{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sveinburne/lets-play-science/issues/50","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sveinburne/lets-play-science/issues/50/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sveinburne/lets-play-science/issues/50/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sveinburne/lets-play-science/issues/50/events","html_url":"https://github.com/sveinburne/lets-play-science/issues/50","id":119968876,"number":50,"title":"Compte-rendu?","user":{"login":"sveinburne","id":3646758,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3646758?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne","html_url":"https://github.com/sveinburne","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sveinburne/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sveinburne/lets-play-science/labels/m%C3%A9ta-topic","name":"méta-topic","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-12-02T15:37:56Z","updated_at":"2015-12-03T16:32:03Z","closed_at":null,"body":"La discussion en #48 me fait penser qu'il manque un niveau de détail entre **définition** et **vision d'ensemble** (THE_APP.MD). Peut-être des pages markdown séparées qui font le compte rendu des réflexions sur des points plus précis? Ces compte-rendu *ne doivent pas être partisans* mais permettent de s'attarder sur plus de détails sans trop encombrer la section **définitions**. \r\nL'autre approche est qu'on s'autorise à faire des définitions assez velues. Perso je préfère une approche concise, avec juste un lien vers le compte-rendu dans la définition.\r\nQu'en pensez-vous ? ( :+1:  ça me va pour une approbation, mais :-1: j'aimerais autant votre point de vue^^)\r\n\r\n**EDIT** : peut être le mot **considérations** va mieux ?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sveinburne/lets-play-science/issues/comments/161707353","html_url":"https://github.com/sveinburne/lets-play-science/issues/50#issuecomment-161707353","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sveinburne/lets-play-science/issues/50","id":161707353,"user":{"login":"gossetj","id":16082610,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16082610?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj","html_url":"https://github.com/gossetj","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gossetj/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-03T16:32:03Z","updated_at":"2015-12-03T16:32:03Z","body":"Concernant les deux possibilités de droit d'accés au wiki, si c'est possible, je serais pour un mode intermédiaire se basant sur la distinction du contenu et de la structure de chaque fichier. Pour le coup, la structure globale ne serait modifiable que par des membres modérateurs qui seraient sollicités par le biais d'issues, et le contenu serait plus libre à la modification."}}