{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gbildson/nprizeadditions/issues/2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gbildson/nprizeadditions/issues/2/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gbildson/nprizeadditions/issues/2/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gbildson/nprizeadditions/issues/2/events","html_url":"https://github.com/gbildson/nprizeadditions/issues/2","id":56165232,"number":2,"title":"Perfidious CRBM ;)","user":{"login":"KeepKool","id":10797502,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10797502?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool","html_url":"https://github.com/KeepKool","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/KeepKool/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-02-01T14:32:01Z","updated_at":"2015-02-02T16:19:18Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hello Greg,\r\n\r\nI just had a look at your C-RBM Code and was wondering if it ever yielded better results than the Basic RBM ? I tried myself an home-made version as close as possible to what is described in all papers (ie Toronto) but it just -NEVER- yielded any better result whatever the parameters were. Despite the fact that the logic behind it seems more than valid I'm starting to think that there is something about that conditional RBM version for Netflix. A misprint ? What do you think ?\r\n\r\nRegards.\r\nKeep"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gbildson/nprizeadditions/issues/comments/72485196","html_url":"https://github.com/gbildson/nprizeadditions/issues/2#issuecomment-72485196","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gbildson/nprizeadditions/issues/2","id":72485196,"user":{"login":"gbildson","id":1090775,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1090775?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson","html_url":"https://github.com/gbildson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbildson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-02T16:19:18Z","updated_at":"2015-02-02T16:19:18Z","body":"Given that I didn't mention getting better results, I don't believe that I did achieve what is mentioned in the papers.   \r\nI had a hard time getting good results in a few situations.   My suspicion is that a few details were left out of the descriptions either as an oversight or for competitive purposes.   Getting tuning parameters was always hard - even after the competition was done. \r\n\r\n     On Sunday, February 1, 2015 9:32 AM, KeepKool <notifications@github.com> wrote:\r\n   \r\n\r\n Hello Greg,I just had a look at your C-RBM Code and was wondering if it ever yielded better results than the Basic RBM ? I tried myself an home-made version as close as possible to what is described in all papers (ie Toronto) but it just -NEVER- yielded any better result whatever the parameters were. Despite the fact that the logic behind it seems more than valid I'm starting to think that there is something about that conditional RBM version for Netflix. A misprint ? What do you think ?Regards.\r\nKeep—\r\nReply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.   "}}