{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/192","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/192/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/192/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/192/events","html_url":"https://github.com/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/192","id":119773884,"number":192,"title":"License discussion","user":{"login":"jonsneyers","id":15010068,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/15010068?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers","html_url":"https://github.com/jonsneyers","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jonsneyers/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":14,"created_at":"2015-12-01T18:01:43Z","updated_at":"2015-12-11T12:03:38Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The discussion that was started in #168 can be continued here, should anyone want to.\r\n\r\nSo for now, I am inclined to:\r\n- keep GPLv3+ license for `flif` and `libflif_enc`\r\n- change to LGPLv3+ for `libflif_dec`\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/comments/163922839","html_url":"https://github.com/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/192#issuecomment-163922839","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/192","id":163922839,"user":{"login":"dlemstra","id":10426229,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10426229?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra","html_url":"https://github.com/dlemstra","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dlemstra/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-11T12:03:38Z","updated_at":"2015-12-11T12:03:38Z","body":"I really don't understand the '(to pay for)' remark. If it is free software then why do you want to earn money from selling your library to companies.\r\n\r\nEven with the clause I don't think we could still not include support for writing FLIF in our binaries. We would like our end users to use the binaries that we provide without having to open source their work. And ImageMagick is not just an application, it can also be used as a library. That means that someone could make a commercial application that uses the ImageMagick library to encode FLIF images. I really don't see the benefit of letting us use it but only let commercial applications use it by using our library."}}