{"push_id":572246054,"size":6,"distinct_size":6,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"08dceda2c03f7e727b7a17b3868a3e6462fd577d","before":"8e4bcef1950476d4060aaac48926ddd3f1367dd8","commits":[{"sha":"4f1996df5d71d8f16be591fb01f9b9580b152fb8","author":{"email":"8d7f979c1534f5c44454845389099db3fe027b4b@cisco.com","name":"Jeff Squyres"},"message":"various: remove $(LTDLINCL) from Makefile.am's that didn't need it","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rhc54/ompi/commits/4f1996df5d71d8f16be591fb01f9b9580b152fb8"},{"sha":"3ac1d0dae58bc70027743d0cdfc860775102f1e0","author":{"email":"8d7f979c1534f5c44454845389099db3fe027b4b@cisco.com","name":"Jeff Squyres"},"message":"*-info: add \"lt_dladvise support\" lines","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rhc54/ompi/commits/3ac1d0dae58bc70027743d0cdfc860775102f1e0"},{"sha":"fe8bc4e7ebc0e4fd36d0cea63a9903643e4bb1a4","author":{"email":"8d7f979c1534f5c44454845389099db3fe027b4b@cisco.com","name":"Jeff Squyres"},"message":"debuggers: make the test safe to build without dlopen\n\nThis is a bit of overkill, but I'm cleaning out a bunch of other\nlibltdl-support assumptions, so I might as well do this one, too.  The\ntest isn't built if we don't have libltdl support, but it had\nhalf-hearted #if protection in it to make it safe to build even if we\ndidn't have libltdl support.  This commit finishes that half-hearted\nsupport.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rhc54/ompi/commits/fe8bc4e7ebc0e4fd36d0cea63a9903643e4bb1a4"},{"sha":"07480a3e8ae9400e23c8e7b744a416111a9d430b","author":{"email":"8d7f979c1534f5c44454845389099db3fe027b4b@cisco.com","name":"Jeff Squyres"},"message":"HACKING: whitespace cleanup.\n\nNo (non-whitespace) content changes.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rhc54/ompi/commits/07480a3e8ae9400e23c8e7b744a416111a9d430b"},{"sha":"08285c63619ff175a6de04e4b6e27a749195c9c5","author":{"email":"8d7f979c1534f5c44454845389099db3fe027b4b@cisco.com","name":"Jeff Squyres"},"message":"lt_interface: properly check OPAL_HAVE_LTDL_ADVISE","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rhc54/ompi/commits/08285c63619ff175a6de04e4b6e27a749195c9c5"},{"sha":"08dceda2c03f7e727b7a17b3868a3e6462fd577d","author":{"email":"a9e68d5c899dcde5abc245dd6cc7016c01d722c8@nvidia.com","name":"Rolf vandeVaart"},"message":"Fix logic for handling priority and eager RDMA. There was some refactoring that was done\nin this code and it ended up changing the logic that is used to set up eager RDMA.\nRather than setting up eager RDMA with a high priority message, it did it the other\nway around.  For some reason, CUDA-aware support did not like this.  So, basically,\nrestore the logic to the way it was prior to the refactoring.  The refactoring did not\nintend to change this.  Lightly reviewed by hjelmn.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rhc54/ompi/commits/08dceda2c03f7e727b7a17b3868a3e6462fd577d"}]}