{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/422","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/422/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/422/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/422/events","html_url":"https://github.com/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/422","id":117096292,"number":422,"title":"In data extracted from russian Wikipedia, lots of entries are misrepresented as books","user":{"login":"mitya57","id":1381584,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1381584?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57","html_url":"https://github.com/mitya57","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-11-16T10:46:25Z","updated_at":"2015-11-19T14:11:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"If you look at the generated canonicalized datasets for russian Wikipedia (i.e. [this preview Turtle file](http://downloads.dbpedia.org/preview.php?file=2015-04_sl_core-i18n_sl_ru_sl_instance-types-en-uris_ru.ttl.bz2)), you will see that nearly half of the entries have their `rdf:type` set to `<http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Book>`.\r\n\r\nFor example:\r\n\r\n    <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Baltic_Sea> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Book> .\r\n\r\nExample from [localized dataset](\r\nhttp://downloads.dbpedia.org/preview.php?file=2015-04_sl_core-i18n_sl_ru_sl_instance-types_ru.ttl.bz2):\r\n\r\n    <http://ru.dbpedia.org/resource/Революция_1905—1907_годов_в_России> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Book> .\r\n\r\nThe relevant articles have the correct infoboxes set (i.e. {{Море…}} and {{революция…}} correspondingly). However, the extraction framework seems to ignore that and parse one of the references instead, which is a reference of the book. The properties of the created Book object are equal to references of that property (i.e. ISBN, etc).\r\n\r\nThis bug makes the Russian segment of DBpedia completely useless."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/comments/158068083","html_url":"https://github.com/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/422#issuecomment-158068083","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/422","id":158068083,"user":{"login":"mitya57","id":1381584,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1381584?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57","html_url":"https://github.com/mitya57","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mitya57/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-19T14:11:37Z","updated_at":"2015-11-19T14:11:37Z","body":"Thanks for the links. I now see that lots of infoboxes are not mapped (approximately half of them).\r\n\r\nIt would still be nice if the articles with unsupported infoboxes would be treated as some generic type, not as a book. I.e. the [page you linked](http://mappings.dbpedia.org/server/statistics/ru/) says that \"Book\" is the most popular template which certainly should not be so."}}