{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/atom/atom/issues/5666","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/atom/atom/issues/5666/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/atom/atom/issues/5666/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/atom/atom/issues/5666/events","html_url":"https://github.com/atom/atom/issues/5666","id":58474062,"number":5666,"title":"Do we really need 3 dot releases in three days?","user":{"login":"composer22","id":624112,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/624112?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22","html_url":"https://github.com/composer22","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/composer22/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2015-02-21T20:38:13Z","updated_at":"2015-02-22T03:01:47Z","closed_at":"2015-02-21T22:32:53Z","body":"How about a little temperament on the release cycle so we can actually work with the tool @ stability,  acceptance test it out, digest functional changes and the like, instead of continually having to sync builds?\r\n\r\nEnd of Comment"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/atom/atom/issues/comments/75416697","html_url":"https://github.com/atom/atom/issues/5666#issuecomment-75416697","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/atom/atom/issues/5666","id":75416697,"user":{"login":"bolinfest","id":655869,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/655869?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest","html_url":"https://github.com/bolinfest","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bolinfest/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-22T03:01:47Z","updated_at":"2015-02-22T03:01:47Z","body":"As someone who upstreams changes to Atom, I'm a big fan of the fast release\ncycle.\n\nOn Saturday, February 21, 2015, Paul Betts <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n\n> Thanks for your thoughts, but this wasn't really a point up for debate.\n> Thanks though!\n>\n> —\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/atom/atom/issues/5666#issuecomment-75416262>.\n>\n"}}