{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/errbit/errbit/issues/955","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/errbit/errbit/issues/955/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/errbit/errbit/issues/955/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/errbit/errbit/issues/955/events","html_url":"https://github.com/errbit/errbit/issues/955","id":109588683,"number":955,"title":"SAML authentication","user":{"login":"md5","id":76367,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/76367?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5","html_url":"https://github.com/md5","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/errbit/errbit/labels/Feature","name":"Feature","color":"52f15c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-10-02T23:21:30Z","updated_at":"2015-12-02T05:09:38Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Would you guys be open to a PR that adds `omniauth-saml` to enable optional SAML authentication for Errbit, similar to how the `GITHUB_AUTHENTICATION` stuff works?\r\n\r\nIf not, what approach would you recommend for integrating with SAML single-sign on? I'd love it if we didn't have to maintain a fork of Errbit in order to get SAML authentication."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/errbit/errbit/issues/comments/161183640","html_url":"https://github.com/errbit/errbit/issues/955#issuecomment-161183640","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/errbit/errbit/issues/955","id":161183640,"user":{"login":"md5","id":76367,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/76367?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5","html_url":"https://github.com/md5","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/md5/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-02T05:09:38Z","updated_at":"2015-12-02T05:09:38Z","body":"We've been getting along OK with the GitHub Enterprise-based login, so I haven't been motivated to prioritize this work.\r\n\r\nAside from my relative satisfaction with using GHE for logins and competing priorities, I've also realized since I opened this issue that `omniauth-saml` is not being actively maintained. I've been watching that repo since about the time I opened this issue and there are quite a few outstanding PRs and issues that have had little or no input from the repository owners. Some of these issues, in particular the ones addressed by https://github.com/PracticallyGreen/omniauth-saml/pull/50 and https://github.com/PracticallyGreen/omniauth-saml/pull/51, have the effect of limiting the interoperability of systems using `omniauth-saml` with the actual SAML identity providers that exist in the wild. For this reason, I expect that getting a solid, interoperable SAML-based login solution for Errbit is something that still has to wait."}}