{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rust-lang/rust/issues/26441","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rust-lang/rust/issues/26441/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rust-lang/rust/issues/26441/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rust-lang/rust/issues/26441/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/26441","id":89661464,"number":26441,"title":"Book: Extraneous sentence in Enums section","user":{"login":"tanderberg","id":1557571,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1557571?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg","html_url":"https://github.com/tanderberg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tanderberg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-06-19T21:08:01Z","updated_at":"2015-06-19T21:10:57Z","closed_at":"2015-06-19T21:10:57Z","body":"In https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/enums.html there is a sentence, \"Both variants are named Digit, but since they’re scoped to the enum name there's no ambiguity.\", which I guess refers to an old, deleted code example. At least, I can't make any sense of it in the current context. :/\r\n\r\nEdit: Closing this as I now see it's fixed in nightly."}}