{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UrsZeidler/shr5rcp/issues/120","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UrsZeidler/shr5rcp/issues/120/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UrsZeidler/shr5rcp/issues/120/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UrsZeidler/shr5rcp/issues/120/events","html_url":"https://github.com/UrsZeidler/shr5rcp/issues/120","id":54195012,"number":120,"title":"Proof of concept vs Usability","user":{"login":"NoxMortem","id":6750572,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6750572?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem","html_url":"https://github.com/NoxMortem","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoxMortem/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UrsZeidler/shr5rcp/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UrsZeidler/shr5rcp/labels/gui","name":"gui","color":"d4c5f9"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UrsZeidler/shr5rcp/labels/product","name":"product","color":"fad8c7"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-01-13T13:45:42Z","updated_at":"2015-01-13T13:45:42Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The shr5rcp program gets better and better but I currently have the feeling that the proof of concept step is taken too far. The current release as it is shows pretty well that both the developer as well as the used technology is capable to accomplish the planned features.\r\n\r\nIt might be worth to plan ahead the next steps of the project and how developement continues. I doubt that many people use the program yet as it is really complicated and needs enhancements on so many levels but the pure amount of massive cool features simply makes me want this project to succeed and that I am able to use it.\r\n\r\nTo help supporters and bug reports it is important to know what features are currently developed as it does not make a lot of fun to invest hours into testing something while the developement is busy with other tasks :)\r\n\r\nI think this project needs to finish some of its short term goals instead of adding new features all the time. This will help to use the product and broaden the amount of users and therefore the feedback.\r\n\r\nSome possible feature you might want to polish first is the server - client interaction.\r\n\r\nCurrently the workflow for example is:\r\n\r\n1. Select script\r\n2. Add participants\r\n3. Add combat round participants for the quick combat script\r\n\r\nFor the combat script for example the step of add combat round participants is redundant. It would remove one whole wizard dialog if the quick combat script assumed that all participants are part of the combat.\r\n\r\nTo start an initiative round again all combat round participants have to be selected.  There is no visual cue that the program does automatically roll the initiative for all not connected players. Does it? It looks like it does and I was simply amazed once again how the tool surprised me. The problem is, the program should not surprise me. I should be amazed because I know what the tool is capable of :)\r\n\r\nAs usual I will try to open issues for the specific little things I see require improvement.\r\n\r\nThe tool is beside some bugs and missing things very good at handling the initiative but for example I do not see how I can assign damage as the damage resistance test works but it does not seem to have any effect.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n"}}