{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/95","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/95/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/95/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/95/events","html_url":"https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/95","id":68242629,"number":95,"title":"INM corrections drawn from faultfinder suggestions","user":{"login":"funderburkjim","id":6393033,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6393033?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim","html_url":"https://github.com/funderburkjim","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":37,"created_at":"2015-04-14T02:32:14Z","updated_at":"2015-04-16T01:26:15Z","closed_at":null,"body":"73  cases were found by faultfinder for the headwords of INM (\tIndex to the Names in the Mahabharata)\r\n\r\nThese comprise headwords of INM that\r\n\r\noccur only in INM\r\nhave spelling patterns that don't occur among the MW headwords,\r\nand spelling patterns are not of the 'rxx' variety.\r\n\r\nThe comments are generated by program, and contain links to the Cologne displays and scans for each case. [Note: For cases where the headword is wrong, and after the correction is made, then the\r\nlink to the Cologne display will likely fail (since it is based on the old, incorrect spelling)].\r\n\r\nThe cases are listed in page order, which should facilitate examination of the cases.\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/comments/93611852","html_url":"https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/95#issuecomment-93611852","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/95","id":93611852,"user":{"login":"funderburkjim","id":6393033,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6393033?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim","html_url":"https://github.com/funderburkjim","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/funderburkjim/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-16T01:26:15Z","updated_at":"2015-04-16T01:26:15Z","body":"In the third group, there is no spelling error, but the text has a headword phrase.  \r\n```\r\n; 04/15/2015  banDanaasurendrARAM -> banDana\r\n18206 old <HI>{@Bandhana(h2) Asurendra1n2a1m2@}¦ = Çiva (1000 names^2).\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  SyAmAyAASrama -> SyAmAyA \r\n32180 old <HI>{@Çya1ma1ya1 a1çrama(h2),@}¦ a ti1rtha. § 733{%m%} (Citraku1t2a):\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  lohitOdaDi -> lohita \r\n60110 old <HI>{@Lohita(h2) udadhi(h2)@}¦ (“the bloody ocean”). § 498\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  padaanuttama -> pada \r\n69736 old <HI>{@Pada(m) anuttama(m2)@}¦ = Vishn2u (1000 names).\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  pativratAyAAKyAna -> pativratAyA \r\n72542 old <HI>{@Pativrata1ya1 a1khya1na(m2)@}¦ (“the story of the faithful\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  piNgAyAASrama -> piNgAyA \r\n73259 old <HI>{@Pin3ga1ya1(h2) a1çrama(h2),@}¦ a ti1rtha. § 733{%y%} (Ujja1naka):\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  pUzRodantaBid -> pUzRo \r\n75847 old <HI>{@Pu1shn2o dantabhid@}¦ (“destroyer of Pu1shan's teeth”)\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  pUzRodantavinASa -> pUzRo  \r\n75849 old <HI>{@Pu1shn2o dantavina1ça(h2)@}¦ (do.) = Çiva: VII, 9541.\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  pUzRodantavinASana -> pUzRo  \r\n75850 old <HI>{@Pu1shn2o dantavina1çana(h2)@}¦ (do.) = Çiva: XII, 10423\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  rAmAyaROpAKyAna -> rAmAyaRa \r\n78355 old <HI>{@Ra1ma1yan2a(m) upa1khya1na(m2)@}¦ (“the episode relating\r\n\r\n; 04/15/2015  uttarAazAQAH -> uttarA CHECK \r\n91669 old <HI>{@Uttara1(h2) Asha1d2ha1h2,@}¦ v. Asha1d2ha1.\r\n```\r\n\r\nI agree that the current key1 headword is wrong in these cases, but am not sure that the corrections\r\nare what we should use for key1.\r\n\r\nAs a side note, there are 385 cases in INM where the headword from the text is given as two or more words.\r\n\r\nCurrently, the headword generation step (hw1.py) derives key1 in these cases as follows:\r\n* remove parenthetical text\r\n* Use the text before the first comma, if there is a comma\r\n* Remove any spaces\r\n\r\nThe result is key1.\r\n\r\nHere are some examples (these are in Anglicized Sanskrit coding - conversion to SLP1 is separate step):\r\n```\r\nAbhimanyor bha1rya1   --> abhimanyorbha1rya1\r\nAçvamedhika(m2) parva(n)  --> as4vamedhikaparva\r\nAparimita, Aparinirmita, Aparinindita  --> aparimita\r\n```\r\n\r\nSo I raise these questions:\r\n1a. Should key1 for the cases  banDanaasurendrARAM , etc., from this faultfinder study be changed per\r\n   Dhaval's original suggestion?  (Dhaval's principle is to use to first word, I think.)\r\n1b. Should the same be done for the two in the first group (of previous comment)\r\n2a.  Should we attend *now* to the rest of the 385 cases of phrase headwords ?\r\n2b.  If so, should we change the key1 algorithm to use  the 'first word' (ignoring parentheses) in these cases?\r\n\r\n"}}