{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ramda/ramda/issues/1384","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ramda/ramda/issues/1384/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ramda/ramda/issues/1384/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ramda/ramda/issues/1384/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ramda/ramda/issues/1384","id":106402728,"number":1384,"title":"Memoize should probably use some internal hashing function rather than toString","user":{"login":"asaf-romano","id":11056617,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11056617?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano","html_url":"https://github.com/asaf-romano","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/asaf-romano/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-09-14T18:39:18Z","updated_at":"2015-11-11T01:55:29Z","closed_at":null,"body":"See #1383 comment 3. I think that using toString limits the flexibility here, as it requires an ``eval`` representation of an object, which may not always contain everything necessary to base an equality check on.\r\n\r\nPowerful enough, such a function could be used for implementing a much more efficient version of ``uniq``, ``union`` and other functions currently relying on ``equals``."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ramda/ramda/issues/comments/155630355","html_url":"https://github.com/ramda/ramda/issues/1384#issuecomment-155630355","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ramda/ramda/issues/1384","id":155630355,"user":{"login":"CrossEye","id":151263,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/151263?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye","html_url":"https://github.com/CrossEye","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CrossEye/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-11T01:55:29Z","updated_at":"2015-11-11T01:55:29Z","body":"I do think we need to find some reasonably efficient way to hash objects, for use in a more complete HashMap structure.  I'm definitely not looking forward to it.  But I think we need it for this, for `uniq` and probably for other things as well.\r\n\r\nIf anyone has good ideas, I'd love to hear them."}}