{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABSN/mnefun/issues/95","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABSN/mnefun/issues/95/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABSN/mnefun/issues/95/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABSN/mnefun/issues/95/events","html_url":"https://github.com/LABSN/mnefun/issues/95","id":105697718,"number":95,"title":"Source space geometry","user":{"login":"kambysese","id":4381290,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4381290?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese","html_url":"https://github.com/kambysese","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kambysese/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-09-09T22:36:19Z","updated_at":"2015-09-12T10:32:33Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@Eric89GXL re:error message concerning the source space patch/distance info, I was able to resolve the issue by changing the `oct` argument in `mne.setup_srouce_space` from 6 to 5 to match the subdividing in the corresponding BEM. My guess is that the mapping operation from 10240 to 5120 triangles in a source space is not feasible; does that make sense? Can you explain. Also if this solution makes sense I can open a PR to make the `oct` kwarg open to user input. LMK."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABSN/mnefun/issues/comments/139747641","html_url":"https://github.com/LABSN/mnefun/issues/95#issuecomment-139747641","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABSN/mnefun/issues/95","id":139747641,"user":{"login":"Eric89GXL","id":2365790,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2365790?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL","html_url":"https://github.com/Eric89GXL","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Eric89GXL/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-12T10:32:33Z","updated_at":"2015-09-12T10:32:33Z","body":"Usually before publishing I'll re-run all the data analysis from scratch to make sure the results didn't change. I don't worry too much about mne-python because of how many regression tests it has. `mnefun` wasn't as rapidly developed / changed the last time I published, so I haven't worried too much about that. You can always reference a specific commit number if you need to, but I don't think you even need to publicize `mnefun`. You can just say you used mne-python of a specific version -- I think most labs have some custom scripts that go on top of main libraries, and that's the sort of function that `mnefun` serves. mne-python also plans to release by the end of the month, so you could presumably re-run your scripts with 0.10 once it comes out."}}