{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/git-duet/git-duet/issues/4","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/git-duet/git-duet/issues/4/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/git-duet/git-duet/issues/4/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/git-duet/git-duet/issues/4/events","html_url":"https://github.com/git-duet/git-duet/issues/4","id":83811358,"number":4,"title":"Support setting `user.name` and `user.email`","user":{"login":"jszwedko","id":316880,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/316880?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko","html_url":"https://github.com/jszwedko","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jszwedko/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/git-duet/git-duet/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-06-02T03:18:41Z","updated_at":"2015-10-16T17:36:52Z","closed_at":null,"body":"A difference from the Ruby implementation is that it also set the `user.name` and `user.email`. I can see both perspectives so I think we should allow this to be a configurable feature."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/git-duet/git-duet/issues/comments/148780689","html_url":"https://github.com/git-duet/git-duet/issues/4#issuecomment-148780689","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/git-duet/git-duet/issues/4","id":148780689,"user":{"login":"codeword","id":4543,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4543?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword","html_url":"https://github.com/codeword","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/codeword/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-16T17:36:52Z","updated_at":"2015-10-16T17:36:52Z","body":"I think git-duet-revert is a fine addition to the project but I still think that git duet needs to modify the user.name and user.email variables.  There are lots of git commands that will result in commits, like rebase -i or rebase (with conflicts) or merge, or, or, or.  If the git duet implementation was to use the user.email and user.name for the author and then the [duet \"env\"] namespace for the committer and any other attributes the duet system needs, then when the user performs git actions that result in core git commits to happen, they would at the very least use one of the pair's credentials rather than some random users or machine name credentials"}}