{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/koajs/koa/issues/391","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/koajs/koa/issues/391/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/koajs/koa/issues/391/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/koajs/koa/issues/391/events","html_url":"https://github.com/koajs/koa/issues/391","id":54754677,"number":391,"title":"Redirect 302/303","user":{"login":"chrisveness","id":1066395,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1066395?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness","html_url":"https://github.com/chrisveness","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisveness/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-01-19T11:47:29Z","updated_at":"2015-01-20T08:31:59Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I know it's not profoundly important, but wouldn't it be better for the default redirect status to be 303 rather than 302?\r\n\r\nQv http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4764297, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5129076."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/koajs/koa/issues/comments/70620120","html_url":"https://github.com/koajs/koa/issues/391#issuecomment-70620120","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/koajs/koa/issues/391","id":70620120,"user":{"login":"tj","id":25254,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/25254?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj","html_url":"https://github.com/tj","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tj/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-20T08:31:59Z","updated_at":"2015-01-20T08:31:59Z","body":"> Note: Many pre-HTTP/1.1 user agents do not understand the 303 status. When interoperability with such clients is a concern, the 302 status code may be used instead, since most user agents react to a 302 response as described here for 303.\r\n\r\nSounds about right to me, I've never seen the opposite behaviour but we're probably well beyond being safe to move to 303 as well, so I guess it doesn't really matter (unless someone can find a real case)"}}