{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mvysny/aedict/issues/488","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mvysny/aedict/issues/488/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mvysny/aedict/issues/488/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mvysny/aedict/issues/488/events","html_url":"https://github.com/mvysny/aedict/issues/488","id":72628473,"number":488,"title":"Searching a word doesn't show it is added to notepad","user":{"login":"eevman","id":12208635,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12208635?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman","html_url":"https://github.com/eevman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eevman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mvysny/aedict/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"fc2929"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-05-02T10:36:22Z","updated_at":"2015-05-16T12:12:54Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I use aedict version 3.16, and I have noticed a strange thing. I was searching for a word. When the dictionary listed it in the results screen, it was not marked with the notepad icon. However I was sure that it has already been added to notepad. Then I found this word in the notepad. When I returned to the start screen with recent words, I could see two entries with the same word - one added to notepad, and other without notepad icon (see picture below). By looking at them it is obvious that they are not completely the same, although they both come from the same dictionary. It looks like that the word stored in notepad was copied from the dictionary, and in the meantime the dictionary has been updated. Now I can't know for sure if the word I'm searching for is in the notepad or not...\r\n\r\nIs it possible to update the notepad entry when the dictionary is updated? Or do you have some other suggestion?\r\n\r\n![2015-05-01_19-26-53](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/12208635/7440766/83bdf58e-f0c7-11e4-8dbf-c48f87b5a901.png)"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mvysny/aedict/issues/comments/102620948","html_url":"https://github.com/mvysny/aedict/issues/488#issuecomment-102620948","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mvysny/aedict/issues/488","id":102620948,"user":{"login":"mvysny","id":254091,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/254091?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny","html_url":"https://github.com/mvysny","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mvysny/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-16T12:12:54Z","updated_at":"2015-05-16T12:12:54Z","body":"You're right, thanks for letting me know. Perhaps I need to find a matching rule which is neither as strict as in Aedict 3.17, nor as relaxed as in Aedict 3.18 :-)\r\nCurrently the matching rule is very relaxed as I only compare by kanjis. This is apparently too relaxed, as seen with the kanji 方. I can make this role more strict so that the entries will match if the kanji+reading set is exactly the same, but if Jim adds e.g. a new reading to an entry, this will again be problematic.\r\nPerhaps the following rule may be enough: the entries will match if they share at least one common kanji AND one common reading? This will apparently fix the issue for 方 but it may still not be enough for other entries - can you please try to name such entries from the top of your head? If yes, we need to find yet more strict rule."}}