{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/67","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/67/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/67/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/67/events","html_url":"https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/67","id":99011477,"number":67,"title":"Confusion about what constitutes \"reverse\"","user":{"login":"atarzwell","id":172500,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/172500?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell","html_url":"https://github.com/atarzwell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/atarzwell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2015-08-04T16:48:48Z","updated_at":"2015-08-07T23:23:43Z","closed_at":"2015-08-07T23:23:43Z","body":"Good work on implementing a CoC, while I've been lucky enough never seen any of theses issues in this community, making what is acceptable and unacceptable explicitly clear to the community is very important. Thanks! :+1: \r\n\r\nHowever, I'm not clear on the whole \"reverse\" things and googling \"reversisms\", \"reverse-racism\", etc seems to indicate it's a contentious issue. \r\n\r\nI'm not sure how to tell the difference between sexism and \"reverse-\" sexism. However the mention of \"cisphobia\" is clear in indicating which \"side\" is protected.\r\n\r\nHowever reverse-racism and reverse-sexism are not defined. Since this is a worldwide group it would seem that this could vary based on locale which would only make it more confusing.\r\n\r\nAs a programmer unversed and uninterested in social activism it would be a lot better to make this explicit so I can respect and abide by it without having to study and research the issues it's trying to correct.\r\n\r\nCan we get a definition of what groups are protected and which ones are not?\r\n\r\n(Eggshells: As mentioned above, I do not mean to offend or instigate, if I have phrased something poorly please accept my apology as that is not my intention, explain the problem to me and I will attempt to reword)"}}