{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-data/issues/43","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-data/issues/43/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-data/issues/43/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-data/issues/43/events","html_url":"https://github.com/irbv-collections/MT-data/issues/43","id":85147734,"number":43,"title":"Vérifier entrée 117731","user":{"login":"brouille","id":11755235,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11755235?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille","html_url":"https://github.com/brouille","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-06-04T15:29:43Z","updated_at":"2015-06-04T15:29:43Z","closed_at":null,"body":"[Originally posted on GoogleCode (id 1556) on 2015-01-20]\n\nGeoff:\r\n\r\nCette entrée comporte des déterminations que je ne comprends pas:\r\nFernald identifie le taxon comme une formule hybride et considère cela comme un n. hybr. - cependant, ceci n'est pas une nothospecies, donc pas un nouveau taxon et donc pas un type - \r\n\r\nor le spécimen est traité [en bas, Types] comme un isotype de C. ×anticostensis var. minor Lepage - et il n'y a aucune annotation à cet effet [en manque-t-il une]\r\n\r\nensuite, annotation de C. Roy: vidi! Isotypus - mais c'est la formule hybride qui est donnée, non une nothosp.\r\n\r\nl'annotation de Reznicek comporte aussi une note Isotype\r\n\r\nIl faut tout vérifier sur ce spécimen\r\nLuc"}}