{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hibernate/hibernate-validator/issues/452","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hibernate/hibernate-validator/issues/452/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hibernate/hibernate-validator/issues/452/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hibernate/hibernate-validator/issues/452/events","html_url":"https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator/pull/452","id":123096988,"number":452,"title":"HV-1039: make karaf feature work with karaf 4.0.x.","user":{"login":"benson-basis","id":3358159,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3358159?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis","html_url":"https://github.com/benson-basis","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/benson-basis/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":15,"created_at":"2015-12-19T16:47:24Z","updated_at":"2015-12-22T10:39:57Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hibernate/hibernate-validator/pulls/452","html_url":"https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator/pull/452","diff_url":"https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator/pull/452.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator/pull/452.patch"},"body":"* update jboss logging\r\n* move paranamer wrap to its own feature\r\n* move to current pax-exam"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hibernate/hibernate-validator/issues/comments/166578201","html_url":"https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator/pull/452#issuecomment-166578201","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hibernate/hibernate-validator/issues/452","id":166578201,"user":{"login":"gunnarmorling","id":28612,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/28612?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling","html_url":"https://github.com/gunnarmorling","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gunnarmorling/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-22T10:39:57Z","updated_at":"2015-12-22T10:39:57Z","body":"> Gentlemen, I've remove the code in the Configuration department, leaving only the API changes in the ResourceBundleMessageInterpolator.\r\n\r\nCool; Could you clean up the testing part a bit? Specifically, I don't think we need a new test class, just amending the existing one should be fine. Also could you squash all commits into a single one, that makes for a cleaner history (I can do that, too, before merging if you prefer that).\r\n\r\n> Is there any live committee on the API we could harass about {{ExpressionFactory}} that you know of?\r\n\r\nIt may be worth reaching out to the EL expert group (see [JSR 341](https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=341)). I don't know whether there are plans for a new revision, but if so, allowing to pass in a classloader for finding the implementation would be a good addition."}}