{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hurlbertlab/dietdatabase/issues/10","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hurlbertlab/dietdatabase/issues/10/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hurlbertlab/dietdatabase/issues/10/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hurlbertlab/dietdatabase/issues/10/events","html_url":"https://github.com/hurlbertlab/dietdatabase/issues/10","id":60128243,"number":10,"title":"number of sites \"99+\" in Korpimaki 1987","user":{"login":"ahhurlbert","id":2699790,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2699790?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert","html_url":"https://github.com/ahhurlbert","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ahhurlbert/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-03-06T16:56:38Z","updated_at":"2015-03-06T19:47:58Z","closed_at":"2015-03-06T19:47:58Z","body":"@wlarsen2 \r\nWe'd like all of our quantitative fields including \"Sites\" to only have numbers so they can be sorted and manipulated properly. Putting \"99+\" (as in the Boreal Owl study of Korpimaki 1987) makes this a text value and a computer wouldn't know how to interpret it.\r\n\r\nThis sounds like it might be a case where you put an estimate for number of sites (\"99\" or whatever you decide), and then provide some further information in the \"Notes\" field about how this estimate was obtained, or how you interpreted the description in the paper. Thanks!"}}