{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/genome/civic-client/issues/22","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/genome/civic-client/issues/22/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/genome/civic-client/issues/22/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/genome/civic-client/issues/22/events","html_url":"https://github.com/genome/civic-client/issues/22","id":58145743,"number":22,"title":"Include additional values on the evidence statement tables","user":{"login":"malachig","id":856728,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/856728?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig","html_url":"https://github.com/malachig","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malachig/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-02-18T23:25:50Z","updated_at":"2015-02-18T23:25:50Z","closed_at":null,"body":"When I select a particular variant (e.g. BRAF V600E) I find myself looking at the table of evidence statements and wondering what their evidence types are (i.e. predictive, prognostic, or diagnostic) and what the evidence directions (i.e. supports vs does not support) of these are. \r\n\r\nActually showing these values would take up way too much space.  But they are simple categorical values just like the 'level' (A, B, C, D).  I'm wondering if we could include them in a compact way (perhaps as colored icons/symbols.  For example,\r\n\r\nEvidence type:\r\nT = therapeutic/predictive\r\nD = diagnostic\r\nP = prognostic\r\n\r\nEvidence direction\r\n'+' = Support\r\n'-' = Does not support\r\n\r\nClinical significance is harder because it is not so much of a simple categorical variable.  In that case maybe you need the full description...  Or we need to come up with more tightly defined categories here.  Or we rely on synthesizing this in the clinical summary."}}