{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ronkeizer/PKPDsim/issues/3","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ronkeizer/PKPDsim/issues/3/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ronkeizer/PKPDsim/issues/3/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ronkeizer/PKPDsim/issues/3/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ronkeizer/PKPDsim/issues/3","id":64850370,"number":3,"title":"consider branching all shiny-related portions to a separate package","user":{"login":"dpastoor","id":3196313,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3196313?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor","html_url":"https://github.com/dpastoor","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dpastoor/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-03-27T20:58:11Z","updated_at":"2015-03-27T21:10:10Z","closed_at":null,"body":"My 'concern' is two-fold:\r\n\r\n- all the dependencies and versions that would be required to run the shiny app must be taken into account - and while it looks super promising\r\n- maintenance: long term, balancing the shiny maintenance with the core simulation functionality may be better served (any managed) by having two separate packages "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ronkeizer/PKPDsim/issues/comments/87092577","html_url":"https://github.com/ronkeizer/PKPDsim/issues/3#issuecomment-87092577","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ronkeizer/PKPDsim/issues/3","id":87092577,"user":{"login":"ronkeizer","id":243793,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/243793?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer","html_url":"https://github.com/ronkeizer","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronkeizer/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-27T21:10:10Z","updated_at":"2015-03-27T21:10:10Z","body":"yes, it's mostly out of convenience that its one package now. I'm a fan of modularity too, and my plan is also to eventually to branch off the shiny part to \"PKPDsim-shiny\" or something. Or make a more general shiny library to do stuff with both PKPDsim and vpc packages, not sure yet."}}