{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/942","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/942/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/942/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/942/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/942","id":119881385,"number":942,"title":"UI Design Suggestions: Submission and Review","user":{"login":"willinsky","id":10342108,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10342108?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky","html_url":"https://github.com/willinsky","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willinsky/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-12-02T07:02:32Z","updated_at":"2015-12-10T09:35:27Z","closed_at":null,"body":"- [ ] I think we should standardize page titles (as I suggested Editorial Dashboard above) and Editorial Workflow for this page, placed above the submission title (even as I regret adding a line to a page). We already have this working well with other pages we have such Press Settings, which has the precision and press-specific nature I’m looking for.\r\n- [ ] The right-hand buttons. Some colored and no colored, especially on the first tab, may suggest only the colored are active. Maybe use a pale blue similar to the hyperlink font to limit the pallet for the less critical buttons of this sort.\r\n- [ ] I My inclination on the order of the buttons is logic-of-decision and frequency-based as follows (the order of buttons in Internal Review is great):\r\n\tSend to Internal Review\r\n\tSend to External Review\r\n\tAccept Submission \r\n\tExpedite Submission\r\n        Decline Submission\r\n\r\n![screen shot 2015-12-01 at 11 01 15 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/10342108/11524407/75d86a84-987f-11e5-9851-e9d33fb1feca.png)\r\n\r\n- [ ] “Start Typing” could be “Start typing reviewer’s name (autocomplete)...\r\n- [ ] These links -- Advanced Search, Create New Reviewer, Enroll Existing Reviewer -- would better be Search reviewer database   Add new reviewer   Enroll user as reviewer . These choices should appear directly below “Reviewer” box and not directly above “Choose a pre…”\r\n- [ ] Could “Choose a predefined message..,” appear in the pull-down itself? Given that a message already appears in the form by default, perhaps what should appear in the pulldown in this module and all modules with this option, is simply “Prepared email texts” and the pull down should appear directly below the “Email to be sent…” to indicate that the selected prepared text will appear in the form for further editing.\r\n- [ ] Work needed on the default email texts (paragraphs are not handled right, with additional spacing.) \r\n- [ ] “Do not send Reviewer email” could better worded as “Do not send email to reviewer.”\r\n- [ ] The two titles “Restrict Available FIles” and “Available Review FIles” would be better reduced to “Files To Be Reviewed”  \r\n- [ ] “Selected Reviewer” does not have title bolding. \r\n- [ ] It would be great to have some standardized visual grouping for this popups that set the messaging section apart from the file selection section.\r\n\r\n![screen shot 2015-12-01 at 11 05 13 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/10342108/11524480/04b0aff0-9880-11e5-8cd4-6c5b81102ab7.png)\r\n\r\n- [ ] “Record Editorial Decision” doesn’t correspond to the pop-up’s Send to External Review. We need a different way of indicating multiple actions in these pop-ups, perhaps along these lines, with text and common button. \r\n- [ ]Notify authors, record decision, and send selected file(s) to External Review.  [Complete]\r\n- [ ]I think we only use a contact author, so that “author” can be singular right through\r\nAgain on the theme of too much going on in the popup, I’d suggest two sections in this one organized like this:\r\n\tNotify Author\r\n\t\tNotification email\r\n\t\tReviewer’s attachments\r\n\tSend to Copyedit \r\n\t\tFiles\r\n\r\n![screen shot 2015-12-01 at 11 06 33 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/10342108/11524512/352eba32-9880-11e5-8ae0-30fdb012127b.png)\r\n\r\n- [ ] Discussion gray box isn’t behaving properly in Internal and External Review.\r\n\r\n![screen shot 2015-12-01 at 11 07 34 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/10342108/11524542/59b0753a-9880-11e5-885b-bea3f3eca0bb.png)\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/comments/163550374","html_url":"https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/942#issuecomment-163550374","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/942","id":163550374,"user":{"login":"NateWr","id":2306629,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2306629?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr","html_url":"https://github.com/NateWr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NateWr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-10T09:35:27Z","updated_at":"2015-12-10T09:35:27Z","body":"If my assertions are wrong on this account, this will be clear in user testing and we'll have reasonable data on which to solve the problem."}}