{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/699","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/699/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/699/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/699/events","html_url":"https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/699","id":77675106,"number":699,"title":"Restrict openWindow() to http(s) schemes?","user":{"login":"jakearchibald","id":93594,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/93594?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald","html_url":"https://github.com/jakearchibald","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakearchibald/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-05-18T14:22:06Z","updated_at":"2015-06-25T07:26:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"We currently reject on `about:blank` (due to #696), but is there any benefit in allowing schemes other than `http` and `https`?\r\n\r\nWhat would it mean to `openWindow('mailto:hello@example.com')`? etc\r\n\r\nI propose we reject on schemes other than http/https. Any objections?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/comments/115140557","html_url":"https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/699#issuecomment-115140557","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/699","id":115140557,"user":{"login":"mattto","id":1782098,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1782098?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto","html_url":"https://github.com/mattto","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mattto/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-25T07:26:30Z","updated_at":"2015-06-25T07:26:30Z","body":"Hey, I just noticed the about:blank spec change.\r\n\r\nChrome currently treats all about:* URLs as \"about:blank\" in openWindow(). Apparently this mimics the behavior of window.open().  cc @mounirlamouri who implemented this in https://codereview.chromium.org/980383004\r\n\r\nBy the logic of issue #696, it would seem we should instead reject all about:* instead of opening about:blank. Should the spec codify that?"}}