{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2206","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2206/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2206/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2206/events","html_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/pull/2206","id":88702646,"number":2206,"title":"MRG Butterfly epoch","user":{"login":"jaeilepp","id":3456414,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3456414?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp","html_url":"https://github.com/jaeilepp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeilepp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":34,"created_at":"2015-06-16T11:47:10Z","updated_at":"2015-06-17T14:23:24Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/pulls/2206","html_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/pull/2206","diff_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/pull/2206.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/pull/2206.patch"},"body":"Butterfly plot can be toggled with a 'b' key.\r\ncloses https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2205"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/comments/112822325","html_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/pull/2206#issuecomment-112822325","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/2206","id":112822325,"user":{"login":"dengemann","id":1908618,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1908618?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann","html_url":"https://github.com/dengemann","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dengemann/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-17T14:23:24Z","updated_at":"2015-06-17T14:23:24Z","body":"We need a different solution, e.g. adding the title above (the title is IMO less important for interpreting the plot than are the event ids). For the labels I'm still not sure. Their length is user dependent. It will be a mess. Maybe an auxiliary figure? We don't really have room for the event id legend inside the plot. I fear what we have so far is already a good compromise.\n\n> On 17 Jun 2015, at 16:17, Teon L Brooks <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n> \n> But we outvoted you so far. I'm not happy about the fact that you just undo what we discussed. Second, having only the triggers is not ideal but a good compromise as it will be in most cases 2 digits and nothing else. The current proposal is barely parseable and cannot be considered an alternative.\n> \n> I didn't make any changes, all i did was raise my concerns about the title/event id. I didn't say we needed to go back to that one, I was merely pointing out that adding the event id back to the top does not solve the initial issue I mentioned about the crowding of the title and the event ids.\n> \n> —\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.\n> \n"}}