{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ls-cwi/heinz/issues/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ls-cwi/heinz/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ls-cwi/heinz/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ls-cwi/heinz/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ls-cwi/heinz/issues/1","id":66354184,"number":1,"title":"Wrong answer","user":{"login":"alexloboda","id":6033802,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6033802?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda","html_url":"https://github.com/alexloboda","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexloboda/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-04-04T19:06:02Z","updated_at":"2015-04-10T03:10:43Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi,\r\n\r\nI think the latest version of your program give wrong answer on some tests. (Your release v2.0 doesn't suffer from this problems). Seems that problem in preprocessing.\r\nNodes:\r\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\nA 2.0\r\nB 0.0\r\nC 0.0\r\nD 0.0\r\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\nEdges:\r\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\nB C 0.0\r\nC D 0.0\r\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\nIt's clear to see that zero subgraph can't be maximum in a graph with positive vertex,\r\n\r\nIn second test case heinz give unconnected answer, that more weighted than optimum.\r\nNodes:\r\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\n2 7.0\r\n5 14.0\r\n6 -1.0\r\n7 -3.0\r\n8 -1.0\r\n9 -6.0\r\n10 0.0\r\n11 -5.0\r\n12 -4.0\r\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\nEdges:\r\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\n2 6 0.0\r\n2 7 0.0\r\n5 8 0.0\r\n5 9 0.0\r\n6 11 0.0\r\n8 11 0.0\r\n7 11 0.0\r\n9 11 0.0\r\n7 12 0.0\r\n9 12 0.0\r\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\nThank you and excuse my bad English."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ls-cwi/heinz/issues/comments/91414483","html_url":"https://github.com/ls-cwi/heinz/issues/1#issuecomment-91414483","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ls-cwi/heinz/issues/1","id":91414483,"user":{"login":"melkebir","id":6084013,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6084013?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir","html_url":"https://github.com/melkebir","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melkebir/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-10T03:10:43Z","updated_at":"2015-04-10T03:10:43Z","body":"Thank you for the bug report, I can reproduce it. It has to do with the enumeration scheme. More soon..."}}