{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/issues/625","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/issues/625/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/issues/625/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/issues/625/events","html_url":"https://github.com/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/issues/625","id":108769457,"number":625,"title":"Having issues closed and locked without addressing them or a chance to reply is very discouraging","user":{"login":"slikts","id":137872,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/137872?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts","html_url":"https://github.com/slikts","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-09-29T00:00:49Z","updated_at":"2015-09-29T16:12:50Z","closed_at":"2015-09-29T00:13:59Z","body":"#594 was locked without giving a chance to respond to the reasons for closing it, and the reasons for closing are unrelated to the issue. The issue was not about removing the settings but moving them out of `tsconfi.json`, which would not affect their usefulness and bring it in line with the normal practice of having a separate config file. The benefits would be the lack of ambiguity and ease of management. I was waiting for the results of the discussion to make a PR, but I don't see how it's possible to contribute if discussion about issues is denied."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/issues/comments/144107523","html_url":"https://github.com/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/issues/625#issuecomment-144107523","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/issues/625","id":144107523,"user":{"login":"slikts","id":137872,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/137872?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts","html_url":"https://github.com/slikts","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slikts/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-29T16:12:50Z","updated_at":"2015-09-29T16:12:50Z","body":"There's a [suggestion](https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/4987) now for `tsconfig.json` to support comments. If this was implemented, you would be stripping the comments, just like you are stripping the formatting now.\r\n\r\nWhat's the problem with leaving an issue for an unresolved problem open? Someone else might have some more useful input. Instead, it's being closed as if it's resolved."}}