{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zostay/P6SGI/issues/4","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zostay/P6SGI/issues/4/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zostay/P6SGI/issues/4/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zostay/P6SGI/issues/4/events","html_url":"https://github.com/zostay/P6SGI/issues/4","id":104600634,"number":4,"title":"Is the error stream sensible?","user":{"login":"zostay","id":34711,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34711?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay","html_url":"https://github.com/zostay","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-09-03T00:58:35Z","updated_at":"2015-09-17T04:47:44Z","closed_at":"2015-09-17T04:47:44Z","body":"Right now the p6sgi.error stream is designed in terms of PSGI with the addition of a `flush` method which is part of Rack or one of the other specs I read at some point and seemed reasonable at some point early on, but I haven't really put much thought into it at this point.\r\n\r\nIs the streaming API sensible and well-justified? Should `flush` be kept? Does anything else need to be added? Should it be refactored into something else entirely?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zostay/P6SGI/issues/comments/140969504","html_url":"https://github.com/zostay/P6SGI/issues/4#issuecomment-140969504","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zostay/P6SGI/issues/4","id":140969504,"user":{"login":"zostay","id":34711,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34711?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay","html_url":"https://github.com/zostay","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zostay/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-17T04:47:44Z","updated_at":"2015-09-17T04:47:44Z","body":"I've replaced the error stream with a Supply. It just seems like the right thing to do and it allows for parity between all the other streams being handled that way. I don't think I'll regret this change."}}