{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arasatasaygin/is.js/issues/155","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arasatasaygin/is.js/issues/155/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arasatasaygin/is.js/issues/155/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arasatasaygin/is.js/issues/155/events","html_url":"https://github.com/arasatasaygin/is.js/issues/155","id":110677631,"number":155,"title":"Way to use any and all with parameter accepting checks - Especially numeric.","user":{"login":"kyletheninja","id":9614105,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9614105?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja","html_url":"https://github.com/kyletheninja","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kyletheninja/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-10-09T15:08:13Z","updated_at":"2015-10-09T15:08:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I see how it could complicate things to let checks that accept extra parameters use any and all.\r\n\r\nHowever I think it would be really useful to say things like,\r\n\r\nis.any.under([33, 45, 67], 50);\r\n=>return true\r\nis.all.under([33, 45, 67], 50);\r\n=>return false\r\n\r\nI think it would make the numeric checks much more useful."}}