{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/131","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/131/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/131/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/131/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/131","id":54204604,"number":131,"title":"Feature Request: Omit URL export when DOI present.","user":{"login":"bnlawrence","id":1792815,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1792815?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence","html_url":"https://github.com/bnlawrence","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bnlawrence/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-01-13T15:12:56Z","updated_at":"2015-01-15T12:54:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I see I can omit keywords in export, but it'd be really desirable to have (at least) one conditional.\r\n\r\nThere is no way I can ever see the use of having a URL in the export, if there is a DOI, indeed, there isn't much point having an \"accessed\" in the latter case either.\r\n\r\nIt'd be really nice to have the option to avoid (url,accessed) if doi was present ... \r\n\r\nThis can be done vaguely elegantly in biblatex, but is a complete hassle in bibtex, but I think in both cases it's a post-fact-hack :-)\r\n\r\nCheers\r\nBryan"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/comments/70081494","html_url":"https://github.com/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/131#issuecomment-70081494","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/131","id":70081494,"user":{"login":"AllThatIsTheCase","id":132108,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/132108?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase","html_url":"https://github.com/AllThatIsTheCase","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AllThatIsTheCase/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-15T12:54:37Z","updated_at":"2015-01-15T12:54:37Z","body":"Cool, can you also get me the \"TestCase\" variety? \"Zotero TestCase\" is one of the export options, alongside \"Better BibLaTeX\""}}