{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/issues/225","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/issues/225/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/issues/225/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/issues/225/events","html_url":"https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/issues/225","id":77840927,"number":225,"title":"Make Rename and Code Actions optionally apply changes to the workspace","user":{"login":"nosami","id":667194,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/667194?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami","html_url":"https://github.com/nosami","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nosami/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-05-18T23:08:37Z","updated_at":"2015-05-18T23:08:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"When using editor events to update the server with changes, it's much simpler to have the following workflow :-\r\n```\r\neditor -> ask server for changes -> apply changes on editor -> editor events propagate the changes back to the server.\r\n```\r\nWhen changes are applied automatically, the editor needs to distinguish between user applied changes and changes that need to be applied due to a refactoring so as not to send changes back to the server that have already been applied.\r\n\r\nI propose that we add a flag onto the request (or reuse existing WantsChanges flag?) to make applying changes optional.\r\n\r\nThoughts? //cc @jrieken "}}