{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/3","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/3/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/3/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/3/events","html_url":"https://github.com/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/3","id":64327651,"number":3,"title":"TLDS RGBA instruction broken","user":{"login":"andravin","id":8460517,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8460517?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin","html_url":"https://github.com/andravin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-03-25T17:33:44Z","updated_at":"2015-03-25T20:57:55Z","closed_at":"2015-03-25T19:55:41Z","body":"The TLDS RGBA instruction has been broken since March 4 checkin b744f88d9d00b358ce7446a0724a042b582f04fa\r\n\r\nThis breaks maxDNN.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that the following lines were removed from MaxasGrammar.pm:\r\n\r\nTLDS: chnls\r\n0x0010000000000000 RGBA"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/comments/86213550","html_url":"https://github.com/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/3#issuecomment-86213550","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/3","id":86213550,"user":{"login":"andravin","id":8460517,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8460517?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin","html_url":"https://github.com/andravin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andravin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-25T20:57:55Z","updated_at":"2015-03-25T20:57:55Z","body":"Can't you just disassemble and reassemble a list of cubins? Like start with your lib and maxDNN.\n\nSent from my iPad\n\n> On Mar 25, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Scott Gray <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n> \n> I did have a bunch of unit tests working, but haven't been good about\n> keeping that up to date. I just have way too much on my plate to be able\n> to fill in all the little details for all my projects that I should be. If\n> that's something you want to contribute it would be a big help. There is\n> now a team at Alibaba working on a Kepler version and I'm sure they could\n> make use of the same test framework. Basically we just need a bunch of ptx\n> code that exercises all the instructions with all the potential flags\n> (all.ptx was the start of this). But ptx is kind of an abomination of a\n> program language to be working in and hence pretty tedious. There's also\n> the challenge of making sure your test code doesn't get optimized away by\n> ptxas.\n> \n> -Scott\n> \n> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Andrew Lavin <notifications@github.com>\n> wrote:\n> \n> > Fix works for me, thanks.\n> >\n> > I think if there was a coverage test in Maxas that checked the op codes of\n> > a bunch of instructions, it would have caught this regression error. Does\n> > that sound like a good idea? I seem to recall you used something like that\n> > to explore new instructions anyway.\n> >\n> > —\n> > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> > <https://github.com/NervanaSystems/maxas/issues/3#issuecomment-86146487>.\n> >\n> —\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.\n> \n"}}