{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/544","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/544/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/544/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/544/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/544","id":94109248,"number":544,"title":"Inconsistencies in AmsterdamUtrechtL2::AmsterdamUtrechtTrack1 Balise header","user":{"login":"janWelte","id":2719967,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2719967?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte","html_url":"https://github.com/janWelte","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"fc2929"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/labels/User%20Story%204","name":"User Story 4","color":"0052cc"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"JakobGartner","id":8400941,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8400941?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner","html_url":"https://github.com/JakobGartner","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-07-09T17:36:20Z","updated_at":"2015-07-09T19:30:54Z","closed_at":null,"body":"As asked by Baseliyos in #495 I've verified the Balise header as I've build a first test model to check communication in US-4.\r\n\r\nBy running the full track and comparing the recognized BGs by the OBU and my BTMtest model I've been able to check whether all balises are correctly received.\r\n\r\nOverall this has been quite successful, but the following 8 BGs have shown inconsistencies. In most cases these are related to implementation bugs, as wrong headers have been plugged in balises.\r\n\r\n1. BG352 is not recognized when the train starts at position 0.0 (probably a conversion problem, more details are needed)\r\n\r\n2. BG357 wrong header as BG367\r\n\r\n3. BG374 problem with positon conversion\r\n\r\n4. BG376 wrong Balise header in 376_0 (BG375_header_B0)\r\n\r\n5. BG382 wrong header in Balise_382_0 (BG382_headerB1) in both same header\r\n\r\n6. BG391 wrong header as BG371\r\n\r\n7. BG396 wrong header as BG139\r\n\r\n8. BG412 wrong header BG411\r\n\r\nThis check has only verified the BG header. Packet Data will be verified in future versions.\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/comments/120120015","html_url":"https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/544#issuecomment-120120015","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/544","id":120120015,"user":{"login":"janWelte","id":2719967,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2719967?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte","html_url":"https://github.com/janWelte","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/janWelte/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-09T19:30:54Z","updated_at":"2015-07-09T19:30:54Z","body":"Thank You.\n\nI've to check 3. closer myself as it has only been clear from my test that this was not send to the BTM.\n\nI have not ha the option to check it in depth already but I'll do this as I'll enhance my test model.\n\nOverall thanks for the great work.\n\nJan Welte\n\n\n\nAm 09.07.2015 um 21:24 schrieb Jakob Gärtner <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>>:\n\nMairamou and I have discussed your issues.\nWe can reproduce all but no.3\n\nShe has provided a correction but can't send due to power failure in her\nneighborhood . She will commit tomorrow morning .\n\nFirst comments embedded in your numbered items\n\nOn 9 juil. 2015, at 14:36, Jan Welte <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:\n\nAs asked by Baseliyos in #495\n<https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/495> I've verified the Balise\nheader as I've build a first test model to check communication in US-4.\n\nBy running the full track and comparing the recognized BGs by the OBU and\nmy BTMtest model I've been able to check whether all balises are correctly\nreceived.\n\nOverall this has been quite successful, but the following 8 BGs have shown\ninconsistencies. In most cases these are related to implementation bugs, as\nwrong headers have been plugged in balises.\n\n1.\n\nBG352 is not recognized when the train starts at position 0.0 (probably\na conversion problem, more details are needed)\n\nCorrected. This was a typo in the position information of BG352\n\n\n1.\n\nBG357 wrong header as BG367\n\nCorrected\n\n\n1.\n\nBG374 problem with positon conversion\n\nWe can't reproduce .\nThe engineering data, the track plan Abcoude sheet 8A and the engineering\ndata in the model all have the value 7857.\n\n\n1.\n\nBG376 wrong Balise header in 376_0 (BG375_header_B0)\n\nCorrected\n\n\n1.\n\nBG382 wrong header in Balise_382_0 (BG382_headerB1) in both same header\n\nCorrected\n\n\n1.\n\nBG391 wrong header as BG371\n\nCorrected\n\n\n1.\n\nBG396 wrong header as BG139\n\nCorrected\n\n\n1.\n\nBG412 wrong header BG411\n\nCorrected\n\n\n\nThis check has only verified the BG header. Packet Data will be verified in\nfuture versions.\n\n—\nReply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n<https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/544>.\n\n—\nReply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/544#issuecomment-120117631>.\n"}}