{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/google/cadvisor/issues/920","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/google/cadvisor/issues/920/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/google/cadvisor/issues/920/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/google/cadvisor/issues/920/events","html_url":"https://github.com/google/cadvisor/issues/920","id":111693952,"number":920,"title":"No disk capacity/usage is reported for Docker using the thinpool lvm devicemapper storage driver","user":{"login":"csrwng","id":5834976,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5834976?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng","html_url":"https://github.com/csrwng","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/csrwng/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":52,"created_at":"2015-10-15T19:49:13Z","updated_at":"2015-10-16T19:57:02Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Based on comments I see in the code, this is not implemented yet:\r\nhttps://github.com/google/cadvisor/blob/master/fs/fs.go#L108\r\nhttps://github.com/google/cadvisor/blob/master/fs/fs.go#L116\r\n\r\nHowever, it's really important for Kubernetes image garbage collection to work on systems that typically use the thinpool lvm storage driver like RHEL or Fedora. \r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/google/cadvisor/issues/comments/148819383","html_url":"https://github.com/google/cadvisor/issues/920#issuecomment-148819383","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/google/cadvisor/issues/920","id":148819383,"user":{"login":"jimmidyson","id":464659,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/464659?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson","html_url":"https://github.com/jimmidyson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jimmidyson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-16T19:57:02Z","updated_at":"2015-10-16T19:57:02Z","body":"So what's the consensus on a way forward for this? Easiest for now is probably: Refactor to retrieve storage backend from `docker info`. Support `devicemapper` via `dmsetup status` parsing for Docker root & container FS (as future work). Should get us where we need?"}}