{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/halotools/issues/253","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/halotools/issues/253/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/halotools/issues/253/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/halotools/issues/253/events","html_url":"https://github.com/astropy/halotools/pull/253","id":118714642,"number":253,"title":"update travis builds for conda and travis changes","user":{"login":"eteq","id":346587,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/346587?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq","html_url":"https://github.com/eteq","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-11-24T22:12:09Z","updated_at":"2015-11-30T20:12:14Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/halotools/pulls/253","html_url":"https://github.com/astropy/halotools/pull/253","diff_url":"https://github.com/astropy/halotools/pull/253.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/astropy/halotools/pull/253.patch"},"body":"This updates the ``.travis.yml`` file to hopefully get travis working again - ``anaconda`` recently made some changes that were causing the tests to not run correctly.\r\n\r\nMoving forward, we'll probably want to do what astropy/package-template#140 is suggesting, but I'm not sure how to do that you, so probably best to get this in now, and then when astropy/package-template#140 is merged, pull that out and into halotools."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/halotools/issues/comments/160746181","html_url":"https://github.com/astropy/halotools/pull/253#issuecomment-160746181","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/halotools/issues/253","id":160746181,"user":{"login":"eteq","id":346587,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/346587?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq","html_url":"https://github.com/eteq","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-30T20:12:14Z","updated_at":"2015-11-30T20:12:14Z","body":"@aphearin - OK, I think this is now actually working.  There are still some failures, but I believe they are *real*.\r\n\r\n@duncandc @aphearin  - note that this required a small modification to ``setup_package.py`` to use the numpy headers with a special incantation of just the string ``'numpy'`` instead of the ``numpy.get_include()`` function.  You had no way of knowing that this is a requirement to get the ``egg-info`` command to work, but for more on this, see astropy/astropy#4357 .  Or just ignore it and accept that this PR fixes it ;)\r\n\r\nAs for the \"real\" failures, it's basically two issues:\r\n* A few doc build failures which look to be some typos and duplicated API pages. \r\n* All of the py 3.x builds are failing.  I could change this to \"allowed failures\" if you don't want to tackle this in the near term, @aphearin.  But note that 3.x compatibility is a fairly important piece that typically only gets harder the longer it gets put off...\r\n\r\nI'd suggest this get merged as-is to get at least some of the tests going, although if py 3.x should be marked as allowed fail, I could put up one more commit to do that."}}