{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/issues/71","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/issues/71/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/issues/71/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/issues/71/events","html_url":"https://github.com/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/issues/71","id":55158855,"number":71,"title":"should the more specific functions make use of generics? (e.g, readNWISdata.r)","user":{"login":"jread-usgs","id":2349007,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2349007?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs","html_url":"https://github.com/jread-usgs","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-01-22T14:26:57Z","updated_at":"2015-01-22T15:03:49Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Seems that the generic `readNWISdata.r` isn't called by the other functions that take specific args. Could reduce the code to pass the args into the generic function to build the URLs and deal with the responses in one location. Thoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/issues/comments/71033248","html_url":"https://github.com/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/issues/71#issuecomment-71033248","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/dataRetrieval/issues/71","id":71033248,"user":{"login":"ldecicco-USGS","id":1105215,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1105215?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS","html_url":"https://github.com/ldecicco-USGS","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ldecicco-USGS/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-22T15:03:49Z","updated_at":"2015-01-22T15:03:49Z","body":"No, just internally make the code cleaner."}}