{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/930","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/930/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/930/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/930/events","html_url":"https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/930","id":58654405,"number":930,"title":"Remove stability designations in core JS API","user":{"login":"mikeal","id":579,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/579?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal","html_url":"https://github.com/mikeal","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mikeal/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-02-23T21:47:40Z","updated_at":"2015-02-23T22:01:25Z","closed_at":null,"body":"For several years we've been marking the core API with a sliding scale of \"stability.\"\r\n\r\nIt seemed like a good idea at the time but is at best, a poorly messaged note about how much work is happening on an API, and at worst an outright lie.\r\n\r\nEven if a module has the lowest level of stability attached we may, and actually have been, guaranteeing backwards compatibility if enough of the ecosystem depends on it.\r\n\r\nStreams is laughably marked \"Unstable\" at the moment. While it is true that streams have been changing a huge amount of effort in each change has gone in to guaranteeing backwards compatibility. That kind of compatibility is not what anyone would expect from an API being messaged as \"Unstable.\""},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/comments/75646320","html_url":"https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/930#issuecomment-75646320","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/iojs/io.js/issues/930","id":75646320,"user":{"login":"Fishrock123","id":1093990,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1093990?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123","html_url":"https://github.com/Fishrock123","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fishrock123/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-23T22:01:25Z","updated_at":"2015-02-23T22:01:25Z","body":"I do think that if we remove them, we need to insert a temporary message on why. It'd probably save us some issues hassle. :)"}}