{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cainus/node-coveralls/issues/97","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cainus/node-coveralls/issues/97/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cainus/node-coveralls/issues/97/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cainus/node-coveralls/issues/97/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cainus/node-coveralls/issues/97","id":85525437,"number":97,"title":"Wrongly reported 100% coverage","user":{"login":"tomekwi","id":4624660,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4624660?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi","html_url":"https://github.com/tomekwi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomekwi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-06-05T12:53:59Z","updated_at":"2015-06-05T12:53:59Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hello,\r\n\r\nhttps://coveralls.io/builds/2738314 shows that 100% coverage was reported even though it’s actually only at 70-80. See proof at https://travis-ci.org/tomekwi/isomorphic-ensure/jobs/65561272 (the build that sent the coverage info.\r\n\r\nIt’s been so since a couple of builds. "}}