{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ioos/compliance-checker/issues/109","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ioos/compliance-checker/issues/109/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ioos/compliance-checker/issues/109/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ioos/compliance-checker/issues/109/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ioos/compliance-checker/issues/109","id":73307409,"number":109,"title":"File Independent Scoring Concept","user":{"login":"mbiddle-nodc","id":8480023,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8480023?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc","html_url":"https://github.com/mbiddle-nodc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbiddle-nodc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-05-05T12:52:01Z","updated_at":"2015-07-16T13:14:01Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi all,\r\n\r\nThis might not be worth talking about, but I wanted to at least get it out in the open if it's something other people could find useful.\r\n\r\nOne of my thoughts is to use this compliance checker for different groups of data providers to test if their netCDF files are correctly formatted for transmission to the archive. Reviewing my understanding of how the scoring system works, the current incarnation has a varying amount of total available points depending on the files and tests. I understand that comparing between tests should yield differing scores, however, providing some consistency between varying files (using the same test) would be useful. \r\n\r\nIt would be beneficial, from the NCEI perspective, if there was some consistent number to represent the score the file receives for each specific test. This would facilitate the use of the compliance checker across a breadth of files and provide a consistent evaluation for all files. \r\n\r\nMy thought is that NCEI could say something along the lines of 'Your files should have a compliance checker score larger than X.' Although, now that I think about it, maybe evaluating the score as a percentage would suffice for these needs."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ioos/compliance-checker/issues/comments/121952353","html_url":"https://github.com/ioos/compliance-checker/issues/109#issuecomment-121952353","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ioos/compliance-checker/issues/109","id":121952353,"user":{"login":"kknee","id":196868,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/196868?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee","html_url":"https://github.com/kknee","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kknee/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-16T13:14:01Z","updated_at":"2015-07-16T13:14:01Z","body":"+1 on being happy to see the JPL version released!"}}