{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1099","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1099/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1099/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1099/events","html_url":"https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1099","id":60779158,"number":1099,"title":"Some refactoring before AVX2 and AVX-512","user":{"login":"magnumripper","id":1268598,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1268598?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper","html_url":"https://github.com/magnumripper","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/labels/Maintenance/cleanup","name":"Maintenance/cleanup","color":"bfe5bf"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-03-12T07:00:22Z","updated_at":"2015-03-12T07:09:17Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@jfoug \r\n\r\nWould it not make sense to drop MMX_COEF_SHA256 and just use MMX_COEF instead? I see no reason to use another one - in both cases it's about how many uint32's you process with a SIMD instruction.\r\n\r\nAlso, I think MMX_COEF_SHA512 should better be called MMX_COEF_64. Because it's not really about SHA512, it's about uint64.\r\n\r\nTaking it a step further we could consider refactoring them to SIMD_COEF_32 and SIMD_COEF_64. MMX is so 1996..."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/comments/78433324","html_url":"https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1099#issuecomment-78433324","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1099","id":78433324,"user":{"login":"magnumripper","id":1268598,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1268598?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper","html_url":"https://github.com/magnumripper","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magnumripper/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-12T07:09:17Z","updated_at":"2015-03-12T07:09:17Z","body":"On the other hand, we'll probably want to use SHA256_SSE_PARA and SHA512_SSE_PARA for future interleaving, as these are actually tied to the respective function. They too could be refactored (eg. MD4_SSE_PARA -> MD4_SIMD_PARA) if we wanted to."}}