{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby-rdf/rdf-vocab/issues/31","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby-rdf/rdf-vocab/issues/31/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby-rdf/rdf-vocab/issues/31/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ruby-rdf/rdf-vocab/issues/31/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ruby-rdf/rdf-vocab/issues/31","id":113616676,"number":31,"title":"IANA vocabulary likely to change","user":{"login":"gkellogg","id":46296,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/46296?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg","html_url":"https://github.com/gkellogg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gkellogg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-10-27T15:52:30Z","updated_at":"2015-10-27T15:52:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The issue on supporting a real vocabulary for Link Relations seems like it's heading to resolution: https://github.com/mnot/I-D/issues/140. However, it seems likely that the choice of IRI will be different to the one we've used. Currently, RDF::Vocab::IANA is based on \"http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/\", this might instead be officially \"http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation#\", which will cause problems for people storing link relations based on these IRIs, however I don't see much that can be done about this."}}