{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/afawcett/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries/issues/112","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/afawcett/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries/issues/112/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/afawcett/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries/issues/112/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/afawcett/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries/issues/112/events","html_url":"https://github.com/afawcett/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries/issues/112","id":55552123,"number":112,"title":"When using the Realtime mode, Formula fields as fields to aggregate are not supported ","user":{"login":"jlig","id":1561704,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1561704?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig","html_url":"https://github.com/jlig","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlig/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":15,"created_at":"2015-01-26T23:17:50Z","updated_at":"2015-10-10T09:52:29Z","closed_at":"2015-02-07T19:02:30Z","body":"Any roadmap on adding the ability to use \"Formula Fields\"?\r\n- If I use the Workflow Rule route to copy the Formula value to a plain currency field.. I'm afraid the new copied \"plain currency field\" will not stay up-to-date when changes are made later?\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/afawcett/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries/issues/comments/147070123","html_url":"https://github.com/afawcett/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries/issues/112#issuecomment-147070123","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/afawcett/declarative-lookup-rollup-summaries/issues/112","id":147070123,"user":{"login":"afawcett","id":1167760,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1167760?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett","html_url":"https://github.com/afawcett","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afawcett/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-10T09:52:29Z","updated_at":"2015-10-10T09:52:29Z","body":"Wow @jlig so sorry for such a late reply here, the DF bump this year just going down! ;-)\r\n\r\nRE: Watch for changes on related records no updated on this really, it's best, if there isn't one already, to raise a GitHub issue and i'll flag it as an enhancement. Its a pretty big one tbh, but non the less its a need i've been asked for a few times before, so worthy of a GitHub issue to allow some collective brainstorming on requirements, design and implementation. :+1: \r\n\r\nRE: \"best you could do\", comment, i ment add Location_A__c to the 'Relationship Criteria Fields' field. At least if that itself changes your rollup will recalculate.\r\n\r\nRE: \"extra overhead\", not significant, its still just checking for changes in the field value nothing else, so no difference between string or checkbox fields in that sense. Obviously the more you add to 'Relationship Criteria Fields'  the more compares it does, but compared to the main part of the work the tool does within a trigger context thats still a small portion, so no don't worry.\r\n\r\nP.S. A thought that just occurred about your 'changes in fields on related records' ask that just occured is.... Make a shadow copy (not on the parent layout) of the fields on the related record, the implement on the related record a Process Builder flow that uses Flow's to query for parent records an update the shadow copy of the field on the parent, then include the shadow copy of the field in 'Relationship Criteria Fields' field. "}}