{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jayway/powermock/issues/8","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jayway/powermock/issues/8/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jayway/powermock/issues/8/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jayway/powermock/issues/8/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jayway/powermock/pull/8","id":52794959,"number":8,"title":"Make powermock compatible with JUnit 4.12","user":{"login":"henri-tremblay","id":1216819,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1216819?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay","html_url":"https://github.com/henri-tremblay","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/henri-tremblay/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2014-12-24T04:23:45Z","updated_at":"2015-01-10T16:56:19Z","closed_at":"2014-12-24T07:55:50Z","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jayway/powermock/pulls/8","html_url":"https://github.com/jayway/powermock/pull/8","diff_url":"https://github.com/jayway/powermock/pull/8.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/jayway/powermock/pull/8.patch"},"body":"Here is a basic fix to make powermock work with JUnit 4.12"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jayway/powermock/issues/comments/69462570","html_url":"https://github.com/jayway/powermock/pull/8#issuecomment-69462570","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jayway/powermock/issues/8","id":69462570,"user":{"login":"kcooney","id":478190,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/478190?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney","html_url":"https://github.com/kcooney","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kcooney/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-10T16:56:19Z","updated_at":"2015-01-10T16:56:19Z","body":"Hey, guys. I am one of the maintainers for JUnit. I was hunting around for things that might have broken by JUnit 4.13 and stumbled upon this pull.\r\n\r\nUsing reflection to access private fields of an internal class sounds fragile. If you have ideas for how we can create a supported API for whatever you are trying to do here, please file a feature request. Note that it's likely that `MethodValidator` (and `JUnit4ClassRunner`) will go away in JUnit 5.0, and there might not be a JUnit 4.13."}}