{"push_id":793634547,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/maint/master/fix-signing","head":"7ce6ebeeaae71818f72a827f417765561941160b","before":"f77c970d14ac13b13f43553da45481275a0414dd","commits":[{"sha":"7ce6ebeeaae71818f72a827f417765561941160b","author":{"email":"de4ab6e26db462b930510ba83e9f80b7db2bef88@puppetlabs.com","name":"Melissa Stone"},"message":"(maint) Swap logic around which architecture to sign\n\nWe had this problem where, if a package was noarch, we assumed we were\nbuilding it for both i386 and x86_64 architectures. However, there are\nsome platforms that we only build one architecture for. In the case of\nthese platforms that we built 64-bit packages for, we're not actually\nsigning them. So, that's a problem. This commit flips the logic of the\nproblem. I've decided 64-bit packages are more important than 32-bit\npackages.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/melissa/packaging/commits/7ce6ebeeaae71818f72a827f417765561941160b"}]}