{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1","id":68218506,"number":1,"title":"Adding edges() and iteredges() Functions for DAWGs","user":{"login":"EliFinkelshteyn","id":991121,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/991121?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn","html_url":"https://github.com/EliFinkelshteyn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":21,"created_at":"2015-04-13T23:32:24Z","updated_at":"2015-04-28T08:58:58Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/pulls/1","html_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1","diff_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1.patch"},"body":"As discussed at https://github.com/kmike/marisa-trie/issues/20, this is support for adding the edges() and iteredges() methods for CompletionDAWG. If this looks good, I'll add similar support for RecordDAWGs and ByteDAWGs. The code isn't as optimized as it could be, but it works, it's clean (IMO), and it's fast enough for me."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/comments/96982023","html_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1#issuecomment-96982023","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1","id":96982023,"user":{"login":"coveralls","id":2354108,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2354108?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls","html_url":"https://github.com/coveralls","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-28T08:58:58Z","updated_at":"2015-04-28T08:58:58Z","body":"\n[![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/2439054/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/2439054)\n\nCoverage decreased (-1.82%) to 92.02% when pulling **0b81a9fede3ec31906a1a0415206e2512bc9808e on EliFinkelshteyn:master** into **3a5692264c98f5d085c707ad90d2fea64a53d07c on kmike:master**.\n"}}