{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pytest-dev/pytest-django/issues/286","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pytest-dev/pytest-django/issues/286/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pytest-dev/pytest-django/issues/286/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pytest-dev/pytest-django/issues/286/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-django/issues/286","id":111576726,"number":286,"title":"Test case using transaction aren't isolated","user":{"login":"xordoquy","id":2340654,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2340654?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy","html_url":"https://github.com/xordoquy","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xordoquy/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pytest-dev/pytest-django/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"eb6420"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-10-15T09:22:01Z","updated_at":"2015-10-15T09:43:11Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This is a regression I have with pytest-django 2.9 - doesn't happen with 2.8. Django is 1.7.1, py.test 2.8.2 and Python 3.4.\r\nSome of my tests are using transactions and aren't run in isolation to each other any longer. They are part of a `unittest.TestCase`.\r\nPerforming a git bisect, the commit 0ec741bd68028ac471bd10a53fbb87949f455a4f seems to introduce the regression.\r\n\r\nThis is probably due to the fact that it now only applies rollbacks to Django TestCase and no more with unittest's ones."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pytest-dev/pytest-django/issues/comments/148335940","html_url":"https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-django/issues/286#issuecomment-148335940","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pytest-dev/pytest-django/issues/286","id":148335940,"user":{"login":"blueyed","id":9766,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9766?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed","html_url":"https://github.com/blueyed","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blueyed/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-15T09:43:11Z","updated_at":"2015-10-15T09:43:11Z","body":"> I don't use the transactional_db feature. The file is marked as pytest.mark.django_db(transaction=True)\r\n\r\nThat is quite the same though, just another way to mark/express it."}}