{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/49","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/49/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/49/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/49/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/49","id":118274442,"number":49,"title":"Breaking snitches reveals who owns it?","user":{"login":"TealNerd","id":4108972,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4108972?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd","html_url":"https://github.com/TealNerd","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TealNerd/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-11-22T16:50:32Z","updated_at":"2015-11-29T17:08:35Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I remember precious stones had this. I think it would be nice to  bring back, maybe only for not blocks to encourage the use of jukes if you want full anonymity?\r\n\r\n@rourke750 @ttk2 thoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/comments/160432448","html_url":"https://github.com/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/49#issuecomment-160432448","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/49","id":160432448,"user":{"login":"rourke750","id":1648936,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1648936?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750","html_url":"https://github.com/rourke750","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rourke750/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-29T17:08:35Z","updated_at":"2015-11-29T17:08:35Z","body":"So for this issue, you would need to store who reinforced a snitch not the group.  How would you go about implementing this for prexisting snitches?  \r\n\r\nWhat approach do we want to take.  Owner of group would be easiest and would not require any db changes.  What were you thinking @TealNerd?"}}