{"push_id":543756801,"size":3,"distinct_size":3,"ref":"refs/heads/2.2-no-leak-tx-when-using-explain","head":"db215b558aa263b140603244eeffdd376efff1aa","before":"603e2e15915e76750882ee0d181b0deea1be085f","commits":[{"sha":"f96bc93f000bab1bad468840a0cc5884a9ded71b","author":{"email":"e90843f68f5fa9727c5235f8fc21eb2f6d758cbe@neotechnology.com","name":"Pontus Melke"},"message":"Rule based planner identified itself as COST for union queries.\n\nFor union queries the planner presented itself in plan description as\nCOST eventhough RULE was actually used.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/davidegrohmann/neo4j/commits/f96bc93f000bab1bad468840a0cc5884a9ded71b"},{"sha":"1e3702f4f8effeca0da299b6ae38e6efe0d6fd5f","author":{"email":"883768b6dd2c42aea0031b24be8a2da40fef4b64@neotechnology.com","name":"Andres Taylor"},"message":"Merge pull request #3776 from pontusmelke/bug-planner-union-queries\n\nRule based planner identified itself as COST for union queries.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/davidegrohmann/neo4j/commits/1e3702f4f8effeca0da299b6ae38e6efe0d6fd5f"},{"sha":"db215b558aa263b140603244eeffdd376efff1aa","author":{"email":"4cd6b59ce20b6e5738e4ab7125c87aeb46810be2@neotechnology.com","name":"Davide Grohmann"},"message":"Do not leak transactions when executing a query in explain mode\n\nThe problem was that when executing a query in explain mode the empty\nresult produced would never close the underlying transaction on close\nlike the other non-empty results.  Now this has been fixed by properly\nclosing the transaction when closing the result resource.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/davidegrohmann/neo4j/commits/db215b558aa263b140603244eeffdd376efff1aa"}]}