{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/machakann/vim-columnmove/issues/2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/machakann/vim-columnmove/issues/2/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/machakann/vim-columnmove/issues/2/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/machakann/vim-columnmove/issues/2/events","html_url":"https://github.com/machakann/vim-columnmove/issues/2","id":95125684,"number":2,"title":"Suggestion for options: block-wise operator mode option","user":{"login":"lervag","id":998898,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/998898?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag","html_url":"https://github.com/lervag","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lervag/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-07-15T07:32:26Z","updated_at":"2015-07-18T16:16:17Z","closed_at":"2015-07-18T16:16:17Z","body":"As I suggested in a comment [here](https://vi.stackexchange.com/questions/3929/column-wise-f-f-t-t), I think it makes sense to map the operator mode for columnmove directly to the block wise modes, in order to be able to do deletes and replaces along the columns.\r\n\r\nIt is very simple to do this with custom mappings, as I've done (see [here](https://github.com/lervag/dotvim/commit/855f5d0549b8d1edcf2f3451b8c10554293f0596#diff-076d61938d25fd036d6436c94d8778faR212)). However, I think this feature could be added as an optional feature."}}