{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/113","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/113/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/113/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/113/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/113","id":53134027,"number":113,"title":"Ability to customize how coverage is reported on cpancover.com","user":{"login":"haarg","id":50029,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/50029?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg","html_url":"https://github.com/haarg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/haarg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2014-12-30T18:01:46Z","updated_at":"2015-08-03T23:25:35Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Some dists aren't fully covered by their standard tests in t, but only by extra tests that may be in a separate directory, or conditional on an environment variable.\r\n\r\nMoo is one example of this.  The [report on cpancover.com](http://cpancover.com/latest/Moo-1.006001/index.html) shows the overall statement coverage as 90%, with some modules going as low as 40%.  There are also some modules not listed on the report at all.  If Moo's xt tests are run as well, the statement coverage will be 100%.\r\n\r\nI would like some way to customize how cpancover.com is doing the coverage reporting.  Having a documented environment variable set would probably be be the simplest thing.  Then the Makefile.PL/Build.PL could adjust the dependencies and tests to be run as needed."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/comments/127430448","html_url":"https://github.com/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/113#issuecomment-127430448","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/113","id":127430448,"user":{"login":"pjcj","id":183004,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/183004?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj","html_url":"https://github.com/pjcj","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjcj/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-03T23:25:35Z","updated_at":"2015-08-03T23:25:35Z","body":"Yes, something along these lines is important.  Thanks for noting it."}}