{"push_id":880069179,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/patch-1","head":"91949489fa46cac4d61d8cb2bc00b788dce0a578","before":"a47c827eff437fcc906d6147aaa2901d604cc62c","commits":[{"sha":"91949489fa46cac4d61d8cb2bc00b788dce0a578","author":{"email":"d4e2c2efd86db1845a92f1cfc08be2cdf6c17520@o2.pl","name":"Krzysiu"},"message":"Update pl.php\n\n1) Flyspray'a > Flyspraya, Flysprayu\r\nIn Polish we use apostrophe only if the last vowel is mute. In this case \"y\" is not mute.\r\n2) Byłeś(-aś) > non gender forms\r\nSome words in Polish are gender depended. Things like \"Byłes(-aś)\" means \"byłeś [for men] byłaś [for women]. Polish linguist, well known expert, suggests that the best way is to use non gender forms, like \"Was password forgotten?\" instead \"Did you [gender depended word] forgot your password?\". In case when it's not possible, he suggests using form \"byłeś / byłaś\" (most natural, easily readable), but I didn't use it, as there's problem with length of such strings, especially with longer words.\r\n\r\nI don't know which is better - \"byłeś(-aś)\" or \"byłeś(aś)\", yet most of translation has \"(-aś)\", so I unified it, where that other form was used. Congratulations for translators for using two forms instead one - for men! That's very noble, modern and pro equality :) I see such forms rarely, so thanks!\r\nSource: http://sjp.pwn.pl/poradnia/haslo/Czy-bylaby-pani-uprzejmy-a;10969.html\r\n3) Simplification of longer strings\r\nSome strings were over-complicated or there were non-typical grammatical syntax, so for accessibility I made it simpler with exactly same meaning. \r\n4) Minor grammar fixes and typos","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Krzysiu/flyspray/commits/91949489fa46cac4d61d8cb2bc00b788dce0a578"}]}