{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript/purescript-maps/issues/35","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript/purescript-maps/issues/35/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript/purescript-maps/issues/35/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript/purescript-maps/issues/35/events","html_url":"https://github.com/purescript/purescript-maps/issues/35","id":92399277,"number":35,"title":"StrMap backing object inherits from Object.prototype and lookup uses in","user":{"login":"michaelficarra","id":218840,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/218840?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra","html_url":"https://github.com/michaelficarra","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript/purescript-maps/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"fc2929"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-07-01T14:29:27Z","updated_at":"2015-07-29T05:08:05Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I imagine `lookup` will think that keys like `\"toString\"` and `\"hasOwnProperty\"` exist in the object, even though the functions that rely on `Object.keys` or iteration through for-in won't see these properties because they're non-enumerable. I haven't tested this, but I'm pretty sure I'm right just by looking at the implementation."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript/purescript-maps/issues/comments/125845945","html_url":"https://github.com/purescript/purescript-maps/issues/35#issuecomment-125845945","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript/purescript-maps/issues/35","id":125845945,"user":{"login":"michaelficarra","id":218840,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/218840?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra","html_url":"https://github.com/michaelficarra","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelficarra/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-29T05:08:05Z","updated_at":"2015-07-29T05:08:05Z","body":"@garyb is this fixed now after https://github.com/purescript/purescript-maps/commit/cca72e0a6ca577bf75ccb4641a333032e5120cbe#diff-f398949aafcfd55358d80eec690ee116?"}}