{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SirVer/ultisnips/issues/593","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SirVer/ultisnips/issues/593/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SirVer/ultisnips/issues/593/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SirVer/ultisnips/issues/593/events","html_url":"https://github.com/SirVer/ultisnips/issues/593","id":112779835,"number":593,"title":"\"Autotrigger\" should be optional","user":{"login":"BohrShaw","id":1585463,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1585463?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw","html_url":"https://github.com/BohrShaw","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BohrShaw/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SirVer/ultisnips/labels/wontfix","name":"wontfix","color":"006b75"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":21,"created_at":"2015-10-22T11:09:24Z","updated_at":"2015-10-28T22:04:04Z","closed_at":"2015-10-28T16:48:46Z","body":"I prefer manual triggering and don't need auto-triggering (and arguably a little performance hit) at all.\r\nHow about adding an option to disable related auto-commands? @seletskiy  "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SirVer/ultisnips/issues/comments/152011471","html_url":"https://github.com/SirVer/ultisnips/issues/593#issuecomment-152011471","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SirVer/ultisnips/issues/593","id":152011471,"user":{"login":"justinmk","id":1359421,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1359421?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk","html_url":"https://github.com/justinmk","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/justinmk/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-28T22:04:04Z","updated_at":"2015-10-28T22:04:04Z","body":"@SirVer if timing was the issue, again https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/3413 may have fixed it, because Neovim now blocks during operator-pending (https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/3382). We are 3 days from 0.1 release, maybe you could run your test suite against current master..."}}