{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elabs/pundit/issues/251","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elabs/pundit/issues/251/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elabs/pundit/issues/251/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elabs/pundit/issues/251/events","html_url":"https://github.com/elabs/pundit/issues/251","id":58712316,"number":251,"title":"Don't look for NilClassPolicy","user":{"login":"jnicklas","id":134,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/134?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas","html_url":"https://github.com/jnicklas","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jnicklas/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-02-24T09:22:24Z","updated_at":"2015-07-15T10:53:38Z","closed_at":"2015-03-26T08:43:49Z","body":"In case `authorize` receives `nil` it should just deny authorization, not look for `NilClassPolicy `. I can't imagine any situation where someone would actually want to implement `NilClassPolicy `."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elabs/pundit/issues/comments/121575047","html_url":"https://github.com/elabs/pundit/issues/251#issuecomment-121575047","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elabs/pundit/issues/251","id":121575047,"user":{"login":"toshify","id":4579559,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4579559?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify","html_url":"https://github.com/toshify","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/toshify/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-15T10:53:38Z","updated_at":"2015-07-15T10:53:38Z","body":"I also miss being able to use the null object pattern with Pundit and would petition to have this change reversed."}}