{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/issues/30","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/issues/30/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/issues/30/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/issues/30/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/issues/30","id":53330627,"number":30,"title":"Put tests in separate module","user":{"login":"ljharb","id":45469,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/45469?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb","html_url":"https://github.com/ljharb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-01-04T09:10:43Z","updated_at":"2015-01-04T19:46:41Z","closed_at":"2015-01-04T19:46:41Z","body":"What would you think about putting the tests in a separate module?\r\n\r\nI'm about to release an ES3-compatible `Array#includes` polyfill, and while I've got my own tests, I'd love to run yours against my module. Currently, I tried installing this module as a devDep, and running `npm explore array.prototype.includes -- 'npm install && npm test'` which only works if I modify your package.json to reference my prelude.\r\n\r\nIf the tests are a separate module, then both of us could require it and run it against our own shimmed environments. Thoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/issues/comments/68646025","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/issues/30#issuecomment-68646025","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/issues/30","id":68646025,"user":{"login":"ljharb","id":45469,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/45469?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb","html_url":"https://github.com/ljharb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-04T19:46:41Z","updated_at":"2015-01-04T19:46:41Z","body":"That means it's a non-goal to get `es5-shim`, `es6-shim`, and most every polyfill in the ecosystem to run `test262` :-(\r\nI'll keep that in mind for the future, thanks."}}