{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aasm/aasm/issues/235","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aasm/aasm/issues/235/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aasm/aasm/issues/235/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aasm/aasm/issues/235/events","html_url":"https://github.com/aasm/aasm/issues/235","id":82981592,"number":235,"title":"When enum option is true, is the state definition redundancy necessary?","user":{"login":"paulwalker","id":73511,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/73511?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker","html_url":"https://github.com/paulwalker","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paulwalker/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-05-31T03:20:46Z","updated_at":"2015-05-31T03:20:46Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It seems as if, by default, the enum field could be read on the Model class rather than requiring the redundant definition of states? If there is a desired difference, allow for an option indicating not to introspect the field?"}}