{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bdefore/universal-redux/issues/19","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bdefore/universal-redux/issues/19/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bdefore/universal-redux/issues/19/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bdefore/universal-redux/issues/19/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bdefore/universal-redux/issues/19","id":124008962,"number":19,"title":"Reducers API","user":{"login":"dts","id":273856,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/273856?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts","html_url":"https://github.com/dts","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dts/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-12-28T02:35:09Z","updated_at":"2015-12-29T05:47:20Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Many of the older examples demonstrates combining reducers with combineReducers in the `redux/modules/index.js` file (https://github.com/bdefore/universal-redux/tree/0.x/examples/jwt), but in https://github.com/bdefore/universal-redux/blob/master/src/redux/create.js#L28, it demonstrates that the correct way to specify them is to export a hash that will be extended and fed into combineReducers, like so:\r\n\r\n```\r\nimport signupReducer from './signup/index';\r\n\r\nexport default {\r\n  signup: signupReducer,\r\n};\r\n```\r\n\r\nIt's an important enough difference from \"redux standard\" that I think it should merit a mention in the main README until a larger documentation base is ready."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bdefore/universal-redux/issues/comments/167723174","html_url":"https://github.com/bdefore/universal-redux/issues/19#issuecomment-167723174","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bdefore/universal-redux/issues/19","id":167723174,"user":{"login":"bdefore","id":142472,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/142472?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore","html_url":"https://github.com/bdefore","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bdefore/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-29T05:47:20Z","updated_at":"2015-12-29T05:47:20Z","body":"@dts what you're desiring is a bit of a wrapper around the redux simple router, which i think i'd prefer to let the project developer decide how best to do. in which case, the newer API is too proscriptive, and I think it's best to return to a place where it's up to you how you and where you'd like to manage `routeReducer`."}}