{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Wenqer/gulp-base64/issues/12","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Wenqer/gulp-base64/issues/12/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Wenqer/gulp-base64/issues/12/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Wenqer/gulp-base64/issues/12/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Wenqer/gulp-base64/pull/12","id":52174298,"number":12,"title":"fix(exclude): fix exclusion bug due to inverted conditional","user":{"login":"booleanbetrayal","id":981825,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/981825?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal","html_url":"https://github.com/booleanbetrayal","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/booleanbetrayal/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2014-12-16T22:11:20Z","updated_at":"2015-04-27T14:44:13Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Wenqer/gulp-base64/pulls/12","html_url":"https://github.com/Wenqer/gulp-base64/pull/12","diff_url":"https://github.com/Wenqer/gulp-base64/pull/12.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/Wenqer/gulp-base64/pull/12.patch"},"body":"The `exclude` array was actually having the opposite effect as the conditional should have been inverted. The `some` test function returns true if any exclusion pattern was found, but while the test function should remain the same, we really want to negate that return value."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Wenqer/gulp-base64/issues/comments/96681317","html_url":"https://github.com/Wenqer/gulp-base64/pull/12#issuecomment-96681317","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Wenqer/gulp-base64/issues/12","id":96681317,"user":{"login":"nbrustein","id":82556,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/82556?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein","html_url":"https://github.com/nbrustein","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nbrustein/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-27T14:44:13Z","updated_at":"2015-04-27T14:44:13Z","body":"@Wenqer - would be really nice to get this merged.  Thanks."}}