{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/3852","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/3852/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/3852/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/3852/events","html_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/3852","id":53666357,"number":3852,"title":"Fixed #21231 -- Enforced a max size for form field values read into memory","user":{"login":"edevil","id":12426,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12426?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil","html_url":"https://github.com/edevil","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edevil/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":52,"created_at":"2015-01-07T18:46:06Z","updated_at":"2015-07-22T17:15:06Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/pulls/3852","html_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/3852","diff_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/3852.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/3852.patch"},"body":"Enforce a maximum size for form field values read into memory.\r\nBased on a previous PR."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/comments/123795864","html_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/3852#issuecomment-123795864","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/3852","id":123795864,"user":{"login":"apollo13","id":81547,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/81547?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13","html_url":"https://github.com/apollo13","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/apollo13/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-22T17:15:06Z","updated_at":"2015-07-22T17:15:06Z","body":"Ugh, just looking at your new timing results, I am a bit surprised that custom split performs this much better, can you add timings against a builtin split without count, so we got them all together? (The new results also make me wonder a little bit about your previous tests, cause str.count+str.split should be quite fast compared to a custom split)"}}