{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftlabs/Screens/issues/10","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftlabs/Screens/issues/10/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftlabs/Screens/issues/10/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftlabs/Screens/issues/10/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ftlabs/Screens/issues/10","id":117604585,"number":10,"title":"User access control","user":{"login":"JakeChampion","id":1569131,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1569131?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion","html_url":"https://github.com/JakeChampion","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeChampion/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-11-18T14:56:41Z","updated_at":"2015-11-30T14:57:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Would it be a good idea to have user's only able to access a subset of screens?\r\n\r\nFor example:\r\nAdmins can access any screen.\r\nCommunications department can access public screens.\r\nDevelopment teams can access their own screens."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftlabs/Screens/issues/comments/160653161","html_url":"https://github.com/ftlabs/Screens/issues/10#issuecomment-160653161","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftlabs/Screens/issues/10","id":160653161,"user":{"login":"triblondon","id":1735391,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1735391?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon","html_url":"https://github.com/triblondon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/triblondon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-30T14:57:30Z","updated_at":"2015-11-30T14:57:30Z","body":"Research needed here: can we use S3O to piggyback on AD groups?  I do not want to create a new groups tool."}}