{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/telefonicaid/fiware-connectors/comments/10066711","html_url":"https://github.com/telefonicaid/fiware-connectors/commit/d50abda95e9619d3c57c405e939b3ad25e049493#commitcomment-10066711","id":10066711,"user":{"login":"gtorodelvalle","id":667284,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/667284?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle","html_url":"https://github.com/gtorodelvalle","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gtorodelvalle/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":46,"line":46,"path":"flume/src/main/java/es/tid/fiware/fiwareconnectors/cygnus/channels/CygnusMemoryChannel.java","commit_id":"d50abda95e9619d3c57c405e939b3ad25e049493","created_at":"2015-03-06T07:56:24Z","updated_at":"2015-03-06T07:56:24Z","body":"The implementation of the `take()` method is slightly different from the one in the FileCygnusChannel class. Is there any reason for this? This kind o situations could be avoided using abstract classes or default interface methods implementations.\r\n\r\nPlease, take my comments as made from someone who is refreshing Java at the moment :p"}}