{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/jquery-license/issues/54","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/jquery-license/issues/54/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/jquery-license/issues/54/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/jquery-license/issues/54/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jquery/jquery-license/issues/54","id":107792843,"number":54,"title":"Remove requirement to have 2 names in CLA signature","user":{"login":"kborchers","id":282468,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/282468?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers","html_url":"https://github.com/kborchers","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":12,"created_at":"2015-09-22T20:17:12Z","updated_at":"2015-10-07T15:08:18Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I have tried making this argument before and I think this PR sums up my argument nicely https://github.com/jquery/esprima/pull/1331"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/jquery-license/issues/comments/146224110","html_url":"https://github.com/jquery/jquery-license/issues/54#issuecomment-146224110","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jquery/jquery-license/issues/54","id":146224110,"user":{"login":"kborchers","id":282468,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/282468?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers","html_url":"https://github.com/kborchers","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kborchers/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-07T15:08:17Z","updated_at":"2015-10-07T15:08:17Z","body":"After a chat with legal here is where we stand. By removing the need for 2 names we do not significantly increase the likelihood that someone will provide fake information. If their intent is to provide something other than their legal name, they can do that with 2 names as easy as 1. With that in mind, legal recommends we make an update to the CLA signature form to request their legal name just to be clear that is what we want and to remove the check for 2 names. Legal also requested that if we could request some other form of non-sensitive but personally identifiable information that would be helpful (like an IP address or something like that though I don't know if that's even possible within our current system). I think for the sake of inclusiveness we should not require 2 names or even question someone who provides a single name as it is not our place to question someone's legal name as long as that is what we are requesting and by signing they are stating that is what they are providing. If there are questions or concerns for me or legal please feel free to comment further before we make this change and close this issue but we should try to make this change ASAP without any objection in the next day or two."}}