{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FasterXML/jackson-datatype-joda/issues/75","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FasterXML/jackson-datatype-joda/issues/75/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FasterXML/jackson-datatype-joda/issues/75/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FasterXML/jackson-datatype-joda/issues/75/events","html_url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-datatype-joda/issues/75","id":110827877,"number":75,"title":"(2.7) Apply `withOffsetParsed()` on formats by default","user":{"login":"cowtowncoder","id":55065,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/55065?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder","html_url":"https://github.com/cowtowncoder","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cowtowncoder/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-10-11T01:43:30Z","updated_at":"2015-10-11T01:43:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"(note: spun from #74)\r\n\r\nLooks like it would make sense to call `withOffsetParsed()` method on date formatters, by default, instead of having to add it depending on settings, unless there are downsides to this.\r\nHopefully our unit test suite can give some guidance as to any potential issues. Also obviously need to verify what Joda javadocs say about this method."}}