{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/3647","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/3647/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/3647/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/3647/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bundler/bundler/issues/3647","id":76382482,"number":3647,"title":"Handle Bundler dependencies better","user":{"login":"strzibny","id":1395527,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1395527?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny","html_url":"https://github.com/strzibny","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/strzibny/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":15,"created_at":"2015-05-14T14:49:08Z","updated_at":"2015-05-16T05:38:24Z","closed_at":"2015-05-15T20:42:16Z","body":"Hi,\r\n\r\nwith new Bundler releases, thor and molinillo dependencies are handled differently (see https://github.com/bundler/bundler/pull/3493/files) than http-net-persistent. Why aren't all bundled dependencies handled the same way? It's already quite tough to unbundle these gems, but now we need to do it differently for different dependencies.\r\n\r\nI see from https://github.com/bundler/bundler/issues/3492 that autoload didn't work or? Can you please clarify and make it consistent again? Thanks."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/comments/102572767","html_url":"https://github.com/bundler/bundler/issues/3647#issuecomment-102572767","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/3647","id":102572767,"user":{"login":"voxik","id":14406,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/14406?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik","html_url":"https://github.com/voxik","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/voxik/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-16T05:38:24Z","updated_at":"2015-05-16T05:38:24Z","body":"> Please stop breaking our library and re-introducing bugs that we have fixed with great effort. Thanks.\r\n\r\nWe are making great effort to not break bundler or any other package. Not sure what would be reason for opposite. And it is interesting to hear that you blaming us for breaking Bundler without any evidence.\r\n\r\nI would very much welcome if you could be more open towards packaging, since it si very well possible that at the end, more people are using packaged version of Bundler then its RubyGems version.\r\n\r\nNevertheless, this is cosmetic issue. I am pretty sure you'll fix it one day in the future .... "}}