{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moll/js-must/issues/17","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moll/js-must/issues/17/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moll/js-must/issues/17/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moll/js-must/issues/17/events","html_url":"https://github.com/moll/js-must/pull/17","id":37370506,"number":17,"title":"Provide a non-strict property check","user":{"login":"smlgbl","id":2204677,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2204677?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl","html_url":"https://github.com/smlgbl","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/smlgbl/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2014-07-08T13:39:54Z","updated_at":"2015-09-22T14:05:59Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moll/js-must/pulls/17","html_url":"https://github.com/moll/js-must/pull/17","diff_url":"https://github.com/moll/js-must/pull/17.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/moll/js-must/pull/17.patch"},"body":"Sometimes I want to compare properties in a non-strict way, but would like to keep the notation.\r\nBesides, I'd like to see the actual value of the property right away, hence the change in output for an AssertionError."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moll/js-must/issues/comments/142298869","html_url":"https://github.com/moll/js-must/pull/17#issuecomment-142298869","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moll/js-must/issues/17","id":142298869,"user":{"login":"moll","id":156837,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/156837?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll","html_url":"https://github.com/moll","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-22T14:05:59Z","updated_at":"2015-09-22T14:05:59Z","body":"Hey, Samuel! Thanks for the PR! I think I set my time machine in the wrong direction and missed one year. :D Seems this is a related to https://github.com/moll/js-must/issues/21. One idea I've had was to shorten the names of strict functions to have them use the `eql` logic internally. `property` would be `prop`, `include` as `incl` et. al. On the negative side, you can't really tell how `property` and `prop` differ by their name. Boolean flags happen to have the same problem.\r\n\r\nWhat's your stance these days?"}}