{"push_id":675795418,"size":3,"distinct_size":3,"ref":"refs/heads/temasek-gcc5.1","head":"7e89b8e293f38472fea55da5ac2096ffcd39f9ea","before":"f6ef28c795d9117e056db3b01755398702a8e569","commits":[{"sha":"61a5733f4ebe6f82001eed738f6ba5c626ede1ee","author":{"email":"9152da451d71c2a1ceb0c7b0908d4018fc127ae6@converseincode.com","name":"Behan Webster"},"message":"ARM: 8158/1: LLVMLinux: use static inline in ARM ftrace.h\n\nWith compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and\nclang), \"extern inline\" does the wrong thing (emits code for an externally\nlinkable version of the inline function). In this case using static inline\nand removing the NULL version of return_address in return_address.c does\nthe right thing.\n\nSigned-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>\nReviewed-by: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>\nAcked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>\nSigned-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Temasek-Dark/leanKernel-shamu/commits/61a5733f4ebe6f82001eed738f6ba5c626ede1ee"},{"sha":"7d68fa92daecff4a772bea4597db0c7d86f0d562","author":{"email":"9152da451d71c2a1ceb0c7b0908d4018fc127ae6@converseincode.com","name":"Behan Webster"},"message":"ARM: 8171/1: Use current_stack_pointer for return_address\n\nUse the global current_stack_pointer to get the value of the stack pointer.\nThis change supports being able to compile the kernel with both gcc and Clang.\n\nSigned-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>\nReviewed-by: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>\nReviewed-by: Jan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@gmx.de>\nAcked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>\nAcked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>\nSigned-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>\nSigned-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Temasek-Dark/leanKernel-shamu/commits/7d68fa92daecff4a772bea4597db0c7d86f0d562"},{"sha":"7e89b8e293f38472fea55da5ac2096ffcd39f9ea","author":{"email":"181323dd666a182bc2d953e52d0ac3ab54cd8391@pengutronix.de","name":"Uwe Kleine-König"},"message":"ARM: 8160/1: drop warning about return_address not using unwind tables\n\nThe warning was introduced in 2009 (commit 4bf1fa5a34aa ([ARM] 5613/1:\nimplement CALLER_ADDRESSx)). The only \"problem\" here is that\nCALLER_ADDRESSx for x > 1 returns NULL which doesn't do much harm.\n\nThe drawback of implementing a fix (i.e. use unwind tables to implement CALLER_ADDRESSx) is that much of the unwinder code would need to be marked as not\ntraceable.\n\nSigned-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>\nSigned-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Temasek-Dark/leanKernel-shamu/commits/7e89b8e293f38472fea55da5ac2096ffcd39f9ea"}]}