{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gavruk/angular-card/issues/7","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gavruk/angular-card/issues/7/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gavruk/angular-card/issues/7/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gavruk/angular-card/issues/7/events","html_url":"https://github.com/gavruk/angular-card/issues/7","id":109491946,"number":7,"title":"Remove requirement on form element","user":{"login":"cybercyst","id":2261255,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2261255?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst","html_url":"https://github.com/cybercyst","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cybercyst/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-10-02T13:35:54Z","updated_at":"2015-10-03T08:02:41Z","closed_at":"2015-10-03T08:02:41Z","body":"In a project I'm working on, I'm using a multi-part form, with nested ng-forms to validate each step. When trying to integrate angular-card, I get an error, since angular-card uses `document.querySelectorAll('form[name=\"cardForm\"]');`  specifying a form element.  Could this be changed to `document.querySelectorAll('[name=\"cardForm\"]');` or possibly `document.querySelectorAll('form[name=\"cardForm\"],ng-form[name=\"cardForm\"');`\r\nI'm not sure if you'd have an even better suggestion, making this directive even more robust?"}}