{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/issues/1462","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/issues/1462/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/issues/1462/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/issues/1462/events","html_url":"https://github.com/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/issues/1462","id":86311352,"number":1462,"title":"New taxon","user":{"login":"herbier","id":12719861,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12719861?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier","html_url":"https://github.com/herbier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/herbier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/labels/Taxon","name":"Taxon","color":"e11d21"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-06-08T20:05:15Z","updated_at":"2015-06-08T20:54:33Z","closed_at":null,"body":"[Originally posted on GoogleCode (id 1771) on 2015-04-27 by margotton.herbier]\n\n195496: 3e détermination: Carex remota Linnaeus var. remotispicula (Hayata) Ohwi\r\n\r\n195516: 1ière détermination: Carex nikoensis Franch. et Sav. (nikkoensis selon tropicos)\r\n\r\nOn retrouve Carex rochebrunii et Carex remota subsp. rechebrunei taxon 19411, 19412 et 19413; dans tropicos il est écrit comme suit Carex remota  subsp. rochebrunii\r\nLe mot s'écrit-il de deux façon? rochebrunii et rochebrunei\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nYour name: Claude Lucier\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/issues/comments/110135492","html_url":"https://github.com/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/issues/1462#issuecomment-110135492","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/irbv-collections/MT-controlled-vocabulary/issues/1462","id":110135492,"user":{"login":"brouille","id":11755235,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11755235?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille","html_url":"https://github.com/brouille","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brouille/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-08T20:54:33Z","updated_at":"2015-06-08T20:54:33Z","body":"[Originally posted on GoogleCode on 2015-04-28 17:53Z]\n\nCarex remota var. remotispicula acc\r\nCarex nikoensis OK [est-ce un type? les récolteurs sont les auteurs du nom] = Carex satsumensis\r\n\r\nCarex rochebrunii et rochebrunei : le premier est erroné (et TROPICOS) - le nom est fondé sur Rochebrune et donc, en latin, rochebrunei = WCSP et IPNI ont l'autre \r\nJ'ai tout corrigé"}}