{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/The-Sequence-Ontology/SO-Ontologies/issues/939","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/The-Sequence-Ontology/SO-Ontologies/issues/939/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/The-Sequence-Ontology/SO-Ontologies/issues/939/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/The-Sequence-Ontology/SO-Ontologies/issues/939/events","html_url":"https://github.com/The-Sequence-Ontology/SO-Ontologies/issues/939","id":86257128,"number":939,"title":"beta turn synonyms, definitions and terms","user":{"login":"srynobio","id":1106139,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1106139?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio","html_url":"https://github.com/srynobio","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/srynobio/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-06-08T17:06:24Z","updated_at":"2015-06-08T17:06:24Z","closed_at":null,"body":"**Reported by batchelorc on 2007-08-21 08:59 UTC**\nHello,\r\n\r\nCouldn't send this yesterday as connection to sourceforge was dicky.  It might be one for Gabby to sort out as it's quite complicated.\r\n\r\nI've been mapping the SO terms for beta turns to the Richardson classification, which is \\(a\\) what they seem to be based on and \\(b\\) how they seem to be referred to in plain text.  \\(Fantastically, the phrases Type I turn only seem to refer to beta turns---there is no polysemy\\).  It looks like this:\r\n\r\nSO:0001136\r\nname: beta\\_turn\\_right\\_handed\\_type\\_one\r\nsynonym: \"Type I beta turn\" EXACT\r\nsynonym: \"Type I turn\" EXACT\r\n\r\nSO:0001134\r\nname: beta\\_turn\\_left\\_handed\\_type\\_one\r\nsynonym: \"Type I' beta turn\" EXACT\r\nsynonym: \"Type I' turn\" EXACT\r\n\r\nSO:0001137\r\nname: beta\\_turn\\_right\\_handed\\_type\\_two\r\nsynonym: \"Type II beta turn\" EXACT\r\nsynonym: \"Type II turn\" EXACT\r\n\r\nSO:0001135\r\nname: beta\\_turn\\_left\\_handed\\_type\\_two\r\nsynonym: \"Type II' beta turn\" EXACT\r\nsynonym: \"Type II' turn\" EXACT\r\n\r\nI think there's a problem with the definitions of the left-handed turns: all of the signs on the angles \\(and the directions of the greater-than/less-than signs\\) should be reversed, because they're currently the same as the definitions of the right-handed turns\\!\r\n\r\nFinally, in the Richardson classification, and in the literature, there are further sorts of beta turn, which all ought to be children of beta\\_turn:\r\n\r\nbeta\\_turn\\_type\\_six\r\n\\+ beta\\_turn\\_type\\_six\\_a\r\n++ beta\\_turn\\_type\\_six\\_a\\_one\r\n++ beta\\_turn\\_type\\_six\\_a\\_two\r\n\\+ beta\\_turn\\_type\\_six\\_b\r\nbeta\\_turn-type\\_eight\r\n\r\nwith synonyms as above \\(that is, \"type VIa2 turn\" and \"type VIa2 beta turn\"\\) EXCEPT no left-handed or right-handed variants.\r\n\r\nThere is, nastily, a Type IV as well, which means \"animal not included in this classification\".  I don't like this, but maybe it ought to go in?\r\n\r\nBest wishes,\r\nColin."}}