{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jensl/critic/issues/86","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jensl/critic/issues/86/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jensl/critic/issues/86/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jensl/critic/issues/86/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jensl/critic/issues/86","id":60673467,"number":86,"title":"Use Markdown in review descriptions, issues and notes","user":{"login":"jacobrask","id":58563,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/58563?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask","html_url":"https://github.com/jacobrask","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacobrask/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jensl/critic/labels/frontend","name":"frontend","color":"C1B89F"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-03-11T15:10:37Z","updated_at":"2015-03-11T15:13:26Z","closed_at":null,"body":"When displaying review descriptions in the new frontend without `<pre>`, I've noticed that people already use basic formatting in descriptions, like lists. The same syntax for bulleted and ordered lists would be valid in Markdown.\r\n\r\nIf we use a decent Markdown library we could also add our own parsing for review ids and commits, and link to those."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jensl/critic/issues/comments/78282784","html_url":"https://github.com/jensl/critic/issues/86#issuecomment-78282784","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jensl/critic/issues/86","id":78282784,"user":{"login":"jensl","id":129190,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/129190?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl","html_url":"https://github.com/jensl","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jensl/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-11T15:13:26Z","updated_at":"2015-03-11T15:13:26Z","body":"Seems like a nice idea, but also probably something that should be optional, per system/user/repository/whatever."}}