{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ofiwg/libfabric/issues/1521","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ofiwg/libfabric/issues/1521/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ofiwg/libfabric/issues/1521/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ofiwg/libfabric/issues/1521/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ofiwg/libfabric/pull/1521","id":120265761,"number":1521,"title":"usnic: Update protocol value that EP_MSG and EP_RDM report.","user":{"login":"bturrubiates","id":2322856,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2322856?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates","html_url":"https://github.com/bturrubiates","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bturrubiates/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":17,"created_at":"2015-12-03T20:43:33Z","updated_at":"2015-12-04T17:17:06Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ofiwg/libfabric/pulls/1521","html_url":"https://github.com/ofiwg/libfabric/pull/1521","diff_url":"https://github.com/ofiwg/libfabric/pull/1521.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ofiwg/libfabric/pull/1521.patch"},"body":"`EP_MSG` and `EP_RDM` have been reporting `FI_PROTO_RUDP`. Instead of\r\nmaintaining `FI_PROTO_RUDP`, remove it and use `FI_PROTO_UNSPEC` instead.\r\n\r\n@goodell @jsquyres \r\n\r\nSigned-off-by: Ben Turrubiates <bturrubi@cisco.com>"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ofiwg/libfabric/issues/comments/162025591","html_url":"https://github.com/ofiwg/libfabric/pull/1521#issuecomment-162025591","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ofiwg/libfabric/issues/1521","id":162025591,"user":{"login":"goodell","id":78560,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/78560?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell","html_url":"https://github.com/goodell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goodell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-04T17:17:06Z","updated_at":"2015-12-04T17:17:06Z","body":"> Then I would go with a vendor defined protocol value that an app just has to know provides no interoperability.\r\n\r\nWhich actually sounds a lot like our existing `RUDP` protocol value then.\r\n\r\n> But why you would want to release such a thing into the wild as part of a supported software release is beyond me.\r\n\r\nFor MPI and some other use cases, inter-version and inter-provider interop are completely unnecessary.  Getting protocols right and getting versioning right can be tricky, so until they're actually sorted out it seems better to avoid declaring support for interop instead of churning protocol names/versions."}}