{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ansistrano/deploy/issues/49","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ansistrano/deploy/issues/49/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ansistrano/deploy/issues/49/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ansistrano/deploy/issues/49/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ansistrano/deploy/pull/49","id":96963756,"number":49,"title":"Display placeholders to hint where hooks exist","user":{"login":"cbrunnkvist","id":34006,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34006?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist","html_url":"https://github.com/cbrunnkvist","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-07-24T04:37:10Z","updated_at":"2015-07-25T01:57:30Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ansistrano/deploy/pulls/49","html_url":"https://github.com/ansistrano/deploy/pull/49","diff_url":"https://github.com/ansistrano/deploy/pull/49.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ansistrano/deploy/pull/49.patch"},"body":"This advertises the availability of the Capistrano flow hooks (or whatever they are referred to) in the standard output. \r\n\r\nI think it would be a timesaver, hopefully preventing you from having to peruse the source code and/or going back and forth to the docs while developing your deployment playbook.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ansistrano/deploy/issues/comments/124786434","html_url":"https://github.com/ansistrano/deploy/pull/49#issuecomment-124786434","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ansistrano/deploy/issues/49","id":124786434,"user":{"login":"cbrunnkvist","id":34006,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34006?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist","html_url":"https://github.com/cbrunnkvist","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrunnkvist/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-25T01:57:30Z","updated_at":"2015-07-25T01:57:30Z","body":"Uh, no...I don't think there is any way unless you invoke Ansible programmatically from a python script.\r\n\r\nI was expecting it to be possible by making use of include/when and having verbose mode reveal the conditional evaluated (thereby hinting..), but the way that works in Ansible now seems a little bit weird - why, if an entire include is skipped, is it still printing (skipped) for the tasks INSIDE the file supposedly not included? "}}