{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipython/ipykernel/issues/77","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipython/ipykernel/issues/77/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipython/ipykernel/issues/77/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipython/ipykernel/issues/77/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ipython/ipykernel/issues/77","id":116741399,"number":77,"title":"Run IOPub in a thread","user":{"login":"minrk","id":151929,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/151929?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk","html_url":"https://github.com/minrk","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minrk/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-11-13T10:24:37Z","updated_at":"2015-11-13T10:24:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"We should be sending IOPub messages in their own thread. This would solve various issues with flushing/threading/etc.\r\n\r\nIt shouldn't be complicated, other than preserving backward-compatibility for APIs which assume direct access to a Socket (consumed by widgets, ipyparallel)."}}