{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client/issues/47","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client/issues/47/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client/issues/47/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client/issues/47/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client/issues/47","id":62169860,"number":47,"title":"Make IQueueingBasicConsumer and ISubscription public","user":{"login":"abellix","id":991739,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/991739?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix","html_url":"https://github.com/abellix","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-03-16T18:28:39Z","updated_at":"2015-03-16T18:37:04Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I am trying to have some cases covered by tests, some of the interfaces I need to mock are made internal in the solution (e.g. I would like to mock IQueueingBasicConsumer). \r\nIs there any reason for interfaces like IQueueingBasicConsumer, ISubscription not being exposed?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client/issues/comments/81859116","html_url":"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client/issues/47#issuecomment-81859116","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client/issues/47","id":81859116,"user":{"login":"abellix","id":991739,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/991739?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix","html_url":"https://github.com/abellix","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abellix/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-16T18:37:04Z","updated_at":"2015-03-16T18:37:04Z","body":"those two would be enough for the moment "}}