{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ualbertalib/discovery/issues/663","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ualbertalib/discovery/issues/663/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ualbertalib/discovery/issues/663/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ualbertalib/discovery/issues/663/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ualbertalib/discovery/issues/663","id":113690291,"number":663,"title":"Availability of items in results view","user":{"login":"seanluyk","id":14880206,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/14880206?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk","html_url":"https://github.com/seanluyk","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seanluyk/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ualbertalib/discovery/labels/UI","name":"UI","color":"fad8c7"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-10-27T21:11:58Z","updated_at":"2015-10-27T21:11:58Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This is possibility duplicated in another issue, but I couldn't find it...\r\n\r\nIs it possible to make the availability of items more clear in the results view?\r\n\r\nHow this is currently configured is that libraries that own the item appear in the **copies available** field in the order that they appear in Symphony, and it doesn't look like all libraries are listed.\r\n\r\nI tried an experiement with a book I had checked out. From the screenshot below, it looks like the item is available, but it's actually checked out. \r\n![2015-10-27_15-04-50](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/14880206/10772624/aca49d00-7cbc-11e5-8f5a-2267557f660f.jpg)\r\n\r\nI've seen some approaches to this in other Blacklight implementations , for example [UVA's Virgo](http://search.lib.virginia.edu/) which handles this a little differently, and may be worth looking it more closely."}}