{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/206","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/206/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/206/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/206/events","html_url":"https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/206","id":52428150,"number":206,"title":"Clarify Rating e.g. itemReviewed should be applicable to Rating; make Rating a CreativeWork?","user":{"login":"danbri","id":170265,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/170265?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri","html_url":"https://github.com/danbri","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/labels/schema.org%20vocab","name":"schema.org vocab","color":"fbca04"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/labels/status:needs%20review","name":"status:needs review","color":"d4c5f9"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/labels/type:small%20proposal","name":"type:small proposal","color":"f7c6c7"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/labels/type:tricky%20problem","name":"type:tricky problem","color":"e11d21"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"danbri","id":170265,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/170265?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri","html_url":"https://github.com/danbri","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/milestones/12","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/milestones/12/labels","id":945063,"number":12,"title":"sdo-gozer release","description":"Milestone for the release following sdo-stantz\r\n\r\nSee http://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v.next\r\n\r\nTest site will be at http://sdo-gozer.appspot.com\r\n\r\nDue date is an estimate.","creator":{"login":"danbri","id":170265,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/170265?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri","html_url":"https://github.com/danbri","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":57,"closed_issues":5,"state":"open","created_at":"2015-01-21T10:29:12Z","updated_at":"2015-02-03T22:46:09Z","due_on":"2015-02-23T00:00:00Z","closed_at":null},"comments":11,"created_at":"2014-12-18T23:06:08Z","updated_at":"2015-02-04T00:40:16Z","closed_at":null,"body":"http://schema.org/Rating\r\n\r\nhttp://schema.org/itemReviewed is attached to AggregateRating and Review. I can't see how you'd indicate a simple (and non-aggregate) Rating without packaging it in a Review, unless we add:\r\n\r\nRating domainIncludes itemReviewed.\r\n\r\nSee also:\r\n* #140 (closed in favour of this issue)\r\n* https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/161 itemReviewed inverseOf review"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/comments/72768028","html_url":"https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/206#issuecomment-72768028","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/206","id":72768028,"user":{"login":"tmarshbing","id":9203402,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9203402?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing","html_url":"https://github.com/tmarshbing","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmarshbing/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-04T00:40:16Z","updated_at":"2015-02-04T00:40:16Z","body":"I was trying to propose something slightly different than 1 or 2. I was just saying to:\r\n- Update the documentation for the existing Review type almost as suggested in proposal 2, but something like this instead: \"A review of an item - for example, of a restaurant, movie, or store. Reviews can be textual (indicated via reviewBody) or numeric~~, in which case they are called Ratings~~(indicated via reviewRating) or both. For a textual Review that carries an associated quantitative rating, use the 'reviewRating' property to reference a Rating. When the main review itself carries ratings (e.g. 'was this review helpful?' evaluations), they can be indicated using aggregateRating.\"\r\n- Optionally, rename the existing Review type to RatingOrReview to better match the updated description.\r\n\r\nThis doesn't satisfy the second requirement from @danbri because you still have to put the rating in the reviewRating property to get to the CreativeWork properties, but I personally think this is OK. My reasoning is:\r\n- Making Rating derive from Review kind of works, but it adds complexity and multiple ways of representing a rating (I can still create a Review with no reviewBody).\r\n- If Rating doesn't derive from Review, then enumerating all reviews and ratings for something becomes a challenge, especially if some of the reviewRating's for some of the reviews duplicate some of the ratings in the (presumably to-be-created) ratings property.\r\n- But most of all, I think the existing system pretty much \"just works\" with a bit of clarification in the documentation. So why make bigger changes?"}}