{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/playframework/playframework/issues/4926","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/playframework/playframework/issues/4926/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/playframework/playframework/issues/4926/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/playframework/playframework/issues/4926/events","html_url":"https://github.com/playframework/playframework/issues/4926","id":98550923,"number":4926,"title":"Return support for Integers (make it configurable)","user":{"login":"markpiller","id":120929,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/120929?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller","html_url":"https://github.com/markpiller","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markpiller/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-08-01T17:20:41Z","updated_at":"2015-08-02T16:19:55Z","closed_at":"2015-08-02T16:19:55Z","body":"First of all shutting down a discussion of an issue the way is done in 4897 is a sign of immaturity and not being able to take responsibility for your actions.  https://github.com/playframework/playframework/issues/4897\r\n\r\nYour changes broke our code. This is on its own is BAD. Your lack of desire to even LISTEN to what we have going on why your changes are not considerate is even WORSE.\r\n\r\nA mature framework would when it breaks backward compatibility would at least consider providing a configuration switch to allow NUMEROUS projects which already use Play to run without any problems - unchanged. That's what experienced developers do. If you disregard everyone who is happy with your project (like us before 2.4 release), and only listen to those who ask for change, you LOSE supporters of your framework, because we simply cannot trust that you're doing the right thing and we do not believe that you will not break something else in the future.\r\n\r\nYou called my response to you \"an attack\". But from my perspective breaking our project is your attack on us. Have you thought about it that way? Or that would require some experience, huh?"}}