{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/issues/15","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/issues/15/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/issues/15/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/issues/15/events","html_url":"https://github.com/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/pull/15","id":48993727,"number":15,"title":"Incorporated all changes that were made in SBA V1.5.3 for ZC 1.5.1.","user":{"login":"mc12345678","id":2072812,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2072812?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678","html_url":"https://github.com/mc12345678","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/labels/Feedback+Requested","name":"Feedback Requested","color":"bfe5bf"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":13,"created_at":"2014-11-16T15:47:59Z","updated_at":"2015-01-16T22:25:05Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/pulls/15","html_url":"https://github.com/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/pull/15","diff_url":"https://github.com/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/pull/15.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/pull/15.patch"},"body":"This did include revision of determining previously ordered products that\r\nhave attributes and are tracked by SBA.\r\nWanted to get some of the testing started.  Still have some delete variant(s) based on other actions to do in attributes_controller; however, need to know if have missed anything in the rest of the code."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/issues/comments/70332575","html_url":"https://github.com/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/pull/15#issuecomment-70332575","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/potteryhouse/stock_by_attribute_1.5.4/issues/15","id":70332575,"user":{"login":"mc12345678","id":2072812,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2072812?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678","html_url":"https://github.com/mc12345678","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mc12345678/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-16T22:25:05Z","updated_at":"2015-01-16T22:25:05Z","body":"Let me ask this... Does the same problem occur with the main thread of the software?  If not what is the difference that is causing the result.  If it does, then I say that the code to generate/determine the quantity available needs to be modified.  Yes, it is confusing to have so many different options on display.  In the test environments I have used, they typically show in the first attribute not the second, but it is confusing and personally I thought it was something previously known to be worked out, so didn't want to touch it if there was parallel work. This is also what was basically being reported in #21 although there was more going on there as well...\r\n\r\nI guess, it appears that as the individual reporting issue #21 was using the main thread, that the issue exists throughout not just in this line of code.  There are improvements in this code that I believe will help in all cases and recommend incorporating this code into the main thread and then correcting the multiple attribute issue(s) of the main thread... It is either in the code leading up to displaying the javascript, or some form of \"calculation\" performed in the javascript... I have looked at neither and was just starting to look at what generates the multiple option name selections and why only one of the two (haven't tried a three attribute product) attributes is so confusing by providing multiple selections for each attribute type."}}