{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis/issues/166","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis/issues/166/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis/issues/166/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis/issues/166/events","html_url":"https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis/issues/166","id":87133483,"number":166,"title":"isCitedBy, isReferencedBy","user":{"login":"justgo129","id":7644769,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7644769?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129","html_url":"https://github.com/justgo129","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justgo129/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-06-10T22:47:54Z","updated_at":"2015-06-10T23:50:53Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@zednis @bduggan @aulenbac @rewolfe @BNewman2104 I don't know whether this would be an ontology question or a dev one so I'm posting it here.  \r\n\r\nMost pubs in GCIS have references for which their representation in endnote had only one UUID regardless of the quantity of identical references.  An example is at  http://data.globalchange.gov/report/federal-actions-climate-resilient-nation.thtml \r\nwhich, although cited in multiple chapters, had a reference in endnote with identical UUIDs in all instances.  Therefore, ``cito:isCitedBy <nca3>`` only appears once on this page.\r\n\r\nHowever, there were a few instances of references repeated in multiple nca3 chapters which have multiple uuids, e.g.:\r\nhttp://data.globalchange.gov/report/ceq-progrep-2010.thtml\r\n\r\nThis is because we were unable to catch 100% of the cases where a reference was cited by multiple chapters and consequently assign the same UUID to all instances of those references.  My point is that it's solely an endnote issue.\r\n\r\nThe point is that this results in identical triples.  For the second example provided above,\r\n```\r\n<http://data.globalchange.gov/report/ceq-progrep-2010>\r\n   cito:isCitedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/report/nca3>;\r\n   biro:isReferencedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/reference/1a73a6da-b3fb-4e34-aa3a-868579682b56>.\r\n\r\n<http://data.globalchange.gov/report/ceq-progrep-2010>\r\n   cito:isCitedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/report/nca3>;\r\n   biro:isReferencedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/reference/37163c2c-5801-4702-9191-f32bf0f05b26>.\r\n```\r\n\r\nIs this a problem?  @zednis would it be easier to just locate an alternate term for biro:isReferencedBy and thus create something like the following (improper use of RDF)  pseudocode:\r\n```\r\n<report_URI> <CitedBy> <report> <inContextOf> <reference_UUID> .\r\n```\r\nwhere ``<inContextOf>`` would replace biro:isReferencedBy?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis/issues/comments/110948355","html_url":"https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis/issues/166#issuecomment-110948355","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGCRP/gcis/issues/166","id":110948355,"user":{"login":"zednis","id":1057295,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1057295?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis","html_url":"https://github.com/zednis","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zednis/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-10T23:50:53Z","updated_at":"2015-06-10T23:50:53Z","body":"@justgo129 I am not sure what you are suggesting with the pseudo RDF at the end.\r\n\r\nI think I can address you question of whether identical triples are a problem.\r\n\r\nThe templates generating 'duplicate triples' is not a problem because an RDF graph is a set of triples.  Duplicate triples when loaded into a triplestore or in-memory RDF store are ignored and and no effect on the set.\r\n\r\nThe example you provided\r\n```\r\n<http://data.globalchange.gov/report/ceq-progrep-2010>\r\n   cito:isCitedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/report/nca3>;\r\n   biro:isReferencedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/reference/1a73a6da-b3fb-4e34-aa3a-868579682b56>.\r\n\r\n<http://data.globalchange.gov/report/ceq-progrep-2010>\r\n   cito:isCitedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/report/nca3>;\r\n   biro:isReferencedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/reference/37163c2c-5801-4702-9191-f32bf0f05b26>.\r\n```\r\n\r\nis equivalent to \r\n```\r\n<http://data.globalchange.gov/report/ceq-progrep-2010>\r\n   cito:isCitedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/report/nca3> ;\r\n   biro:isReferencedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/reference/1a73a6da-b3fb-4e34-aa3a-868579682b56> ;\r\n   biro:isReferencedBy <http://data.globalchange.gov/reference/37163c2c-5801-4702-9191-f32bf0f05b26> .\r\n```"}}