{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/89","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/89/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/89/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/89/events","html_url":"https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/89","id":100997409,"number":89,"title":"Quality of the Open Code of Conduct seems a bit iffy.","user":{"login":"Ainok","id":13796874,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13796874?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok","html_url":"https://github.com/Ainok","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ainok/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-08-14T12:01:29Z","updated_at":"2015-08-17T11:06:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I'm not entirely sure what's going on, or why lots of large companies are still using this. But there seems to be a lot of random nonsense in the latest open code of conduct.\r\n\r\nStuff that's bolded is made up of words that exist in no modern dictionary; italicised words don't seem to make any sort of sense.\r\n\r\n>Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over *privileged people*’s comfort. We will not act on complaints regarding:\r\n\r\n>**‘Reverse’ -isms**, including ‘**reverse racism,**’ **‘reverse sexism,’** and **‘cisphobia’**\r\n>Refusal to explain or debate social justice concepts\r\n>Criticizing racist, sexist, **cissexist**, or otherwise *oppressive behavior* or assumptions\r\n\r\n>Deliberate **misgendering**. This includes **deadnaming** or persistently using a pronoun that does not correctly reflect a person's *gender identity*. You must address people by the name they give you when not addressing them by their username or handle\r\n\r\nWhen I say, \"don't seem to make any sort of sense\", I mean, what on earth is classified as a \"privileged person\" or \"oppressive behaviour\"?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/comments/131782374","html_url":"https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/89#issuecomment-131782374","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/issues/89","id":131782374,"user":{"login":"davblayn","id":13794694,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13794694?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn","html_url":"https://github.com/davblayn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davblayn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-17T11:06:37Z","updated_at":"2015-08-17T11:06:37Z","body":"Here's two key commits I take issue with. f05fd4eea62fc1f7fde00f42b76d4dea97d07642, where they've gleefully added the condescending XKCD comic that people wave around as if it's a shield for criticism, and, of course, b00eff579ded8c76cee0d2cb6b5beed6e84258fb, where a **GitHub employee** decided to add the lovely remark about \"reverse-isms\" not existing.\r\n\r\nI sickened that companies are actually adopting this."}}