{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yahoo/squidb/issues/53","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yahoo/squidb/issues/53/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yahoo/squidb/issues/53/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yahoo/squidb/issues/53/events","html_url":"https://github.com/yahoo/squidb/issues/53","id":97470485,"number":53,"title":"Thread safety","user":{"login":"MFlisar","id":2437726,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2437726?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar","html_url":"https://github.com/MFlisar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-07-27T14:01:45Z","updated_at":"2015-07-27T16:28:21Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Is there any thread safety handling integrated that can be somehow enabled? I think not, so is it considered to be integrated one day?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yahoo/squidb/issues/comments/125264537","html_url":"https://github.com/yahoo/squidb/issues/53#issuecomment-125264537","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yahoo/squidb/issues/53","id":125264537,"user":{"login":"MFlisar","id":2437726,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2437726?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar","html_url":"https://github.com/MFlisar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MFlisar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-27T16:28:21Z","updated_at":"2015-07-27T16:28:21Z","body":"Yes. I have a long running service (that displays floating UI elements) and a setting activity. I update the service on every single change in the settings, so it sometimes is slow and therefore I decided to split both things into different processes...\r\n\r\nI'm already using something like your second suggestion to hand on bus events to another processes and probably i'll take that approach."}}