{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/chocolatey/chocolatey.org/issues/150","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/chocolatey/chocolatey.org/issues/150/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/chocolatey/chocolatey.org/issues/150/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/chocolatey/chocolatey.org/issues/150/events","html_url":"https://github.com/chocolatey/chocolatey.org/issues/150","id":53937767,"number":150,"title":"Package moderation guidelines and rules","user":{"login":"Redsandro","id":1702193,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1702193?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro","html_url":"https://github.com/Redsandro","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Redsandro/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-01-10T01:23:57Z","updated_at":"2015-01-10T16:43:25Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Initiating talks, for now or for later.\r\n\r\n>@Redsandro\r\n> I agree with Jean-Philippe that it's unclear when something is a guideline or when it is a rule, as I have experienced myself from time to time. Also, the explanation you (@ferventcoder) gave about when to use what alternative version number is something that would look good in the wiki itself.\r\n>\r\nBased on how we moderate, I think we should split the guidelines into rules and recommendations. We need to uphold a certain quality and unity, but it's frustrating for maintainers volunteering to fix a package based on something the recommendation seems to allow for, and then have us moderators say it must be different.\r\n\r\n.\r\n\r\n> @gep13 \r\nWe need to make things clear, but in order to do this, I think that we need to all be in agreement, so that we can stick to them.\r\n>\r\nHappy to work with you to start defining this.\r\n>\r\nI would suggest creating an issue on Chocolatey GitHub so that we can start conversation.\r\n\r\n**Package Fix Notation**\r\n* Date Notation - @gep13\r\n* Incremental Notation"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/chocolatey/chocolatey.org/issues/comments/69462097","html_url":"https://github.com/chocolatey/chocolatey.org/issues/150#issuecomment-69462097","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/chocolatey/chocolatey.org/issues/150","id":69462097,"user":{"login":"gep13","id":1271146,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1271146?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13","html_url":"https://github.com/gep13","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gep13/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-10T16:43:25Z","updated_at":"2015-01-10T16:43:25Z","body":"I have updated the first post in this discussion with a rudimentary voting mechanism."}}