{"push_id":821867495,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"7ad34375b81bba62cd7c447d438fd696c47ce96d","before":"d1794dc4eb8116c643db422bdc02930a2846a8ee","commits":[{"sha":"6042028f7321393817f1df53aef9e69289c55c1f","author":{"email":"f4b28e76227655e2f75926a7939b12f4960b40e7@dabbelt.com","name":"Palmer Dabbelt"},"message":"Split config.bfd to use riscv{32,64}, not riscv*\n\nI'm trying to rebase our binutils port off of upstream's git repo, and\nthis is one of the things I ended up noticing.  I believe this is the\ncorrect thing to do, since we're now only supporting riscv32/riscv64\nas our tuples.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/riscv/riscv-gnu-toolchain/commits/6042028f7321393817f1df53aef9e69289c55c1f"},{"sha":"7ad34375b81bba62cd7c447d438fd696c47ce96d","author":{"email":"51a3852a7ca5422b3a2513b602a62a572b076ae1@eecs.berkeley.edu","name":"Andrew Waterman"},"message":"Merge pull request #93 from palmer-dabbelt/config_bfd\n\nSplit config.bfd to use riscv{32,64}, not riscv*","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/riscv/riscv-gnu-toolchain/commits/7ad34375b81bba62cd7c447d438fd696c47ce96d"}]}