{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/72","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/72/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/72/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/72/events","html_url":"https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/72","id":96377480,"number":72,"title":"B4 Definitions of gcis:TemporalExtents and gcis:SpatialExtents","user":{"login":"xgmachina","id":5825684,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5825684?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina","html_url":"https://github.com/xgmachina","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xgmachina/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":15,"created_at":"2015-07-21T17:56:36Z","updated_at":"2015-08-19T22:41:01Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In http://data.globalchange.gov/gcis.owl#TemporalExtents and  http://data.globalchange.gov/gcis.owl#SpatialExtents, should the domains and ranges explicitly call out “datasets” given the descriptions of these terms?\r\nComment: Might be good to see ISO’s Extents to reduce reinventing the wheel. more specifically the geographical and temporal extents. ISO also distinguishes with vertical extents too.\r\ne.g. https://ontohub.org/socop/ISO19115.owl\r\nGCIS currently pulling OAI-PMH feeds from several of the NASA DAACs. There is discussion about ingesting from GeoPortal, which follows ISO."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/comments/132813125","html_url":"https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/72#issuecomment-132813125","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/72","id":132813125,"user":{"login":"zednis","id":1057295,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1057295?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis","html_url":"https://github.com/zednis","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-19T22:41:01Z","updated_at":"2015-08-19T22:41:01Z","body":"I believe \"-88\" is a valid value for a literal of type ``xsd:float``, have you seen any documentation that suggests otherwise?"}}