{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NETMF/llilum/issues/71","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NETMF/llilum/issues/71/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NETMF/llilum/issues/71/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NETMF/llilum/issues/71/events","html_url":"https://github.com/NETMF/llilum/issues/71","id":117768789,"number":71,"title":"Q: Adding support for ARMv6-M ISA ?","user":{"login":"cw2","id":10730406,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10730406?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2","html_url":"https://github.com/cw2","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cw2/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-11-19T08:56:23Z","updated_at":"2015-12-02T22:11:00Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I am curious what would be (the high-level) steps to add support for ARMv6-M ISA (translated by LLVM) and the necessary runtime?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NETMF/llilum/issues/comments/161449649","html_url":"https://github.com/NETMF/llilum/issues/71#issuecomment-161449649","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NETMF/llilum/issues/71","id":161449649,"user":{"login":"smaillet-ms","id":8934567,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8934567?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms","html_url":"https://github.com/smaillet-ms","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smaillet-ms/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-02T22:11:00Z","updated_at":"2015-12-02T22:11:00Z","body":"Yes, Lorenzo's comments apply to the runtime (particularly the threading implementation) My comments were in regards to the compilation tools and code generation. \r\n\r\nAre you sure of those part numbers? The [STM32F103](http://www.st.com/web/catalog/mmc/FM141/SC1169/SS1031/LN1565) has a Cortex-M3 in it, which wouldn't require any changes to the code, though the RB variant might be a bit tight on memory right now as we haven't applied a lot of optimizations yet. (We are looking at various levels of optimization now so you should see continued improvement on that over time)."}}