{"push_id":723888092,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/lp5.1","head":"5b0e8804f218a3d24c17a644826834eefc78ce15","before":"ab4488a8ba368a1857cca8ab15ad31085e703274","commits":[{"sha":"5b0e8804f218a3d24c17a644826834eefc78ce15","author":{"email":"cb3904095a5bc20edc93ba3dfa3e7d27d981b654@intel.com","name":"Shaohua Li"},"message":"block: fiops sync/async scale\n\nCFQ gives 2.5 times more share to sync workload. This matches CFQ.\n\nNote this is different with the read/write scale. We have 3 types of\nrequests:\n1. read\n2. sync write\n3. write\nCFQ doesn't differentitate type 1 and 2, but request cost of 1 and 2\nare usually different for flash based storage. So we have both sync/async\nand read/write scale here.\n\nChange-Id: Ia7fff6a65f21f87be56a879f4f20f1e8a443fd69\nSigned-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AICP/kernel_moto_shamu/commits/5b0e8804f218a3d24c17a644826834eefc78ce15"}]}