{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/998","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/998/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/998/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/998/events","html_url":"https://github.com/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/998","id":95856926,"number":998,"title":"Proposal: Permanently disable rule SA1109","user":{"login":"sharwell","id":1408396,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1408396?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell","html_url":"https://github.com/sharwell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sharwell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/labels/needs%20discussion","name":"needs discussion","color":"f7c6c7"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/labels/proposal","name":"proposal","color":"207de5"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-07-18T20:25:16Z","updated_at":"2015-07-18T20:25:16Z","closed_at":null,"body":"All violations of rule SA1109 (BlockStatementsMustNotContainEmbeddedRegions) are also violations of rule SA1123 (DoNotPlaceRegionsWithinElements). I propose disabling SA1109 the same way we disabled SA1126 (in #997) for the following reasons:\r\n\r\n1. Rule SA1109 is a subset of another rule; disabling the rule still leaves users with a warning *and* a code fix for less computational work.\r\n2. Violations of SA1109 are rare; special-casing this rule is unlikely to ever provide significant benefits to users."}}