{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110/events","html_url":"https://github.com/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110","id":30821719,"number":110,"title":"Reconciling with `package.jsonld`","user":{"login":"jbenet","id":138401,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/138401?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet","html_url":"https://github.com/jbenet","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/labels/spec-datapackage","name":"spec-datapackage","color":"009800"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":53,"created_at":"2014-04-03T23:02:30Z","updated_at":"2015-05-01T13:10:04Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hey guys!\r\n\r\nI'm the author of [datadex](http://datadex.io), and now working with @maxogden on [dat](http://dat-data.com). As a package manager for datasets, datadex uses a package file to describe its datasets. Choosing between `data-package.json` and `package.jsonld` is hard:\r\n\r\n- On the one hand, [`data-package.json`](http://dataprotocols.org/data-packages/) has been around longer, has a well defined spec, and many packages use it.\r\n\r\n- On the other, [`package.jsonld`](http://standardanalytics.io/package/) takes into account [jsonld](http://json-ld.org/) (which came out recently), and plugs into [schema.org](http://schema.org)'s schemas, for linked-data goodness. And at first glance, it seems [most of what's in `data-package.json` is in `package.jsonld`](http://standardanalytics.io/package/getting-started). \r\n\r\nIt's confusing for adopters to have two different specs. I think we should reconcile these two standards and push forward with one. Thoughts? What work would it entail?\r\n\r\n\r\nTo ease transition costs, I'm happy to take on the convergence work if others are too busy. Also, I can write a tool to convert between current `data-package.json` and `package.jsonld` and whatever else.\r\n\r\nCheers!\r\n\r\ncc @rgrp, @maxogden, @sballesteros\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/comments/98129679","html_url":"https://github.com/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110#issuecomment-98129679","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/110","id":98129679,"user":{"login":"hubgit","id":14294,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/14294?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit","html_url":"https://github.com/hubgit","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hubgit/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-01T13:10:04Z","updated_at":"2015-05-01T13:10:04Z","body":"I'll have a look, yes. I'm not sure what the best URL for each property would be, though: maybe something like `http://dataprotocols.org/data-packages/#name`?\r\n\r\n---\r\n\r\nAll that needs to be added to `datapackage.json` is this:\r\n\r\n`\"@context\": \"url of the context.json file\"`"}}