{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144/events","html_url":"https://github.com/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144","id":78124808,"number":144,"title":"License under an Apache license","user":{"login":"glaforge","id":47907,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/47907?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge","html_url":"https://github.com/glaforge","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glaforge/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":37,"created_at":"2015-05-19T15:02:14Z","updated_at":"2015-05-20T10:35:52Z","closed_at":null,"body":"GPL and LGPL licensed libraries is often problematic when integrating in other projects.\r\nCould it be possible to also license the project under the Apache license, or even MIT / BSD?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/comments/103838885","html_url":"https://github.com/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144#issuecomment-103838885","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/javaparser/javaparser/issues/144","id":103838885,"user":{"login":"ftomassetti","id":439078,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/439078?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti","html_url":"https://github.com/ftomassetti","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftomassetti/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-20T10:35:52Z","updated_at":"2015-05-20T10:35:52Z","body":"thank you @rpau ! I think it is fair to list the contributors. Your name is listed among the contributors in the pom file (https://github.com/javaparser/javaparser/blob/master/pom.xml) but I understand it is not very visible. I would suggest to add a reference to walkmod in the license section, something among the lines of: \"This project is available under multiple license, users are allowed to choose betweens XXX and LGPL. This is possible because contributors granted permissions to do so. Among them Raquel Pau from the Walkmod project\" and we could maybe add a link to the walkmod project. Of course this is just my suggestion, we should discuss it with all the people involved in the project but if I understand correctly  you are not going to prevent us to move to a dual license, if the community agrees on this, right?\r\n\r\n@SmiddyPence yes, alas we would need some contributor agreement for the future :(\r\n\r\nAbout the dual licenses we could perhaps adopt MIT and LGPL which seems to be compatible."}}