{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhipster/generator-jhipster/issues/1858","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhipster/generator-jhipster/issues/1858/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhipster/generator-jhipster/issues/1858/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhipster/generator-jhipster/issues/1858/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jhipster/generator-jhipster/issues/1858","id":100661489,"number":1858,"title":"Show ids for many to many relationship in entities and entity detail view","user":{"login":"andidev","id":571389,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/571389?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev","html_url":"https://github.com/andidev","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andidev/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhipster/generator-jhipster/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-08-13T00:00:25Z","updated_at":"2015-08-21T08:12:51Z","closed_at":"2015-08-21T08:12:51Z","body":"The relationship ids are shown in the entities view and entity detail view for many-to-one entities and one-to-one entities (owner side). However they are missing for many-to-many relationships on owner side.\r\n\r\nWe should add the relationship ids and make them clickable as described in #1857."}}