{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/algolia/algoliasearch-rails/issues/50","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/algolia/algoliasearch-rails/issues/50/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/algolia/algoliasearch-rails/issues/50/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/algolia/algoliasearch-rails/issues/50/events","html_url":"https://github.com/algolia/algoliasearch-rails/issues/50","id":71660187,"number":50,"title":"Is the Sequel ORM supported?","user":{"login":"kennym","id":160117,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/160117?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym","html_url":"https://github.com/kennym","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kennym/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-04-28T18:05:00Z","updated_at":"2015-04-28T20:21:32Z","closed_at":null,"body":"We are using a Rails app with the Sequel ORM. From what I see in the source code, you don't support Sequel yet, which is a bummer for us."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/algolia/algoliasearch-rails/issues/comments/97196401","html_url":"https://github.com/algolia/algoliasearch-rails/issues/50#issuecomment-97196401","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/algolia/algoliasearch-rails/issues/50","id":97196401,"user":{"login":"redox","id":29529,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/29529?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox","html_url":"https://github.com/redox","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/redox/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-28T20:21:32Z","updated_at":"2015-04-28T20:21:32Z","body":"Yeah, the idea is to send batches of ~1,000 records at a time. For ActiveRecord we're using the `find_in_batche` method and for MongoId we're using the native `cursor` (streaming) mechanism to iterate over the whole table. At any time, you only need to keep `batch size` objects in memory."}}