{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ClusterHQ/flocker/issues/1974","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ClusterHQ/flocker/issues/1974/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ClusterHQ/flocker/issues/1974/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ClusterHQ/flocker/issues/1974/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ClusterHQ/flocker/issues/1974","id":108071395,"number":1974,"title":"VMs","user":{"login":"davedoesdev","id":2329683,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2329683?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev","html_url":"https://github.com/davedoesdev","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":13,"created_at":"2015-09-24T06:59:49Z","updated_at":"2015-09-28T08:25:04Z","closed_at":"2015-09-25T20:42:09Z","body":"Have you got any plans to manage storage for VMs (QEMU/KVM)?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ClusterHQ/flocker/issues/comments/143672808","html_url":"https://github.com/ClusterHQ/flocker/issues/1974#issuecomment-143672808","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ClusterHQ/flocker/issues/1974","id":143672808,"user":{"login":"davedoesdev","id":2329683,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2329683?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev","html_url":"https://github.com/davedoesdev","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davedoesdev/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-28T08:25:04Z","updated_at":"2015-09-28T08:25:04Z","body":"Probably not: I need the rbd upfront and qemu is best off using librbd directly  http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/qemu-rbd/\r\n\r\n> QEMU can pass a block device from the host on to a guest, but since QEMU 0.15, there’s no need to\r\n> map an image as a block device on the host. Instead, QEMU can access an image as a virtual block \r\n> device directly via librbd. This performs better because it avoids an additional context switch, and can \r\n> take advantage of RBD caching"}}