{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/issues/38","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/issues/38/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/issues/38/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/issues/38/events","html_url":"https://github.com/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/issues/38","id":106935606,"number":38,"title":"Ordering of LGA and IBRA region facets","user":{"login":"nielsklazenga","id":4694550,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4694550?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga","html_url":"https://github.com/nielsklazenga","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nielsklazenga/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-09-17T08:33:46Z","updated_at":"2015-09-23T05:29:39Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The ordering by descending number of returned records of the IBRA region and, especially, LGA facets makes it very hard to find an individual facet. Is it possible to order them alphabetically instead, as has been done for the some of the taxonomic facets? If so, better wait for discussion at HISCOM, as there are things to say for both ways of ordering.\r\n\r\nThe drop-downs in the Advanced Search field should of course always be in alphabetical order."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/issues/comments/142498136","html_url":"https://github.com/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/issues/38#issuecomment-142498136","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/issues/38","id":142498136,"user":{"login":"nickdos","id":532845,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/532845?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos","html_url":"https://github.com/nickdos","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nickdos/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-23T05:29:39Z","updated_at":"2015-09-23T05:29:39Z","body":"Ordering of facets is via the `index|count` value for `sort` in the file:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/avh-hub/blob/master/grouped_facets.json\r\n\r\nAs comment above says, there are advantages to having sort for either option. So discussing at HISCOM is a good idea."}}