{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10394","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10394/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10394/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10394/events","html_url":"https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10394","id":59712802,"number":10394,"title":"llvmcall test failure with LLVM 3.6.0 on Win64","user":{"login":"tkelman","id":5934628,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5934628?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman","html_url":"https://github.com/tkelman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tkelman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/labels/windows","name":"windows","color":"0b02e1"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":34,"created_at":"2015-03-03T21:58:50Z","updated_at":"2015-04-04T16:03:10Z","closed_at":null,"body":"See https://gist.github.com/tkelman/adddb1018adabbb6711b\r\n\r\nMostly lapack / ccall seems broken. The core failure in `jl_method_table_assoc_exact` is also worrying. Dict and hashing just die with no error.\r\n\r\nOn win32 things are reasonable if you run the tests one at a time (hits #10377 but otherwise ok), though trying to run all of the tests in the same process results in this:\r\n```\r\n    JULIA test/all\r\n     * linalg1              in 109.44 seconds\r\n     * linalg2              in 120.57 seconds\r\n     * linalg3              in  34.47 seconds\r\n     * linalg4              in  57.44 seconds\r\n     * linalg/lapack        in   7.78 seconds\r\n     * linalg/triangular    in 1033.00 seconds\r\n     * linalg/tridiag       in  23.88 seconds\r\n     * linalg/pinv          in  27.93 seconds\r\n     * linalg/givens        in  19.15 seconds\r\n     * linalg/cholesky      in  59.27 seconds\r\n     * linalg/lu            in   0.94 seconds\r\n     * linalg/arnoldi       in  19.38 seconds\r\n     * core                 in 248.43 seconds\r\n     * keywordargs          in  38.54 seconds\r\n     * numbers              in 992.47 seconds\r\n     * strings              in 401.38 seconds\r\n     * dates                in 1106.73 seconds\r\n     * dict                 in 155.75 seconds\r\n     * hashing\r\nThis application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.\r\nPlease contact the application's support team for more information.\r\nterminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'\r\n  what():  std::bad_alloc\r\nMakefile:9: recipe for target 'all' failed\r\nmake[1]: *** [all] Error 3\r\nMakefile:496: recipe for target 'testall1' failed\r\nmake: *** [testall1] Error 2\r\n```"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/comments/89604868","html_url":"https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10394#issuecomment-89604868","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10394","id":89604868,"user":{"login":"vtjnash","id":330950,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/330950?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash","html_url":"https://github.com/vtjnash","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vtjnash/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-04T16:03:10Z","updated_at":"2015-04-04T16:03:10Z","body":"it's perhaps possible that I broke llvmcall when fixing the calling conventions. since it is undocumented and under-tested, it was hard to know."}}