{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iu-parfunc/lvars/issues/111","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iu-parfunc/lvars/issues/111/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iu-parfunc/lvars/issues/111/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iu-parfunc/lvars/issues/111/events","html_url":"https://github.com/iu-parfunc/lvars/issues/111","id":90137163,"number":111,"title":"Refactor ParThreadsafe to use secret-superclass","user":{"login":"rrnewton","id":274582,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/274582?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton","html_url":"https://github.com/rrnewton","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rrnewton/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-06-22T15:48:09Z","updated_at":"2015-08-25T15:38:11Z","closed_at":"2015-08-25T15:38:11Z","body":"\"Secret superclass\" is a better design pattern than this current business of using an `unsafeParIO` method, which we make sure the user cannot instance themselves.\r\n\r\nShould be real easy to solve this because `unsafeParIO` uses can just be replaced with `internalLiftIO`.  And it removes the confusing redundancy between those two.\r\n"}}