{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sembiance/mtgjson/issues/64","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sembiance/mtgjson/issues/64/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sembiance/mtgjson/issues/64/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sembiance/mtgjson/issues/64/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Sembiance/mtgjson/issues/64","id":98734126,"number":64,"title":"Remove 'variations' field as it is redundant","user":{"login":"Sembiance","id":81436,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/81436?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance","html_url":"https://github.com/Sembiance","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sembiance/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sembiance/mtgjson/labels/discuss","name":"discuss","color":"006b75"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-08-03T12:34:18Z","updated_at":"2015-08-03T14:35:59Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I am thinking about removing the 'variations' field. Essentially all it is doing is pointing to other cards in the same set that have the same name. That's it. Seems pretty easy for anyone consuming the MTGJSON data that if multiple cards in the same set have the same name, clearly they are variations of each other.\r\n\r\nAlso, right now the 'variations' field uses multiverseid's which many sets do not have, thus the field is already absent on a good number of cards and sets. So removing it would actually bring some consistency to the data."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sembiance/mtgjson/issues/comments/127262916","html_url":"https://github.com/Sembiance/mtgjson/issues/64#issuecomment-127262916","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sembiance/mtgjson/issues/64","id":127262916,"user":{"login":"flyingmutant","id":73059,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/73059?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant","html_url":"https://github.com/flyingmutant","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flyingmutant/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-03T14:35:59Z","updated_at":"2015-08-03T14:35:59Z","body":"Yes, sounds like a good idea."}}