{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rsyslog/liblognorm/issues/103","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rsyslog/liblognorm/issues/103/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rsyslog/liblognorm/issues/103/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rsyslog/liblognorm/issues/103/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rsyslog/liblognorm/issues/103","id":96590567,"number":103,"title":"v2: think about compatibility of v1 complex parsers","user":{"login":"rgerhards","id":1482123,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1482123?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards","html_url":"https://github.com/rgerhards","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rsyslog/liblognorm/milestones/1","html_url":"https://github.com/rsyslog/liblognorm/milestones/v2%20initial","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rsyslog/liblognorm/milestones/1/labels","id":1217733,"number":1,"title":"v2 initial","description":"Initial v2 version. Must include the new algo, but not necessarily full features. Intent is to provide something that helps gather feedback.","creator":{"login":"rgerhards","id":1482123,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1482123?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards","html_url":"https://github.com/rgerhards","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgerhards/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":5,"closed_issues":11,"state":"open","created_at":"2015-07-21T09:25:43Z","updated_at":"2015-07-29T13:23:12Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":19,"created_at":"2015-07-22T15:08:36Z","updated_at":"2015-07-29T13:23:13Z","closed_at":"2015-07-29T13:23:12Z","body":"We need to think if we can emulate them; if not, we need at least document them as no longer present plus a way how to convert the rulebase.\r\n\r\nIdea is that we eventually can convert them on the fly into a json prscnf object, but that may not be worth the hassle.\r\n\r\nThis is to be done late in the v2 cycle, when everything else has stabilized."}}