{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sybil-Li/Jacobi/issues/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sybil-Li/Jacobi/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sybil-Li/Jacobi/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sybil-Li/Jacobi/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Sybil-Li/Jacobi/issues/1","id":98638267,"number":1,"title":"about the current state of the repo?","user":{"login":"thisiscam","id":7684342,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7684342?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam","html_url":"https://github.com/thisiscam","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thisiscam/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-08-02T21:20:58Z","updated_at":"2015-08-04T02:37:08Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It's not actually an issue but I'm currently trying to implement a \"batched svd\" concept on GPU and I figured that this repo's work might be of use. I was wondering is repo's functionality finished/in progress? Or are there any timing comparisons from CPU counterparts(e.g. lapack)? I'm willing to contribute, since my current direction is to let a block to calculate one n*20 svd and do thousands of these in parallel, and a working version of a single matrix svd would be a start. \r\n\r\nHopefully this project is still active @Sybil-Li ?   "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sybil-Li/Jacobi/issues/comments/127458533","html_url":"https://github.com/Sybil-Li/Jacobi/issues/1#issuecomment-127458533","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Sybil-Li/Jacobi/issues/1","id":127458533,"user":{"login":"Sybil-Li","id":8293371,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8293371?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li","html_url":"https://github.com/Sybil-Li","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Sybil-Li/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-04T02:37:08Z","updated_at":"2015-08-04T02:37:08Z","body":"The jacobi algorithm works better for square matrix, and the parallel version targets very large square matrices like 4096*4096. Also the implementation in this repo only works for symmetric matrices, I suppose you can make it work for n*20 matrices, but I don't think the performance will beat lapack. Someone else is working on the implementation for general matrices, if you would like to see his work I can find out for you if he has a public repo for it.\r\n\r\nHope this helps!"}}