{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2050","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2050/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2050/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2050/events","html_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2050","id":72446868,"number":2050,"title":"EHN: report save when error?","user":{"login":"kingjr","id":4881164,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4881164?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr","html_url":"https://github.com/kingjr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kingjr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":14,"created_at":"2015-05-01T14:48:21Z","updated_at":"2015-05-01T16:57:11Z","closed_at":"2015-05-01T16:32:04Z","body":"@dengemann Do you know whether it would be feasible to automatically save the report if there's an error and catch the latter without having to explicitly put the report.save() in a try/except condition? "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/comments/98177336","html_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2050#issuecomment-98177336","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2050","id":98177336,"user":{"login":"dengemann","id":1908618,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1908618?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann","html_url":"https://github.com/dengemann","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-01T16:57:11Z","updated_at":"2015-05-01T16:57:11Z","body":"let's check it out in our meeg-preprocessing playground sandbox\n\n2015-05-01 18:56 GMT+02:00 J-R King <notifications@github.com>:\n\n> It's less performant, but most HTML are not that heavy, so overwriting\n> wouldn't be a major issue, should it? (But yes, ideally, it would be\n> incremental, but IMO that'd be a big piece of work, for a small feature)\n>\n> —\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2050#issuecomment-98177172>\n> .\n>\n"}}