{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/express-pouchdb/issues/203","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/express-pouchdb/issues/203/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/express-pouchdb/issues/203/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/express-pouchdb/issues/203/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pouchdb/express-pouchdb/issues/203","id":70978324,"number":203,"title":"express-pouchdb started failing pouchdb tests today","user":{"login":"nolanlawson","id":283842,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/283842?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson","html_url":"https://github.com/nolanlawson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nolanlawson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-04-25T22:58:13Z","updated_at":"2015-04-26T14:11:15Z","closed_at":"2015-04-26T14:11:15Z","body":"Looks like the pouchdb-server tests are consistently failing in Travis as of today (see https://github.com/pouchdb/pouchdb/pull/3749#issuecomment-96277434). I'm guessing it's because of the `pouchdb-security` update @marten-de-vries? Else I'm not sure.\r\n\r\nThe error we're seeing is:\r\n\r\n```\r\n  1) test.design_docs.js-http \"before each\" hook:\r\n     Uncaught Error: ETIMEDOUT\r\n      at onError (/home/travis/build/pouchdb/pouchdb/lib/deps/ajax.js:66:18)\r\n      at Request._callback (/home/travis/build/pouchdb/pouchdb/lib/deps/ajax.js:108:14)\r\n      at self.callback (/home/travis/build/pouchdb/pouchdb/node_modules/request/request.js:123:22)\r\n      at Request.emit (events.js:95:17)\r\n      at null._onTimeout (/home/travis/build/pouchdb/pouchdb/node_modules/request/request.js:590:12)\r\n      at Timer.listOnTimeout [as ontimeout] (timers.js:112:15)\r\n```"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/express-pouchdb/issues/comments/96387964","html_url":"https://github.com/pouchdb/express-pouchdb/issues/203#issuecomment-96387964","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/express-pouchdb/issues/203","id":96387964,"user":{"login":"marten-de-vries","id":1750170,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1750170?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries","html_url":"https://github.com/marten-de-vries","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marten-de-vries/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-26T14:11:15Z","updated_at":"2015-04-26T14:11:15Z","body":"https://travis-ci.org/pouchdb/pouchdb/jobs/60034164 just passed, which is confirmation from Travis that reverting the .destroy() hack in ``pouchdb-wrappers`` indeed is a workaround."}}