{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bmuller/rpcudp/issues/6","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bmuller/rpcudp/issues/6/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bmuller/rpcudp/issues/6/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bmuller/rpcudp/issues/6/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bmuller/rpcudp/issues/6","id":120817561,"number":6,"title":"Add authentication and end to end encryption.","user":{"login":"F483","id":977605,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/977605?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483","html_url":"https://github.com/F483","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2015-12-07T16:48:00Z","updated_at":"2015-12-09T18:15:20Z","closed_at":"2015-12-07T16:49:38Z","body":"Currently packets are blindly trusted, leaving authentication up to the user and the same for encryption. In a post Snowden world this is no longer acceptable.\r\n\r\nGood options for encryption and authentication now exist for memory constrained protocols, as shown by bitcoin. Which authentication/encryption schema to use is however subject to much debate.\r\n\r\nPS: Since this would break compatibility, I'm also adding additional issues that also would require a break. This should keep everyone on the same page as to a possible future direction."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bmuller/rpcudp/issues/comments/163346386","html_url":"https://github.com/bmuller/rpcudp/issues/6#issuecomment-163346386","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bmuller/rpcudp/issues/6","id":163346386,"user":{"login":"F483","id":977605,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/977605?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483","html_url":"https://github.com/F483","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/F483/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-09T18:15:20Z","updated_at":"2015-12-09T18:15:20Z","body":"I agree that your 2. point is the better, provided that there is a simple good way to wrap rpcudp packets.\r\n\r\nMy knowledge of twisted is not to good, is there a general way in twisted where I could insert an encryption layer below rpcudp to do this?"}}