{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/astroquery/issues/585","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/astroquery/issues/585/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/astroquery/issues/585/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/astroquery/issues/585/events","html_url":"https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/issues/585","id":109567411,"number":585,"title":"Make SDSS query region a circle","user":{"login":"eteq","id":346587,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/346587?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq","html_url":"https://github.com/eteq","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eteq/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-10-02T20:36:41Z","updated_at":"2015-10-02T20:58:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This issue was discussed in #545, but we opted to do it as a separate fix so the other work in #545 could get in sooner.\r\n\r\nBasically, the SDSS region queries (which have a `radius`) keyword in fact search a box instead of a circular region on the sky.  That needs to be fixed.  I think @weaverba137 *might* be working on this?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/astroquery/issues/comments/145153692","html_url":"https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/issues/585#issuecomment-145153692","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/astropy/astroquery/issues/585","id":145153692,"user":{"login":"keflavich","id":143715,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/143715?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich","html_url":"https://github.com/keflavich","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/keflavich/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-02T20:58:13Z","updated_at":"2015-10-02T20:58:13Z","body":"If they're going to end up functionally equivalent, we should probably at least include a 'deprecation warning' and redirect from one (cross-id?) to the other.  Otherwise, hacking beyond all recognition (and making it like the other astroquery modules) is a good idea.  The history of this module is somewhat murky; it has contributions from a few sources and I did not do a very good job of curating it, preferring partial functionality over conformance to standards.  But, @bsipocz may be able to fill in some additional details there."}}