{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VBA-tools/Excel-TDD/issues/9","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VBA-tools/Excel-TDD/issues/9/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VBA-tools/Excel-TDD/issues/9/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VBA-tools/Excel-TDD/issues/9/events","html_url":"https://github.com/VBA-tools/Excel-TDD/issues/9","id":55506522,"number":9,"title":"AfterEach","user":{"login":"rich-glow","id":7628536,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7628536?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow","html_url":"https://github.com/rich-glow","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rich-glow/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-01-26T16:50:59Z","updated_at":"2015-01-26T16:58:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It would be great if `AfterEach` functionality existed to be symmetrical with `BeforeEach`.\r\n\r\nIs this on the roadmap?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VBA-tools/Excel-TDD/issues/comments/71494590","html_url":"https://github.com/VBA-tools/Excel-TDD/issues/9#issuecomment-71494590","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VBA-tools/Excel-TDD/issues/9","id":71494590,"user":{"login":"timhall","id":1211148,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1211148?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall","html_url":"https://github.com/timhall","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timhall/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-26T16:58:13Z","updated_at":"2015-01-26T16:58:13Z","body":"I've definitely been thinking about it and have needed it for one of my projects, but it's been tricky to implement. The issue has been that there isn't really a way to know that a spec has finished in order to call `AfterEach`. I've played with calling it when the next spec is started, but couldn't find a way to call it the last time.\r\n\r\nI'll look into it more and see what can be done."}}