{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ceph/ceph-docker/issues/19","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ceph/ceph-docker/issues/19/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ceph/ceph-docker/issues/19/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ceph/ceph-docker/issues/19/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ceph/ceph-docker/issues/19","id":58368298,"number":19,"title":"Ceph OSD docker bug","user":{"login":"leseb","id":912735,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/912735?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb","html_url":"https://github.com/leseb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leseb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":31,"created_at":"2015-02-20T15:33:16Z","updated_at":"2015-08-20T09:04:19Z","closed_at":"2015-07-30T12:32:56Z","body":"Just put this here as a reminder and potential blocker for Docker OSD deployments.\r\nhttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10763\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ceph/ceph-docker/issues/comments/132945279","html_url":"https://github.com/ceph/ceph-docker/issues/19#issuecomment-132945279","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ceph/ceph-docker/issues/19","id":132945279,"user":{"login":"SamYaple","id":7925105,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7925105?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple","html_url":"https://github.com/SamYaple","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SamYaple/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-20T09:04:19Z","updated_at":"2015-08-20T09:04:19Z","body":"@tangzhankun\r\n\r\nKeep in mind, shared _container_ pid namepsaces are coming in Docker. This will allow all the OSDs to share one PID namespace, solving the problem without the issue of sharing the host PID namespace.\r\n\r\nThat being said, I think we can hold out for that feature and live with the current situation, but I have no vested interest here so I am ok with whatever anyone decides. I am here to share info about the issue only.\r\n\r\nPoint of clarification on your second point. The different network namespaces isn't the issue, its two OSDs that are reachable at the same IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) that _cannot_ communicate with each other. I do not know how this same host communication works, whether it is a simple pid check or something more, but sharing the PID namespace allows them to see each other as alive and healthy."}}