{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eed3si9n/scalaxb/issues/310","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eed3si9n/scalaxb/issues/310/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eed3si9n/scalaxb/issues/310/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eed3si9n/scalaxb/issues/310/events","html_url":"https://github.com/eed3si9n/scalaxb/pull/310","id":57800951,"number":310,"title":"Ability to ignore unknown elements in response","user":{"login":"jet-black","id":6629797,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6629797?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black","html_url":"https://github.com/jet-black","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jet-black/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-02-16T12:54:04Z","updated_at":"2015-03-27T13:43:53Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eed3si9n/scalaxb/pulls/310","html_url":"https://github.com/eed3si9n/scalaxb/pull/310","diff_url":"https://github.com/eed3si9n/scalaxb/pull/310.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/eed3si9n/scalaxb/pull/310.patch"},"body":"Our team wants scalaxb to be able to ignore unknown xml elements inside response, as well as ignoring order in which they are arrived. It is against XSD specification, but it is very useful when another server changes it's schema without notifying clients. Please, review this request."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eed3si9n/scalaxb/issues/comments/86943822","html_url":"https://github.com/eed3si9n/scalaxb/pull/310#issuecomment-86943822","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eed3si9n/scalaxb/issues/310","id":86943822,"user":{"login":"eed3si9n","id":184683,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/184683?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n","html_url":"https://github.com/eed3si9n","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eed3si9n/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-27T13:43:53Z","updated_at":"2015-03-27T13:43:53Z","body":"I can no longer see whatever I commented, but thanks for the update.\r\nI am guessing one of them is that it fixes #291/#298, which should be noted in the release note.\r\n"}}