{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/881","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/881/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/881/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/881/events","html_url":"https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/881","id":51213665,"number":881,"title":"fail2ban network","user":{"login":"szepeviktor","id":952007,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/952007?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor","html_url":"https://github.com/szepeviktor","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/szepeviktor/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":24,"created_at":"2014-12-07T10:16:23Z","updated_at":"2015-01-09T21:26:15Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The same botnet is attacking different servers administered by me.\r\nIs there a way to syncronize banned IPs?\r\nThus banning the other server's attackers. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/comments/69401583","html_url":"https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/881#issuecomment-69401583","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/881","id":69401583,"user":{"login":"buanzo","id":553167,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/553167?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo","html_url":"https://github.com/buanzo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buanzo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-09T21:26:15Z","updated_at":"2015-01-09T21:26:15Z","body":"serf is quite awesome indeed.\r\n\r\nbut if you need to keep things simple, and also if you do not necessarily\r\nhave an established relationship between nodes (for instance,\r\nself-organized attack prevention/detection human group), then\r\nsecure/reliable/flexible is https.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nOn Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:31 PM, grinapo <notifications@github.com> wrote:\r\n\r\n> I don't want to disturb the waters but I usually prefer *secure*,\r\n> *reliable* and *flexible* transport between servers. There are a few\r\n> message passing solutions (esp. if you're already possess some clustering\r\n> running) but the simplest out of the top of my head is serf (\r\n> https://www.serfdom.io/) where you basically setup a mesh of serf nodes\r\n> (either autodetected or manual, multicast or unicast) then use the client a\r\n> a few simple \"scripts\" to broadcast bans and unbans. Doesn't care if\r\n> servers are offline, can queue up messages or not, etc. And pretty simple\r\n> to set up.\r\n> [Note to self: someday I shoulda follow my own advice and set it up. :-P]\r\n>\r\n> —\r\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\r\n> <https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/881#issuecomment-69349223>.\r\n>"}}