{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/1320","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/1320/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/1320/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/1320/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/1320","id":98826252,"number":1320,"title":"Duplicating option field does not duplicate options","user":{"login":"Notanotherdotcom","id":190857,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/190857?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom","html_url":"https://github.com/Notanotherdotcom","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Notanotherdotcom/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-08-03T19:54:23Z","updated_at":"2015-08-16T11:11:05Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This would be useful for lots of \"yes/no\" options, but then in such circumstances you would probably use a Page field instead if there's a lot of repetition. I just get the feeling that the expected action would be to duplicate the options too? Happy for folks to disagree with that of course.\r\n\r\nGenerally speaking I also think it should duplicate which templates a field was assigned to, or at least have the option under Duplicate/Clone This Field to do just that.\r\n\r\nIn fact, perhaps both of those suggestions would be useful to other fields and two checkboxes under the Duplicate/Clone This Field section would be the best option."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/comments/131525363","html_url":"https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/1320#issuecomment-131525363","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/1320","id":131525363,"user":{"login":"ryancramerdesign","id":328272,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/328272?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign","html_url":"https://github.com/ryancramerdesign","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryancramerdesign/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-16T11:11:05Z","updated_at":"2015-08-16T11:11:05Z","body":"I agree it would make sense to duplicate the options too, but this one is a bit unique in that the options are stored off in a separate DB table, so there's a lot more to clone than just the field. It's possible to do, but something I'd like to revisit in the future. "}}