{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SparkDevNetwork/Rock/issues/881","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SparkDevNetwork/Rock/issues/881/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SparkDevNetwork/Rock/issues/881/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SparkDevNetwork/Rock/issues/881/events","html_url":"https://github.com/SparkDevNetwork/Rock/issues/881","id":60136488,"number":881,"title":"Inactive People in Check-in when in a Known Relationship ","user":{"login":"bwitting","id":1859094,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1859094?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting","html_url":"https://github.com/bwitting","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-03-06T18:01:57Z","updated_at":"2015-03-10T17:59:48Z","closed_at":null,"body":"If a person's record is set to inactive, they do not appear in check-in; however, if they are in a known relationship with a person, they still appear when searching by that person's phone number, even if they are set to inactive."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SparkDevNetwork/Rock/issues/comments/78110925","html_url":"https://github.com/SparkDevNetwork/Rock/issues/881#issuecomment-78110925","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SparkDevNetwork/Rock/issues/881","id":78110925,"user":{"login":"bwitting","id":1859094,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1859094?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting","html_url":"https://github.com/bwitting","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bwitting/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-10T17:59:48Z","updated_at":"2015-03-10T17:59:48Z","body":"Sorry, you're right - it is working exactly as you described.  \r\n\r\nI understand your intended use case, but is there any way to have someone removed from the check-in list besides marking them deceased? We have families get confused because there are so many families that show up when they search, and some of those families we know have moved, etc.\r\n\r\nAnother thing we might to do help with that is change our instructions - we are having people search by only their last four digits right now, but having them search by 7 or 10 should greatly reduce the results.  "}}