{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bluemont/kria/issues/8","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bluemont/kria/issues/8/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bluemont/kria/issues/8/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bluemont/kria/issues/8/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bluemont/kria/issues/8","id":89069720,"number":8,"title":"No Backpressure?","user":{"login":"halgari","id":654621,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/654621?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari","html_url":"https://github.com/halgari","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/halgari/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-06-17T16:54:10Z","updated_at":"2015-06-18T18:02:55Z","closed_at":null,"body":"There doesn't seem to be a way in the API to support back pressure. From my readings of the docs Kria may call a callback many times, is there a way to limit it to stop returning results if I can't process them fast enough? "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bluemont/kria/issues/comments/113241343","html_url":"https://github.com/bluemont/kria/issues/8#issuecomment-113241343","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bluemont/kria/issues/8","id":113241343,"user":{"login":"xpe","id":4576329,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4576329?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe","html_url":"https://github.com/xpe","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xpe/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-18T18:02:55Z","updated_at":"2015-06-18T18:02:55Z","body":"Thanks for the question and digging in!\r\n\r\n> Or perhaps the call to (.read ) could be put in a callback and handed to the user's callback. That way they can determine when to continue reading more data.\r\n\r\nI like this suggestion.\r\n\r\nWould anyone else like to weigh in?\r\n\r\n"}}