{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144/events","html_url":"https://github.com/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144","id":78124808,"number":144,"title":"License under an Apache license","user":{"login":"glaforge","id":47907,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/47907?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge","html_url":"https://github.com/glaforge","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":27,"created_at":"2015-05-19T15:02:14Z","updated_at":"2015-05-20T08:31:46Z","closed_at":null,"body":"GPL and LGPL licensed libraries is often problematic when integrating in other projects.\r\nCould it be possible to also license the project under the Apache license, or even MIT / BSD?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/comments/103807845","html_url":"https://github.com/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144#issuecomment-103807845","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144","id":103807845,"user":{"login":"ptitjes","id":64956,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/64956?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes","html_url":"https://github.com/ptitjes","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ptitjes/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-20T08:31:46Z","updated_at":"2015-05-20T08:31:46Z","body":"@ftomassetti Well, I am not against the use of JavaParser in commercial projects if this use is not hidden (mention of use, pointers to source code) and if those commercial projects invest in JavaParser. What I don't want is non-free copying/rebranding of our code."}}