{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/redcap-tools/redcap-tools.github.io/issues/2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/redcap-tools/redcap-tools.github.io/issues/2/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/redcap-tools/redcap-tools.github.io/issues/2/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/redcap-tools/redcap-tools.github.io/issues/2/events","html_url":"https://github.com/redcap-tools/redcap-tools.github.io/issues/2","id":110305766,"number":2,"title":"What should move?  What should stay?","user":{"login":"wibeasley","id":1372890,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1372890?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley","html_url":"https://github.com/wibeasley","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wibeasley/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-10-07T20:06:28Z","updated_at":"2015-10-09T16:04:53Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I like the concept of this organization and the [organization's website](http://redcap-tools.github.io/) that @sburns just started.  I believe that any active and semi-active projects should be *listed* on the page (regardless if they're on GitHub).  I like that that anyone can go to this page  --especially those not officially in the consortium.  However I'm not convinced that every project should be *hosted* by the GitHub organization.  I'm starting this post to see what other people think.\r\n\r\nThere are some scenarios that make a lot of sense to me to move, including the reasons mentioned in https://github.com/sburns/PyCap/issues/58.  Chris Nefcy has offered some C# code that's likely a fit here too.\r\n\r\nHowever, I'm wondering if the move is unnecessarily disruptive in other scenarios.  If a repo has sustained momentum in it's current org, I'm tentative moving it.  I'm particularly hesitant to disrupt [REDCapR](https://github.com/OuhscBbmc/REDCapR) status; I'm concerned that moving it will make it less clear which people are responsible for improvements, maintenance, & user-support.\r\n\r\nAdmittedly I don't have much experience to draw from.  Has anyone been involved with a reorganization/transition before at this medium-sized scale?  Under what conditions is it beneficial and encourage broader participation?  Under what conditions does it make things murkier and weaken accountability?  (Feel free to propose reasons why I'm being unnecessarily possessive and short-sighted.)\r\n\r\n(cc others who've contributed to REDCap-related repos: @haozhu233 @rparrish @nutterb @123andy @aarenson @pbchase  @sburns.  Please include anyone else whom I haven't met that might be interested in this conversation.)"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/redcap-tools/redcap-tools.github.io/issues/comments/146912110","html_url":"https://github.com/redcap-tools/redcap-tools.github.io/issues/2#issuecomment-146912110","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/redcap-tools/redcap-tools.github.io/issues/2","id":146912110,"user":{"login":"sburns","id":440820,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/440820?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns","html_url":"https://github.com/sburns","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sburns/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-09T16:04:53Z","updated_at":"2015-10-09T16:04:53Z","body":"Great points @pbchase. \"Abandoned\" is a strong word but it implies here too. This can be a place to bring abandoned projects back from the dead."}}