{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/1574","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/1574/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/1574/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/1574/events","html_url":"https://github.com/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/1574","id":60078357,"number":1574,"title":"G29 - New homing behaviour?","user":{"login":"avluis","id":875593,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/875593?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis","html_url":"https://github.com/avluis","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avluis/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-03-06T09:28:36Z","updated_at":"2015-03-07T01:40:19Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Just tried newest push on dev branch after merging on my fork for a Prusa i3v 12\" with ABL.\r\nDid the G29 command get modified/improved to home to center once done (before it stayed at the last corner where it proved) with the Auto Bed Leveling routine?\r\n\r\nIn an somewhat related note, I like to extrude a bit of filament (call it a anchor) before starting a print (usually along with a brim and/or skirt) and notice the new G29 behavior - should I modify my slic3r start G-code to move to a corner and do this or will this behavior change (not final, bug, etc)?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/comments/77666171","html_url":"https://github.com/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/1574#issuecomment-77666171","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MarlinFirmware/Marlin/issues/1574","id":77666171,"user":{"login":"thinkyhead","id":698003,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/698003?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead","html_url":"https://github.com/thinkyhead","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thinkyhead/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-07T01:40:19Z","updated_at":"2015-03-07T01:40:19Z","body":"Bed size has been used as the hard limit on movement up to now. If we keep it that way, then you would have to increase the bed size in the firmware to allow the probe to go over the whole bed area. On the other hand, the total freedom of movement of the XY axes could be specified separately, and this would allow full motion. The downside is it would mean a pretty major change to a core configuration option. My current solution of limiting the probe to places where the nozzle is still within the bed may be a minor bummer, but it's consistent with the settings, which reasonably should forbid going past the set limits."}}