{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webjars/webjars/issues/1127","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webjars/webjars/issues/1127/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webjars/webjars/issues/1127/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webjars/webjars/issues/1127/events","html_url":"https://github.com/webjars/webjars/issues/1127","id":94591190,"number":1127,"title":"npm packages: SPDX expressions as license","user":{"login":"cornerman","id":1043127,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1043127?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman","html_url":"https://github.com/cornerman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cornerman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-07-12T19:01:03Z","updated_at":"2015-07-13T01:40:10Z","closed_at":null,"body":"According to the [npm-docs](https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#license), multiple licenses should be written as SPDX expressions, but when I try to deploy, e.g., jshint (v2.8.0) with license ```(MIT AND JSON)```, bintray complains about an invalid license."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webjars/webjars/issues/comments/120781612","html_url":"https://github.com/webjars/webjars/issues/1127#issuecomment-120781612","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/webjars/webjars/issues/1127","id":120781612,"user":{"login":"jamesward","id":65043,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/65043?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward","html_url":"https://github.com/jamesward","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesward/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-13T01:40:10Z","updated_at":"2015-07-13T01:40:10Z","body":"That makes sense.  I've seen an `AND` used when different parts of a distribution are licensed differently.   But a simple `AND` expression doesn't seem like a good way to express that case since it doesn't clarify which parts are licensed which way.  And I can't really think of a good reason why a whole distribution would be licensed under a conjoined license.  So maybe we should ask the upstream project for clarification around what they mean by their `(MIT AND JSON)` license choice."}}