{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/esprima/issues/1024","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/esprima/issues/1024/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/esprima/issues/1024/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/esprima/issues/1024/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jquery/esprima/issues/1024","id":57523599,"number":1024,"title":"Revert comment attachment to 1.2 behavior?","user":{"login":"mikesherov","id":364532,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/364532?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov","html_url":"https://github.com/mikesherov","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/esprima/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"e11d21"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/esprima/labels/harmony%20branch","name":"harmony branch","color":"f7c6c7"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":26,"created_at":"2015-02-12T21:39:02Z","updated_at":"2015-02-13T12:07:27Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Moving the discussion from https://code.google.com/p/esprima/issues/detail?id=607\r\n\r\nTo summarize, even if the comment attachment algorithm is less ambiguous in 2.0, it was more useful in 1.2 to the library authors who were using it, and was a non BC change for eslint.\r\n\r\nI believe that we should revert to the 1.2 behavior, and revisit the change in behavior for 3.0.0, and discuss the design decision further as a team.\r\n\r\n@ariya @jeffmo thoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/esprima/issues/comments/74244417","html_url":"https://github.com/jquery/esprima/issues/1024#issuecomment-74244417","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/esprima/issues/1024","id":74244417,"user":{"login":"mikesherov","id":364532,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/364532?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov","html_url":"https://github.com/mikesherov","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikesherov/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-13T12:07:27Z","updated_at":"2015-02-13T12:07:27Z","body":"@ariya I just meant its tangentially related in the spirit of exposing functionality at the risk of losing refactor ability. "}}