare to Calvin's approach ?"}}