{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jab/bidict/issues/23","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jab/bidict/issues/23/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jab/bidict/issues/23/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jab/bidict/issues/23/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jab/bidict/issues/23","id":118890374,"number":23,"title":"consider removing namedbidict","user":{"login":"jab","id":64992,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/64992?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab","html_url":"https://github.com/jab","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jab/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-11-25T17:50:52Z","updated_at":"2015-12-26T20:48:16Z","closed_at":"2015-12-26T20:48:16Z","body":"To enable me to focus better on more core functionality, I'm considering removing namedbidict. The value it has provided doesn't seem worth the maintenance burden.\r\n\r\nHere is a sample of people/orgs whose code would break if this happens:\r\n- @venmo ([example](https://github.com/venmo/btnamespace/blob/e4b269f9a/btnamespace/actions.py#L11))\r\n- @NEU-Libraries ([example](https://github.com/NEU-Libraries/alma-analytic-tools/blob/e554b76f/RequestObject.py#L108)\r\n- @maddyloo ([example](https://github.com/maddyloo/miniBibServer/blob/9750e1e/latex_accents.py#L9))\r\n- @lig ([example](https://github.com/lig/pyfusegridfs/blob/05104ea2a/fusegridfs/fuse.py#L30))\r\n- @adrinjalali ([example](https://github.com/adrinjalali/Network-Classifier/blob/8f4fd4c/read_vantveer.py#L124))\r\n- @belevtsoff ([example](https://github.com/belevtsoff/earlPipeline/blob/985f2f9b/earlpipeline/backends/base_simple_engine.py#L17))\r\n\r\nEveryone please give feedback here, and please spread the word to other bidict users. I'm leaning toward going through with this, but if users' feedback trumps the rationale above, I won't.\r\n\r\n<bountysource-plugin>\r\n---\r\nWant to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/28609302-consider-removing-namedbidict?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6404484&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6404484&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).\r\n</bountysource-plugin>"}}