{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/PMEAL/OpenPNM/issues/295","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/PMEAL/OpenPNM/issues/295/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/PMEAL/OpenPNM/issues/295/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/PMEAL/OpenPNM/issues/295/events","html_url":"https://github.com/PMEAL/OpenPNM/issues/295","id":55851116,"number":295,"title":"Make geom and phys __getitem__ look into net and phase?","user":{"login":"jgostick","id":5092049,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5092049?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick","html_url":"https://github.com/jgostick","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgostick/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/PMEAL/OpenPNM/labels/development%20discussion","name":"development discussion","color":"009800"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-01-29T03:18:56Z","updated_at":"2015-02-11T04:04:21Z","closed_at":null,"body":"At the moment, geom['pore.diameter'] returns data, and net['pore.diameter'] looks into geom and returns the same data.  \r\n\r\nMight it also be a good idea if it worked the other way too?  So geom['pore.coords'] look into itself, finds nothing, then looks into net, finds net['pore.coords'] and returns the 'pore.coord' values corresponding to each pore in the geom?  "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/PMEAL/OpenPNM/issues/comments/73831194","html_url":"https://github.com/PMEAL/OpenPNM/issues/295#issuecomment-73831194","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/PMEAL/OpenPNM/issues/295","id":73831194,"user":{"login":"TomTranter","id":7068741,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7068741?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter","html_url":"https://github.com/TomTranter","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TomTranter/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-11T04:04:21Z","updated_at":"2015-02-11T04:04:21Z","body":"Yes, it would be really useful to be able to do geom['throat.conns'] too. I must have coded 3 or 4 different versions of this lookup throughout developing Voronoi and it's still not straight-forward with the new mapping. Although maybe we should try to limit the data we store directly on the network instead."}}