{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/niktre/mlb_jasna/issues/13","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/niktre/mlb_jasna/issues/13/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/niktre/mlb_jasna/issues/13/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/niktre/mlb_jasna/issues/13/events","html_url":"https://github.com/niktre/mlb_jasna/issues/13","id":96624536,"number":13,"title":"Implicit algorithm","user":{"login":"uschille","id":7782554,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7782554?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille","html_url":"https://github.com/uschille","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/niktre/mlb_jasna/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/niktre/mlb_jasna/labels/needs%20testing","name":"needs testing","color":"eb6420"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-07-22T17:40:14Z","updated_at":"2015-08-08T21:13:38Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In Burkhard's supplemental material, I am wondering whether one can join step 4 and step 5 by inserting Eq. (7) into Eq. (8) and using the chain rule. The result could be evaluated in one loop over the lattice which seems more efficient.\r\n\r\nSome notes for myself for later reference...\r\n* [x] Check if pbc_y need to be adjusted\r\n* [x] Check if HALO size can be reduced again\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/niktre/mlb_jasna/issues/comments/129045407","html_url":"https://github.com/niktre/mlb_jasna/issues/13#issuecomment-129045407","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/niktre/mlb_jasna/issues/13","id":129045407,"user":{"login":"uschille","id":7782554,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7782554?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille","html_url":"https://github.com/uschille","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uschille/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-08T21:13:38Z","updated_at":"2015-08-08T21:13:38Z","body":"I think the interface to the Fortran subroutine is now working. However, when called from the multiphase LB it reports that the matrix is not symmetric. I'll need to check whether it actually should be symmetric (I've trusted BD on this one)."}}