{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jstransformers/test-jstransformer/issues/11","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jstransformers/test-jstransformer/issues/11/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jstransformers/test-jstransformer/issues/11/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jstransformers/test-jstransformer/issues/11/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jstransformers/test-jstransformer/issues/11","id":93671882,"number":11,"title":"What about multiple tests?","user":{"login":"tunnckoCore","id":5038030,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5038030?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore","html_url":"https://github.com/tunnckoCore","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tunnckoCore/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-07-08T01:53:14Z","updated_at":"2015-07-09T19:41:27Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Multiple test cases and etc? That's why im against that philosophy \"tests are just to prove code is working\" - No, tests are for 2 things.. 200% coverage, cuz 100% isn't enough sometimes to prove code is working as you expect; and examples and use cases, cuz docs and readmes not enough. Cuz in readme should have only the simplest and shortest working use case.\r\n\r\nI always look the tests of every package in daily basis and find more and more use cases. And always look them, cuz readmes and docs are not enough in 99% of the time.\r\n\r\nAnd hence.. that boilerplate merging puked on every transformer history, imo. Sorry for the tone, but im horrified. Other than that @RobLoach did awesome work around these months."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jstransformers/test-jstransformer/issues/comments/120122856","html_url":"https://github.com/jstransformers/test-jstransformer/issues/11#issuecomment-120122856","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jstransformers/test-jstransformer/issues/11","id":120122856,"user":{"login":"RobLoach","id":25086,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/25086?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach","html_url":"https://github.com/RobLoach","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RobLoach/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-09T19:41:27Z","updated_at":"2015-07-09T19:41:27Z","body":"As a side note to adding two tests that test the same thing...\r\n\r\n> Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results -- Einstein\r\n\r\nI'm all for more tests, as long as they improve use case coverage, without adding more maintenance on our side."}}