{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maidsafe/rfcs/issues/11","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maidsafe/rfcs/issues/11/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maidsafe/rfcs/issues/11/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maidsafe/rfcs/issues/11/events","html_url":"https://github.com/maidsafe/rfcs/pull/11","id":90672936,"number":11,"title":"RFC - Unified Structured Data","user":{"login":"dirvine","id":123627,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123627?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine","html_url":"https://github.com/dirvine","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":13,"created_at":"2015-06-24T13:18:02Z","updated_at":"2015-06-29T12:23:14Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maidsafe/rfcs/pulls/11","html_url":"https://github.com/maidsafe/rfcs/pull/11","diff_url":"https://github.com/maidsafe/rfcs/pull/11.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/maidsafe/rfcs/pull/11.patch"},"body":""},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maidsafe/rfcs/issues/comments/116634395","html_url":"https://github.com/maidsafe/rfcs/pull/11#issuecomment-116634395","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maidsafe/rfcs/issues/11","id":116634395,"user":{"login":"dirvine","id":123627,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123627?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine","html_url":"https://github.com/dirvine","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dirvine/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-29T12:23:14Z","updated_at":"2015-06-29T12:23:14Z","body":">> 3 Do you mean here making some owners more special than others here?\r\n\r\n>Yes\r\n\r\nI suppose what I am saying here is, this going further than multi-sig?  Nobody has asked for this so far and I am not aware of any other multi-sig that does this. So in essence I see us adding to an existing mechanism, some complexity that is not what people expect in multi-sig. My feeling is if we just provide the expected actions first then we keep it simple, expected and comfortable. \r\n \r\nI appreciate all the people creating multiple identities to add themselves weight etc. this is available in todays multi-sig systems, AFAIK nobody does that. They could but ...\r\n\r\nI feel we just really want to do what people expect in these cases or abandon creating `multi-sig` and create our own system and name to go with it, but we have promised multi-sig and it does make sense to in any crypto-currency type situation for sure. I think here we are making all data able to act the same, which is again a known mechanism used by document signatories and several business's today (docusign etc.). \r\n\r\ni.e. we are proposing more here than people expect or have asked for under the umbrella of a known name (multi-sig) So we are not implementing a known algorithm, but something more than that!"}}