{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/pict/issues/9","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/pict/issues/9/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/pict/issues/9/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/pict/issues/9/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Microsoft/pict/issues/9","id":120414362,"number":9,"title":"Negative value dont work when constraint order 1?","user":{"login":"GuillaumeSoldat","id":16153393,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16153393?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat","html_url":"https://github.com/GuillaumeSoldat","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GuillaumeSoldat/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-12-04T14:41:50Z","updated_at":"2015-12-11T04:35:13Z","closed_at":"2015-12-11T04:35:13Z","body":"Hi,\r\n\r\nFirst of all, thank you for this nice tool!\r\n\r\nI'm using PICt for few days and I try toi use negative value (use a \"~\")\r\nI'm not a developer so I just status on an output I obtained and which seems strange.\r\n\r\nConsidering in a file.txt the following parameters:\r\n\r\nParam: param1, ~param2\r\nValue: value1, value2, value3, value4\r\n\r\nI tryed to generate output from order 1 and order 2:\r\n\r\n![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/16153393/11592155/1cf13a5c-9a9d-11e5-8d73-b2762947ce5e.png)\r\n\r\nI understand the output using order 2\r\n=> I force the exhaustif combinatory among all parameters\r\n\r\nI DON'T understand the output using order 1\r\n=> I expected only one  value associated to \"~param2\" because it is combined to one \"positive value\". This is not relevant to test the \"~param2\" with other \"positive\" value in case of order 1.\r\n\r\nThank you in advance for your answer / correction, it would help a lot.\r\n\r\nRegards"}}