{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Seddryck/NBi/issues/109","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Seddryck/NBi/issues/109/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Seddryck/NBi/issues/109/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Seddryck/NBi/issues/109/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Seddryck/NBi/issues/109","id":101827055,"number":109,"title":"Question: How to set up comparison rule <= (if possible)","user":{"login":"HACR87","id":13865331,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13865331?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87","html_url":"https://github.com/HACR87","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HACR87/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2015-08-19T07:38:25Z","updated_at":"2015-08-19T10:52:51Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Dear NBi-users\r\n\r\nI just began working with this great add-on and read through the documention. I'm still a bit unsure wether or not it is possible so I hope someone can clarify.\r\n\r\nI'm setting up a test-suite to Validate a SSAS cube against a relational data source, and compare 2 cubes (pre-prod/prod). It is expected that the cube should be larger or equal the one in production after burning the cube.\r\n\r\nIs it possible to set up this rule?\r\n\r\nMy test is rather simple. Either mdx <-> mdx or mdx<-> sql\r\n```\r\n <test name=\"description\">\r\n                    <system-under-test>\r\n                        <execution>\r\n                            <query file=\"....mdx\" connectionString=\"@ref1\" />\r\n                        </execution>\r\n                    </system-under-test>\r\n                    <assert>\r\n                        <equalTo>\r\n                            <query file=\"....sql\" connectionString=\"@ref2\" />\r\n                        </equalTo>\r\n                    </assert>\r\n                </test>\r\n```\r\n\r\nI tried specifying a ```<column index=\"2\" role=\"value\" type=\"numeric\" tolerance=\"+10%\" />``` but without luck, as it's treated like +/- 10%.\r\n\r\nThank you in advance\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Seddryck/NBi/issues/comments/132538837","html_url":"https://github.com/Seddryck/NBi/issues/109#issuecomment-132538837","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Seddryck/NBi/issues/109","id":132538837,"user":{"login":"FuegoArtificial","id":13558754,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13558754?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial","html_url":"https://github.com/FuegoArtificial","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FuegoArtificial/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-19T10:52:51Z","updated_at":"2015-08-19T10:52:51Z","body":"I see, then this approach is no option for you... :(\r\nI don't have other ideas by now."}}