{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/social-vocab/issues/7","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/social-vocab/issues/7/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/social-vocab/issues/7/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/social-vocab/issues/7/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c-social/social-vocab/issues/7","id":72255564,"number":7,"title":"Some qualified relations need context","user":{"login":"fosterlynn","id":3776081,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3776081?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn","html_url":"https://github.com/fosterlynn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-04-30T19:13:42Z","updated_at":"2015-04-30T20:53:43Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I'm wondering if we want to define vocab for the context for relations that don't have the context embedded in them already.  For example, Elf follows Amy.  Vs. Elf follows Amy on Facebook (but Elf doesn't follow Amy on Google+).  I think the context might always be a Group (?).\r\n\r\nMembership has the context already embedded, for example Elf member of Social WG, the context is Social WG."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/social-vocab/issues/comments/97963767","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c-social/social-vocab/issues/7#issuecomment-97963767","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/social-vocab/issues/7","id":97963767,"user":{"login":"fosterlynn","id":3776081,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3776081?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn","html_url":"https://github.com/fosterlynn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fosterlynn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-30T20:53:43Z","updated_at":"2015-04-30T20:53:43Z","body":"@rhiaro @johnbreslin Thanks, great clarification!  (In the domains I am used to you do actually want to know about the relationships of Persons and/or Organizations, and the UserAccount is just login credentials related to the Person.  I need to get acclimated to the social stuff...)\r\n\r\nAnd I totally agree about getting the Person - UserAccount - Profile - etc. issue resolved, seems very core!  Looking forward to what you come up with!  Then we can nail down the right concept(s) on these relationships."}}