{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/177","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/177/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/177/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/177/events","html_url":"https://github.com/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/177","id":52716072,"number":177,"title":"Auto increment id for accesstoken table is not sufficient for large applications","user":{"login":"oreh","id":831790,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/831790?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh","html_url":"https://github.com/oreh","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oreh/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/milestones/9","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/milestones/9/labels","id":904811,"number":9,"title":"0.9.0","description":"","creator":{"login":"masci","id":7241,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7241?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci","html_url":"https://github.com/masci","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":5,"closed_issues":0,"state":"open","created_at":"2014-12-15T20:24:19Z","updated_at":"2015-02-02T17:00:19Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":1,"created_at":"2014-12-23T05:51:12Z","updated_at":"2015-02-02T17:00:21Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Currently, the PK of accesstoken table is using int type (as default django table id does). But this 32-bit field can only hold around 2 billions records. The keys will be used out in a year if you have 10 millions users who generate new keys on a daily basis. \r\n\r\nCan we change the type from int to bigint? Or even better, can we use 'token' as the PK?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/comments/72493419","html_url":"https://github.com/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/177#issuecomment-72493419","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/177","id":72493419,"user":{"login":"masci","id":7241,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7241?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci","html_url":"https://github.com/masci","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/masci/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-02T17:00:21Z","updated_at":"2015-02-02T17:00:21Z","body":"We're currently planning to support both django1.7 and south1.0 migrations, so we prefer to postpone the resolution of this issue after that."}}