{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby/rubyspec/issues/70","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby/rubyspec/issues/70/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby/rubyspec/issues/70/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby/rubyspec/issues/70/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ruby/rubyspec/pull/70","id":82920504,"number":70,"title":"[WIP] Explorative PR for a merge of opal's fork","user":{"login":"elia","id":1051,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1051?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia","html_url":"https://github.com/elia","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-05-30T21:40:14Z","updated_at":"2015-06-06T16:26:40Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby/rubyspec/pulls/70","html_url":"https://github.com/ruby/rubyspec/pull/70","diff_url":"https://github.com/ruby/rubyspec/pull/70.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ruby/rubyspec/pull/70.patch"},"body":"> eregontp: @opalrb Nice! I would be interested to know how you guys use RubySpec :) Definitely open an issue if we can make it easier for you.\r\n\r\n– https://twitter.com/eregontp/status/604710586300133376\r\n\r\nI don't expect this PR to be merged right away, rather I'm opening it to check & fix all the little things that will make it ok for a merge.\r\n\r\ncc @eregon @opal/core"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby/rubyspec/issues/comments/109613400","html_url":"https://github.com/ruby/rubyspec/pull/70#issuecomment-109613400","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby/rubyspec/issues/70","id":109613400,"user":{"login":"elia","id":1051,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1051?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia","html_url":"https://github.com/elia","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elia/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-06T16:26:39Z","updated_at":"2015-06-06T16:26:39Z","body":"One last note, \r\n\r\n> You are right, the spec is just about the existence of #hash.\r\n> A should respond_to(:hash) would make a lot more sense then.\r\n\r\nI've updated the spec to use respond_to but I noticed that this way it's not calling the method anymore. Not necessarily a problem, but still worth being aware of the change."}}