{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tux3/qTox/issues/1059","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tux3/qTox/issues/1059/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tux3/qTox/issues/1059/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tux3/qTox/issues/1059/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tux3/qTox/issues/1059","id":55662244,"number":1059,"title":"Quoting is Broken","user":{"login":"ProMcTagonist","id":4358079,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4358079?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist","html_url":"https://github.com/ProMcTagonist","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ProMcTagonist/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tux3/qTox/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"fc2929"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tux3/qTox/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2015-01-27T19:23:16Z","updated_at":"2015-01-28T08:34:42Z","closed_at":null,"body":"If > is the first character, everything on that line should be green.\r\n\r\nI often have cause to quote someone or something who used characters that the latest regex arbitrarily deems unquotable."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tux3/qTox/issues/comments/71798151","html_url":"https://github.com/tux3/qTox/issues/1059#issuecomment-71798151","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tux3/qTox/issues/1059","id":71798151,"user":{"login":"zetok","id":3148759,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3148759?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok","html_url":"https://github.com/zetok","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zetok/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-28T08:34:42Z","updated_at":"2015-01-28T08:34:42Z","body":"@stqism \r\n> (…) but I need you to understand that I represent the unspoken majority voice that makes up our users.\r\n\r\nThat's what you claim.\r\n\r\nEven if claim is true, it still doesn't mean that you are right. Not so long ago you were opposed to replacing current groupchats. Why were you doing it? Probably because **you** were convinced that there isn't much of need for them.\r\n\r\nFunny fact: you're almost never in groupchat, thus you don't see people coming there, saying that current groupchats suck… and would go away unhappy about how Tox works if not reassured that groupchats are being remade to include important features they should have.\r\n\r\nWhile you may **think** that you represent unspoken majority, are you really doing it?\r\n\r\nEven if people currently don't know about greentexting, it is no way implied that they can't learn about it, since is easy to do so, and doesn't require any effort. Not to mention that ``>`` is used in places outside of 4chan to quote things.\r\n\r\n> (…) this majority we're hurting here.\r\n\r\nPlease stop.\r\nHow exactly greentexting is hurting anyone?\r\nEh. I get that you're trying to get your point in this issue, and that at the same time generally speak about why you're doing what you're doing. It may be the case in some other issues, but I hardly see how greentexting could do that. Mind providing a real example? Otherwise it would be just FUD…\r\n\r\nIf you're so concerned about features, you really should go brag about no screenshot/video streaming feature in qTox, since that's the feature people find really useful… So called \"unspoken minority\".\r\n\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\n>A setting to enable the feature that's left off by default gives both groups the best of both worlds without ruining the experience for both sides.\r\n\r\nSadly, qTox already has plenty of settings, which IMHO should be limited as much as possible, since they're not user-friendly.\r\n\r\nThing with greentexting… yes, it could be an option, but an opt-out one. Presenting to user client with features turned off is more or less pointless, and would result in people wondering why some people lead their text with ``>``. Effectively, you're just asking for greentexting to be turned off, just in a little bit different manner.\r\nThen again, if it's an opt-out, user is confronted with either using it as it is, or try to find in settings option for it.\r\n\r\nAnother question that I would like to ask you is, why do you feel that making it harder for clients to have some nice text colouring in them is a good thing?"}}