{"push_id":876398652,"size":2,"distinct_size":0,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"356dbc4e694e3d1bd98090d69a4a9f3f84c3dbaf","before":"4317d9875ac87828eeb51af7e1d7affb3c213926","commits":[{"sha":"ab1cb51f54a9d3743ccfa3d3461dbaeadc2a7d04","author":{"email":"102d1c3810edb5bcf453485073d58f4c6e0cd8f9@hush.ai","name":"iirelu"},"message":"Make usage of vec! macro consistent\n\nPreviously it was a mix of vec!() and vec![], as both work thanks to the\nimplementation of macros in Rust (even vec!{} would work), this makes\nthem all use the generally-accepted vec![] standard, which imitates the\nsyntax used for slices and is considered to make things clearer.","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rust-lang/cargo/commits/ab1cb51f54a9d3743ccfa3d3461dbaeadc2a7d04"},{"sha":"356dbc4e694e3d1bd98090d69a4a9f3f84c3dbaf","author":{"email":"3a2c29237f73c7cf88424b80e427b1884f346b35@rust-lang.org","name":"bors"},"message":"Auto merge of #2167 - iirelu:vec-macro-consistency, r=alexcrichton\n\n~~Because it bugged me~~ It's better to have a single consistent way of using macros, and not mixing `{}` `[]` `()` blocks.","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rust-lang/cargo/commits/356dbc4e694e3d1bd98090d69a4a9f3f84c3dbaf"}]}