{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/charter-html/issues/23","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/charter-html/issues/23/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/charter-html/issues/23/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/charter-html/issues/23/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/23","id":82477438,"number":23,"title":"Migrating back from a WG to a CG","user":{"login":"plehegar","id":1490400,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1490400?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar","html_url":"https://github.com/plehegar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/plehegar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-05-29T15:41:18Z","updated_at":"2015-05-30T01:59:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"How to transition back from the WG IPR policy to the CG IPR policy if specs turn out not to be ready for the standards track but are not “abandoned”?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/charter-html/issues/comments/106973745","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/23#issuecomment-106973745","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/charter-html/issues/23","id":106973745,"user":{"login":"wcarr","id":10898434,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10898434?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr","html_url":"https://github.com/wcarr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wcarr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-30T01:59:37Z","updated_at":"2015-05-30T01:59:37Z","body":">  If you make a contribution into the WG and the spec doesn't go to REC, all bets are off.\r\n\r\nI thought the point being made was contributions made in the WG only cause licensing at REC.  So, if you move a spec from a WG to a CG, the parts contributed in the WG don't have any patent licensing associated with them in the CG (only the parts contributed in the CG do). If you never go back to the WG, you lose the licensing you would have gotten from the WG for the parts from the WG.  \r\n\r\nBut, that's the same as the WG abandoning the spec and that happens now.  That's what the WG would be doing if they sent it back to the CG and never took it back.\r\n\r\nIf it does go back to the WG and finish, it doesn't seem like it would matter whether it went back and forth to the CG or not.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n"}}