{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/amstan/jackclient-python/comments/9331587","html_url":"https://github.com/amstan/jackclient-python/commit/9002ac903a96e5a7292be6cefef9987320394a4c#commitcomment-9331587","id":9331587,"user":{"login":"mgeier","id":705404,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/705404?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier","html_url":"https://github.com/mgeier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgeier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":68,"line":1598,"path":"jack.py","commit_id":"9002ac903a96e5a7292be6cefef9987320394a4c","created_at":"2015-01-18T19:44:55Z","updated_at":"2015-01-18T19:44:55Z","body":"What about the other solution?\r\n\r\nIf you add `jack_ringbuffer_get_*_vector()`, there will be no reason anymore not to implement `*_advance()`.\r\nI think it should be easy to implement the `*_vector()` stuff, they only have to return two buffer objects each and the implementation can be shared, because both do basically the same.\r\nThis may not be used much (or at all?), but since it's straightforward to implement, I don't see a reason why not to implement it."}}