{"push_id":566971257,"size":2,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/develop","head":"036e3a8969ce19d862b71680134e54d1134ef8ec","before":"9838e1f183223af41260d9ac02e6081dfaaa0c94","commits":[{"sha":"76a82c80fb4471d70c219a332b174c15eb713a62","author":{"email":"68c46a606457643eab92053c1c05574abb26f861@citusdata.com","name":"Jason Petersen"},"message":"Fix multi-shard SELECT problem with HAVING clauses\n\nBecause Vars from HAVING clauses weren't being included in the remote\nquery's target list, they would be NULL if they did not appear in the\ntarget list or a GROUP/ORDER clause. This change includes them in the\nremote target list so they'll be available for local evaluation of the\nHAVING clause.","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/citusdata/pg_shard/commits/76a82c80fb4471d70c219a332b174c15eb713a62"},{"sha":"036e3a8969ce19d862b71680134e54d1134ef8ec","author":{"email":"19c0f8b45929ad0502f377fdb9764099b45b684b@gmail.com","name":"Jason Petersen"},"message":"Merge pull request #55 from citusdata/feature-multi_select_with_having-#53\n\nFix multi-shard SELECT problem with HAVING clauses\r\n\r\ncr: @sumedhpathak","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/citusdata/pg_shard/commits/036e3a8969ce19d862b71680134e54d1134ef8ec"}]}