{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/756","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/756/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/756/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/756/events","html_url":"https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/756","id":56325988,"number":756,"title":"Support fully disabling Node polyfills perhaps?","user":{"login":"loganfsmyth","id":132260,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/132260?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth","html_url":"https://github.com/loganfsmyth","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loganfsmyth/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-02-03T02:40:25Z","updated_at":"2015-02-03T22:42:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This is kind of half feature request half bug report :P\r\n\r\n1.5.x introduced 'setImmediate' pollyfilling, which is great, but in our case it was kind of a regression because it meant when we updated, we had a new rewrite that polyfilled setImmediate calls that were previously not rewritten. That caused some of our tests started failing because of slight timing differences between the new setImmediate polyfill and `Q` own internal polyfill.\r\n\r\nI'll just set `setImmediate: false` now, but I'm now slightly concerned about updated in the future silently starting to inject polyfills that I don't expect. Not necessarily the end of the world, but we try to track all 3rd-party code that we package and distribute, and this would have probably been missed if not for the test failures it caused.\r\n\r\nThanks!"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/comments/72751828","html_url":"https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/756#issuecomment-72751828","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/756","id":72751828,"user":{"login":"sokra","id":1365881,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1365881?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra","html_url":"https://github.com/sokra","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sokra/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-03T22:42:30Z","updated_at":"2015-02-03T22:42:30Z","body":"True. Any idea what we can do?"}}