{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/luxas/kubernetes-on-arm/issues/2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/luxas/kubernetes-on-arm/issues/2/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/luxas/kubernetes-on-arm/issues/2/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/luxas/kubernetes-on-arm/issues/2/events","html_url":"https://github.com/luxas/kubernetes-on-arm/issues/2","id":110527509,"number":2,"title":"Mix of Rpi1/Rpi2+CubieTruck (or armv6 vs armv7)","user":{"login":"nsteinmetz","id":33180,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33180?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz","html_url":"https://github.com/nsteinmetz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":41,"created_at":"2015-10-08T19:45:10Z","updated_at":"2015-12-01T13:59:00Z","closed_at":"2015-12-01T12:25:50Z","body":"Hi,\r\n\r\nDid you try a mix of Rpi1 (armv6) and Rpi2/Cubietruck (armv7) on a kubernetes cluster ? I was thinking of using RPi1 as master and RPI2 as worker nodes so that only armv7 images are run on the Rpi2/CubieTruck.\r\n\r\nOr should we have only armv7 k8s cluster on one side and armv6 k8s cluster on the other side ?\r\n\r\nI should test your project soon. Do you think it could be compatible with CubieTruck boards top ? "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/luxas/kubernetes-on-arm/issues/comments/160977188","html_url":"https://github.com/luxas/kubernetes-on-arm/issues/2#issuecomment-160977188","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/luxas/kubernetes-on-arm/issues/2","id":160977188,"user":{"login":"nsteinmetz","id":33180,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33180?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz","html_url":"https://github.com/nsteinmetz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsteinmetz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-01T13:59:00Z","updated_at":"2015-12-01T13:59:00Z","body":"Exactly, it's maybe within uboot-cubietruck package itself and ouf of pacman control as flashing boot record is a sensible task ? That's why I say it's not a big issue to keep this [Y|n] step."}}