{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/8","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/8/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/8/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/8/events","html_url":"https://github.com/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/8","id":63729835,"number":8,"title":"The behaviour attribute value doesn't specify it's parsing.","user":{"login":"buckett","id":5921,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5921?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett","html_url":"https://github.com/buckett","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/buckett/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":12,"created_at":"2015-03-23T14:00:56Z","updated_at":"2015-04-08T14:19:29Z","closed_at":null,"body":"There's no specification on how the `behaviour` attribute's value should parsed. How should strings, URIs and XPath expressions should be quoted.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/comments/90930437","html_url":"https://github.com/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/8#issuecomment-90930437","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/8","id":90930437,"user":{"login":"martinmueller39","id":5765679,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5765679?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39","html_url":"https://github.com/martinmueller39","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martinmueller39/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-08T14:19:29Z","updated_at":"2015-04-08T14:19:29Z","body":"I've compared the TEI Simple dtd with the DTA schema.  Simple is more generous than DTA, but DTA has the following elements that Simple does not allow for:\n\n  addName\n  country\n  foreName\n  genName\n  nameLink\n  orgName\n  persName\n  roleName\n  surname\n\nShould we include them? I can see three different arguments in favour of doing so. First, DTA has been adopted by CLARIN as its base format. Other things being equal, there is a benefit if a text in that format validates under Simple.\n\nSecond, and perhaps more substantively, named entity extraction seems to be the chief, and often the only, thing that people are interested in when they work with texts.\n\nThird, when I showed Simple to the Perseus folks, they were very interested in the processing model but objected to the exclusion of the name elements.\n\nOn the minus side, you can just use type attributes for sub specification of names, and Simple may run the risk of no longer being simple. Do we want to slide down that slippery slope?\n\n\n\n"}}