{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/troessner/reek/issues/742","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/troessner/reek/issues/742/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/troessner/reek/issues/742/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/troessner/reek/issues/742/events","html_url":"https://github.com/troessner/reek/pull/742","id":111372926,"number":742,"title":"Unified smell warning interface","user":{"login":"mvz","id":10898,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10898?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz","html_url":"https://github.com/mvz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-10-14T10:49:29Z","updated_at":"2015-10-16T08:14:44Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/troessner/reek/pulls/742","html_url":"https://github.com/troessner/reek/pull/742","diff_url":"https://github.com/troessner/reek/pull/742.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/troessner/reek/pull/742.patch"},"body":"See #738.\r\n\r\nThe ultimate goal is for all of SmellWarning's attributes to be on equal footing. This was already the case for the json/yaml hash output.\r\n\r\nThis restores the `.reek_of` interface."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/troessner/reek/issues/comments/148648691","html_url":"https://github.com/troessner/reek/pull/742#issuecomment-148648691","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/troessner/reek/issues/742","id":148648691,"user":{"login":"chastell","id":56633,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/56633?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell","html_url":"https://github.com/chastell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chastell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-16T08:14:44Z","updated_at":"2015-10-16T08:14:44Z","body":"Sorry, two more nitpicks:\r\n\r\n1. Can you alter the commit that failed the build so that we don’t merge known-red commits? I might be a bit over-zealous here, but I really like to be able to git-bisect assuming every commit builds.\r\n1. Can you move the `FIXME` from a comment to an issue (‘port all `Hash.[]` calls to `Array#to_h`)? I think I agree with Timo that it’s better to track them this way (or, in this case, just fix it on the `reek-4` branch)."}}