{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tjmehta/keypather/issues/10","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tjmehta/keypather/issues/10/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tjmehta/keypather/issues/10/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tjmehta/keypather/issues/10/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tjmehta/keypather/pull/10","id":58720108,"number":10,"title":"Make the Keypather class auto-instance.","user":{"login":"justsml","id":397632,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/397632?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml","html_url":"https://github.com/justsml","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-02-24T10:33:32Z","updated_at":"2015-02-25T23:47:47Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tjmehta/keypather/pulls/10","html_url":"https://github.com/tjmehta/keypather/pull/10","diff_url":"https://github.com/tjmehta/keypather/pull/10.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/tjmehta/keypather/pull/10.patch"},"body":"Hey @tjmehta I love your code's approach & scope of feature support... Anyway I will create a separate  issue to discuss some of my thoughts. Anyway, here's a patch to eliminate the need for double parenthesis:\r\nSee my updates to the README.md\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tjmehta/keypather/issues/comments/76087118","html_url":"https://github.com/tjmehta/keypather/pull/10#issuecomment-76087118","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tjmehta/keypather/issues/10","id":76087118,"user":{"login":"justsml","id":397632,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/397632?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml","html_url":"https://github.com/justsml","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justsml/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-25T23:47:47Z","updated_at":"2015-02-25T23:47:47Z","body":"Hey guys... I updated the code... It's still failing... I was wondering how important having the force option is? It adds a layer of branching in the code that might be handled a little differently... I was thinking of moving this kind of functionality under something like ```keypath.trySet()``` otherwise you have to choose up front how every keypather call will be affected. ... @tjmehta @stoeffel any thoughts? ... Sorry if this is kinda drifting off topic..."}}