{"push_id":881931457,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/2.1","head":"5f8cfed05c1ffc968db438adbe29c31274e833cb","before":"0ffd6b4e63e99d997ee8acb0b851c0efc0dbb72f","commits":[{"sha":"3c10c7f0f5806f5cedd8dd60b15d33f7034638aa","author":{"email":"cd30b83b3787c52251dabc7000a4f9dfbe1c5f24@gmail.com","name":"Nik Everett"},"message":"[test] Fix SnapshotBackwardsCompatibilityIT\n\nSnapshotBackwardsCompatibilityIT had drifted from its twin methods in\nSharedClusterSnapshotRestoreIT. This creates SnapshotSharedTestCases which\nmakes the similar methods in both test cases use the same code, modulo the\ncluster upgrade.\n\nRelated to #13522","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/elasticsearch/commits/3c10c7f0f5806f5cedd8dd60b15d33f7034638aa"},{"sha":"5f8cfed05c1ffc968db438adbe29c31274e833cb","author":{"email":"01a4fb2f8db550bcc5e5337b8117efa603a23f75@elasticsearch.com","name":"Britta Weber"},"message":"fix SnapshotBackwardsCompatibilityIT.testSnapshotMoreThanOnce - test neeeds to run with 0 replicas\n\nThe test creates one shard and a random number of replicas and then checks that if we\nsnapshot the same shard twice and nothing changed in between we re-use the files we\nsnapshotted the first time when we snapshot the second time. This will only\nwork if the primary is the same between first and second snapshot. We cannot guarantee that\nif primary changes inbetween for example because the node that holds the primary during the\nfirst snapshot is upgraded and a replica is promoted to primary.\nTherfore in the bwc test the number of replicas must be 0.\n\nOriginally the bwc test had 0 replicas configured but this detail got lost in c0702dff.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/elasticsearch/commits/5f8cfed05c1ffc968db438adbe29c31274e833cb"}]}