{"push_id":541175500,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"fee3dcf1f143a4cc2e53501048c659b3aeb26284","before":"2162ed6b0335b502eb5f7e3b1d98b9837d448288","commits":[{"sha":"bf4c78bc25303264d661ae144a46217e39007219","author":{"email":"abbeee14574502be75498298fab55c152b9bac47@nicolast.be","name":"Nicolas Trangez"},"message":"Add tests for unavailability of `tee` and `splice` in `libc`\n\nAs suggested by Paul Luse in review 135319 (for 2a0a8ae00f2), this\nbrings test coverage of the `swift.common.splice` module up to 100%.\n\nThe mechanism used to check whether the functions are looked up on `libc`\nis somewhat ugly, but using a `PropertyMock` raising an `AttributeError`\nas `side_effect` doesn't work: it results in `mock` creating a `Mock`\ninstance and returning it.\n\nChange-Id: I14828cfc2ae644dbd9ead8c20613b19cea8607f1\nSee: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135319/4/swift/common/splice.py,cm\nSee: 2a0a8ae00f2d3b7db255b0905b063e930f824f3d","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openstack/swift/commits/bf4c78bc25303264d661ae144a46217e39007219"},{"sha":"fee3dcf1f143a4cc2e53501048c659b3aeb26284","author":{"email":"d95b56ce41a2e1ac4cecdd398defd7414407cc08@review.openstack.org","name":"Jenkins"},"message":"Merge \"Add tests for unavailability of `tee` and `splice` in `libc`\"","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openstack/swift/commits/fee3dcf1f143a4cc2e53501048c659b3aeb26284"}]}