{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stampit-org/stamp-specification/issues/6","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stampit-org/stamp-specification/issues/6/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stampit-org/stamp-specification/issues/6/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stampit-org/stamp-specification/issues/6/events","html_url":"https://github.com/stampit-org/stamp-specification/issues/6","id":96050435,"number":6,"title":"propertyDescriptors new name?","user":{"login":"koresar","id":1622575,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1622575?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar","html_url":"https://github.com/koresar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-07-20T12:06:44Z","updated_at":"2015-07-21T04:15:47Z","closed_at":"2015-07-21T03:55:54Z","body":"I'm looking for a better name for the [propertyDescriptors](https://github.com/stampit-org/stamp-specification#the-stamp-descriptor).\r\n\r\nFirst of all we don't really want people to use this feature directly. `assign` and `merge` are more than enough in 99.9% cases.\r\nAlthough, a `convertClass` (aka `convertConstructor`) would need `propertyDescriptors` to implement various scenarios, like [getters and setters](http://www.2ality.com/2015/02/es6-classes-final.html).\r\nHowever, this might lead to unpredictable undesirable dehaviors (see node.js `url` object numerous problems). Also, it complicates the standard very much.\r\n\r\nThus, I see three options:\r\n* Leave `propertyDescriptors` name as is.\r\n* Rename to `props`.\r\n* Drop the `propertyDescriptors` altogether.\r\n\r\nDunno which way is better. There are 3 Cons to have this. And only one Pro.\r\n\r\nAny proposals?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stampit-org/stamp-specification/issues/comments/123149811","html_url":"https://github.com/stampit-org/stamp-specification/issues/6#issuecomment-123149811","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stampit-org/stamp-specification/issues/6","id":123149811,"user":{"login":"koresar","id":1622575,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1622575?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar","html_url":"https://github.com/koresar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/koresar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-21T04:15:47Z","updated_at":"2015-07-21T04:15:47Z","body":"That's what I was asking for. Please, avoid closing issues while at least someone is discussing things."}}