{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sympy/sympy/issues/8719","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sympy/sympy/issues/8719/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sympy/sympy/issues/8719/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sympy/sympy/issues/8719/events","html_url":"https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/8719","id":53181926,"number":8719,"title":"Add Positive assumption helper for gamma function, Fixes #8524 ","user":{"login":"aktech","id":5647941,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5647941?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech","html_url":"https://github.com/aktech","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sympy/sympy/labels/Assumptions","name":"Assumptions","color":"eb6420"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2014-12-31T12:32:03Z","updated_at":"2015-01-01T08:10:48Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sympy/sympy/pulls/8719","html_url":"https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/8719","diff_url":"https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/8719.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/8719.patch"},"body":"The Positive assumption helper for gamma function is missing:\r\nSo the the following code returns None:\r\n\r\n```python\r\n>>> n = Symbol('n', real=True, positive=True)\r\n>>> gamma(n).is_positive\r\n```\r\nWith this PR, Positive assumption works well for gamma function.\r\n\r\nFixes #8524 "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sympy/sympy/issues/comments/68482297","html_url":"https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/8719#issuecomment-68482297","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sympy/sympy/issues/8719","id":68482297,"user":{"login":"aktech","id":5647941,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5647941?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech","html_url":"https://github.com/aktech","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aktech/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-01T08:10:48Z","updated_at":"2015-01-01T08:10:48Z","body":"I think the current one is more readable, as advised by Sergery:\r\nSee above (Sergery's comment).\r\nI am also not sure how fuzzy_or works."}}