{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bcoe/nyc/issues/39","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bcoe/nyc/issues/39/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bcoe/nyc/issues/39/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bcoe/nyc/issues/39/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bcoe/nyc/issues/39","id":100457429,"number":39,"title":"What about my untested files?","user":{"login":"ronkorving","id":631240,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/631240?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving","html_url":"https://github.com/ronkorving","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkorving/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bcoe/nyc/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-08-12T03:29:15Z","updated_at":"2015-08-21T02:14:23Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi,\r\n\r\nSo I tried out nyc on my project that I test with tape. I noticed that it doesn't report about files that are never touched by unit tests. Is this expected behavior? Everything looks very green, when in reality some files aren't yet tested at all."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bcoe/nyc/issues/comments/133246919","html_url":"https://github.com/bcoe/nyc/issues/39#issuecomment-133246919","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bcoe/nyc/issues/39","id":133246919,"user":{"login":"rmg","id":17978,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/17978?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg","html_url":"https://github.com/rmg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-21T02:14:23Z","updated_at":"2015-08-21T02:14:23Z","body":"@ronkorving I think the simplest approach would be generating a list of files that are eligible for coverage and then adding stub entries for any that are missing in the final coverage report. Could be really prone to false-positives, though, depending on how the module is written."}}