{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/origin/issues/5014","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/origin/issues/5014/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/origin/issues/5014/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/origin/issues/5014/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/5014","id":110513426,"number":5014,"title":"Introduce group controls to SCC","user":{"login":"pweil-","id":5230419,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5230419?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-","html_url":"https://github.com/pweil-","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-10-08T18:25:02Z","updated_at":"2015-10-08T19:06:40Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/origin/pulls/5014","html_url":"https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/5014","diff_url":"https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/5014.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/5014.patch"},"body":"Introduce new strategy knobs for supplemental groups and fsgroup to the SCC.  Both strategies are range based setup (which, in hindsight could've been done for the user strats - I think I will update the PSP proposal with this if folks like it).\r\n\r\nIn preparation for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/14991 and <PR pending for FSGroups by @pmorie>\r\n\r\n@swagiaal @pmorie @smarterclayton @liggitt  "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/origin/issues/comments/146656726","html_url":"https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/5014#issuecomment-146656726","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/origin/issues/5014","id":146656726,"user":{"login":"pweil-","id":5230419,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5230419?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-","html_url":"https://github.com/pweil-","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pweil-/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-08T19:06:39Z","updated_at":"2015-10-08T19:06:39Z","body":"> Al the other fields are phrased as capabilities, but groups are just nouns. Would suggest RunWithSupplementalGroups and either UseFilesystemGroup or AllowFilesystemGroup\r\n\r\nDang, I knew you'd catch that.  I went with the new terminology style proposed in PSP.  I'll change it to be consistent."}}