{"action":"reopened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/azavea/nyc-trees/issues/435","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/azavea/nyc-trees/issues/435/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/azavea/nyc-trees/issues/435/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/azavea/nyc-trees/issues/435/events","html_url":"https://github.com/azavea/nyc-trees/issues/435","id":56424806,"number":435,"title":"When showing territory on group detail page, should we show mapped/unmapped blockfaces in different colors?","user":{"login":"RickMohr","id":2162993,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2162993?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr","html_url":"https://github.com/RickMohr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RickMohr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/azavea/nyc-trees/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-02-03T19:32:09Z","updated_at":"2015-05-07T20:18:22Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Benefit: see at a glance how the group is doing (rather than having to go find it on the progress page)\r\nDrawback: it has to either be dead obvious what color means \"mapped\" and what color means \"unmapped\" (e.g. red/green) or else we need a legend on that little map."}}