{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12015","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12015/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12015/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12015/events","html_url":"https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12015","id":101843078,"number":12015,"title":"MP GO:0007062 sister chromatid cohesion","user":{"login":"ValWood","id":7359272,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7359272?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood","html_url":"https://github.com/ValWood","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ValWood/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-08-19T09:12:38Z","updated_at":"2015-08-19T11:09:36Z","closed_at":null,"body":"GO:0007062 sister chromatid cohesion\r\nshould move down to be a descendent of 'nuclear chromosome segregation'"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/comments/132547085","html_url":"https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12015#issuecomment-132547085","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12015","id":132547085,"user":{"login":"mah11","id":5196259,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5196259?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11","html_url":"https://github.com/mah11","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mah11/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-19T11:09:36Z","updated_at":"2015-08-19T11:09:36Z","body":"I'm not sure this will work -- chromosome segregation is defined as including several events that take place after the nuclear envelope breaks down in those species where, well, the nuclear envelope breaks down for mitosis. Can the process still be \"nuclear\" if part of it happens when there's no nucleus?\r\n\r\nFor the same reason, it looks dodgy for 'sister chromatid segregation' to be is_a 'nuclear chromosome segregation'."}}