{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Adamantworks/Amazon.DynamoDB/issues/15","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Adamantworks/Amazon.DynamoDB/issues/15/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Adamantworks/Amazon.DynamoDB/issues/15/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Adamantworks/Amazon.DynamoDB/issues/15/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Adamantworks/Amazon.DynamoDB/issues/15","id":56191660,"number":15,"title":"Consider Treating Tuples as composite keys","user":{"login":"WalkerCodeRanger","id":186398,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/186398?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger","html_url":"https://github.com/WalkerCodeRanger","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/WalkerCodeRanger/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Adamantworks/Amazon.DynamoDB/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-02-02T03:13:33Z","updated_at":"2015-02-12T01:11:03Z","closed_at":"2015-02-12T01:11:03Z","body":"Since Composite.Split returns a Tuple. It probably makes sense to add a converter from Tuple to a composite key"}}