{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spatial4j/spatial4j/issues/98","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spatial4j/spatial4j/issues/98/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spatial4j/spatial4j/issues/98/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spatial4j/spatial4j/issues/98/events","html_url":"https://github.com/spatial4j/spatial4j/pull/98","id":65981920,"number":98,"title":"Move SpatialOperation from lucene to spatial4j","user":{"login":"ryantxu","id":705951,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/705951?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu","html_url":"https://github.com/ryantxu","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-04-02T18:15:31Z","updated_at":"2015-04-03T05:01:15Z","closed_at":"2015-04-03T05:00:31Z","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spatial4j/spatial4j/pulls/98","html_url":"https://github.com/spatial4j/spatial4j/pull/98","diff_url":"https://github.com/spatial4j/spatial4j/pull/98.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/spatial4j/spatial4j/pull/98.patch"},"body":"Right now the spatial operation code is in the lucene module.  This means that libraries require lucene core to know the supported operations.  We should have access to the operations from client code\r\n\r\nLets move this to spatial4j"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spatial4j/spatial4j/issues/comments/89163913","html_url":"https://github.com/spatial4j/spatial4j/pull/98#issuecomment-89163913","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spatial4j/spatial4j/issues/98","id":89163913,"user":{"login":"ryantxu","id":705951,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/705951?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu","html_url":"https://github.com/ryantxu","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryantxu/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-03T05:01:15Z","updated_at":"2015-04-03T05:01:15Z","body":"It's a shame the more rich set of predicates supported by JTS in JtsGeometry is isolated there. Maybe that's somewhat inevitable.\r\n\r\nYes -- it seems like that is the tradeoff for having JTS as an optional dependency"}}