{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/valueflows/agent/issues/56","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/valueflows/agent/issues/56/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/valueflows/agent/issues/56/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/valueflows/agent/issues/56/events","html_url":"https://github.com/valueflows/agent/issues/56","id":122601468,"number":56,"title":"Where are we at with this vocab section?","user":{"login":"bhaugen","id":117439,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/117439?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen","html_url":"https://github.com/bhaugen","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bhaugen/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-12-16T21:07:27Z","updated_at":"2015-12-22T12:56:11Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@Connoropolous suggests [in this hylo proposal](https://www.hylo.com/p/12324),\r\n> Collaborative development of a vocabulary that results in a standardized schema for crucial data types such as 'people' 'groups' and many more. \r\n\r\nI get the impression that the VF crew is fairly satisfied with the the people and groups vocab -  [vf:agent](https://github.com/valueflows/agent), and is moving on to other topics. \r\n\r\nIs that true? I'm a little hesitant because we have not made the full round trip to Holodex yet, and @elf-pavlik is out of pocket for awhile.\r\n\r\nI'll ask for more use cases from Hylo...\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/valueflows/agent/issues/comments/166610520","html_url":"https://github.com/valueflows/agent/issues/56#issuecomment-166610520","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/valueflows/agent/issues/56","id":166610520,"user":{"login":"fosterlynn","id":3776081,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3776081?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn","html_url":"https://github.com/fosterlynn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-22T12:56:11Z","updated_at":"2015-12-22T12:56:11Z","body":"> i'd prefer we go either either memberOf and hasMember (which is closest to what everyone expects)\r\n\r\nOK let's do it! \r\n\r\nI also don't care, in the sense that I don't think we know how to make a better decision right now.  ( @Connoropolous  mentioned \"affiliate\" for NextEdge, but I don't think that drives this decision.  I picked up on it because it seemed like he chose it as reflective of the kind of networks that tend to develop these days, looser than membership. Of course many groups and even networks are tighter than that too.  @ahdinosaur I take your point that \"member\" is a pretty normal term.)  In any case, member it is!"}}