{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/1627","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/1627/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/1627/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/1627/events","html_url":"https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/1627","id":73374038,"number":1627,"title":"NODE_PATH deprecation","user":{"login":"silverwind","id":115237,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/115237?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind","html_url":"https://github.com/silverwind","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/labels/discuss","name":"discuss","color":"02d7e1"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/labels/module","name":"module","color":"fbca04"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":16,"created_at":"2015-05-05T17:21:11Z","updated_at":"2015-05-14T19:27:52Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This came up a few times now, and has been suggested again in https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/1452#issuecomment-99012975\r\n\r\nWhat is the recommended alternative to `NODE_PATH` should we choose to remove it? There is probably a lot of misuse with `NODE_PATH` around, but is it really so bad that we want to drop it completely? How should we handle warnings?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/comments/102144500","html_url":"https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/1627#issuecomment-102144500","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/1627","id":102144500,"user":{"login":"silverwind","id":115237,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/115237?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind","html_url":"https://github.com/silverwind","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/silverwind/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-14T19:27:52Z","updated_at":"2015-05-14T19:27:52Z","body":"I like that very much :+1:. We should probably still call it `io.js` until the merger is done, but other than that, would love if you can file a PR that adds this on top of the NODE_MODULE part, whil removing the old paragraph."}}