{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/issues/19","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/issues/19/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/issues/19/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/issues/19/events","html_url":"https://github.com/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/issues/19","id":80709027,"number":19,"title":"Class conflict lors du merge du land cover","user":{"login":"SteeveEbener","id":12602163,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12602163?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener","html_url":"https://github.com/SteeveEbener","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/labels/need%20feedback","name":"need feedback","color":"009800"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2015-05-25T23:42:27Z","updated_at":"2015-06-23T22:55:49Z","closed_at":null,"body":"j'ai fait un test pour voir si le merge land cover identifiait effectivement les conflict de classes (j'ai créé une couche de route avec les même classes que celle du landcover) et l'identification ne s'est pas faite, il n'y a eu aucun message ni d'information reportée sous stack category conflict\r\n\r\nFrédéric: contrôle des conflit. Ok, je vais tester avec d'autres données."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/issues/comments/114666728","html_url":"https://github.com/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/issues/19#issuecomment-114666728","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fxi/AccessMod_shiny/issues/19","id":114666728,"user":{"login":"SteeveEbener","id":12602163,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12602163?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener","html_url":"https://github.com/SteeveEbener","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteeveEbener/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-23T22:55:49Z","updated_at":"2015-06-23T22:55:49Z","body":"Sorry if I misunderstood you but one of your previous comment as well as the following email was mentioning to close the issue and open a new one:\r\n\r\nFrom: Frédéric Moser [mailto:frederic.moser@unepgrid.ch] \r\nSent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:30 PM\r\nTo: Steeve Ebener\r\nSubject: Re: FW: [AccessMod_shiny] Class conflict lors du merge du land cover (#19)\r\n\r\nLe dataset est apparu dans la dropbox, mais c'est pas encore complètement téléchargé. \r\n\r\nCela dit, j'ai effectué un test avec des erreurs de classes avec un autre dataset (philippines 500m) et j'ai réussi à reproduire le problème. J'avais fait une erreur de syntaxe d'expression régulière, ce qui empêchait certaine couche d'être évaluée pour la détection de conflit. Ca devrait être réglé maintenant. Si c'est le cas, tu peux simplement fermer le ticket dans github ou donner de nouveaux détail.\r\n\r\nMerci, \r\n\r\nFred\r\n\r\nI am therefore copying here the new issue you closed in order to keep the all track:\r\n\r\nThe resolution of class conflicts between the road network and the landcover is still not working.\r\n\r\nThis morning I have used the conflict road and landcover layers I placed in the AccessMod5\\data\\sample\\MWI_conflict_roads folder in the dropbox.\r\n\r\nBoth files present the same set of classes: 1, 2 and 3 but he only asked me to solve the conflict for class 3 and did the merge keeping the other two conflicts and therefore removing some of the roads\r\n\r\nIn addition to that, I thought the \"new_class\" column would be physically added to the original road layer to be able knowing the correspondence with the original class but it seems this is not the case.\r\n\r\nFinally, if you have to set of roads in the stack, which can be the case if you want to look at the impact of building a road (case currently discussed with ADB) the module identifies conflicts among road layers as well.\r\n\r\nI am sorry but this approach for trying to solve the conflicts is too complicated => we need to reach something that is much closer than what is implemented in Version 4.0.\r\n\r\nThere are reasons why we have been using this approach, even since the first version of AccessMod if I am not wrong.\r\n\r\nThanks for your understanding,\r\n\r\nSteeve"}}