{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1043","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1043/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1043/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1043/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1043","id":95848676,"number":1043,"title":"Update omnia conda recipe for OpenMM 6.3?","user":{"login":"jchodera","id":3656088,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3656088?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera","html_url":"https://github.com/jchodera","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-07-18T18:37:37Z","updated_at":"2015-07-19T08:25:38Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Is it time to update the conda recipe for OpenMM 6.3?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/comments/122638695","html_url":"https://github.com/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1043#issuecomment-122638695","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1043","id":122638695,"user":{"login":"swails","id":779022,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/779022?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails","html_url":"https://github.com/swails","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/swails/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-19T08:25:38Z","updated_at":"2015-07-19T08:25:38Z","body":"Doesn't `openmm-dev` serve this purpose?  I'm with @peastman on avoiding building a new package until we're certain it won't change.  It'd be best the conda build to have the same versioning as OpenMM proper, and for the conda build *not* to silently slip a different set of binaries in if any changes are needed b/w the preview beta and official release.\r\n\r\nGoing from broken -> not broken conda packages is not really problematic IMO, so correcting a \"bad\" conda build won't trip up many people without them realizing it."}}