{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhuckaby/webcamjs/issues/90","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhuckaby/webcamjs/issues/90/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhuckaby/webcamjs/issues/90/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhuckaby/webcamjs/issues/90/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jhuckaby/webcamjs/issues/90","id":95345644,"number":90,"title":"Size of camera on large resolutions","user":{"login":"uranthos","id":13359585,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13359585?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos","html_url":"https://github.com/uranthos","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-07-16T04:09:01Z","updated_at":"2015-08-25T04:48:06Z","closed_at":null,"body":"On my webpage I have the webcamjs size set to 320 x 240 resolution, on all the resolutions upto and including 1920x1080, the webcamjs control is taking up the entire space I have given it. however on any resolution greater then 1920x1080, the size of the control is staying correct BUT the actual 'camera view' is only taking a portion of 320 x 240, leaving an thick white border below and to the right of the webcamjs control, This occurs within IE 11 and unfortunately I am currently unable to test this using any other browser \r\n\r\nAny assistance would be greatly appreciated,\r\n\r\nThanks \r\n\r\n![untitled picture](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13359585/8715376/172ff7c2-2bc4-11e5-8722-ce4c318999fe.png)\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhuckaby/webcamjs/issues/comments/134472160","html_url":"https://github.com/jhuckaby/webcamjs/issues/90#issuecomment-134472160","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhuckaby/webcamjs/issues/90","id":134472160,"user":{"login":"uranthos","id":13359585,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13359585?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos","html_url":"https://github.com/uranthos","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uranthos/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-25T04:48:06Z","updated_at":"2015-08-25T04:48:06Z","body":"I can definitely say this as a configuration option would have been a great help ... about a month ago lol ... whether or not it would be beneficial to anyone else is unknown as i guess most people that run 4K screens are most likely going to do the update to windows 10 therefore wont need the flash fallback anyway... I could be wrong but i don't think anyone running ie5 will be driving a 4K screen lol.  saying that it would be nice not to have a custom swf file ;)"}}