{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432/events","html_url":"https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432","id":121562244,"number":432,"title":"decouple payments and payroll","user":{"login":"whit537","id":134455,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/134455?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537","html_url":"https://github.com/whit537","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-12-10T19:41:53Z","updated_at":"2015-12-24T15:30:21Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Right now we require Teams on Gratipay to use *both* our payments *and* our payroll products (though of course payroll doesn't exist right now). I think this makes it harder to sign up new customers, especially established ones. It would be great to be able to pay for Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Firefox, etc. on Gratipay, but it'd be a *much* harder sell to get them on the platform if they have to agree to payroll, too."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/comments/167126228","html_url":"https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432#issuecomment-167126228","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432","id":167126228,"user":{"login":"whit537","id":134455,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/134455?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537","html_url":"https://github.com/whit537","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whit537/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-24T15:30:21Z","updated_at":"2015-12-24T15:30:21Z","body":"For organizations that *do* have a split hard/soft fee model, such as Gratipay, do we want Gratipay to be generally usable for the hard fee? Or just for the soft fee?"}}