{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenSCAP/scap-workbench/issues/40","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenSCAP/scap-workbench/issues/40/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenSCAP/scap-workbench/issues/40/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenSCAP/scap-workbench/issues/40/events","html_url":"https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-workbench/issues/40","id":103054581,"number":40,"title":"[RFE] Hide 'default' profile if it does not contain some selected rules","user":{"login":"iankko","id":8414918,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8414918?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko","html_url":"https://github.com/iankko","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/iankko/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-08-25T15:48:28Z","updated_at":"2015-08-25T15:48:28Z","closed_at":null,"body":"```scap-workbench``` currently provides listing of profiles present in the benchmark, that can be selected to be used to scan the system in question. The ```default``` profile is exceptional in this context. Exceptional in the sense, it's not present in every benchmark, and it's required by the SCAP standard to be provided \"artificially\" by the scanner. The motivation behind this requirement being that ```default``` profile it's intended to contain all rules (if no more specific XCCDF profile is selected).\r\n\r\nThough in the context of SCAP Security Guide project the ```default``` profile is not used (the ```default``` profiles contains no rules selected). Therefore for SCAP Security Guide purpose the ```default``` profile is of very limited use (one use case coming to mind is to select ```default``` profile to have empty benchmark, then use tailoring to select just couple of rules to be scanned).\r\n\r\nTherefore this RFE is to request the ```default``` profile to be shown in the listing of available ```scap-workbench``` profiles only in the case the ```default``` profile provided from the content truly contains some of the rules being selected (e.g. it would not be displayed if it does not contain some selected rules).\r\n\r\nThank you, Jan."}}