{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx/issues/3542","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx/issues/3542/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx/issues/3542/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx/issues/3542/events","html_url":"https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/3542","id":108956235,"number":3542,"title":"Should sockets performance tests be inner loop?","user":{"login":"ellismg","id":9602953,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9602953?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg","html_url":"https://github.com/ellismg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ellismg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-09-29T20:45:25Z","updated_at":"2015-09-29T20:45:25Z","closed_at":null,"body":"These tests have failed to meet the baseline a few times, but they pass on re-run.\r\n\r\nhttp://dotnet-ci.cloudapp.net/job/dotnet_corefx_windows_debug_prtest/4407/testReport/junit/System.Net.Sockets.Performance.Tests/SocketPerformanceAPMTests/SocketPerformance_SingleSocketClientAsync_LocalHostServerAPM/\r\n\r\nWhen the CI System runs jobs, it can run multiple jobs on the same machine at the same time, could that be causing problems or are there real problems here that we should be investigating?\r\n\r\nIt seems like the long term plan is that we move to @ianhays's [Performance] stuff.  Can we just adopt these changes for that instead of having yet another perf testing thing that also runs inner loop?\r\n\r\n/cc @CIPop @davidsh @pgavlin @bartonjs."}}