{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/issues/17","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/issues/17/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/issues/17/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/issues/17/events","html_url":"https://github.com/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/issues/17","id":88868909,"number":17,"title":"Compare Raleigh ETJ Boundary with Census Tracts","user":{"login":"adamajm","id":8593748,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8593748?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm","html_url":"https://github.com/adamajm","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/labels/in%20progress","name":"in progress","color":"ededed"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"moor1204","id":7927082,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7927082?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204","html_url":"https://github.com/moor1204","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moor1204/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-06-16T23:50:16Z","updated_at":"2015-06-18T14:31:07Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Find out which census tracts are not fully inside the Raleigh ETJ boundary so we can understand how to benchmark our results against Census estimates"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/issues/comments/113173453","html_url":"https://github.com/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/issues/17#issuecomment-113173453","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CORaleigh/affordable_rental_tracking/issues/17","id":113173453,"user":{"login":"adamajm","id":8593748,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8593748?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm","html_url":"https://github.com/adamajm","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adamajm/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-18T14:31:07Z","updated_at":"2015-06-18T14:31:07Z","body":"I looked at this on arcgis desktop: found some clear cases of census tracts that BARELY overlap with Raleigh jurisdiction, therefore would not be useful to compare our Rental Unit numbers with. They are:\n053009\n052802\n052803\n053003\n\nWe should exclude these census tracts from any comparative analysis (until Raleigh annexes those territories!)."}}