{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IIIF/iiif.io/issues/604","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IIIF/iiif.io/issues/604/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IIIF/iiif.io/issues/604/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IIIF/iiif.io/issues/604/events","html_url":"https://github.com/IIIF/iiif.io/issues/604","id":116446479,"number":604,"title":"Use https or http URIs for new identifiers?","user":{"login":"azaroth42","id":871868,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/871868?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42","html_url":"https://github.com/azaroth42","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IIIF/iiif.io/labels/auth","name":"auth","color":"f7c6c7"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IIIF/iiif.io/labels/search","name":"search","color":"006b75"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":11,"created_at":"2015-11-11T23:44:01Z","updated_at":"2015-12-11T17:57:09Z","closed_at":null,"body":"\r\nAssuming that #417 is addressed, should we create URIs that use the HTTPS or HTTP scheme/protocol for identifiers?  For example, should the context for auth 1.0 be:\r\n\r\n* http://iiif.io/api/auth/1/context.json\r\n* http<b>s</b>://iiif.io/api/auth/1/context.json\r\n\r\nIf HTTP is the decision, this would invalidate #601.  If HTTPS is the decision, the current changes are for Auth 1.0 and Search 1.0.  It would affect any future specifications as well, of course.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IIIF/iiif.io/issues/comments/164003686","html_url":"https://github.com/IIIF/iiif.io/issues/604#issuecomment-164003686","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IIIF/iiif.io/issues/604","id":164003686,"user":{"login":"jpstroop","id":999701,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/999701?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop","html_url":"https://github.com/jpstroop","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpstroop/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-11T17:57:09Z","updated_at":"2015-12-11T17:57:09Z","body":"I think we can keep HTTPS in examples in the auth spec where it wouldn't make sense to do anything else, but stay silent otherwise."}}