{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/micropython/micropython/issues/1085","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/micropython/micropython/issues/1085/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/micropython/micropython/issues/1085/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/micropython/micropython/issues/1085/events","html_url":"https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/1085","id":55376863,"number":1085,"title":"Standardizing physical memory access","user":{"login":"pfalcon","id":500451,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/500451?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon","html_url":"https://github.com/pfalcon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfalcon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/micropython/micropython/labels/rfc","name":"rfc","color":"FF66CC"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":42,"created_at":"2015-01-24T16:43:08Z","updated_at":"2015-04-22T12:47:50Z","closed_at":null,"body":"stmhal has (undocumented) \"stm\" module which provides physical memory access. I'd like to propose to standardize it - under different name of course.  As \"stm\" is not documented, moving mem* to a new module hopefully shouldn't be a big problem. I propose \"physmem\" as a module name. Alternatively, to save on modules, we can put it into uctypes (not sure that's ideal though)."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/micropython/micropython/issues/comments/95160825","html_url":"https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/1085#issuecomment-95160825","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/micropython/micropython/issues/1085","id":95160825,"user":{"login":"danicampora","id":7749335,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7749335?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora","html_url":"https://github.com/danicampora","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danicampora/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-22T12:47:50Z","updated_at":"2015-04-22T12:47:50Z","body":"I also commented on your recent commit that documents the RTC wake-up functionality. Maybe we should try to reach an agreement on a common generic API for all callbacks. I already implemented one version of this for the CC3200 that even allows the user to configure from which power mode(s) the interrupt can wake the device.\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/micropython/micropython/blob/master/cc3200/misc/mpcallback.c\r\n\r\nIt's quite flexible so I think we can work on top of that to make something that will suit stmhal and other platforms as well."}}