{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ndaniels/MRFy/issues/18","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ndaniels/MRFy/issues/18/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ndaniels/MRFy/issues/18/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ndaniels/MRFy/issues/18/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ndaniels/MRFy/issues/18","id":84349342,"number":18,"title":"Could Control.Monad.LazyRandom now be replaced with the new MonadRandom package?","user":{"login":"MetaMemoryT","id":4522109,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4522109?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT","html_url":"https://github.com/MetaMemoryT","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MetaMemoryT/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-06-03T04:14:35Z","updated_at":"2015-07-03T03:59:39Z","closed_at":null,"body":"MonadRandom >= 0.4 contains instances for Control.Monad.RWS.Lazy \r\n\r\nWould this instance suffice rather than the custom LazyRandom monad?\r\n\r\nAre their any unique features it has that should be documented in comparison to MonadRandom?\r\n\r\nIs their any performance issues with the RWS transformers?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ndaniels/MRFy/issues/comments/118225356","html_url":"https://github.com/ndaniels/MRFy/issues/18#issuecomment-118225356","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ndaniels/MRFy/issues/18","id":118225356,"user":{"login":"ndaniels","id":797135,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/797135?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels","html_url":"https://github.com/ndaniels","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndaniels/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-03T03:59:39Z","updated_at":"2015-07-03T03:59:39Z","body":"This instance might suffice. I haven't had a chance to look into it. It seems worth investigating.\r\n\r\nFor MRFy specifically, the running time is so heavily dominated by the Viterbi implementation that I don't think we'd notice any performance issues with the RWS transformers."}}