{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/12968","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/12968/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/12968/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/12968/events","html_url":"https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/12968","id":102085607,"number":12968,"title":"Is ReadOnly port in Kubelet still needed.","user":{"login":"gmarek","id":1703842,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1703842?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek","html_url":"https://github.com/gmarek","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gmarek/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/labels/kind/cleanup","name":"kind/cleanup","color":"c7def8"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/labels/team/node","name":"team/node","color":"d2b48c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":27,"created_at":"2015-08-20T08:06:52Z","updated_at":"2015-09-03T17:22:36Z","closed_at":null,"body":"There are some voices that it's no longer necessary/won't be necessary for original purpose, as Heapster is/will be using secured port to scrape cAdvisor data. @roberthbailey @vishh @bgrant0607.\r\n\r\nOn the other hand with @fgrzadkowski we used it to debug some problems Filip was having, so it isn't completely useless.\r\n\r\n@dchen1107 @yujuhong - any thoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/comments/137518804","html_url":"https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/12968#issuecomment-137518804","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/12968","id":137518804,"user":{"login":"vishh","id":7063592,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7063592?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh","html_url":"https://github.com/vishh","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vishh/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-03T17:22:36Z","updated_at":"2015-09-03T17:22:36Z","body":"Can you clarify the plumbing required in kubelet?\n\nOn Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Robert Bailey <notifications@github.com>\nwrote:\n\n> Just getting back to this -- it sounds like the agreement is that we want\n> to deprecate the read-only port (yay!) but we may need to leave it in for a\n> bit longer while we add the appropriate plumbing into the kubelet. If that\n> is the consensus, then we really shouldn't add the concept of a kubelet\n> read-only port to the v1 API.\n>\n> —\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/12968#issuecomment-137343462>\n> .\n>\n"}}