{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/rgbif/issues/172","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/rgbif/issues/172/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/rgbif/issues/172/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/rgbif/issues/172/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ropensci/rgbif/issues/172","id":94690297,"number":172,"title":"unable to extract coordinate uncertainty or coordinate precision","user":{"login":"qgroom","id":5530576,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5530576?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom","html_url":"https://github.com/qgroom","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qgroom/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2015-07-13T10:25:39Z","updated_at":"2015-07-21T18:03:17Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I would have expected that occ_search would be able to search and/or retrieve using coordinate uncertainty or coordinate precision, but this doesn't appear to be the case. Can these field be added, at least to the output fields?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/rgbif/issues/comments/123417143","html_url":"https://github.com/ropensci/rgbif/issues/172#issuecomment-123417143","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/rgbif/issues/172","id":123417143,"user":{"login":"sckott","id":577668,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/577668?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott","html_url":"https://github.com/sckott","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-21T18:03:17Z","updated_at":"2015-07-21T18:03:17Z","body":"@qgroom After talking to GBIF, looks like is in some occurrence records, if given by the data provider, e.g., see the field `coordinateUncertaintyInMeters` in http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/1088909149/verbatim  - However, this field hasn't made it's way into the data returned from the search API\r\n\r\nFor now, you do one of two things:\r\n\r\n* The downloads from GBIF, either from their web portal, or via the `download_*()` functions in `rgbif`, give the field `coordinateAccuracy` - the uncertainty radius for lat/lon in decimal degrees, interpreted and kept directly on the Occurrence class https://github.com/gbif/gbif-api/blob/master/src/main/java/org/gbif/api/model/occurrence/Occurrence.java#L121 \r\nhttps://github.com/gbif/dwc-api/blob/master/src/main/java/org/gbif/dwc/terms/GbifTerm.java#L41 (description from GBIF team) - I'm not sure if that's what you're looking for. \r\n* Or, you could retrieve `coordinateUncertaintyInMeters` where available from each verbatim occurrence record, e.g., `occ_get(1088909149, verbatim = TRUE, fields = \"all\")` - The field `coordinateUncertaintyInMeters` is supposed to be in the regular occurrence record that shows up via `occ_search()` function, but that's a bug they aim to fix http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-2795"}}