{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ricksbrown/accessibility-developer-tools/comments/14931743","html_url":"https://github.com/ricksbrown/accessibility-developer-tools/commit/ef5cef634fc55423124ab0fb2001340a8e3c38a1#commitcomment-14931743","id":14931743,"user":{"login":"alice","id":95208,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/95208?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice","html_url":"https://github.com/alice","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":30,"line":49,"path":"src/audits/DuplicateId.js","commit_id":"ef5cef634fc55423124ab0fb2001340a8e3c38a1","created_at":"2015-12-11T18:22:38Z","updated_at":"2015-12-11T18:22:38Z","body":"Any chance you could split this piece into a separate change as well? My thinking was that this is a good optimisation, but it's really only optimising this rule and adds a lot of complexity to an already complex change, so it'd be nice to be able to separate out the two optimisations (obviously this one depends on the main optimisation, so it would need to depend on that change)."}}