{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/63","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/63/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/63/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/63/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/63","id":121825290,"number":63,"title":"Outbox stream having ALL objects seems unsustainable","user":{"login":"dissolve","id":2546145,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2546145?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve","html_url":"https://github.com/dissolve","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dissolve/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-12-12T01:56:43Z","updated_at":"2015-12-12T05:58:29Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Having the endpoint require that it contains every object ever published seems rather unsustainable.  Does this include deleted items?  Why can a implementation not limit this to only the last N?\r\n\r\nWould a multi-user system be basically giving a firehose (of public posts) to everyone?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/comments/164113862","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/63#issuecomment-164113862","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/63","id":164113862,"user":{"login":"wilkie","id":31674,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31674?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie","html_url":"https://github.com/wilkie","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wilkie/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-12T05:58:29Z","updated_at":"2015-12-12T05:58:29Z","body":"Hmm. Anything not specified in the specification would be implementation-defined. I'd think whether or not to persist activities is ultimately an implementation decision. These comments seem a bit pedantic, in that context, if explicitly specified. That is, a solution may just be to simply provide the blanket implication: if you don't want posts in your outbox, don't include them in the Collection.\r\n\r\nSo, I'd say: it SHOULD contain \"...every object that the user has ever published, subject to the ability of the requestor to retrieve the object\" and allow that implication."}}