{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nltk/nltk/issues/1114","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nltk/nltk/issues/1114/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nltk/nltk/issues/1114/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nltk/nltk/issues/1114/events","html_url":"https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/1114","id":105111471,"number":1114,"title":"Stanford dependency parser","user":{"login":"rmalouf","id":657077,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/657077?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf","html_url":"https://github.com/rmalouf","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rmalouf/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-09-06T19:06:07Z","updated_at":"2015-09-07T18:43:19Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nltk/nltk/pulls/1114","html_url":"https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/1114","diff_url":"https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/1114.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/1114.patch"},"body":"Modify interface to the Stanford Parser to return either constituency trees or typed\r\ndependency graphs."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nltk/nltk/issues/comments/138354812","html_url":"https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/1114#issuecomment-138354812","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nltk/nltk/issues/1114","id":138354812,"user":{"login":"stevenbird","id":55406,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/55406?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird","html_url":"https://github.com/stevenbird","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/stevenbird/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-07T18:43:19Z","updated_at":"2015-09-07T18:43:19Z","body":"@rmalouf – this might be the first instance of a parser which can return phrase-structure trees or dependency trees, which means I'd like to be sure that ad hoc polymorphism is the best way to go (instead of, say, providing `parse` and `depparse` methods or some such solution). Do you want to argue for the polymorphism approach? @heatherleaf do you have an opinion, in light of your earlier input to the parser API in #620?"}}