{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/philipwalton/flexbugs/issues/15","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/philipwalton/flexbugs/issues/15/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/philipwalton/flexbugs/issues/15/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/philipwalton/flexbugs/issues/15/events","html_url":"https://github.com/philipwalton/flexbugs/issues/15","id":55324145,"number":15,"title":"Chrome/Firefox do not collapse inline-flex correctly","user":{"login":"gregwhitworth","id":865244,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/865244?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth","html_url":"https://github.com/gregwhitworth","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gregwhitworth/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-01-23T19:48:04Z","updated_at":"2015-01-27T07:34:51Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This was just brought up on the mailing list and can be hit already in the wild (which was found by a webdev). Here is the [issue](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0479.html), needs a workaround. @tabatkins points [out here](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0476.html) why they should flex to 0 based on flex-basis defaults."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/philipwalton/flexbugs/issues/comments/71601489","html_url":"https://github.com/philipwalton/flexbugs/issues/15#issuecomment-71601489","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/philipwalton/flexbugs/issues/15","id":71601489,"user":{"login":"philipwalton","id":326742,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/326742?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton","html_url":"https://github.com/philipwalton","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/philipwalton/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-27T07:34:51Z","updated_at":"2015-01-27T07:34:51Z","body":"Interesting.\r\n\r\nThe linked case seems somewhat unlikely, but I imagine a fair amount of people who don't fully understand the flex shorthand will do things like combine `width:100px` and `flex:1`, and not realize that `flex:1` implies a `flex-basis` of `0%`.\r\n\r\nI suppose the workaround is to not use the flex shorthand with width/height."}}