{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Swamp-Ig/ProceduralParts/issues/95","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Swamp-Ig/ProceduralParts/issues/95/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Swamp-Ig/ProceduralParts/issues/95/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Swamp-Ig/ProceduralParts/issues/95/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Swamp-Ig/ProceduralParts/issues/95","id":53766343,"number":95,"title":"1.0 preparation","user":{"login":"ItMustBeACamel","id":7095625,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7095625?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel","html_url":"https://github.com/ItMustBeACamel","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ItMustBeACamel/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-01-08T16:01:38Z","updated_at":"2015-01-09T05:42:54Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Alright. I would do the release. If there are no objections, of course.\r\n\r\nFixes since the last release:\r\n-wandering nozzle\r\n-resource amounts are persistent after loading in editor\r\n-tech limits in science sandbox mode\r\n-tweaks for extraplanetary launchpad and TAC tanks\r\n\r\nThere is still a problem when using the offset tool. I'm not sure how much time and effort is required to fix this, so it might be better to release the fixes we have so far and tell the users to avoid part clipping when using procedural tanks until there is a fix.\r\n\r\n@Swamp-Ig , @NathanKell : I updated the changelog for 1.0. I do not really have an oversight on the changes since 0.9 so I took the info from the release notes on github. Any additions/changes?\r\n\r\n@OtherBarry : Still available for the forum thread?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Swamp-Ig/ProceduralParts/issues/comments/69295795","html_url":"https://github.com/Swamp-Ig/ProceduralParts/issues/95#issuecomment-69295795","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Swamp-Ig/ProceduralParts/issues/95","id":69295795,"user":{"login":"NathanKell","id":5144098,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5144098?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell","html_url":"https://github.com/NathanKell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NathanKell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-09T05:42:54Z","updated_at":"2015-01-09T05:42:54Z","body":"@ItMustBeACamel sounds good. And I agree about releasing rather than trying to fix the offsets; handling that (which is similar to the problem faced when attaching a tweakscaled part to a Proc Part node--race condition woo).\r\n\r\nIf you updated the changelog based off the notes in each Release on git, that should be fine--I believe I spelled out all changes made in them."}}