{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/106","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/106/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/106/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/106/events","html_url":"https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/106","id":70994801,"number":106,"title":"PD corrections drawn from faultfinder suggestions","user":{"login":"funderburkjim","id":6393033,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6393033?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim","html_url":"https://github.com/funderburkjim","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2015-04-26T01:53:56Z","updated_at":"2015-06-21T20:25:47Z","closed_at":"2015-06-17T11:43:36Z","body":"This issue is devoted to spelling corrections in the PD dictionary .\r\n\r\nThere are 1171 cases, comprising headwords where:\r\n* faultfinder found spelling differences from headwords of MW, and\r\n* spelling difference was not of the 'rxx' variety, and\r\n* headword appears in sanhw1.txt list only for PD dictionary,\r\n\r\nSince 1171 cases is a rather large number to manually check, a further programmatic examination was made.\r\nThere are many headwords among the 1171 which are compounds; if we can identify a given case as a\r\ncompound, then that case is likely  to be correctly spelled.\r\n\r\nA program was devised to catch some of these compounds; the program identifies 724 as compounds,\r\nthus leaving 435 cases unexplained, to be examined further by reference to scanned image.\r\n\r\nHere are materials prepared: \r\n* [pd-cpd.html](http://funderburkjim.github.io/fuzzywork/pd-cpd.html) shows the analysis into compounds \r\n* [pd-cpd.txt](https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/blob/master/dictionaries/PD/faultfinder/pd-cpd.txt)\r\n* [pd-fuzzyalpha_not_cpd.html](http://funderburkjim.github.io/fuzzywork/pd-fuzzyalpha_not_cpd.html) provides links and fuzzyalpha suggestions for the 435 cases that need hand examination.  Probably, the\r\nsuggestions won't be very useful.  Also, it is anticipated that only a small number of cases will actually be\r\nspelling errors.\r\n* [pd-fuzzyalpha_not_cpd.txt](https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/blob/master/dictionaries/PD/faultfinder/pd-fuzzyalpha_not_cpd.txt) is the text version of the 435 cases that need examination.\r\n\r\n[Issue#100](https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/100) describes the method expected to be used in processing the *not_cpd* cases.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/comments/113953185","html_url":"https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/106#issuecomment-113953185","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/106","id":113953185,"user":{"login":"funderburkjim","id":6393033,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6393033?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim","html_url":"https://github.com/funderburkjim","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-21T20:25:47Z","updated_at":"2015-06-21T20:25:47Z","body":"A close reading of the 2nd example above points out an error:\r\n** the IAST appears in error  -  the 'i' in akhila is long, but should be short **\r\n\r\nThis discrepancy between IAST and Devanagari did NOT come up in this study, since the words under\r\nexamination were those that faultfinder kicked out (based on key1), and there is nothing wrong with key1.\r\n\r\nThis example suggests that an examination of  IAST-Devanagari differences for ALL PD headwords might be in order.\r\n\r\nI'll put this idea in new issue."}}