{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bips/issues/262","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bips/issues/262/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bips/issues/262/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bips/issues/262/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/262","id":122877651,"number":262,"title":"BIP 102: update to match implementation","user":{"login":"jgarzik","id":494411,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/494411?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik","html_url":"https://github.com/jgarzik","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jgarzik/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bips/labels/Proposed%20BIP%20modification","name":"Proposed BIP modification","color":"5319e7"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-12-18T04:26:52Z","updated_at":"2015-12-18T11:54:52Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bips/pulls/262","html_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/262","diff_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/262.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/262.patch"},"body":"Contains latest ISM and formula changes.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bips/issues/comments/165762150","html_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/262#issuecomment-165762150","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bips/issues/262","id":165762150,"user":{"login":"jameshilliard","id":3298484,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3298484?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard","html_url":"https://github.com/jameshilliard","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jameshilliard/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-18T11:54:52Z","updated_at":"2015-12-18T11:54:52Z","body":"NACK major changes like this should use a different BIP number, this will cause major confusion in regards to statements people have made in support of a particular proposal or against a proposal. For example the BIP100 tagging by miners was in support of the original draft proposal but NOT the subsequent changes made afterwards which made significant modifications to the cap decrease threshold in addition to the removal of the 32MB ceiling. I think non-trivial changes to draft BIP's should not be allowed without creating a new BIP number even if the proposal has not been officially submitted to this repo in order to ensure that people's statements in support of a particular proposal are not ambiguous."}}