{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NUKnightLab/TimelineJS3/issues/65","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NUKnightLab/TimelineJS3/issues/65/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NUKnightLab/TimelineJS3/issues/65/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NUKnightLab/TimelineJS3/issues/65/events","html_url":"https://github.com/NUKnightLab/TimelineJS3/issues/65","id":58617060,"number":65,"title":"I18N keys for BC dates","user":{"login":"JoeGermuska","id":46313,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/46313?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska","html_url":"https://github.com/JoeGermuska","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JoeGermuska/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NUKnightLab/TimelineJS3/labels/Enhancement","name":"Enhancement","color":"0052cc"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-02-23T17:14:24Z","updated_at":"2015-02-23T17:14:24Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This is a bit tricky, especially if we don't want to have a lot of redundant date format keys, but it has come up repeatedly, as in NUKnightLab/TimelineJS#427\r\n\r\nFortunately, TimelineJS3's I18N inheritance should make it easier to implement incrementally. \r\n\r\nQuestions\r\n\r\n* Can it be relative to the regular date formats, so that it only specifies a modifier (BC/BCE) and it's relationship to the date?\r\n* Should we support explicit AD/CE and the relative translations? If so, how?"}}