{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maxcountryman/flask-login/issues/234","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maxcountryman/flask-login/issues/234/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maxcountryman/flask-login/issues/234/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/maxcountryman/flask-login/issues/234/events","html_url":"https://github.com/maxcountryman/flask-login/issues/234","id":108133986,"number":234,"title":"Backward incompatiblity again","user":{"login":"JohnLockwood","id":1295550,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1295550?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood","html_url":"https://github.com/JohnLockwood","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JohnLockwood/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-09-24T13:49:58Z","updated_at":"2015-09-24T14:20:46Z","closed_at":"2015-09-24T14:20:46Z","body":"Was there a reason (other than \"because I could\") for changing the user.is_authenticated etc from a method to a property?  This broke flask-security and probably a lot of other code, and yes, I know you documented it and so forth.  If there was a particular client that really needed to use properties, couldn't they have written wrappers for them?"}}