{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/manifest/issues/332","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/manifest/issues/332/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/manifest/issues/332/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/manifest/issues/332/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/332","id":62015147,"number":332,"title":"shouldn't the default scope be bounded?","user":{"login":"kenchris","id":1101339,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1101339?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris","html_url":"https://github.com/kenchris","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kenchris/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/manifest/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2015-03-16T08:58:05Z","updated_at":"2015-04-22T18:31:14Z","closed_at":null,"body":"If scopeURL is undefined (i.e., it is unbounded because of an error or it was not declared in the manifest), return true.\r\n\r\nI find it a bit scary that it is fully unbounded. I would expect that the default scope would be the base url"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/manifest/issues/comments/95293413","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/332#issuecomment-95293413","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/manifest/issues/332","id":95293413,"user":{"login":"marcoscaceres","id":870154,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/870154?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres","html_url":"https://github.com/marcoscaceres","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-22T18:31:14Z","updated_at":"2015-04-22T18:31:14Z","body":"@kenchris, I don't have a strong opinion, but can see the rationale for your concern ... right now, I guess I would prefer we keep Chrome's current behavior (i.e., unbounded, with the UA able to pull the plug or change the UI if a user leaves an origin). Maybe you can list some more potential issues? \r\n\r\n@PaulKinlan, I've created a separate issue for deep linking aspects. I agree that it's a bit hand-wavy right now... no one has made a proof of concept to show that it would actually work. Can we please discuss in #363? "}}