{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Dataliberate/bibschemaorg/issues/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Dataliberate/bibschemaorg/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Dataliberate/bibschemaorg/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Dataliberate/bibschemaorg/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Dataliberate/bibschemaorg/issues/1","id":71628484,"number":1,"title":"Please don't squash contributor commits","user":{"login":"dbs","id":317113,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/317113?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs","html_url":"https://github.com/dbs","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbs/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-04-28T15:54:20Z","updated_at":"2015-04-28T16:35:12Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi, for the sake of retaining commit revision and authorship history, please don't squash the commits down into a single monolithic initial commit as appears to have been done here.\r\n\r\nIt's much better practice to maintain separate branches and merge them; that makes it possible for upstream to simply issue a \"git merge\" command and retain the entire revision history from all of the contributing branches."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Dataliberate/bibschemaorg/issues/comments/97129099","html_url":"https://github.com/Dataliberate/bibschemaorg/issues/1#issuecomment-97129099","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Dataliberate/bibschemaorg/issues/1","id":97129099,"user":{"login":"danbri","id":170265,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/170265?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri","html_url":"https://github.com/danbri","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-28T16:35:12Z","updated_at":"2015-04-28T16:35:12Z","body":"Yes it would be good to have the larger history merge-able..."}}