{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ompl/ompl/issues/61","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ompl/ompl/issues/61/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ompl/ompl/issues/61/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ompl/ompl/issues/61/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ompl/ompl/pull/61","id":112239187,"number":61,"title":"Fix for 2dcircles_optimize","user":{"login":"gammell","id":5250910,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5250910?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell","html_url":"https://github.com/gammell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-10-19T21:42:32Z","updated_at":"2015-10-23T11:58:51Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ompl/ompl/pulls/61","html_url":"https://github.com/ompl/ompl/pull/61","diff_url":"https://github.com/ompl/ompl/pull/61.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ompl/ompl/pull/61.patch"},"body":"I was able to replicate the errors in 2dcircles_optimize **with** the old margin in the comparison. They appear to occur because, sometimes, the planner simply doesn't find a better solution than the initial one.\r\n\r\nThis code relaxes tests enough that it will pass in the situations. Whether that is too much of a relaxation is an open question.\r\n\r\nWill rebase once it's ready to go."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ompl/ompl/issues/comments/150553033","html_url":"https://github.com/ompl/ompl/pull/61#issuecomment-150553033","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ompl/ompl/issues/61","id":150553033,"user":{"login":"gammell","id":5250910,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5250910?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell","html_url":"https://github.com/gammell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gammell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-23T11:58:51Z","updated_at":"2015-10-23T11:58:51Z","body":"Out of curiosity I ran the test through valgrind on the other PR, and the CFOREST errors appear to be gone. I don't like unexplained bug fixes, but maybe it has something to do with fixing the current inadmissible pruning scheme?... I dunno."}}