{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jasnell/dev-policy/issues/14","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jasnell/dev-policy/issues/14/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jasnell/dev-policy/issues/14/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jasnell/dev-policy/issues/14/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jasnell/dev-policy/issues/14","id":66682458,"number":14,"title":"Should semver-major PR's always require TSC review?","user":{"login":"jasnell","id":439929,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/439929?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell","html_url":"https://github.com/jasnell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jasnell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-04-06T19:13:28Z","updated_at":"2015-04-06T19:13:28Z","closed_at":null,"body":"An argument can be made that any change that requires a semver-major bump ought to be put on the TSC agenda as a sanity check. These ought to be rare and likely are far reaching in impact so requiring the additional review would make sense."}}