{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joselito198030/google-opt-out-plugin/issues/53","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joselito198030/google-opt-out-plugin/issues/53/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joselito198030/google-opt-out-plugin/issues/53/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joselito198030/google-opt-out-plugin/issues/53/events","html_url":"https://github.com/joselito198030/google-opt-out-plugin/issues/53","id":106477906,"number":53,"title":"Let sign the Addon to fulfil Mozilla extension signing needs","user":{"login":"GoogleCodeExporter","id":9614759,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9614759?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter","html_url":"https://github.com/GoogleCodeExporter","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GoogleCodeExporter/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-09-15T04:50:16Z","updated_at":"2015-09-15T18:39:15Z","closed_at":"2015-09-15T18:39:15Z","body":"```\nRequirement that Firefox add-ons (AMO and Non-AMO) be signed with \nmozilla-issued certificates to help get a handle on the proliferation of \nmalicious and harmful add-ons, since Mozilla Firefox won't accept unsigned \nadd-ons in future releases beginning with Firefox 41.\n\n\nWhat version of the product are you using? On what operating system?\n\nMozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 \nFirefox/39.0\n\ngoogle-opt-out-plugin 1.5\n\n\nPlease provide any additional information below.\n\nhttps://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing\nhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=signed-addons\nhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1KhpDteoHFmVRkzlrT8v0N3F-KrPxLoZFM3mWmEmOses/\nedit?pli=1\n\nhttps://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/02/10/extension-signing-safer-experience/\nhttps://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/05/27/update-signing-new-developer-agreemen\nt/\n\n\n* How do I get my add-ons signed if they are hosted on AMO?\nNo action is required. We will automatically sign the latest reviewed versions \nof all add-ons currently hosted on AMO. You'll receive an email notification \nwhen this has been completed, and users will see that the add-on was updated. \nAfter the signature system goes live, all new versions will be signed \nautomatically after they pass review.\n\n* How do I get my add-ons signed if they are not hosted on AMO?\nYou will need to create an AMO account and submit your add-on. There will be an \noption where you indicate the add-on isn't hosted on AMO, and you'll be able to \nsubmit your add-on files without having them published on the site.\n\n* How does the signing process work?\nFiles submitted for signing will go through an automated review process. If \nthey pass this review, they are automatically signed and sent back to the \ndeveloper. This process should normally take seconds. If the file doesn't pass \nreview, the developer will have the option to request a manual review, which \nshould take less than two days. This is not the same process that currently \napplies to AMO add-ons, which has been typically slower.\n\n\n\nAddendum:\n\nSame needs and procedure to be done for your\nGoogle Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on  \nhttps://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout?hl=en\nhttps://support.google.com/analytics/answer/181881?hl=en\n```\n\nOriginal issue reported on code.google.com by `sie...@gmail.com` on 29 May 2015 at 10:17"}}