{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bos/text/issues/120","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bos/text/issues/120/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bos/text/issues/120/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bos/text/issues/120/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bos/text/issues/120","id":74657598,"number":120,"title":"Maintenance release of 1.1.x with GHC<7.4, bytestring>=0.10 support?","user":{"login":"bergmark","id":100681,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/100681?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark","html_url":"https://github.com/bergmark","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bergmark/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-05-09T11:56:46Z","updated_at":"2015-05-09T11:56:46Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Related: https://github.com/bos/text/issues/108\r\n\r\nWe are running builds against multiple ghcs and versions for curation. The fact that `text-1.1.*`  doesn't build with `bytestring >= 0.10` is causing us problems, e.g. http://matrix.hackage.haskell.org/package/process-listlike#GHC-7.2/process-listlike-1.0\r\n\r\nWould it be possible to get a `1.1.1.4` release that fixes this?\r\n\r\nI prepared and tested a commit for this (can't send PR's against tags): https://github.com/bergmark/text/commit/fba4081026ae7d70e26c10e28ce44f2becce4d88\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\nAdam\r\n"}}