{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/1262","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/1262/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/1262/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/1262/events","html_url":"https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/1262","id":95771196,"number":1262,"title":"What is the Webpack 2.0 situation in regards to integrating with Aurelia and Angular 2.0?","user":{"login":"dschissler","id":3968727,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3968727?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler","html_url":"https://github.com/dschissler","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-07-18T00:41:48Z","updated_at":"2015-07-18T19:14:50Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Is any thought going into how Webpack will integrate with these next-gen frameworks?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/comments/122581753","html_url":"https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/1262#issuecomment-122581753","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webpack/webpack/issues/1262","id":122581753,"user":{"login":"dschissler","id":3968727,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3968727?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler","html_url":"https://github.com/dschissler","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dschissler/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-18T19:14:50Z","updated_at":"2015-07-18T19:14:50Z","body":"They are pushing their gulp based jspm cli system (with 'system' something).  It seems that Angular 2.0 might be going the jspm route as well.  It allows HTML and Javascript import syntax to be used and it seems like the most comprehensive ES2015 and ES2016 system around, although they are both pre-release.\r\n\r\nAlready with Babel in Webpack I'm using the new JS import syntax instead of requires and that is working out well enough.  However, it doesn't seem to support the `import {x, y, z} from 'package'` syntax since its really just mapping it to a CommonJS require.  Then about HTML imports I have no idea about that and maybe it would be covered in a loader.\r\n\r\nI'm not well versed in all of the nuances and I'd be waiting for all of the tooling around it to evolve.  Someone at least should be eying Angular 2.0 and Aurelia since they both are both being created with future tech.\r\n\r\nI think that Webpack should have a path through all of this new tech so that as much new syntax can be used.\r\n"}}