{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uProxy/uproxy/issues/1122","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uProxy/uproxy/issues/1122/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uProxy/uproxy/issues/1122/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uProxy/uproxy/issues/1122/events","html_url":"https://github.com/uProxy/uproxy/issues/1122","id":63052578,"number":1122,"title":"Change isRequest when local user ignores a remote user's request?  (resolve discrepancy between design doc and code)","user":{"login":"dborkan","id":6494307,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6494307?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan","html_url":"https://github.com/dborkan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dborkan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-03-19T17:55:13Z","updated_at":"2015-03-19T17:55:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Our design document for user-level consent (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p16jeodYUYF9tp2mh9nDVIHlKagzHZLYVHRKZLZkspw) says the following:\r\n* \"upon an action by the local user to ignores a remote user's requests, the isRequesting is set to false for every offline instance of the remote user. This allows user to return to an initial state where the remote user is not considered as asking for access just because an offline instance was once requesting access.\"\r\n\r\nI don't believe this was implemented in the recent changes for user-level consent.  Also I am not sure we should implement this, but I'm entering this issue so we don't forget to address this (either change the code or change the design doc once we agree)"}}