{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/570","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/570/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/570/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/570/events","html_url":"https://github.com/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/570","id":51496633,"number":570,"title":"Using platform 'redhat' fails with 'Package curl cannot be queried'","user":{"login":"nemski","id":2901882,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2901882?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski","html_url":"https://github.com/nemski","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nemski/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2014-12-09T23:19:58Z","updated_at":"2015-01-12T18:34:29Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The RedHat naming convention is inconsistent The documentation refers to RedHat Enterprise Linux as simply \"redhat\" and the platform code accepts 'redhat' and 'el' as possible values to define it but various code, including unix/pkg.rb only look for the 'el' platform and fail when a platform of 'redhat' is provided.\r\n\r\nThe name 'el' isn't really descriptive. My preference would be to gut all references to redhat and el and only use the platform of 'rhel' to avoid having to cater for duplicate names while keeping it descriptive."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/comments/69619956","html_url":"https://github.com/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/570#issuecomment-69619956","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/570","id":69619956,"user":{"login":"anodelman","id":4140109,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4140109?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman","html_url":"https://github.com/anodelman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anodelman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-12T18:34:29Z","updated_at":"2015-01-12T18:34:29Z","body":"There is definitely confusion in the code.  We settled on using 'el-' exclusively, but won't crash if you happen to call something rhel or centos (we just don't treat them properly).  It is unlikely that I can do a full renaming run due to all of our internal dependencies, would extending to el-/redhat/centos be better?"}}