{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/172","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/172/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/172/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/172/events","html_url":"https://github.com/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/172","id":79799130,"number":172,"title":"GAS syntax support","user":{"login":"ysangkok","id":284023,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/284023?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok","html_url":"https://github.com/ysangkok","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ysangkok/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-05-23T09:52:48Z","updated_at":"2015-05-26T12:12:01Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It would be really nice if there were GAS syntax support, since this would allow using the IA16 port of GCC for compiling, and OpenWatcom for assembling and linking: [How do I assemble GAS assembly and link it with the Open Watcom C library?](http://stackoverflow.com/q/30191000)\r\n\r\nThanks for your efforts."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/comments/105502133","html_url":"https://github.com/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/172#issuecomment-105502133","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/172","id":105502133,"user":{"login":"pchapin","id":2094217,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2094217?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin","html_url":"https://github.com/pchapin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pchapin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-26T12:12:01Z","updated_at":"2015-05-26T12:12:01Z","body":"I believe the syntax used by `gas` is AT&T syntax which is not technically `gcc` specific. That said, I agree with Jiri that supporting that syntax in Open Watcom is probably not a priority. For one thing doing it properly would entail also updating the debugger, `wdis`, and maybe some other tools. So it's a more involved change than one might at first suppose. Also it's unclear to me why @ysangkok wants to compile with gcc and yet assemble and link with Open Watcom."}}