{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/devcenter/issues/327","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/devcenter/issues/327/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/devcenter/issues/327/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/devcenter/issues/327/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openshift/devcenter/issues/327","id":100130714,"number":327,"title":"Ruby \"recommended version\" on Windows","user":{"login":"Azolo","id":141295,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/141295?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo","html_url":"https://github.com/Azolo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-08-10T17:58:43Z","updated_at":"2015-08-20T20:16:16Z","closed_at":"2015-08-20T20:03:11Z","body":"Is it still viable to have Ruby 1.9.3 as the recommended version for Windows?\r\n\r\nNow that 1.9.3 has reached EoL I've noticed a lot of gems dropping support for Ruby 1.9.3. Since `rhc` seems to use *optimistic* dependency resolution on a bunch of gems, it just feels like something could break at any time.\r\n\r\nOn the other hand, if none of the gems stop that support, everything could work just fine."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/devcenter/issues/comments/133158606","html_url":"https://github.com/openshift/devcenter/issues/327#issuecomment-133158606","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/devcenter/issues/327","id":133158606,"user":{"login":"Azolo","id":141295,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/141295?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo","html_url":"https://github.com/Azolo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Azolo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-20T20:16:16Z","updated_at":"2015-08-20T20:16:16Z","body":"Kk, sounds good. Also RubyInstaller recommends 2.1.X because you are correct 2.2 currently doesn't gave the number of fat gems that 2.1 has."}}