{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Statistical-Connectomics-Sp15/intro/issues/14","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Statistical-Connectomics-Sp15/intro/issues/14/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Statistical-Connectomics-Sp15/intro/issues/14/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Statistical-Connectomics-Sp15/intro/issues/14/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Statistical-Connectomics-Sp15/intro/issues/14","id":56131603,"number":14,"title":"What \"Connectomics\" refers to","user":{"login":"SandyaS72","id":10769726,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10769726?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72","html_url":"https://github.com/SandyaS72","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SandyaS72/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-01-31T17:15:27Z","updated_at":"2015-02-03T14:15:18Z","closed_at":"2015-02-03T14:15:18Z","body":"At first glance, \"connectomics\" seems like a very general term, but most of the literature around it specifically refers to structural connectomes as opposed to functional. Is this a distinction that was made deliberately, if so why and who decided it, or is it something that's just kind of come to be accepted as an unstated convention?"}}