{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cp3-llbb/Framework/issues/65","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cp3-llbb/Framework/issues/65/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cp3-llbb/Framework/issues/65/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cp3-llbb/Framework/issues/65/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cp3-llbb/Framework/issues/65","id":107726438,"number":65,"title":"Question on sum(w)","user":{"login":"OlivierBondu","id":2760084,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2760084?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu","html_url":"https://github.com/OlivierBondu","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/OlivierBondu/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-09-22T14:29:04Z","updated_at":"2015-09-22T14:29:04Z","closed_at":null,"body":"While discussing GridIn with @swertz we ran into this log:\r\n```\r\nSum of event weight: 17010\r\n\r\nJob done in 3617.79s\r\n15350 processed events, 39 selected.\r\n```\r\n(full log at ``/storage/data/cms/store/user/swertz/MuonEG/MuonEG_Run2015C-PromptReco-v1_2015-09-04/150922_085937/0000/log/cmsRun_1.log.tar.gz``)\r\n\r\ngiven this is data I am not sure I understand why sum(w) != nprocessed... from #22 I expect they should be the exact same, but since recently the met filter is run before the producer, could this be the reason ?\r\n\r\nalso, from the log it seems ``event`` enters second in the scheduling sequence, which could be a possible reason: \r\n```\r\nproducers:\r\n -> Adding producer 'electrons' of type 'electrons'\r\n -> Adding producer 'event' of type 'event'\r\n -> Adding producer 'fat_jets' of type 'fat_jets'\r\n -> Adding producer 'hlt' of type 'hlt'\r\n -> Adding producer 'jets' of type 'jets'\r\n -> Adding producer 'met' of type 'met'\r\n -> Adding producer 'muons' of type 'muons'\r\n -> Adding producer 'nohf_met' of type 'met'\r\n -> Adding producer 'vertices' of type 'vertices'\r\n\r\n```\r\n"}}