{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/pouchdb/issues/3686","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/pouchdb/issues/3686/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/pouchdb/issues/3686/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/pouchdb/issues/3686/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pouchdb/pouchdb/issues/3686","id":65901699,"number":3686,"title":"put and changes in the same tick with memdown?","user":{"login":"ronag","id":3065230,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3065230?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag","html_url":"https://github.com/ronag","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-04-02T10:42:30Z","updated_at":"2015-04-04T16:34:29Z","closed_at":null,"body":"What would it take to be able to get a \"put\" and the corresponding \"changes\" call to be performed in the same tick using leveldb + memdown?\r\n\r\nWould it be possible to achieve by building a plugin?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/pouchdb/issues/comments/89611486","html_url":"https://github.com/pouchdb/pouchdb/issues/3686#issuecomment-89611486","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pouchdb/pouchdb/issues/3686","id":89611486,"user":{"login":"ronag","id":3065230,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3065230?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag","html_url":"https://github.com/ronag","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ronag/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-04T16:34:29Z","updated_at":"2015-04-04T16:34:29Z","body":"Would it be possible to schedule at the end of the current tick instead of the next tick. That would both avoid Zalgo and provide the behaviour necessary for e.g. <input> tags in React."}}