{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cplusplus/concurrency_ts/issues/97","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cplusplus/concurrency_ts/issues/97/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cplusplus/concurrency_ts/issues/97/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cplusplus/concurrency_ts/issues/97/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cplusplus/concurrency_ts/issues/97","id":73095079,"number":97,"title":"Can is_ready by noexcept","user":{"login":"arturl","id":1875734,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1875734?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl","html_url":"https://github.com/arturl","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arturl/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-05-04T18:39:45Z","updated_at":"2015-05-04T18:39:45Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Calling this function on invalid future results in UB. Can it still be noexcept?\r\n\r\nCurrent wording assumes 'yes'. LWG, please advice."}}